Integration and Comparison of Clementine and Lunar Prospector Data: Global Scale Multielement Analysis1 (Fe,Ti, and Th) of the Lunar Surface |
| |
Authors: | Chevrel S. D. Pinet P. C. Daydou Y. Feldman W. C. |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) UMR5562, GRGS, Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France;(2) Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS D-466, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA |
| |
Abstract: | In this paper, we present (1) a statistical analysis, based on a systematic clustering method, of a dataset integrating the global abundance maps of the three elements iron, titanium, and thorium derived from Clementine and Lunar Prospector and (2) a comparison of iron abundances between Clementine and Lunar Prospector. Homogeneous geologic units are compositionally characterized and spatially defined in relation to the major rock types sampled on the Moon. With the lowest abundances of Fe, Ti, and Th found on the Moon, the lunar highland terrains are quite homogeneous with two major large feldspathic units, one being slightly more mafic than the other. Two distinct regions with unique compositions are unambiguously identified: the Procellarum KREEP Terrane (PKT) and the South Pole–Aitken (SPA). The PKT, which includes all the units with Th abundances higher than 3.5 ppm (KREEP-rich materials), is delimited by an almost continuous ringlike unit. In particular, it includes the western nearside maria, except for Mare Humorum. With concentrations in Fe, Ti, and Th enhanced relative to the surrounding highlands, the South Pole–Aitken basin floor represents a large mafic anomaly on the far side, suggesting wide deposits of lower crust and possible mantle materials. However, due to indirect residual latitude effects in the CSR (Clementine spectral reflectance) measurements, iron abundances might have been overestimated in SPA, thus implying that crustal materials, rather than mantle materials, might represent the dominant contributor to the mafic component exposed on the basin floor. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|