Regional variability in dust‐on‐snow processes and impacts in the Upper Colorado River Basin |
| |
| Authors: | S McKenzie Skiles Thomas H Painter Jayne Belnap Lacey Holland Richard L Reynolds Harland L Goldstein John Lin |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA;2. Southwest Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Moab, UT, USA;3. Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA;4. Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Dust deposition onto mountain snow cover in the Upper Colorado River Basin frequently occurs in the spring when wind speeds and dust emission peaks on the nearby Colorado Plateau. Dust loading has increased since the intensive settlement in the western USA in the mid 1880s. The effects of dust‐on‐snow have been well studied at Senator Beck Basin Study Area (SBBSA) in the San Juan Mountains, CO, the first high‐altitude area of contact for predominantly southwesterly winds transporting dust from the southern Colorado Plateau. To capture variability in dust transport from the broader Colorado Plateau and dust deposition across a larger area of the Colorado River water sources, an additional study plot was established in 2009 on Grand Mesa, 150 km to the north of SBBSA in west central, CO. Here, we compare the 4‐year (2010–2013) dust source, deposition, and radiative forcing records at Grand Mesa Study Plot (GMSP) and Swamp Angel Study Plot (SASP), SBBSA's subalpine study plot. The study plots have similar site elevations/environments and differ mainly in the amount of dust deposited and ensuing impacts. At SASP, end of year dust concentrations ranged from 0.83 mg g?1 to 4.80 mg g?1, and daily mean spring dust radiative forcing ranged from 50–65 W m?2, advancing melt by 24–49 days. At GMSP, which received 1.0 mg g?1 less dust per season on average, spring radiative forcings of 32–50 W m?2 advanced melt by 15–30 days. Remote sensing imagery showed that observed dust events were frequently associated with dust emission from the southern Colorado Plateau. Dust from these sources generally passed south of GMSP, and back trajectory footprints modelled for observed dust events were commonly more westerly and northerly for GMSP relative to SASP. These factors suggest that although the southern Colorado Plateau contains important dust sources, dust contributions from other dust sources contribute to dust loading in this region, and likely account for the majority of dust loading at GMSP. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
| Keywords: | snow energy balance snowmelt dust‐on‐snow light absorbing impurities snow hydrology spatial variability |
|
|
