第二届中国卫星导航学术年会（CSNC2011）（第一号通知）

中国卫星导航学术年会（China Satellite Navigation Conference,CSNC）是一个开放的学术交流平台。旨在加强学术创新,促进卫星导航系统的合作与交流．力Ⅱ强技术创新,促进卫星导航系统的工程建设;加强理论创新,促进卫星导航理论进步;加强应用创新,促进卫星导航产业的科学发展。     

第四怖中国卫星导航学术年会（CSNC 2013）征文通知（第1号通知）

中国卫星导航学术年会（China Satellite Navigation Conference,CSNC）是一个开垫的甓杰蕊蕊平台。旨在加强学术创新,促进卫星导航系统的合作与交流;加强技术创新,促进卫星导航系统酌工程建设;加强“囊理娩叫时新。促进卫星导航理论进步;加强应用创新,促进卫星导航产业的科学发展。     

北斗卫星导航系统简介

北斗卫星导航系统[BeiDou（COMPASS）Navigation Satellite System]是中国正在实施的自主发展、独立运行的全球卫星导航系统。系统建设目标是：建成独立自主、开放兼容、技术先进、稳定可靠的覆盖全球的北斗卫星导航系统,促进卫星导航产业链形成,形成完善的国家卫星导航应用产业支撑、推广和保障体系,推动卫星导航在国民经济社会各行业的广泛应用。     

第三届中国卫星导航学术年会(CSNC 2012)征文通知(第1号通知)

中国卫星导航学术年会(China Satellite Navigation Conference,CSNC)是一个开放的学术交流平台。旨在加强学术创新,促进卫星导航系统的合作与交流;加强技术创新,促进卫星导航系统的工程建设;加强理论创新,促进卫星导航理论进步;加强应用创新,促进卫星导航产业的科学发展。第三届中国卫星导航学术年会将于2012年5月在中国广州召开,涵盖学术交流、高端论坛、展览展示和科学普及等内容,欢迎国内外广大科技工作者及各界人士积极参加并向会议投稿。     

第四届中国卫星导航学术年会(CSNC 2013)征文通知(第1号通知)

中国卫星导航学术年会(China Satellite Navigation Conference,CSNC)是一个开放的学杰交流平台。旨在加强学术创新,促进卫星导航系统的合作与交流;加强技术创新,促进卫星导航系统的工程建设;加强理论创新,促进卫星导航理论进步;加强应用创新,促进卫星导航产业的科学发展。     

北斗卫星导航系统与测绘学科发展

<正>北斗导航开启了中国自主卫星导航事业,拓展了卫星导航的深度应用。北斗卫星导航系统以其导航、定位、授时及短文通信于一体,成为国际上别具特色的卫星导航系统,也成为中国测绘与导航发展的助推器。     

伪卫星技术及其在导航定位中的应用分析

卫星导航系统可以在任何时间、任何地点为用户提供导航服务,即只要用户能够接收到良好的卫星导航信号,就能确定自身的准确位置。但是当卫星工作异常或因受到建筑物或地形遮挡而信号不佳时,用户定位将受到很大影响。作为一种新型的导航定位技术,伪卫星技术应用于现有的卫星导航系统中,可以大大提高导航系统的定位精度、完备性和有效性。在论述伪卫星技术及其应用的同时,重点对伪卫星技术在已有导航系统星座几何布局改善、差分定位解算等方面进行了分析与验证,为我国卫星导航系统的后续建设及其应用拓展提出了建设性意见。     

第二届中国卫星导航学术年会会议议题说明

围绕卫星导航系统产业化发展的相关政策法规的壁垒、不足,结合北斗系统建设与应用推广的实际需求、卫星导航定位应用中的国家安全威胁及利益维护、工程化实践经验、管理心得工程建设管理的相关经验、产业化应用的标准体系建立等方面,开展交流研讨,推动我国卫星导航产业的国家政策、法规的健全和发展。     

基于BDS短报文服务的海流机-岸基通信

为了解决海流机海上作业的工况监测和海流机与岸基的远距离通信及数据传输困难等问题,选择将北斗卫星导航系统（BDS）应用到海流机在海上的定位和通信中. 分析海流特点和海流机的几种常见工况. 介绍基于北斗卫星导航系统-卫星无线电导航业务（BDS-RNSS）的海流机定位原理和BDS的短报文通信特点. 将“位拼接-LZW”双重数据压缩应用到短报文通信系统中. 设计一种适用于海流机通信的主控制系统并拟定海流机和岸上用户终端之间的通信方案,旨在提高通信效率和增大数据传输量.      

第三届中国卫星导航学术年会(CSNC2012)征文通知(第1号通知)

中国卫星导航学术年会(China Satellite Navigation Conference,CSNC)是一个开放的学术交流平台。旨在加强学术创新,促进卫星导航系统的合作与交流;加强技术创新,促进卫星导航系统的工程建     

Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed terrestrial reference frame

The International GNSS Service (IGS) contributes to the construction of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) by submitting time series of station positions and Earth Rotation Parameters (ERP). For the first time, its submission to the ITRF2008 construction is based on a combination of entirely reprocessed GPS solutions delivered by 11 Analysis Centers (ACs). We analyze the IGS submission and four of the individual AC contributions in terms of the GNSS frame origin and scale, station position repeatability and time series seasonal variations. We show here that the GPS Terrestrial Reference Frame (TRF) origin is consistent with Satellite laser Ranging (SLR) at the centimeter level with a drift lower than 1 mm/year. Although the scale drift compared to Very Long baseline Interferometry (VLBI) and SLR mean scale is smaller than 0.4 mm/year, we think that it would be premature to use that information in the ITRF scale definition due to its strong dependence on the GPS satellite and ground antenna phase center variations. The new position time series also show a better repeatability compared to past IGS combined products and their annual variations are shown to be more consistent with loading models. The comparison of GPS station positions and velocities to those of VLBI via local ties in co-located sites demonstrates that the IGS reprocessed solution submitted to the ITRF2008 is more reliable and precise than any of the past submissions. However, we show that some of the remaining inconsistencies between GPS and VLBI positioning may be caused by uncalibrated GNSS radomes.     

Timing and Positioning with GLONASS and GPS

Considering GLONASS as one of the pillars of the international Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), the Russian Federation works toward the integration of GLONASS with other navigation systems, cooperates with the internal user community, and contributes to the development and coordination of standards concerning GLONASS and the combined use of GLONASS and the global positioning system (GPS). This work is pursued in conformity with recommendations of respective international organizations. Most users recognize that the GLONASS/GPS combination has better characteristics in terms of availability, accuracy, integrity, and so on. However, the combined use of these satellite systems raises problems that must be addressed. This article reviews problems encountered when using two different navigation systems. Solutions developed thus far are outlined. The potential of GLONASS and approaches for high accuracy UTC time transfer are discussed. The transformation between the WGS 84 and PZ 90 reference frames and their conformity with the international terrestrial reference frame (ITRF) is considered. Various solutions are viewed in connections with recommendations made by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), the Global Navigation Satellite System Panel (GNSP), and the Consultative Committee for Definition of the Second (CCDS) concerning the desirability of using either or both systems interchangeably. ? 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

DORIS Contribution to ITRF2005

We examine the contribution of the Doppler Orbit determination and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS) technique to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF2005) by evaluating the quality of the submitted solutions as well as that of the frame parameters, especially the origin and the scale. Unlike the previous versions of the ITRF, ITRF2005 is constructed with input data in the form of time-series of station positions (weekly for satellite techniques and daily for VLBI) and daily Earth orientation parameters (EOPs), including full variance–covariance information. Analysis of the DORIS station positions’ time-series indicates an internal precision reaching 15 mm or better, at a weekly sampling. A cumulative solution using 12 years of weekly time-series was obtained and compared to a similar International GNSS Service (IGS) GPS solution (at 37 co-located sites) yielding a weighted root mean scatter (WRMS) of the order of 8 mm in position (at the epoch of minimum variance) and about 2.5 mm/year in velocity. The quality of this cumulative solution resulting from the combination of two individual DORIS solutions is better than any individual solution. A quality assessment of polar motion embedded in the contributed DORIS solutions is performed by comparison with the results of other space-geodetic techniques and in particular GPS. The inferred WRMS of polar motion varies significantly from one DORIS solution to another and is between 0.5 and 2 mas, depending on the strategy used and in particular estimating or not polar motion rate by the analysis centers. This particular aspect certainly needs more investigation by the DORIS Analysis Centers.     

Assessment of the possible contribution of space ties on-board GNSS satellites to the terrestrial reference frame

The realization of the international terrestrial reference frame (ITRF) is currently based on the data provided by four space geodetic techniques. The accuracy of the different technique-dependent materializations of the frame physical parameters (origin and scale) varies according to the nature of the relevant observables and to the impact of technique-specific errors. A reliable computation of the ITRF requires combining the different inputs, so that the strengths of each technique can compensate for the weaknesses of the others. This combination, however, can only be performed providing some additional information which allows tying together the independent technique networks. At present, the links used for that purpose are topometric surveys (local/terrestrial ties) available at ITRF sites hosting instruments of different techniques. In principle, a possible alternative could be offered by spacecrafts accommodating the positioning payloads of multiple geodetic techniques realizing their co-location in orbit (space ties). In this paper, the GNSS–SLR space ties on-board GPS and GLONASS satellites are thoroughly examined in the framework of global reference frame computations. The investigation focuses on the quality of the realized physical frame parameters. According to the achieved results, the space ties on-board GNSS satellites cannot, at present, substitute terrestrial ties in the computation of the ITRF. The study is completed by a series of synthetic simulations investigating the impact that substantial improvements in the volume and quality of SLR observations to GNSS satellites would have on the precision of the GNSS frame parameters.     

Combination of GNSS and SLR observations using satellite co-locations

Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) observations to Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) satellites may be used for several purposes. On one hand, the range measurement may be used as an independent validation for satellite orbits derived solely from GNSS microwave observations. On the other hand, both observation types may be analyzed together to generate a combined orbit. The latter procedure implies that one common set of orbit parameters is estimated from GNSS and SLR data. We performed such a combined processing of GNSS and SLR using the data of the year 2008. During this period, two GPS and four GLONASS satellites could be used as satellite co-locations. We focus on the general procedure for this type of combined processing and the impact on the terrestrial reference frame (including scale and geocenter), the GNSS satellite antenna offsets (SAO) and the SLR range biases. We show that the combination using only satellite co-locations as connection between GNSS and SLR is possible and allows the estimation of SLR station coordinates at the level of 1–2 cm. The SLR observations to GNSS satellites provide the scale allowing the estimation of GNSS SAO without relying on the scale of any a priori terrestrial reference frame. We show that the necessity to estimate SLR range biases does not prohibit the estimation of GNSS SAO. A good distribution of SLR observations allows a common estimation of the two parameter types. The estimated corrections for the GNSS SAO are 119 mm and −13 mm on average for the GPS and GLONASS satellites, respectively. The resulting SLR range biases suggest that it might be sufficient to estimate one parameter per station representing a range bias common to all GNSS satellites. The estimated biases are in the range of a few centimeters up to 5 cm. Scale differences of 0.9 ppb are seen between GNSS and SLR.     

INS辅助的实时动态GNSS单频周跳探测

采用全球卫星导航系统（Global Navigation Satellite System，GNSS）模糊度固定解可提高GNSS/惯性导航系统（inertial navigation system，INS）组合导航定位精度，而在复杂环境下，单频GNSS难以实现完善的实时动态周跳探测，影响GNSS模糊度保持。研究了星间单差与站星双差的INS辅助GNSS单频周跳探测检验量，重点分析检验量的误差特性。分析得出检验量误差主要与INS增量误差有关，受接收机至待检星与参考星之间星地矢量夹角的影响。提出了选取两颗参考星并优选探测检验量的方法，降低方位角因素的影响，提高周跳探测性能。周跳探测的阈值在滑动窗口内估计，对INS误差被GNSS误差淹没的部分进行抑制，充分反映INS误差影响，阈值估计具有较强的自适应性。     

On the short-term temporal variations of GNSS receiver differential phase biases

As a first step towards studying the ionosphere with the global navigation satellite system (GNSS), leveling the phase to the code geometry-free observations on an arc-by-arc basis yields the ionospheric observables, interpreted as a combination of slant total electron content along with satellite and receiver differential code biases (DCB). The leveling errors in the ionospheric observables may arise during this procedure, which, according to previous studies by other researchers, are due to the combined effects of the code multipath and the intra-day variability in the receiver DCB. In this paper we further identify the short-term temporal variations of receiver differential phase biases (DPB) as another possible cause of leveling errors. Our investigation starts by the development of a method to epoch-wise estimate between-receiver DPB (BR-DPB) employing (inter-receiver) single-differenced, phase-only GNSS observations collected from a pair of receivers creating a zero or short baseline. The key issue for this method is to get rid of the possible discontinuities in the epoch-wise BR-DPB estimates, occurring when satellite assigned as pivot changes. Our numerical tests, carried out using Global Positioning System (GPS, US GNSS) and BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS, Chinese GNSS) observations sampled every 30 s by a dedicatedly selected set of zero and short baselines, suggest two major findings. First, epoch-wise BR-DPB estimates can exhibit remarkable variability over a rather short period of time (e.g. 6 cm over 3 h), thus significant from a statistical point of view. Second, a dominant factor driving this variability is the changes of ambient temperature, instead of the un-modelled phase multipath.     

几种精密卫星钟差加密方法的比较与分析

卫星钟差是影响GPS高精度单点定位的一个重要因素,通过分析几种加密GPS精密卫星钟差的方法,将加密结果与GFZ(German Research Centre for Geosciences)提供的数据进行比较,并通过精度分析,得出分段线性插值法是加密GPS精密卫星钟差一种较为可靠的方法。     

Android智能手机GNSS数据质量分析

随着全球卫星导航系统(GNSS)的不断建设,智能手机基于移动位置服务 (LBS)得到了迅猛发展. 文中选取市面上常见的3种手机机型,包括:三星S9+(Exynos)、华为Mate30和华为P40 Pro作为研究对象,并使用北斗星通UR4B0-D高性能GNSS接收机进行同步静态观测实验,从卫星可见数、载噪比(CNR)、卫星高度角和多路径误差等方面,对手机GNSS数据质量进行分析. 结果表明:不同型号手机在观测能力和数据质量方面存在明显差异. Android智能手机的GNSS数据质量较差,CNR较小,且CNR与卫星高度角无明显关系. 此外,多路径误差是影响Android智能手机高精度定位的主要误差项之一.      

Locata定位系统的时间同步机制

Locata系统是一种新型的高精度地基定位系统,它既可以与现有的全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)无缝对接,也可以在卫星信号失效时独立提供定位服务。Locata系统的定位精度可以达到厘米级,其关键技术是高精度(纳秒级)的时间同步技术。文中通过分析Locata系统的定位原理,对Locata系统独特的时间同步技术进行了研究,详细描述了其时间同步机制和技术实现方案,并给出了时间同步的具体流程和步骤。该研究可为我国研制地基伪卫星定位系统提供参考。