MicroRaman spectroscopy of diamond and graphite in Almahata Sitta and comparison with other ureilites |
| |
Authors: | Aidan J. ROSS Andrew STEELE Marc D. FRIES Lukas KATER Hilary DOWNES Adrian P. JONES Caroline L. SMITH Peter M. JENNISKENS Michael E. ZOLENSKY Muawia H. SHADDAD |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Centre for Planetary Sciences, UCL/Birkbeck Research School of Earth Sciences, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK;2. IARC, Department of Mineralogy, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK;3. Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road, Washington, District of Columbia 20015, USA;4. Planetary Science Institute, 1700 E. Ft. Lowell, Tucson, Arizona 85719, USA;5. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, M/S 183‐301, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109, USA;6. Department of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK;7. Carl Sagan Center, SETI Institute, 515 North Whisman Road, Mountain View, California 94043, USA;8. NASA Johnson Space Center, Mail Code KT, Houston, Texas 77058, USA;9. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Khartoum, P.O. Box 321, Khartoum 11115, Sudan |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() This work is the first detailed study of carbon phases in the ureilite Almahata Sitta (sample #7). We present microRaman data for diamond and graphite in Almahata Sitta, seven unbrecciated ureilites, and two brecciated ureilites. Diamond in Almahata Sitta was found to be distinct from that in unbrecciated and brecciated ureilites, although diamond in unbrecciated and brecciated ureilites is indistinguishable. Almahata Sitta diamond shows a peak center range of 1318.5–1330.2 cm?1 and a full width at half maximum (FWHM) range of 6.6–17.4 cm?1, representing a shock pressure of at least 60 kbar. The actual peak shock pressure may be higher than this due to postshock annealing, if shock synthesis is the source of ureilite diamonds. Diamond in unbrecciated and brecciated ureilites have peak center wave numbers closer to terrestrial kimberlite diamond, but show a wider range of FWHM than Almahata Sitta. The larger peak shift observed in Almahata Sitta may indicate the presence of lonsdaleite. Alternatively, the lower values in brecciated ureilites may be evidence of an annealing step either following the initial diamond‐generating shock or as a consequence of heating during reconsolidation of the breccia. Graphite in Almahata Sitta shows a G‐band peak center range of 1569.1–1577.1 cm?1 and a G‐band FWHM range of 24.3–41.6 cm?1 representing a formation temperature of 990 ± 120 °C. Amorphous carbon was also found. We examine the different theories for diamond formation in ureilites, such as chemical vapor deposition and shock origin from graphite, and explore explanations for the differences between Almahata Sitta and other ureilites. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|