Interdependent development? Problems of aggregation and implementation in the Brandt report

This paper argues that the Brandt Report's central concept of ‘mutuality’ is too imprecise and too impotent to serve as a useful guide to practical action on behalf of the Third World's poor. It is suggested that these shortcomings result from three, related, flaws in the Report's construction—a conceptual flaw, a modelling flaw, and a political flaw. To the extent that these failings are reproduced, too, in the wider geographical paradigm of interdependent development, geographers might draw a useful lesson from a critique of the Brandt Report.