峨眉山玄武岩分布区内铂族元素异常分析及其找矿远景预测

区域地球化学填图成果表明，在中国西南川-滇-黔交界地区存在一个与产出规模巨大的峨眉山玄武岩分布范围相吻合的Pt，Pd地球化学巨省。作为地幔热柱成因的峨眉山玄武岩的铂族元素丰度虽略有偏高，但玄武岩中铂族元素很难形成可以利用的铂族矿物，故该异常是“非找矿异常”。在该区内寻找铂族元素矿床应在基性岩-超基性岩体出露较多的中岩区南段，注意沿循已知的矿床、矿化或较小型基性岩侵入体，将矿区(或岩体)的整体地质特征、地球化学特征等与典型的岩浆型铂族元素矿床相比较，进而研究、预测本矿区或本岩体的铂族元素成矿的可能性及远景规模等，寻找岩浆型铂族元素矿床，而在岩浆型矿床的周边地质体内注意寻找热液型铂族元素矿床。     

云南铂族元素找矿基础问题

云南省铂族元素矿床成矿地质条件较好，已有不少已知矿床、矿点、找矿信息及地球化学异常。找矿重点以基性超基性岩型为主，也应考虑其它类型，如热液型、黑色页岩型、煤岩型等。找矿重点地区除在峨眉山玄武岩分布区及其周边外，应注意康滇地轴中部及边缘中新生代断裂带通过的地区。峨眉山玄武岩分布区外围的卡林型金矿和浅成低温热液型矿床分布区亦值得重视，如滇东南地区。此外，寒武系黑色岩系及含磷层位的含铂性是一个具有挑战性的新课题，值得加强研究。云南铂族元素矿床的成矿时代，可能从元古代到新生代均有，对云南找铂来说非常有利，其它省区无法与之相比。新生代构造可能将深埋的矿体错动到浅部，找矿中需要特别注意。不妨“沿河找矿”。第四纪的风化壳中是否有铂族元素的富集也可探索。     

基于GIS的攀西地区铂族元素成矿地质条件初步分析

攀西地区以良好的铂族元素(PGE)成矿地质背景，而成为我国铂族元素找矿热点地区之一。本文在建立攀西地区铂族元素矿床地质概念模型的基础上，用地理信息系统(GIS)分析了该地区的铂族元素成矿地质条件，包括地质构造、峨眉山玄武岩、基性一超基性岩和铂族元素地球化学异常特征。指出研究区的深大断裂对铂族元素的富集表现出很好的控制作用，峨眉山玄武岩为铂族元素的矿源层之一，岩浆岩为铂族元素的富集提供了成矿物质及成矿能量。     

基于SAMCF法的攀西地区水系沉积物铂族元素异常提取

攀西地区是我国重要的铂族元素地球化学省,具良好的铂族元素(PGE)成矿地质条件;攀枝花-西昌一带有一个与峨眉山玄武岩分布范围基本吻合的Pt、Pd区域地球化学异常。本文根据不同地层单元水系沉积物中Pt、Pd元素地球化学特征,用子区中位数衬值滤波(SAMCF)法提取铂族元素异常,圈出多处Pt、Pd衬值异常区。结合有关铂族元素矿床地球化学特征,通过水系沉积物中Pt、Pd综合异常的筛选,初步优选出8个铂族元素异常找矿远景区和19个Ⅱ类异常区,为进一步开展铂族矿床找矿提供依据。     

攀西地区铂族元素矿床研究新进展

中国西南都峨眉山玄武岩分布地区由于受到了古生代峨眉地幔柱的强烈影响而具有良好的寻找铂族元素矿床的成矿条件,以往曾经勘探了四川的杨柳坪和云南的金宝山两个大型铂族元素矿床。近年来又发现了许多铂族元素矿化点和矿点。最近,笔者在承担地质大调查项目(“铂钯等新类型矿产资源勘查技术方法、成矿规律与资源潜力研究”)及国土     

黔西地区峨眉山玄武岩（东岩区）铂族元素地球化学特征

利用同位素稀释-等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)方法测定了黔西水域、威宁等地的东岩区峨眉山玄武岩的铂族元素含量。结果表明，相对于原始地幔，东岩区峨眉山玄武岩的铂族元素发生了较强的分异作用，Os、Ir、Ru、Rh亏损，Pd、Pt发生富集，相对配分模式为Pd-Pt富集型；经球粒陨石及原始地幔标准化的铂族元素配分模式为向左陡倾斜型，具有陡的正斜率，Pd／Ir显著高于原始地幔、球粒陨石、原始上地幔等，而与地幔低度熔融形成的N-MORB、大陆拉斑玄武岩等接近，表明峨眉山玄武岩的物质来源为上地幔熔融程度偏低的玄武岩浆。     

中国铂族元素矿床类型和地质特征

根据成矿地质环境、容矿岩石类型、元素共生组合、矿床地质特征和成矿作用性质，将我国的铂族元素矿床划分为岩浆型、热液弄才外生型三大类型和九个亚类，而赋存于基性超基性岩体中的铜镍型铂族元素矿床是我国最重要的铂族元素矿床。     

峨眉山玄武岩的输送通道:云南元谋朱布岩体

朱布镁铁-超镁铁侵入岩赋存有中型硫化物铂族元素矿床。根据岩体大小和矿床储量的简单质量平衡计算，矿床的形成需要至少3000倍现存岩体体积的岩浆参与成矿，因此朱布岩体应该是峨眉山玄武岩的输送通道。岩体的年龄、地质特征、地球化学都支持这个结论。岩体的原始岩浆应该属于峨眉山高钛玄武岩。     

四川力马河镁铁-超镁铁质岩体的地球化学特征及成岩成矿分析

四川会理力马河镍矿是峨眉山大火成岩省最重要的岩浆硫化物矿床之一,成矿岩体为一小型锾铁-超镁铁岩侵入体,由含斜长石的超镁铁岩(包括舍长辉石橄榄岩和斜长橄榄辉石岩)和辉长岩类的镬铁质岩组成.矿床富含硫化物,成矿元素组合为铜、镍,铂族元素含量很低,没有铂族元素的工业富集,是蛾眉山大火成岩省中富铜镍贫铂族元素的代表性岩浆硫化物矿床.本文对力马河镍矿成矿岩体的镁铁、超镁铁岩及矿床中各种硫化物矿石进行了主量元素、微量元素及铂族元素含量分析.分析结果表明,力马河岩体的镁铁、超镁铁岩属拉斑玄武岩成因系列,岩石特征微量元素比值大致与高钛的峨眉山玄武岩相当、与低钛的峨眉山玄武岩有明显区分,但估计原始岩浆强不相容微量元素绝对含量大大低于高钛玄武岩,因此,其成矿岩体不是与一般的低钛或高钛峨眉山玄武岩(不包括苦橄岩在内)直接对应的深成相.岩体超镁铁岩及矿石铂族元素组成特征表现为无钌亏损的型式,钯/铱比值较小、在5左右,也显著不同于一般的峨眉山玄武岩,而类似于峨眉山大火成岩省苦橄岩的铂族元素组成.运用岩石地球化学研究方法计算,原始岩浆为苦橄质成分:MgO含量约17%、SiO2含量约48%.估计原始岩浆形成于130公里左右的深度,由类似于洋岛玄武岩岩浆源区成分的地幔经19%左右的部分熔融形成.超镁铁岩及硫化物矿石铂族元素含量一般在10-9～10-8暑级,铂族元素相对铜镍强烈亏损,铜/钯比值高于原始地幔10～100倍,铜镍铂族元素组成的原始地幔标准化曲线呈铂族元素显著亏损的“U“型.模式分析说明,导致铂族元素亏损的原因是岩浆成矿演化过程中多阶段硫化物熔离作用造成的,早期熔离出来的硫化物被丢失并造成岩浆中铂族元素亏损,其铂族元素亏损后的岩浆(第)二次硫化物熔离富集形成铂族元素亏损的矿石.     

贵州威宁地区峨眉山玄武岩型自然铜-辉铜矿矿床的成矿前景

贵州威宁一带产于峨眉山玄武岩中的自然铜．辉铜矿矿床（点）经过几十年研究，但在找矿勘探方面一直难以突破。本文从矿床地质特征、成矿物质来源出发，讨论了与成矿规律和成矿远景，认为矿化受夹层和断裂双重控制，成矿以后期热液改造作用为主。与基伟诺型矿床相比，玄武岩厚度不大及不连续分布、陆相地表喷发、埋藏深度不大、缺少成矿流体汇聚的构造条件是形成大矿的不利因素。在峨眉山玄武岩分布区内，玄武岩厚度巨大、构造应力集中的地区有可能找到中型规模以上的矿床。     

青海省铂族矿找矿方向探讨

根据铂族元素的成矿特征和青海省构造运动的多期性、继承性，复合叠加改造成矿作用明显及各种含铂岩石建造的分布特征，研究认为：在青海省内铂族元素矿产的找矿工作，不仅要重视寻找与基性一超基性岩有关铂矿，而且也要注意在黑色页岩型、热液型、红色造山建造中寻找含铜砂岩型等矿床的研究与评价。     

Metal sources for the polymetallic Ni–Mo–PGE mineralization in the black shales of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation,South China

Total organic carbon content (TOC), trace element and platinum-group element (PGE) concentrations were determined in the black shales of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in the Nayong area, Guizhou Province, South China, in order to study the polymetallic Ni–Mo–PGE mineralization. The results demonstrate that numerous elements are enriched in the polymetallic ores compared to those of the nearby black shale, particularly Ni, Mo, Zn, TOC and total PGE, which can reach up to 7.03 wt.%, 8.49 wt.%, 11.7 wt.%, 11.5 wt.% and 943 ppb, respectively. The elemental enrichment distribution patterns are similar to those in the Zunyi and Zhangjiajie areas except that the Nayong location is exceptionally enriched in Zn. Whereas positive correlations are observed between the ore elements of the polymetallic ores, no such correlations are observed in the black shale. These positively correlated metallic elements are classified into three groups: Co–Ni–Cu–PGE, Zn–Cd–Pb and Mo–Tl–TOC. The geological and geochemical features of these elements suggest that Proterozoic and Early Palaeozoic mafic and ultramafic rocks, dolomites and/or Pb–Zn deposits of the Neoproterozoic Dengying Formation and seawater could be the principal sources for Co–Ni–Cu–PGE, Zn–Cd–Pb, and Mo–Tl–TOC, respectively. Furthermore, the chondrite-normalized patterns of PGEs with Pd/Pt, Pd/Ir and Pt/Ir indicate that PGE enrichment of the polymetallic ores is most likely related to hydrothermal processes associated with the mafic rocks. In contrast, PGE enrichment in the black shale resembles that of the marine oil shale with terrigenous and seawater contributions. Our investigations of TOC, trace elements and PGE geochemistry suggest that multiple sources along with submarine hydrothermal and biological contributions might be responsible for the formation of the polymetallic Ni–Mo–PGE mineralization in the black shales of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation across southern China.     

Platinum-group elements in alpine-type ultramafic rocks and related chromite ores of the main ophiolite belt of the Urals

On the basis of a representative collection of ultramafic rocks and chromite ores and a series of technological samples from the largest (Central and Western) deposits in the Rai-Iz massif of the Polar Urals and the Almaz-Zhemchuzhina and Poiskovy deposits in the Kempirsai massif of the southern Urals, the distribution and speciation of platinum-group elements (PGE) in various type sections of mafic-ultramafic massifs of the Main ophiolite belt of the Urals have been studied. Spectral-chemical and spectrophotometric analyses were carried out to estimate PGE in 700 samples of ultramafic rocks and chromite ores; 400 analyses of minerals from rocks, ores, and concentrates and 100 analyses of PGE minerals (PGM) in chromite ores and concentrates were performed using an electron microprobe. Near-chondritic and nonchondritic PGE patterns in chromitebearing sections have been identified. PGE mineralization has been established to occur in chromite ore from all parts of the mafic-ultramafic massifs in the Main ophiolite belt of the Urals. The PGE deposits and occurrences discovered therein are attributed to four types (Kraka, Kempirsai, Nurali-Upper Neiva, and Shandasha), which are different in mode of geological occurrence, geochemical specialization, and placer-forming capability. Fluid-bearing minerals of the pargasite-edenite series have been identified for the first time in the matrix of chromite ore of the Kempirsai massif (the Almaz-Zhemchuzhina deposit) and Voikar-Syn’ya massif (the Kershor deposit). The PGE grade in various types of chromite ore ranges from 0.1–0.2 to 1–2 g/t or higher. According to technological sampling, the average PGE grade in the largest deposits of the southeastern ore field of the Kempirsai massif is 0.5–0.7 g/t. Due to the occurrence of most PGE as PGM 10–100 mm in size and the proved feasibility of their recovery into nickel alloys, chromites of the Kempirsai massif can be considered a complex ore with elevated and locally high Os, Ir, and Ru contents. The Nurali-Upper Neiva type of ore is characterized by small-sized primary deposits, which nevertheless are the main source of large Os-Ir placers in the Miass and Nev’yansk districts of the southern and central Urals, respectively.     

Lead isotopic systematics for native copperchalcocite mineralization in basaltic lavas of the Emeishan large igneous province, SW China： Implications for the source of copper

The Emeishan continental flood basalt, which is widespread in Yunnan, Guizhou and Sichuan provinces of Southwest China, is the volcanic product of a Permian mantle plume, and native copper-chalcocite mineralization associated with the basalt is very common in the border area of Yunnan and Guizhou provinces. The mineralization occurred in the tuff intercalation and terrestrial sedimentary rock intercalation which were formed during the main period of basalt eruption. The orebodies are controlled by the stratigraphic position and faults. Metal ore minerals in the ores are mainly native copper, chalcocite and tenorite, with small amounts of chalcopyrite, bomite, pyrite and malachite, and sometimes with large amounts of bitumen, carbon and plant debris. Several decades of ore deposits are distributed in the neighboring areas of the two provinces, while most of them are small-scale deposits or only ore occurrences. By comparing the lead isotopic composition of the ores with that of the wall-rocks, cover and basement rocks of various periods, the source of copper in this type of ore deposits was studied in this paper. The results showed that: (1) The Pb isotopic composition of the ores from ten deposits is absolutely different from that of sili-ceous-argillaceus rocks of the Upper Permian Xuanwei Formation, limestones of the Lower Permian Series and Carboniferous, Cambrian sandstone-shale and recta-sedimentary rock and dolomite from the upper part of the Meso-Proterozoic Kunyang Group, This indicates that ore lead was derived neither from the cover rock nor from the basement rocks; (2) Although the Neo-Proterozoic Siman dolomite and silicalite, and dolomite in the lower part of the Kunyang Group are similar in Pb isotopic composition to the ores, lead and copper contents in these rocks are very low and they have not made great contributions to copper mineralization; (3) The ores have the same Pb iso-topic composition as the basalt, the latter being enriched in copper. These facts indicate that lead and copper were derived from the basalt. According to the regional geological data and the geological-geochemical characteristics of the ore deposits, it is suggested that ore-forming materials were leached out from the basalt. The thickness and buried depth of the basalt and regional tectonic dynamics can affect the formation of large-scale copper deposits. Therefore, exploration for this type of ore deposits should be conducted in the areas from western Yunnan to western Sichuan, where there are developed basalts of great thickness, with extensive tectonic movement and magmatic activity.     

中国铂族金属资源现状与前景

本文简要叙述了我国对铂族金属资源量的需求、保证程度，并对比分析了各种类型铂族金属矿床的资源发展趋势；重点对我国攀西-滇中地区诺里尔斯克苦橄质火山-侵入岩型铜镍铂矿床、上扬子湘黔地区黑色页岩型钼镍铂矿床和四川会理构造蚀变岩型铂族元素矿床进行了资源前景分析，并认为极有可能在这几种类型中取得找矿突破，其中黑色页央和构造蚀变 型铂族金属矿床是近期发现的新类型矿床。     

湘西北天门山地区镍钼矿床铂族元素富集特征及成因探讨

本文从含矿岩系，矿体产状、元素组合和地球化学特征，论述大庸天门山地区下寒武统黑色岩系中镍钼矿床的铂族元素和稀土元素的含量和富集特征，并阐明成矿物质具有多来源，矿床成因类型属同生沉积多金属矿床，镍钼矿床是我国铂族元素矿床类型之一，稀土具有综合利用价值。     

南秦岭山阳—柞水矿集区夏家店金矿床微量-铂族元素地球化学特征及其对矿床成因的指示

夏家店金矿床位于南秦岭造山带内,是一个受构造和地层控制的大型金矿床,矿石类型为角砾岩型、碎裂岩型和石英脉型3种类型,赋矿围岩主要为寒武系水沟口组的炭泥质板岩、炭硅质板岩、硅质岩及白云岩,次为泥盆系西岔河组的角砾岩。本文对夏家店金矿床中矿石（角砾状炭硅质板岩、碎裂硅化白云岩、碎裂炭泥质板岩和石英脉状矿化的硅质岩）和围岩（硅质岩、硅化白云岩和硅质板岩）的微量元素、铂族元素（PGE）质量分数进行测试,进而探讨成矿物质来源以及矿床成因。结果表明：不同类型的矿石与其各自的围岩具有高度的相似性,均富集Sr、Ga、Zr等元素;不同类型的矿石稀土总量均高于各类围岩,但是两者具有相似的稀土配分模式,轻稀土富集,重稀土亏损,均表现出负Eu异常（δEu值为0.51~0.63）;不同类型的矿石PGE总量（7.71×10^-9~38.30×10^-9,平均值23.00×10^-9）均明显大于各类围岩PGE总量（1.28×10^-9~2.44×10^-9,平均值1.86×10^-9）,相比上地壳,不同类型的矿石均明显富集Os、Ir、Pt和Pd,亏损Ru、Rh,而各类围岩均富集Os,亏损Pt、Ru、Rh、Pd,但两者的铂族元素配分曲线具有高度相似性,呈Ru亏损的V型,为地壳的（Os）-Pt-Pd型配分模式。以上特征表明不同类型的矿石和围岩具有明显的微量、稀土元素和PGE地球化学继承性,暗示夏家店下寒武统有可能是重要的矿源层之一。同时,所有矿石和围岩的Au/Ir值（分别为4 821~299 666）和406~8 050）及Pd/Ir值（分别为16.9~588.0和15.2~47.5）变化范围均较大,两者Au/Ir值远高于炭质球粒陨石和原始地幔值、Pd/Ir值远高于岩浆成因矿石值,且夏家店金矿床矿石和围岩的PGE配分曲线与典型热液成因矿床一致。这些特征显示夏家店金矿床具有明显的热液成因,是构造-热液流体成矿作用的产物。     

铂族元素矿床地球化学勘查的战略和技术

最近10年，PGE地球化学勘查取得许多进展，在此对主要进展作一简短的评述。①通过对已知其它金属矿床的再认识和再评价，发现新类型PGE矿床；②通过对已知PGE矿床的地球化学勘查，发现新的找矿靶区；③在空白区通过PGE地球化学填图，发现规模巨大的PGE地球化学省或巨省，为寻找PGE矿床提供了直接的找矿信息。根据中国的具体情况提出了中国PGE地球化学勘查的战略目标是：采用迅速，掌握全局，逐步缩小靶区的找矿战略，力争用5-10a时间使PGE矿床找矿获得重大突破。部署工作应以西南Pt、Pd地球化学省、新-甘-青Pt     

激电测深法在南秦岭苏岭沟金矿区的勘查应用

探测了泥盆系地层覆盖地段Ⅰ号构造带和黑色含矿岩系在深部向西延伸及其倾向埋深展布情况。根据激电测深数据获得“低阻-高极化”特征的断面激电异常曲线图并结合地质资料,解译推测了深部含矿目标层及含矿构造空间赋存状况。经钻探验证,金矿化体位置与激电测深推断的极化率异常中心埋深基本吻合。