无机多元素现代仪器分析技术

本文重点介绍地质领域目前广泛应用的无机多元素现代仪器分析技术,包括电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱(ICP-AES)、电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)、X射线荧光光谱(XRF)、原子吸收光谱(AAS)、原子荧光光谱(AFS)、电子探针分析技术和共享平台的建立、激光剥蚀等离子体质谱(LA-ICP-MS)微区原位分析技术以...     

塞曼原子吸收法测定大洋多金属结核中的铜钴镍

报道以ＨＮＯ３－ＨＦ－ＨＣｌＯ４分解多金属结核样品，用日立１８０－８０偏振塞曼原子吸收分光光度计测定Ｃｕ、Ｃｏ和Ｎｉ的方法。试验了介质及共存元素对测定的影响，选择了最佳测定条件。用该法测定了大洋锰结核标准物质中的Ｃｕ、Ｃｏ、Ｎｉ，结果与标准值符合，且方法已应用于大批量样品分析中。对这些标样６次测定的ＲＳＤ分别是Ｃｕ０．４９％￣１．９９％，Ｃｏ１．８６％￣２．６６％，Ｎｉ０．４６％￣１．９６％。     

黄原酯棉富集—火焰原子吸收法测定盐和水样中的痕量铅

本文介绍用黄原酯棉富集-火焰原子吸收法测定盐和水样中的痕量Pb,用于盐样中0.5—20μg/g和水样中5—200μg/L Pb的测定,结果与其它方法基本吻合。     

甲基异丁基酮负载泡塑富集-原子吸收法测定金

用甲基异丁基酮(MIBK)负载泡塑从5%～25%的王水介质中吸附富集金,经2%硫脲～1%盐酸解脱,以原子吸收法测定.金的回收率大于99.8%,方法用于含金地质样品的分析时,效果较泡塑吸附好.用火焰原子吸收法测定w(Au)为19.40×10-6的金标样,验证分离富集方法的可靠性.结果其平均值为19.32×10-6,相对标准偏差(RSD)为1.15%(n=11).     

泡沫塑料分离富集原子吸收法测定氰化液中金和银

研究了装有聚醚型泡沫塑料和三苯基膦负载聚醚型泡沫塑料的吸附柱对Au,Ag的分离富集的条件,并应用于氰化液、解吸液和电解液中Au和Ag测定中的预富集,Au和Ag的回收率均>98％。对含Au量为0.91μg/ml,含Ag量0.36μg/ml的试样,经过10次测定,其相对标准偏差分别为1.22％和2.31％。     

双毛细管雾化器氢化物-火焰原子吸收法测定地质样品中痕量硒和碲

本文研究了双毛细管雾化器氢化物-火焰原子吸收法测定地质样品中痕量Se和Te的方法。测定Se、Te的灵敏度分别为0.012μg/ml和0.0088μg/ml(1％吸收);对含1.6ppm Se与0.42ppm Te的样品测定,其RSD(n=6)分别为3.3％和5.5％。方法简单、灵敏、实用。用GSS及GSD系列部分标样验证了方法的可靠性,可以测定一般地质样品中0.0001％以上的Se和0.0000x％以上的Te。     

离子交换—原子吸收光谱法测定海水中痕量铜、铅、锌、镉、铁、锰

本文介绍了用国产D401型螯合树脂分离富集海水中铜、铅、锌、镉、铁、锰等痕量元素,并用原子吸收光谱仪测定其含量的方法。讨论了各元素的分离条件选择及干扰元素的影响,并与溶剂萃取法的结果作了比较。各元素检测的定量下限为:铜0.5μg/L、铅0.1μg/L、锌1.0μg/L、镉0.01μg/L、铁2.0μg/L、锰2.0μg/L。方法精密度在4—8％之间,回收率为90—102％。     

GGR Critical Review of Analytical Developments in 2006–2007

In 2005 the Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research editorial team, in the true spirit of scientific endeavour, embarked on an experiment of our own. We decided to trial a new kind of review, somewhat different from those more typically observed in journals, and one that would provide readers with a summary of analytical developments across a broad range of topics appropriate to the Earth sciences. The first contribution of this kind appeared in 2005, and reported on developments in 2003 (Hergt et al. 2005). The second, this time a biennial review, was published in 2006 and reported on highlights of the 2004 and 2005 literature (Hergt et al. 2006). Based on reprint requests, positive remarks at conferences and strong citations we consider the experiment a resounding success and proudly present here the third in this series. This comprises six individual review sections that cover the main analytical technologies and topical application fields in geoanalysis and geochemistry, including geological and environmental reference materials, ICP‐thermal and secondary ionisation‐mass spectrometry, as well as neutron activation analysis, X‐ray fluorescence and atomic absorption spectrometry.     

用改进单纯形优化法测定大米中的镉

利用原子吸收分光光度法（火焰法）,根据改进单纯形优化法建立了大米中微量元素镉的测定方法,结果表明,改进单纯形优化法的灵敏度比传统方法有所提高,实验次数少,线性关系良好。运用法对广东省韶关马坝、英德、增城、广州效区等地区出产生的大米进行了测定,并用标准加入法做回实验,回收率介于９４．６６％－１０３．３０％。     

Use of the Anion‐Exchange Resin Amberlite IRA‐93 for the Separation of Arsenite and Arsenate in Aqueous Samples

The method described uses the separation of As(III) and As(V) species in aqueous samples by means of the anion‐exchange resin Amberlite IRA‐93. The samples were acidified using acetic acid and passed through a glass column filled with pre‐treated Amberlite IRA‐93 resin. As(III) was poorly adsorbed on the anionic exchanger material, whereas As(V) was retained. The arsenic concentration was measured in the column effluent by graphite furnace AAS (GF‐AAS). The retained As(V) was eluted from the column using 1 M NaOH. Prior to the determination of the As(V) concentration in the NaOH eluate, the eluate was passed through a glass column filled with a cation‐exchange resin (Amberlite 200) to remove sodium ions and minimize the Na⁺ interference with the AAS determination. After calibration the method was applied to the separation of As(III) and As(V) species in two aqueous extracts of arsenic contaminated soils. The results were compared with those obtained from an on‐line separation and determination of As(III) and As(V) in the aqueous soil extracts using a state of the art HPLC‐ICP‐MS system.