首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

空间域和频率域平面位场延拓影响因素和稳定性分析
引用本文:刘芬,王万银,纪晓琳.空间域和频率域平面位场延拓影响因素和稳定性分析[J].物探与化探,2019(2):320-328.
作者姓名:刘芬  王万银  纪晓琳
作者单位:长安大学地质工程与测绘学院;长安大学重磁方法技术研究所;西部矿产资源与地质工程教育部重点实验室
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目"典型覆盖区航空地球物理技术示范与处理解释软件平台开发"项目(2017YFC0602200)之课题"航空地球物理数据综合处理解释方法研究及软件开发"(2017YFC0602202);中国大洋"十三五"资源环境类课题"合同区海山地形单元识别与底质类型研究"(DY135-C1-1-03);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(310826171007)
摘    要:位场延拓是重、磁位场数据处理的重要方法之一,高精度的位场延拓结果对后续的数据处理和解释尤为重要。笔者从平面位场延拓的基本公式出发,分析了空间域和频率域位场延拓结果精度的影响因素以及稳定性。通过理论模型测试比较了这些影响因素(场源体顶面埋深、剖面长度、扩边方法、窗口大小、点距和延拓高度)在空间域和频率域进行位场延拓时的异同性。经过测试表明,点距和延拓高度对延拓结果的影响最大,其次是剖面长度、扩边方法以及窗口大小,场源体的顶面埋深影响最小。随着顶面埋深的增大,会使延拓结果的精度降低;增大剖面长度和进行扩边会提高位场延拓结果的精度;选择合适滑动窗口可以提高计算效率,窗口越大延拓结果精度越高,窗口半径一般选择20倍延拓高度。空间域和频率域中位场延拓结果精度相当,但在空间域中,当延拓高度小于1倍点距时,延拓结果误差很大,此时需要用插值方法加密点距。

关 键 词:位场延拓  影响因素  精度分析  稳定性

Influence factors and stability analysis of plane potential field continuation in space and frequency domains
LIU Fen,WANG Wan-Yin,JI Xiao-Lin.Influence factors and stability analysis of plane potential field continuation in space and frequency domains[J].Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,2019(2):320-328.
Authors:LIU Fen  WANG Wan-Yin  JI Xiao-Lin
Institution:(College of Geology Engineering and Geomatics,Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, China;Insititute of Gravity and Magnetic Technology,Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, China;Key Laboratory of Western China's Mineral Resources and Geological Engineering, Ministry of Education, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, China)
Abstract:Potential field continuation is one of the important methods of gravity and magnetic potential field data processing,and obtaining high-precision continuation results is particularly important for subsequent data processing and interpretation. Starting with the basic formula of plane potential field continuation,the authors analyzed the factors and the stability that affect the accuracy of continuation results in space and frequency domains. Using the theory model,the authors investigated the buried depth of the top surface of the field source,the length of the section,the method of edge enlargement,the size of the window,the dot pitch and the continuation height,and compared the different influences of these factors in space domain and frequency domain. The theory model test shows that the dot pitch and continuation height have the greatest influence on the continuation results,followed by the section length,the method of edge enlargement and the size of window,with the top surface of the field source exhibiting minimal influence. With the increase of the top surface’s depth,the continuation results accuracy is reduced. Increasing and expanding the length of the section will improve the accuracy of the field continuation results. Selecting the appropriate sliding window can improve the calculation efficiency,with the increasing window radius,the accuracy of the field continuation results is improved,and it can generally be chosen as 20 times of the continuation distance. The accuracy of the field continuation results have similarity in space domain and frequency domain;nevertheless,in space domain,the continuation error is very large when the continuation distance is less than 1 time of the dot pitch,so it needs to encrypt the dot pitch by using the interpolation method in this situation.
Keywords:continuation of potential field  influence factors  precision analysis  stability
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号