Checks on the measurement of potential evapotranspiration using water balance data and independent measures of groundwater recharge

A twelve-year record of daily evaporation and evapotranspiration measurements at the Coleraine campus of the University of Ulster in Northern Ireland is analysed. Potential evapotranspiration (PE) is independently derived from: (i) Penman PT estimates; (ii) irrigated grass lysimeters PE(L); (iii) measurements of tank evaporation, PE(T). Both PE(T) and PE(L) are higher in winter than PT and have more prolonged summer peaks. Examination of soil moisture deficits during the period shows that actual evapotranspiration (AE) rarely falls below the potential rate and that PE and AE are therefore equal for most of the year. The availability of rainfall, stream discharge and groundwater data from an instrumented river catchment on the University campus enables water balances to be constructed for the period of study. Separate water balances using each of the PE estimates show that Penman PT most satisfactorily reflects catchment storage changes monitored independently. Penman PT is therefore confirmed as the most appropriate estimate of PE for the climatic, soil and vegetation conditions of the region. The use of Penman PT in water balance determinations, however, does not secure perfect agreement between estimated recharge and depletion of catchment storage on the one hand, and observed changes in water-table level on the other. The combined effects of error in surface water balance determinations are estimated at about 13%.