首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

非均匀地表蒸散遥感研究综述
引用本文:周倜,彭志晴,辛晓洲,李福根.非均匀地表蒸散遥感研究综述[J].遥感学报,2016,20(2):257-277.
作者姓名:周倜  彭志晴  辛晓洲  李福根
作者单位:中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所 遥感科学国家重点实验室, 北京 100101;中国科学院大学, 北京 100049,中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所 遥感科学国家重点实验室, 北京 100101;中国科学院大学, 北京 100049,中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所 遥感科学国家重点实验室, 北京 100101,中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所 遥感科学国家重点实验室, 北京 100101;中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
基金项目:中国科学院重点部署项目(编号:KZZD-EW-TZ-18);国家自然科学基金(编号:41371360)
摘    要:本文评述了目前常用的遥感估算地表蒸散方法,包括地表能量平衡模型、Penman-Monteith类模型、温度—植被指数特征空间方法、Priestley-Taylor类模型和其他方法。然而使用这些方法估算地表蒸散时会面临严重的尺度效应,而产生尺度效应的根本原因之一是地表异质性,在分析了非均匀下垫面对水热通量遥感反演造成的影响后,介绍了面积加权、校正因子补偿与温度降尺度3种尺度误差纠正方法;并从地面观测实验的角度简述了非均匀下垫面水热通量真实性检验的研究;最后探讨了将来建立更具时空代表性的非均匀下垫面地表蒸散遥感估算模型可能会面临的一些挑战。

关 键 词:遥感  蒸散  模型  尺度效应  非均匀下垫面  地面实验
收稿时间:2015/2/9 0:00:00
修稿时间:2015/5/4 0:00:00

Remote sensing research of evapotranspiration over heterogeneous surfaces:A review
ZHOU Ti,PENG Zhiqing,XIN Xiaozhou and LI Fugen.Remote sensing research of evapotranspiration over heterogeneous surfaces:A review[J].Journal of Remote Sensing,2016,20(2):257-277.
Authors:ZHOU Ti  PENG Zhiqing  XIN Xiaozhou and LI Fugen
Institution:State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China,State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China,State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China and State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract:This review surveys the most currently used evapotranspiration estimation methods based on remote sensing. The methods are divided into different categories, including surface energy balance models, Penman-Monteith models, land surface temperature-vegetation index space methods, Priestley-Taylor models, empirical statistical methods, complementary methods, and land process assimilation models.These methods are mainly focused on two problems. The first problem is how to deal with aerodynamic surface temperature used in gradient diffusion equation. One-source models have two major solutions. One is to use remotely sensed radiative temperature as a direct substitution for aerodynamic surface temperature or use semi-empirical relations to obtain the surface-atmospheric differential temperature. In two-source models, the heat fluxes are decomposed by component temperature. The second problem is how to calculate surface resistance that influences heat flux exchange from the soil surface and canopy layers. This process is complicated to calculate at the local scale. Basing from the two problems, scientists combined the features and superiority of remote sensing, such as the relationship between various vegetation indices and surface parameters with the fundamental theory of these methods, and developed these methods from saturated surface toward unsaturated surface to calculate evapotranspiration.However, severe scale effects emerge when these methods are used in heterogeneous surfaces. Surface heterogeneity influences the driving force of evapotranspiration estimation. Thus, three methods to correct scale error over heterogeneous surfaces are shown in detail:area weighting method, correction factor method, and land surface temperature downscaling(or thermal spatial sharpening) method. The core concepts of these methods are to couple high and low spatial resolution satellite data and statistically quantify the inhomogeneity in mixed pixels to correct the scale error in evapotranspiration estimation. In meteorological science, land process models using mosaic(or area-weighted method) and statistical dynamic methods are developed for heterogeneous surfaces. In the statistical dynamic method, one single or two mutually independent surface parameters or atmospheric forces are regarded as random variables. Consequently, their spatial distributions are expressed as probability density function to be melted into evapotranspiration retrieval models. These ideas are worthy to be adopted in remotely sensed evapotranspiration estimation.As another important part of evapotranspiration estimation, the progress of turbulent heat flux validation research over heterogeneous surfaces is introduced at length from the angle of observation experiments. The measured heat fluxes possibly originate from source areas instead of in situ pixels. Thus, the traditional validation method that compares the retrieved pixel value with the observation value to evaluate result accuracy may cause uncertainty. Some schemes are developed using footprint models to determine the scope and weight of source area pixels and decrease the uncertainty in validation. Moreover, we provide a brief introduction of the basic principles of the footprint models that are mostly used in remote sensing in the present case. These models include Eulerian analytic flux footprint models and Lagrangian stochastic trajectory approach.Finally, we discuss the challenges that researchers may encounter in the future to develop representative models of remotely sensed evapotranspiration retrieval over heterogeneous surfaces.
Keywords:remote sensing  evapotranspiration  model  scale effect  heterogeneous surface  surface observation experiment
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《遥感学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《遥感学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号