南海琼东南盆地深水区储层类型及研究意义

通过对琼东南盆地钻井及典型地震相分析,认为琼东南盆地深水区发育两种类型的储层:第一类为形成于浅水环境的储层,包括扇三角洲砂体、滨浅海相滩坝砂体和台地碳酸盐岩;第二类为形成于深水环境的储层,包括盆底扇和峡谷水道等低位砂体。其中,深水区广泛分布的海底扇、峡谷水道砂体和台地碳酸盐岩具有良好的深水油气勘探潜力。     

基于解析信号振幅识别磁源体边界的分析解释方法

解析信号本质上是一种全通滤波器,由于其不受人为因素干扰,能够较好地反映原始信号包含的信息特征。该方法不仅是对非平稳信号进行分析的有效方法,也是检测信号局部特征的有力工具。本文通过对实信号的解析信号处理得到复信号,由该复信号的振幅,能清晰地刻画信号能量空间分布特征。模型试验表明,解析信号振幅方法减小了常规化极方法在勘探程度较低的地区引起假异常的问题,使地下磁性体与振幅中心位置对应。尤其在低纬度或地形切割较大的地区,该方法更具优势。将该方法应用于老挝爬立山铁矿区实测磁异常的分析,由此圈定了磁铁矿分布位置,并由区内56个钻孔证实该推断的可靠性。     

金矿自然重砂矿物组合规律及其找矿指示意义

对云南、海南、江西、湖北、河南、新疆、浙江、山东、辽宁等27个省185个典型金矿床的自然重砂矿物进行统计分析,发现自然重砂矿物对金矿具有良好的响应,自然金、黄铁矿、方铅矿、黄铜矿、白铅矿、辰砂等对寻找金矿具有指示意义。不同成因类型的金矿床反映出的自然重砂矿物组合不同,斑岩型金矿床的标型指示矿物组合为自然金+黄铁矿+方铅矿+重晶石+闪锌矿+白铅矿+金红石,卡林型—类卡林型金矿床的标型指示矿物组合为自然金+黄铁矿+方铅矿+辉锑矿+毒砂+雄(雌)黄,而造山型+矽卡岩型+热液型+构造蚀变岩型金矿床的标型指示矿物组合为自然金+黄铁矿+方铅矿+辰砂。不同区域的金矿床反映出的自然重砂矿物组合也各有差异,闪锌矿为南方各省金矿床的特征矿物,辰砂和白钨矿为北方地区金矿床的特征矿物,重晶石和白铅矿为西部地区金矿的特征矿物。综合研究认为,自然重砂具有直接找矿和指导找矿的作用,按照特定成因类型和区域金矿床所建立的自然重砂矿物组合对建立矿床找矿模型具有重要的意义。     

银矿自然重砂矿物组合规律及其找矿意义

根据20世纪60年代全国范围内展开的自然重砂测量工作所累积的自然重砂数据资料,统计了全国各省72个典型银矿床的自然重砂情况,通过计算和分析各自然重砂矿物在所对应的类型的矿床中的报出频率,得出火山沉积型、沉积型、变质型、侵入岩型4种类型的银矿所对应的自然重砂矿物组合。展现这4种类型矿床的重砂矿物组合的相似之处及不同之处。按照这种方式建立的不同矿床类型的自然重砂矿物组合,对于建立自然重砂找矿模型具有重要的意义。     

萤石矿自然重砂矿物组合规律及其找矿意义

为探究不同类型的萤石矿所反映的自然重砂矿物组合所携带的对各类型萤石矿的指示特征,统计了浙江、湖南、湖北、青海、广西、福建、安徽、新疆、甘肃、河北共计10个地区23个典型萤石矿床的自然重砂矿物报出情况,计算各重砂矿物报出率,分析得出热液型矿、后期热液型及热液充填型3种类型萤石矿床各自对应的自然重砂矿物组合和标型矿物组合。结果显示,各类型矿床自然重砂矿物组合既有相同之处也有显示各自的特点。因此,按照矿床类型建立的自然重砂矿物组合及其含量变化,对于新一轮的矿产资源勘查具有重要的意义。     

四川自然重砂异常特征及其成矿潜力响应

在自然重砂数据库系统(ZSAPS2.0)平台下,通过对四川省1∶20万自然重砂测量数据中的全省自然重砂矿物进行整理、统计和分析,开展了四川省自然重砂异常圈定及异常区带划分。结合四川省矿产资源潜力评价工作相关信息认为,自然重砂异常在矿产预测中具有一定的指示作用,部分具有较好的成矿潜力,所划分的自然重砂异常可作为全省开展相应矿种找矿工作部署的综合信息之一,可为省级找矿预测提供指导性信息。     

下期要目

正~~     

黔西地区构造变形特征及其煤层气地质意义

黔西地区处于特提斯与滨太平洋两个构造域的交接地带,多期性质不同的构造作用形成了现今错综复杂的构造变形特征。根据构造变形的差异,可划分为织金-纳雍NE向构造变形区、水城-紫云NW向构造变形区和黔西南复杂构造变形区。在野外地质的基础上,结合微观变形特征和矿物流体包裹体测试分析,认为黔西地区构造变形属于上地壳低温-中低温环境下的脆性-脆韧性变形;由于黔西地区基底构造相对稳定,成煤期后断块内部变形较弱,煤储层形成了一定程度的构造裂隙,有助于渗透率的提高,煤层气勘探开发前景良好。     

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987113001333

The basement of the Romanian Carpathians is made of Neoproterozoic to early Paleozoic periGondwanan terranes variably involved in the Variscan orogeny,similarly to other basement terrains of Europe.They were hardly dismembered during the Alpine orogeny and traditionally have their own names in the three Carpathian areas.The Danubian domain of the South Carpathians comprises the Dragsan and Lainici-Paius peri-Amazonian terranes.The Dragsan terrane originated within the ocean surrounding Rodinia and docked with Rodinia at ~800 Ma.It does not contain Cadomian magmatism and consequently it is classified as an Avalonian extra-Cadomian terrane.The Lainici-Paius terrane is a Ganderian fragment strongly modified by Cadomian subduction-related magmatism.It is attached to the Moesia platform.The Tisovita terrane is an ophiolite that marks the boundary between Dragsan and Lainici-Paius terranes.The other basement terranes of the Romanian Carpathians originated close to the Ordovician NorthAfrican orogen,as a result of the eastern Rheic Ocean opening and closure.Except for the Sebes-Lotru terrane that includes a lower metamorphic unit of Cadomian age,all the other terranes(Bretila,Tulghes,Negrisoara and Rebra in the East Carpathians,Somes,Biharia and Baia de Aries in the Apuseni mountains,Fagaras,Leaota,Caras and Pades in the South Carpathians) represent late Cambrian—Ordovician rock assemblages.Their provenance,is probably within paleo-northeast Africa,close to the Arabian-Nubian shield.The late Cambrian-Ordovician terranes are defined here as Carpathian-type terranes.According to their lithostratigraphy and origin,some are of continental margin magmatic arc setting,whereas others formed in rift and back-arc environment and closed to passive continental margin settings.In a paleogeographic reconstruction,the continental margin magmatic arc terranes were first that drifted out,followed by the passive continental margin terranes with the back-arc terranes in their front.They accreted to Laurussia during the Variscan orogeny.Some of them(Sebes-Lotru in South Carpathians and Baia de Aries in Apuseni mountains) underwent eclogite-grade metamorphism.The Danubian terranes,the Bretila terrane and the Somes terrane were intruded by Variscan granitoids.     

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987114000395

The study of fluid inclusions in high-grade rocks is especially challenging as the host minerals have been normally subjected to deformation, recrystallization and fluid-rock interaction so that primary in- clusions, formed at the peak of metamorphism are rare. The larger part of the fluid inclusions found in metamorphic minerals is typically modified during uplift. These late processes may strongly disguise the characteristics of the ＂original＂ peak metamorphic fluid. A detailed microstructural analysis of the host minerals, notably quartz, is therefore indispensable for a proper interpretation of fluid inclusions. Cathodoluminescence （CL） techniques combined with trace element analysis of quartz （EPMA, LA- [CPMS） have shown to be very helpful in deciphering the rock-fluid evolution. Whereas high-grade metamorphic quartz may have relatively high contents of trace elements like Ti and A1, low- temperature re-equilibrated quartz typically shows reduced trace element concentrations. The result- ing microstructures in CL can be basically distinguished in diffusion patterns （along microfractures and grain boundaries）, and secondary quartz formed by dissolution-reprecipitation. Most of these textures are formed during retrograde fluid-controlled processes between ca. 220 and 500 ℃, i.e. the range of semi-brittle deformation （greenschist-facies） and can be correlated with the fluid inclusions. In this way modified and re-trapped fluids can be identified, even when there are no optical features observed under the microscope.