首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

煤层气井排采动态主控地质因素分析
引用本文:康永尚,王金,姜杉钰,叶建平,张守仁,张兵,秦绍锋.煤层气井排采动态主控地质因素分析[J].地质论评,2016,62(6):1511-1520.
作者姓名:康永尚  王金  姜杉钰  叶建平  张守仁  张兵  秦绍锋
作者单位:1)中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院,北京,102249; 2)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室,北京,102249;,中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院,北京,102249;,中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院,北京,102249;,中海石油(中国)有限公司非常规油气分公司,北京,100011;中联煤层气有限责任公司,北京,100011,中海石油(中国)有限公司非常规油气分公司,北京,100011;中联煤层气有限责任公司,北京,100011,中海石油(中国)有限公司非常规油气分公司,北京,100011;中联煤层气有限责任公司,北京,100011,中海石油(中国)有限公司非常规油气分公司,北京,100011;中联煤层气有限责任公司,北京,100011
基金项目:本文为国家重大专项(编号:2011ZX05042)资助的成果。
摘    要:沁水盆地寿阳区块和柿庄区块煤层气(CBM)井的排采动态在整体上表现出明显差异,而单一区块内部煤层气井的排采动态也存在较大差异。本文就两个区块的煤系地层沉积相、煤层渗透率、断裂构造、地应力类型和构造应力强度以及顶底板岩性组合类型等因素对排采动态的影响开展对比分析。基于静态地质条件和排采动态资料的综合研究表明:煤系地层沉积相、煤层渗透率、地应力类型和构造应力强度的差异是两个区块煤层气井排采动态差异的主要原因;单一区块内煤层气井的排采动态差异受控于局部断裂构造、地应力类型以及煤层顶底板岩性组合类型等局部因素;在煤层气开发选区和开发井位部署时,应综合考虑资源量、渗透率和多种局部地质因素的共同影响。

关 键 词:煤层气  寿阳区块  柿庄区块  排采动态  主控地质因素
收稿时间:3/9/2016 12:00:00 AM
修稿时间:2016/10/13 0:00:00

Analysis on Controlling Geological Factors Influencing Drainage Performances of Coalbed Methane Wells
KANG Yongshang,WANG Jin,JIANG Shanyu,YE Jianping,ZHANG Shouren,ZHANG Bing and QIN Shaofeng.Analysis on Controlling Geological Factors Influencing Drainage Performances of Coalbed Methane Wells[J].Geological Review,2016,62(6):1511-1520.
Authors:KANG Yongshang  WANG Jin  JIANG Shanyu  YE Jianping  ZHANG Shouren  ZHANG Bing and QIN Shaofeng
Institution:1) College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249; 2) State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, Beijing, 102249;,College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249;,College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249;,CNOOC China Limited, Unconventional Oil & Gas Branch, Beijing, 100011; China United Coalbed Methane Corporation, Ltd., Beijing, 100011,CNOOC China Limited, Unconventional Oil & Gas Branch, Beijing, 100011; China United Coalbed Methane Corporation, Ltd., Beijing, 100011,CNOOC China Limited, Unconventional Oil & Gas Branch, Beijing, 100011; China United Coalbed Methane Corporation, Ltd., Beijing, 100011 and CNOOC China Limited, Unconventional Oil & Gas Branch, Beijing, 100011; China United Coalbed Methane Corporation, Ltd., Beijing, 100011
Abstract:Objectives: Shouyang block and Shizhuang block are the main coalbed methane (CBM) exploration and development blocks in China. There is an obvious integral difference of drainage dynamic of CBM wells between two blocks. Moreover, that difference is also observed in a single block. This paper is focused on analysis of controlling geological factors drainage dynamic of CBM wells. Methods:Based on geological data from two blocks, this paper carries out a comparison analysis on the sedimentary facies, coal seam permeability, characteristics of faults, in situ stress types and tectonic stress amplitude, as well as lithological assemblages for understanding the controlling factors causing the integral difference of drainage dynamic of CBM wells between two blocks and that in a single block. Results:The study shows that the distinction of sedimentary facies, coal seam permeability, in situ stress types and tectonic stress amplitude are main factors causing the difference of drainage dynamic of CBM wells between two blocks, while the faults, in situ stress types and lithological association types at specific well locations interpret the difference of drainage dynamic of CBM wells within a block. Conclusions:Selections of favorable area and well site/coal target for CBM development should be based not only on the resources evaluation, but also and especially essential, on sedimentary facies, coal seam permeability, structure and lithological association types.
Keywords:Shouyang block  Shizhuang block  coalbed methane  drainage dynamics  controlling geological factors  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地质论评》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地质论评》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号