TIMS measurements of Ra and Ra in the Gulf of Lion, an attempt to quantify submarine groundwater discharge

Submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) is now recognized as an important pathway for water and chemical species fluxes to the coastal ocean. In order to determinate SGD to the Gulf of Lion (France), we measured the activities of ²²⁶Ra and ²²⁸Ra by thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) in coastal waters and in the deep aquifer waters of the Rhone deltaic plain after pre-concentration of radium by MnO₂. Compared to conventional counting techniques, TIMS requires lower quantities of water for the analyses, and leads to higher analytical precision. Radium isotopes were thus measured on 0.25–2 L water samples containing as little as 20 fg of ²²⁶Ra and 0.2–0.4 fg of ²²⁸Ra with precision equal to 2%. We demonstrate that coastal surface waters samples are enriched in ²²⁶Ra and ²²⁸Ra compared to the samples further offshore. The high precision radium measurements display a small but significant ²²⁶Ra and ²²⁸Ra enrichment within a strip of circa 30 km from the coast. Radium activities decrease beyond this region, entrained in the northern current along the shelf break or controlled by eddy diffusion. The radium excess in the first 30 km cannot be accounted for by the river nor by the early diagenesis. The primary source of the radium enrichment must therefore be ascribed to the discharge of submarine groundwater. Using a mass-balance model, we estimated the advective fluxes of ²²⁶Ra and ²²⁸Ra through SGD to be 5.2 × 10¹⁰ and 21 × 10¹⁰ dpm/d respectively. The ²²⁶Ra activities measured in the groundwater from the Rhone deltaic plain aquifer are comparable to those from other coastal groundwater studies throughout the world. By contrast, ²²⁸Ra activities are higher by up to one order of magnitude. Taking those groundwater radium activities as typical of the submarine groundwater end-member, a minimum volume of 0.24–4.5 × 10¹⁰ l/d is required to support the excess radium isotopes on the inner shelf. This has to be compared with the average rivers water runoff of 15.4 × 10¹⁰ l/d during the study period (1.6 to 29% of the river flow).