排序方式: 共有5条查询结果,搜索用时 125 毫秒
1
1.
2.
Potential climate-change impacts on the Chesapeake Bay 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Raymond G. Najjar Christopher R. Pyke Mary Beth Adams Denise Breitburg Carl Hershner Michael Kemp Robert Howarth Margaret R. Mulholland Michael Paolisso David Secor Kevin Sellner Denice Wardrop Robert Wood 《Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science》2010
We review current understanding of the potential impact of climate change on the Chesapeake Bay. Scenarios for CO2 emissions indicate that by the end of the 21st century the Bay region will experience significant changes in climate forcings with respect to historical conditions, including increases in CO2 concentrations, sea level, and water temperature of 50–160%, 0.7–1.6 m, and 2–6 °C, respectively. Also likely are increases in precipitation amount (very likely in the winter and spring), precipitation intensity, intensity of tropical and extratropical cyclones (though their frequency may decrease), and sea-level variability. The greatest uncertainty is associated with changes in annual streamflow, though it is likely that winter and spring flows will increase. Climate change alone will cause the Bay to function very differently in the future. Likely changes include: (1) an increase in coastal flooding and submergence of estuarine wetlands; (2) an increase in salinity variability on many time scales; (3) an increase in harmful algae; (4) an increase in hypoxia; (5) a reduction of eelgrass, the dominant submerged aquatic vegetation in the Bay; and (6) altered interactions among trophic levels, with subtropical fish and shellfish species ultimately being favored in the Bay. The magnitude of these changes is sensitive to the CO2 emission trajectory, so that actions taken now to reduce CO2 emissions will reduce climate impacts on the Bay. Research needs include improved precipitation and streamflow projections for the Bay watershed and whole-system monitoring, modeling, and process studies that can capture the likely non-linear responses of the Chesapeake Bay system to climate variability, climate change, and their interaction with other anthropogenic stressors. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
Suthan Suthersan Denice Nelson Matthew Schnobrich 《Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation》2011,31(1):45-49
Optimization of large‐scale injection‐based remedial systems requires engineering to intentionally capitalize on the biological, chemical, and physical mechanisms that occur within and between the zones of reagent application. These types of systems can be called hybrid designs as they employ multiple processes to achieve remediation endpoints ( Figure 1 ), resulting in optimized system performance and a reduction in the overall life‐cycle cost. While all remedial applications incorporate these mechanisms to some extent, the importance of each of these processes is magnified in large‐scale applications. This column discusses the dominant mechanisms responsible for mass reduction within both source and distal plume footprints, with a focus on the application of “Hybridized Design” for enhanced reductive dechlorination (ERD) systems.
1