利用短期静态PPP结果反演海潮负荷位移

采用香港11个GPS测站的观测资料进行1 h、2 h、3 h和4h静态PPP解算，获得4组PPP坐标序列，利用调和分析求取11个测站处8个主要分潮的负荷位移参数（振幅和相位），将其与海潮模型计算的负荷位移参数进行对比，并比较分析PPP反演值与海潮模型值改正海潮负荷信号的效果。结果表明，垂直和水平方向上，不同PPP结果反演8个分潮的负荷位移分别具有约5 mm和7 mm的差异；PPP反演8个分潮垂向负荷位移优于全球海潮模型，但水平方向上的反演效果稍弱。     

静态精密单点定位精度分析

阐述了精密单点定位技术的应用价值,分析了观测数据和精密钟差采样间隔对静态精密单点定位的影响,提供了工程实际使用有益的参考.     

基于拨号网络的跨操作系统平台互联一例

介绍了两台计算机之间通过电话线和Modem互联通讯的原理及应用，详细论述了在这种组网方式下如何通过SLIP协议(或PPP协议)实现SCO UNIX主机和Windows主机、SCO UNIX主机相连来实现文件的远程传输，并提出解决方案，给出实例。     

星站差分与PPP技术在深远海调查中的位置服务精度分析

利用在全球不同海域的船载GNSS进出港数据,以事后动态处理技术(PPK)的坐标计算值为评价基准,分析了Veripos星站差分系统和事后动态精密单点定位技术(PPP)在不同运动状态下的位置服务精度。结果表明,Veripos与PPP在低动态下的平面与高程位置服务精度可优于6.2 cm和14.9 cm,在常规动态下平均精度优于20 cm;PPP与Veripos坐标分量平均互差小于15 cm,标准差小于23 cm,在深远海调查中PPP技术可作为星站差分系统的有效补充和特殊情况下的位置服务替代。     

PPP/SINS紧耦合系统仿真的研究与分析

在捷联惯导(SINS)和GPS卫星接收机进行紧耦合的研究中,采用差分定位进行紧耦合的方法比较成熟,而关于精密单点定位(PPP)与捷联惯导紧耦合的研究还比较少。本文对精密单点定位与捷联惯导紧组合系统进行了Matlab仿真,利用数学解析的方法产生机载运动轨迹,通过设置系统的参数,获得仿真SINS和GPS数据;然后,通过PPP/SINS紧组合系统的仿真程序解算,将定位结果与PPP的结果比较,表明PPP/SINS紧组合导航定位的结果比PPP的精度和可靠性好,而且收敛的速度更快,同时也验证了算法的正确性。最后,分析了不同等级惯导对定位精度的影响。     

GPS星历精度对精密单点定位的影响

精密单点定位的实质就是利用精密星历和精密卫星钟改正来实现单机精密定位。本文简要地介绍了精密单点定位的原理及技术关键,在此基础上,分析了IGS目前提供的3种精密星历(IGF、IGR、IGU)的精度和时延性。根据实验数据进一步分析了3种精密星历对精密单点定位精度的影响。通过精度分析,得出利用IGS的超快星历也可以达到厘米级定位精度,为全球厘米级单站RTK提供了有益的参考。     

面向流媒体传输的空间数据变化累积模型

将流媒体技术引入到以矢量数据为主的网络GIS传输中,其关键是建立逐级精细化的多层次表达模型,并在服务器端数据预组织上建立线性索引结构。本研究针对该目标建立一种矢量数据多重表达的新模型,即变化累积模型,认为尺度空间中从粗到细的数据表达过程是一些"变化"的累积,"变化"表现为两个连续尺度表达间的差别,通过"变化"元素的逐渐增加或减少来实现渐进传输。基于该模型对面状数据渐进式传输进行研究,将多边形分级剖分为一系列凸壳或外接矩形的基础上建立变化累积模型,通过剖分元素的组合完成渐进式流媒体传输。     

���ܵ��㶨λ��GNSS����������е�Ӧ��

??????????λ???PANDA?????????纣????????2009??2011??2013??????3??GNSS?????????д????????????ITRF2008?μ???????????????з??????ó?????????????????仯????E???????32.16 mm/a????N???????-10.08 mm/a?????????????????????λ?????????????????????μ?????????     

Impact of different sampling rates on precise point positioning performance using online processing service

In this study, the effect of different sampling rates (i.e. observation recording interval) on the Precise Point Positioning (PPP) solutions in terms of accuracy was investigated. For this purpose, a field test was carried out in ?orum province, Turkey, on 11 September 2019. Within this context, a Geodetic Point (GP) was established and precisely coordinated. A static GNSS measurement was occupied on the GP for about 4-hour time at 0.10 second (s)/10 Hz measurement intervals with the Trimble R10 geodetic grade GNSS receiver. The original observation file was converted to RINEX format and then decimated into the different data sampling rates as 0.2 s, 0.5 s, 1 s, 5 s, 10 s, 30 s, 60 s, and 120 s. All these RINEX observation files were submitted to the Canadian Spatial Reference System-Precise Point Positioning (CSRS-PPP) online processing service the day after the data collection date by choosing both static and kinematic processing options. In this way, PPP-derived static coordinates, and the kinematic coordinates of each measurement epoch were calculated. The PPP-derived coordinates obtained from each decimated sampling intervals were compared to known coordinates of the GP for northing, easting, 2D position, and height components. According to the static and kinematic processing results, high data sampling rates did not change the PPP solutions in terms of accuracy when compared to the results obtained using lower sampling rates. The results of this study imply that it was not necessary to collect GNSS data with high-rate intervals for many surveying projects requiring cm-level accuracy.     

�й�����IGS����վ���ܵ��㶨λ����ʱ������Ƶ�׷���

??ITRF2008??????й???????5??IGS??????WUHN??BJFS??URUM??KUNM??SHAO??2012??????????????TriP?????????????????????????С??????????????????????????????????????????н?????????????????????????????????GAMIT/GLOBK????????????????????з?????????ж???????????????й??????IGS???????????д??????????????????????????????????????????????????URUM??KUNM??BJFS??SHAO?????????????????????BPPL+WN????WUHN??????N??E??U????????????????з?????????????BPPL+WN??FN+WN??PL+WN??????????BPPL+WN??????????а???????????????????????????2 mm??BPPL???????WN??????1/10???????0.28??0.89 mm????????????????С???????????????????????????????????С??????TriP??????????????????????????????????????????????????