语义驱动的层次化地图符号设计方法

地图符号是地图学的重要组成部分。当前有关地图符号的研究,主体均集中在地图符号的视觉图形方面,而对地图符号的概念语义缺乏足够的重视。本文提出了一种语义驱动的层次化地图符号设计方法,即以语义关系作为符号图形构造的基准,通过语义关系控制地图符号的图形构成,以充分发掘地图符号的概念语义成分在符号设计中的内在价值。重点论述了本体层次的语义特征提取、符素设计、聚合语义结构建模和语义驱动的符号生成4个关键步骤。利用本文符号设计方法对现有符号标准进行改进设计和认知实验。结果表明,该方法在符号认识效率方面表现较优,且在模拟信息传输过程中体现了较为稳定的高传输效率,具备有效提升地图符号的信息感知效率的潜力。     

基于本体的网络地理空间数据集成

 随着地理数据深度、广度和复杂度的不断增加,如何集成这些在结构、语法及语义上高度异质性的需求越来越迫切。尽管XML在一定程度上解决了结构异质性问题,OGC标准规范解决了语法异质性问题,但语义异质性问题仍然成为分布式环境下地理空间数据集成与互操作的最大障碍。本文提出了一种基于本体的网络地理空间数据集成方法:以本体思想对数据进行语义组织;结合OGC网络服务标准规范对数据进行服务语义发布;利用支持双向映射的混合本体模式来解决全局本体与各应用本体之间的冲突,实现数据的语义集成。通过海洋海岸带土地利用数据集成试验表明,本文方法不仅能够克服数据间语义异质性问题,并在很大程度上屏蔽了数据底层集成的复杂环节,使得数据集成过程简单、高效。     

地理空间数据本质特征语义相关度计算模型

关联数据是跨网域整合多源异构地理空间数据的有效方式,语义丰富的关联是准确、快速发现目标数据的关键。根据地理空间数据在空间、时间、内容上的语义关系,提出地理空间数据本质特征语义相关度计算模型。通过构建本质特征的关联指标体系,分层次逐级计算地理空间数据的语义相关度。与传统的语义相关度计算方式不同,以地理元数据为语料库,充分考虑地理空间数据的特点及空间、时间、内容在检索中不同的重要程度,分别采用几何运算、数值运算、词语语义相似度计算和类别层次相关度计算的方式,构建地理空间数据的语义相关度计算模型。该模型具有构建简单、适用于多源异构数据、充分结合了数学运算和专家经验知识等特点。实验表明：模型能够有效地计算地理空间数据本质特征的语义相关度,并具备一定的扩展性。     

Automatic placement of GIS vector map annotation in area feature by long-diagonal

IntroductionMap is a graphics expression of spatial infor-mation. Map language includes map symbolwhose basic languageis graphics ,and map anno-tation as nature language (letters) . Map annota-tion plays an i mportant role in computer aidedcartography and GIS.It is a complementarityformap graphics and makes the map hold richer in-formation[1].Map annotation is one of the international ar-duous problemsin automatic map generalization.With the development of computer technology ,the automatic …     

Data structures for three-dimensional spatial information systems in geology

Abstract

The accumulation of geological information in digital form, due to modern exploration methods, has introduced the possibility of applying geographical information system technology to the field of geology. To achieve the benefits in information management and in data analysis and interpretation, however, it will be necessary to develop spatial models and associated data structures which are specifically designed for working in three dimensions. Some progress in this direction has already been demonstrated, with the application of octree spatial subdivision techniques to the storage of uniform volume elements representing mineral properties. By imposing octree tessellations on more precisely-defined geometric data, such as triangulated surfaces and polygon line segments, it may now be possible to combine efficient spatial addressing with topologically-coded boundary representations of geological strata. The development of storage schemes capable of representing such geological boundary models at different scales poses a particular problem, a possible solution to which may be by means of hierarchical classification of the vertices of triangulated surfaces according to shape contribution.     

基于语义类型本体的地名组配查询

地名查询方式多种多样,但它们都没有考虑地名语义类型因素,而语义类型恰恰是地名信息中相当重要的一部分。以地名语义分类为基础,构建了地名语义类型本体模型,并以郑州市为例进行了地名组配查询实验。结果表明,该方式对于检索地名的相关信息具有较好的辅助作用,为地名查询与检索作了有益的补充。     

数字调绘系统在基础测绘生产中的应用

近年来,我院开展以“采编一体、内外一体、图库一体”为核心的信息化测绘生产体系建设,航测生产流程再造工作是关键所在。这就要求航测外业调绘要满足内外一体化的要求,实现外业调绘信息的快速、高效录入,减少繁琐作业环节（编辑打印调绘片、外业清绘调绘片、内业转绘调绘成果）实现外业调绘信息的数字化,这也是提高生产效率和降低作业成本的核心技术之一。针对野外测量生产信息化的薄弱环节,我院通过使用GEOWAY Fielder数字调绘系统,大大提高了野外调绘的工作效率,解决了新增地物标绘的精度问题,为数字化图生产与建库的前端数据采集提供了新方法。本文主要介绍了GEOWAY Fielder数字调绘系统在我院基础测绘1∶10000数字线划图生产中的应用,总结出数字调绘系统定位精度及数字调绘系统的优势和实际应用中应注意的问题。     

Distributed geospatial information processing: sharing distributed geospatial resources to support Digital Earth

Abstract

This paper introduces a new concept, distributed geospatial information processing (DGIP), which refers to the process of geospatial information residing on computers geographically dispersed and connected through computer networks, and the contribution of DGIP to Digital Earth (DE). The DGIP plays a critical role in integrating the widely distributed geospatial resources to support the DE envisioned to utilise a wide variety of information. This paper addresses this role from three different aspects: 1) sharing Earth data, information, and services through geospatial interoperability supported by standardisation of contents and interfaces; 2) sharing computing and software resources through a GeoCyberinfrastructure supported by DGIP middleware; and 3) sharing knowledge within and across domains through ontology and semantic searches. Observing the long-term process for the research and development of an operational DE, we discuss and expect some practical contributions of the DGIP to the DE.