首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

地震空区的定量判据
引用本文:陈宇卫,陆远忠.地震空区的定量判据[J].地震,1994(2):11-18.
作者姓名:陈宇卫  陆远忠
作者单位:安徽省地震局,安徽省地震局 中国合肥 230031,中国合肥 230031
摘    要:在中国,孕震空间已经比较广泛地应用于地震预报的实践,并多次取得实际预测强震的效果。但经过系统震例研究发现,利用孕震空间预报地震的虚报漏报率比较高。本文运用解决临界相变问题的重正化群方法所求出的孕震空间区可能发生失稳破裂,导致强震发生的判据对孕震空间的危险性作出进一步鉴别,并用突变论方法求解尖拐空变方程,预测孕震空区未来发生强震的时间和震级,并进一步确定孕震空区的危险性。对26个中国大陆强有的孕震空

关 键 词:地震  孕震空区  定量判据  地震预报

QUANTITATIVE CRITERION OF SEISMIC GAPS
Chen Yuwei Lu Yuanzhong.QUANTITATIVE CRITERION OF SEISMIC GAPS[J].Earthquake,1994(2):11-18.
Authors:Chen Yuwei Lu Yuanzhong
Institution:Seismologiccal Bureau of Anhui Province
Abstract:The preparation gap method has been extensively applied to earthquake prediction practice in China and some strong earthquakes are successfully forecasted with help of this method. It is found that the false alarm rate and rate of failing to forecast by using this method are still higher according to systematic study of earthquake cases. In this paper authors applied the renormalization group method, which has been used to the critical phase transformation, to give the criterion of strong earthquake occurrence due to crack's instable extesion possibly created in preparation gaps and further distinguish the risk of the preparation gaps, then to solve the cusp catastrophic equation with the catastrophism method to predict time and magnitude of future strong earthquake in the gaps, finally to get a better determination of earthquake risk in the preparation gaps. The method proposed in this paper is applied to the preparation gaps formed before 26 strong earthquakes in the mainland of China. The results show that the method which combines the index of prepqration gaps with renormalization group theory and catasrophism theory to identify the risk of preparation gaps and predict the magnitude and time of future earthquakes, may significantly improve the earthquake prediction. The false alarm rate of this method is reduced to 20%, the rate of failing to forecast is reduced to zero. Therefore, R value (represents the quality of prediction ) rises from about 0.3 to 0.8. The further perspective tests are necessary fqr the above-mentioned results and conclusions, that is, to study the cases in which preparation gaps have ocurred but no corresponding earthquakes observed, and to make some prediction for the possible earthquakes and to evaluate the efficiency of the method.
Keywords:seismic preparation gap  quantitative criterion  renormalization group  catastrophism
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号