星云中继假说:星云中的原始生命和地球生命的起源（英文）

提出了关于地球生命起源的新模型—星云中继假说,它是宇宙胚种论的修改版本.在这个模型中,作为宇宙"种子"的原始生命起源于太阳系的前身恒星系统中的生物化学过程,并且在前身恒星死亡后充满整个原太阳星云.地球生命的起源可以分为3个阶段:太阳前身恒星的原始生命起源,原太阳星云时期和太阳系形成与地球生命时期.这个模型最主要的推论是原始生命(或其后裔)以及它们的化石存在于太阳系内各种天体之中.     

太阳系早期的短寿期放射性核素

较详细地介绍全新的太阳系起源理论——X-wind模式,天体化学实验发现太阳系早期存在大量的短寿期放射性核素(半衰期小于100Ma),这些核素对太阳系的形成和演化有重要的影响,一种理论认为,这些核素是在恒星内部合成,并由星风注入原太阳分子云,星风产生的激波诱发分子云核的塌缩而形成原太阳,另一种理论认为,这些核素是高能粒子与原太阳分子云或太阳星云中的气体和尘埃相互作用的产物。     

吸积盘与恒星在星云盘中形成时的角动量损失

本文根据吸秘盘理论与天文观测结果,给出一个恒星在星云盘中形成的模型.通过计算角动量方程,获得了质量定常分布ρ(r)～r_(-β)(β=0,1,2)时的一般性解.对1M恒星的数值解表明:恒星在转动磁化的星云盘中形成时,角动量确实发生了巨大转移;并且,β=2的解能较满意地解释太阳系的角动量奇异性.     

银河系化学元素的丰度特征和合成图像(Ⅱ):太阳系原始同位素丰度异常及其解释

太阳系原始同位素组成是研究太阳系起源和演化的基础。评述了太阳星云的原始放射性核素丰度特征及解释此丰度特征的分子云自增丰模型、AGB星污染模型和散裂反应模型。陨石包体中前太阳矿物颗粒的同位素组成异常表明,前太阳颗粒中低密度石墨、X型碳硅石可能来源于超新星爆发,而AGB星或红巨星被认为是尖晶石和碳硅石的最可能的恒星来源。太阳系中比较特殊的氖和氙的同位素组成异常也与超新星爆发密切相关。     

银河系化学元素的丰度特征和合成图像（II）：太阳系原始同位素丰度？…

太阳系原始同位素组成是研究太阳系起源和演经的基础,评述了太阳星云的原始放射性核素丰度特征及解释此丰度特征的分子云自增丰模型,ＡＧＢ星污染模型和散裂反应模型,阴石包体中前太阳矿物颗粒的同位素组成异常表明,前太阳颗粒只氏密度石墨,Ｘ型碳硅石可能来源于超新星爆发,而ＡＧＢ星或红巨星被认为尖晶石和碳硅石的最可能的恒星来源,太阳系中比较特殊的氖和氙的同位素组成异常出现与超新星爆发密切相关。     

行星状星云的形状与环绕的伴星有关

有迹象表明,实际上所有的中、高金属度恒星都环绕着某种东西。天文学家是通过观察恒星膨胀的气体遗迹得出这一推论的。以色列海法大学索科尔认为一颗濒死恒星在经历红巨星阶段后抛射的行星状星云的形状揭示了它的轨道伴星的大小和本原。 行星状星云是宇宙中最漂亮的     

星云之谜

在晴朗的夜空中,人们除了可以看到白茫茫的银河,还会常常看到一些模糊暗淡、宛如白色云雾的“云雾状天体”,1694年,荷兰天文学家惠更斯把它命名为“星云”。1755年康德指出：“星云”和银河系一样,可能是由众多恒星组成的巨大天体系统,在浩瀚的太空中,存在着无数这样的天体系统。19世纪中叶,德国科学家洪堡把这种天体系统形象地比喻为宇宙中的小岛,他将德文welt（宇宙）和insel（岛）连用,起名为weltinsel,即宇宙岛。     

太阳系的角动量分佈

任何有关太阳系起源的学说都必须能够说明太阳系角动量分布的特殊性,这种特殊性首先由傅歇于1884年指出来.拉普拉斯的星云假说未能说明这种特殊性.本世纪开始以来,先后提出的各种学说都注意到这个问题,但是都未能满意地说明它.最近十多年来,有关行星和卫星的各种数据有了相当多的增添和改进,恒星和行星内部结构的研究有了很大的进展,使得有可能得出太阳和各个行星的自转角动量的较可靠的数值.本工作的目的就是利用最新的数据来计算太阳系各天体的角动量,为太阳系起源问题的研究提供资料.     

猎户座大星云区116个星的照相观测

猎户座大星云以及和它相联系的 O 星协和 T 星协的研究有重大的意义.猎户座大星云似乎是最丰富,并且离我们最近的大质量气体麈埃星云之一,其中有种类极多的各种恒星.猎户座大星云区的变星非常富有 T 星协的特征,而且数目非常多,因此不止一次地成为观测对象.但是,如果不算猎户座 T 星,则这些变星中还没有一个具有比较长时期的、数量足够多的观测资料.从巴连那果的巨大研究可以看出,对于某些恒星,他本     

天体运动的轨道偏心率研究概述---从恒星系统到行星系统

偏心率是描述天体运动轨道的重要参数之一, 能够为揭示天体的动力学演化提供重要线索, 进而帮助理解天体形成与演化的过程及背后的物理机制. 随着天文观测技术的不断发展, 人们对于天体运动轨道的研究已经走出太阳系, 包含的系统也从大质量端的恒星系统延伸到了低质量端的行星系统. 聚焦天体轨道偏心率研究, 回顾了目前在恒星系统(包括主序恒星、褐矮星以及致密星)和行星系统(包括太阳系外巨行星以及``超级地球''、``亚海王星''等小质量系外行星)方面取得的进展, 总结了不同尺度结构下偏心率研究的一些共同之处和待解决的问题. 并结合当下和未来的相关天文观测设备和项目, 对未来天体轨道偏心率方面的研究工作进行了展望.     

3. Solar System Formation and Early Evolution: the First 100 Million Years

The solar system, as we know it today, is about 4.5 billion years old. It is widely believed that it was essentially completed 100 million years after the formation of the Sun, which itself took less than 1 million years, although the exact chronology remains highly uncertain. For instance: which, of the giant planets or the terrestrial planets, formed first, and how? How did they acquire their mass? What was the early evolution of the “primitive solar nebula” (solar nebula for short)? What is its relation with the circumstellar disks that are ubiquitous around young low-mass stars today? Is it possible to define a “time zero” (t ₀), the epoch of the formation of the solar system? Is the solar system exceptional or common? This astronomical chapter focuses on the early stages, which determine in large part the subsequent evolution of the proto-solar system. This evolution is logarithmic, being very fast initially, then gradually slowing down. The chapter is thus divided in three parts: (1) The first million years: the stellar era. The dominant phase is the formation of the Sun in a stellar cluster, via accretion of material from a circumstellar disk, itself fed by a progressively vanishing circumstellar envelope. (2) The first 10 million years: the disk era. The dominant phase is the evolution and progressive disappearance of circumstellar disks around evolved young stars; planets will start to form at this stage. Important constraints on the solar nebula and on planet formation are drawn from the most primitive objects in the solar system, i.e., meteorites. (3) The first 100 million years: the “telluric” era. This phase is dominated by terrestrial (rocky) planet formation and differentiation, and the appearance of oceans and atmospheres.     

Interstellar Grains as Amino Acid Factories and the Origin of Life

Some two decades ago, Hoyle and Wickramasinghe (1976) proposed that the physical conditions inside dense molecular clouds favour the formation of amino acids and complex organic polymers. There now exists both astronomical and laboratory evidence supporting this idea. Recent millimeter array observations have discovered the amino acid glycine (NH₂CH₂COOH) in the gas phase of the dense star-forming cloud Sagittarius B2. These observations would pose serious problems for present-day theories of molecule formation in space because it is unlikely that glycline can form by the gas-phase reaction schemes normally considered for dense cloud chemistry. Several laboratory experiments suggest a new paradigm in which amino acids and other large organic molecules are chemically manufactured inside the bulk interior of icy grain mantles photoprocessed by direct and scattered ultraviolet starlight. Frequent chemical explosions of the processed mantles would eject large fragments of organic dust into the ambient cloud. Large dust fragments break up into smaller ones by sputtering and ultimately by photodissociation of individual molecules. Hence, a sizeable column density (N≈ 10¹⁰−10¹⁵ cm^-2) of amino acids would be present in the gaseous medium as a consequence of balancing the rate of supply from exploding mantles with the rate of molecule destruction. Exploding mantles can therefore solve the longstanding molecule desorption problem for interstellar dense cloud chemistry. A sizeable fraction of the organic dust population can survive destruction and seed primitive planetary systems throughout our galaxy with prebiological organic molecules needed for proteins and nucleic acids in living organisms. This possibility provides fresh grounds for a new version of the old panspermia hypothesis first introduced by Anaxagoras. It is shown that panspermia is more important than asteroid and cometary organic depositions onto primitive Earth. Furthermore, no appeal to Miller-Urey synthesis in a nonoxidizing atmosphere of primitive Earth is then needed to seed terrestrial life. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Origin of Life

The evolution of life has been a big enigma despite rapid advancements in the field of astrobiology, microbiology and genetics in recent years. The answer to this puzzle is as mindboggling as the riddle relating to evolution of the universe itself. Despite the fact that panspermia has gained considerable support as a viable explanation for origin of life on the earth and elsewhere in the universe, the issue, however, remains far from a tangible solution. This paper examines the various prevailing hypotheses regarding origin of life-like abiogenesis, RNA world, iron–sulphur world and panspermia, and concludes that delivery of life-bearing organic molecules by the comets in the early epoch of the earth alone possibly was not responsible for kick-starting the process of evolution of life on our planet.     

Gas capture and rare gas retention by accreting planets in the solar nebula

In this paper, the physico-chemical effects of the nebula gas on the planets are reviewed from a standpoint of planetary formation in the solar nebula.The proto-Earth growing in the nebula was surrounded by a primordial atmosphere with a solar chemical composition and solar isotopic composition. When the mass of the proto-Earth was greater than 0.3 times the present Earth mass, the surface was molten because of the blanketing effect of the atmosphere. Therefore, the primordial rare gasses contained in the primordial atmosphere dissolved into the molten Earth material without fractionation and in particular the dissolved neon is expected to be conserved in the present Earth material. Hence, if dissolved neon with a solar isotopic ratio is discovered in the Earth material, it will indicate that the Earth was formed in the nebula and that the dissolved rare gases were one of the sources which degassed to form the present atmosphere.     

Accumulation processes in the primitive solar nebula

Particle accumulation processes are discussed for a variety of physical environments, ranging from the collapse phase of an interstellar cloud to the different parts of the models of the primitive solar nebula constructed by Cameron and Pine. Because of turbulence in the collapsing interstellar gas, it is concluded that interstellar grains accumulate into bodies with radii of a few tens of centimeters before the outer parts of the solar nebula are formed. These bodies can descend quite rapidly through the gas toward midplane of the nebula, and accumulation to planetary size can occur in a few thousand years. Substantial modifications of these processes take place in the outer convection zone of the solar nebula, but again it is concluded that bodies in that zone can grow to planetary size in a few thousand years.From the discussion of the interstellar collapse phase it is concluded that the angular momentum of the primitive solar nebula was predominantly of random turbulent origin, and that it is plausible that the primitive solar nebula should have possessed satellite nebulae in highly elliptical orbits. It is proposed that the comets were formed in these satellite nebulae.A number of other detailed conclusions are drawn from the analysis. It is shown to be plausible that an iron-rich planet should be formed in the inner part of the outer nebular convection zone. Discussions are given of the processes of planetary gas accretion, the formation of satellites, the T Tauri solar wind, and the dissipation of excess condensed material after the nebular gases have been removed by the T Tauri solar wind. It is shown that the present radial distances of the planets (but not Bode's Law) should be predicted reasonably well by a solar nebula model intermediate between the uniform and linear cases of Cameron and Pine.     

What was the Volatile Composition of the Planetesimals that Formed the Earth?

Is there an asteroid type or meteorite class that best exemplifies the materials that went into the Earth? Carbonaceous chondrites were once the objects of choice, and in the minds of many this choice is still valid. However, the origin of primitive chondritic meteorites is unclear. At the extremes they could either be fragments of very small parent bodies that never became hot enough to undergo geochemical modification other than mild lithification, or remnants of the uppermost layers of a body that had undergone a significant degree of internal differentiation, while the top layers remained cool due to radiative heat loss or loss of volatiles to space. This latter case is problematic if one considers these objects as precursors to the Earth since the timescale for the evolution of such a small body could be longer than the timescale for the accretion of the Earth. Large-scale circulation of materials in the primitive solar nebula could greatly increase the diversity of materials near 1 AU while also making the entire inner solar system both more homogeneous and much wetter than previously expected. The total mass of the nebula is an important, but poorly constrained factor controlling the growth of planetesimals. There is also a selection effect that dominates our sampling of the planetesimals that may have existed 4.5 billion years ago; namely, small fragile bodies are more likely to be lost from the system or ground down by collisions between small bodies, yet these are precisely those that may have dominated the population from which the Earth accreted. The composition of these aggregates could have played a very important role in the early chemical evolution of the Earth. In particular, the Earth may have been much wetter and richer in hydrocarbons and other reducing materials than previously suspected.     

Primodial retention of carbon by the terrestrial planets

Chemical equilibrium calculations on the stability of pure and dissolved graphite and cohenite (Fe₃C), several other carbides, and several carbonates have been carried out for a system with solar elemental abundances over a very wide range of temperature and pressure. The calculated abundances of condensed carbon compounds are similar to the observed inventories on Earth and Venus, but fully 10 times smaller than the minimum carbon abundance found in ordinary chondrites. The total carbon content of most iron meteorites is compatible with their origin as a cooling FeNiCSP solution which was saturated with dissolved carbon at the solidus, such as would be produced by melting an ordinary chondrite, not by direct condensation from or equilibrium with the primitive solar nebula. It is argued that the carbon content of Mars need not be appreciably greater than that of the Earth. Material with even lower formation temperatures than Mars, such as the primitive material in the asteroid belt, may retain substantially more carbon as disequilibrium polymeric organic matter, possibly by the Fischer-Tropsch mechanism favored by Anders. Carbonates are not found as equilibrium products in a solar-composition system, and are probably secondary alteration products. CaCO₃ might, however, persist in a solar-composition gas at temperatures below 460°K and pressures below 10^?6.6 bar. The most stable condensed carbon compounds are found to be graphite, Fe₃C, and possibly TiC, all in solid solution in the metal phase.     

Origin of the atmospheres of the terrestrial planets

The monotonic decrease in the atmospheric abundance of ³⁶Ar per gram of planet in the sequence, Venus, Earth, and Mars has been assumed to reflect some conditions in the primitive solar nebula at the time of formation of the planetary atmospheres, having to do either with the composition of the nebula itself or the composition of the trapped gases in small solid bodies in the nebula. Behind such hypotheses lies the assumption that planetary atmospheres steadily gain components. However, not only can gases enter atmospheres; they may also be lost from atmospheres both by adsorption into the planetary interior and by loss into space as a result of collisions with minor and major planetesimals. In this paper a necessarily qualitative discussion is given of the problem of collisions with minor planetesimals, a process called atmospheric cratering or atmospheric erosion, and a discussion is given of atmospheric loss accompanying collision of a planet with a major planetesimal, such as may have produced the Earth's Moon.     

Progress towards the vindication of panspermia

Theories of panspermia are rapidly coming into vogue, with the possibility of the transfer of viable bacterial cells from one planetary abode to another being generally accepted as inevitable. The panspermia models of Hoyle and Wickramasinghe require the transfer of viable bacterial cells from interstellar dust to comets and back into interplanetary and interstellar space. In such a cycle a viable fraction of as little as 10^-18 at the inception of a newly formed comet/planet system suffices for cometary panspermia to dominate over competing processes for the origin and transfer of life. The well-attested survival attributes of microbes under extreme conditions, which have recently been discovered, gives credence to the panspermia hypothesis. The prediction of the theory that comets bring microbes onto the Earth at the present time is testable if aseptic collections of stratospheric air above the tropopause can be obtained. We describe a recent collection of this kind and report microbiological analysis that shows the existence of viable cells at 41 km, falling to Earth at the rate of a few tonnes per day over the entire globe. Some of these cells have been cultured in the laboratory and found to include microorganisms that are not too different from related species on the Earth. This is in fact what the Hoyle-Wickramasinghe theory predicts. The weight of evidence goes against the more conservative explanation that organisms are being lofted to the high atmosphere from the ground. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

The Leonard Award Address Presented 1998 July 27, Dublin,Ireland: On the difficulties of making Earth-like planets

Abstract— Here I discuss the series of events that led to the formation and evolution of our planet to examine why the Earth is unique in the solar system. A multitude of factors are involved: These begin with the initial size and angular momentum of the fragment that separated from a molecular cloud; such random factors are crucial in determining whether a planetary system or a double star develops from the resulting nebula. Another requirement is that there must be an adequate concentration of heavy elements to provide the 2% “rock” and “ice” components of the original nebula. An essential step in forming rocky planets in the inner nebula is the loss of gas and depletion of volatile elements, due to early solar activity that is linked to the mass of the central star. The lifetime of the gaseous nebula controls the formation of gas giants. In our system, fine timing was needed to form the gas giant, Jupiter, before the gas in the nebula was depleted. Although Uranus and Neptune eventually formed cores large enough to capture gas, they missed out and ended as ice giants. The early formation of Jupiter is responsible for the existence of the asteroid belt (and our supply of meteorites) and the small size of Mars, whereas the gas giant now acts as a gravitational shield for the terrestrial planets. The Earth and the other inner planets accreted long after the giant planets, from volatile-depleted planetesimals that were probably already differentiated into metallic cores and silicate mantles in a gas-free, inner nebula. The accumulation of the Earth from such planetesimals was essentially a stochastic process, accounting for the differences among the four rocky inner planets—including the startling contrast between those two apparent twins, Earth and Venus. Impact history and accretion of a few more or less planetesimals were apparently crucial. The origin of the Moon by a single massive impact with a body larger than Mars accounts for the obliquity (and its stability) and spin of the Earth, in addition to explaining the angular momentum, orbital characteristics, and unique composition of the Moon. Plate tectonics (unique among the terrestrial planets) led to the development of the continental crust on the Earth, an essential platform for the evolution of Homo sapiens. Random major impacts have punctuated the geological record, accentuating the directionless course of evolution. Thus a massive asteroidal impact terminated the Cretaceous Period, resulted in the extinction of at least 70% of species living at that time, and led to the rise of mammals. This sequence of events that resulted in the formation and evolution of our planet were thus unique within our system. The individual nature of the eight planets is repeated among the 60-odd satellites—no two appear identical. This survey of our solar system raises the question whether the random sequence of events that led to the formation of the Earth are likely to be repeated in detail elsewhere. Preliminary evidence from the “new planets” is not reassuring. The discovery of other planetary systems has removed the previous belief that they would consist of a central star surrounded by an inner zone of rocky planets and an outer zone of giant planets beyond a few astronomical units (AU). Jupiter-sized bodies in close orbits around other stars probably formed in a similar manner to our giant planets at several astronomical units from their parent star and, subsequently, migrated inwards becoming stranded in close but stable orbits as “hot Jupiters”, when the nebula gas was depleted. Such events would prevent the formation of terrestrial-type planets in such systems.