基于ARGO资料的MTSAT海温产品误差分析

利用全球海洋观测网计划ARGO浮标的表层海温测量值分析了MTSAT卫星的海温反演误差。结果显示,平均绝对误差为0.73℃,均方根误差为0.885℃,满足应用需要;海温反演异常点多分布在30°N以北的高纬区域。为了确保海温产品数据的可靠性,需要通过数据误差控制技术来检测和控制海表温度反演的异常值,影像边缘和高纬地区的区域数据应谨慎使用。     

卡尔曼滤波在卫星红外、微波海表温度数据融合中的应用

卫星红外波段测量海表温度具有空间分辨率高的优点,但受云的影响而导致数据空间覆盖率低;微波辐射计具有全天候、穿透性优势,但空间分辨率低,而且近岸区域受到陆地电磁波的干扰,不能反演有效的海表温度.由于单一卫星传感器获取的数据存在一定的局限性和差异性,因此根据不同卫星传感器的特点,将红外、微波传感器卫星数据进行数据融合具有重要的实际应用意义.卡尔曼滤波是一种最优化自回归数据处理算法,本文将卡尔曼滤波法应用于红外和微波卫星海表温度数据融合研究,给出全天候、高分辨率的海表温度.研究区域为西北太平洋区域:10°N～50°N,105°E～145°E,研究数据时间为2008年3月.     

西北太平洋红外辐射计海表温度数据交叉比对分析

本文将西北太平洋海域作为研究区域,以2003—2009年的三个海表温度(sea surface temperature,SST)红外产品(AVHRR Pathfinder/NOAA,MODIS/Terra和MODIS/Aqua)为研究对象,分别与Argo浮标数据进行了真实性检验,同时红外产品之间也进行了交叉比对分析。通过评定产品间的差异及使用条件,为融合产品数据源选取和权重分配提供参考依据,用以提高融合产品的数据质量。结果表明,三种红外数据与Argo浮标的平均偏差在±0.2°C之间,均方根误差小于0.8°C,且存在明显的季节性变化,白天的平均偏差均是夏季为正、冬季为负,夜间的平均偏差基本均为负偏差,冬季比夏季的偏差更大,冬季的均方根误差较小;三种红外数据之间的平均偏差在±0.1°C之间,均方根误差小于0.6°C;三个红外产品在空间上均能反映西北太平洋海域的海表温度变化趋势,三个产品之间无明显优劣差异;尽管红外数据的空间覆盖率偏低,但是它提供了高精度和高特征分辨率的数据产品,并弥补了近岸海域缺乏观测数据的不足。     

西北太平洋多源微波辐射计海表温度数据交叉比对分析

海表温度产品是研究全球海洋大气系统的重要数据源,在海洋相关领域的研究和应用方面具有重要价值。以西北太平洋海域为研究区域,本文对2013年和2014年3个微波辐射计海表温度产品(AMSR-2,TMI和WindSat)的产品特性和Argo浮标进行了真实性检验,并对3个传感器数据进行了交叉比对分析,具体涉及海表温度分布、温度梯度分布、观测点分布、匹配点分布、平均偏差分布、均方根误差分布、统计分析结果的逐月演变和海表温度误差棒分析。结果表明,3个微波辐射计在空间尺度上都能比较一致地反映西北太平洋海域的海表温度变化趋势。但遥感数据与浮标数据却存在季节性变化和昼夜差异,其中冬季微波数据与浮标数据的平均偏差和均方根误差较小,降轨数据与浮标数据的结果更接近。AMSR-2的海表温度数据质量比TMI和WindSat的海表温度数据更接近Argo数据。相比于WindSat和TMI,AMSR-2和TMI的海表温度数据质量更为接近,但是由于受到近岸陆地信号干扰,AMSR-2和TMI离岸100 km以内海域的数据应当慎用。     

HY-2卫星扫描微波辐射计数据反演北极海冰漂移速度

本文基于最大互相关法,利用海洋二号（HY-2）卫星扫描微波辐射计37 GHz通道多时相垂直极化亮温数据,获取了北极海冰漂移速度。采用2012年和2013年国际北极浮标计划海冰现场观测数据,对利用微波辐射计亮温资料反演的冬季北极海冰漂移速度进行了定量验证,结果表明:流速和流向均方根误差分别为1.12 cm/s和16.37°,从一定程度上说明了HY-2卫星扫描微波辐射计亮温数据反演海冰漂移速度的可行性。此外,使用美国国防气象卫星F-17搭载的专用微波成像仪91 GHz通道垂直极化亮温,采用高斯拉普拉斯滤波方法进行处理,结合最大互相关法反演的海冰漂移速度,优于法国海洋开发研究院海冰漂移速度产品。     

最新SMOS卫星海表盐度L3/4级产品的误差分析

选取SMOS任务的2个海洋盐度专家中心(法国的CATDS-CECOS和西班牙的BEC)的5种经过再处理的新版SSS L3/4产品作为研究对象,以Argo浮标资料及WOA09资料作为参考标准,对其误差特征进行了细致的分析比较,为将其同化到海洋模式中以及用于其它海洋学的分析应用研究,提供必要的参考。主要结论如下:SMOS年平均海表盐度场与WOA09资料很接近,一些已知的重要的分布形势都有所体现;大洋中部误差较小,近陆误差大;热带误差较小,高纬地区误差较大;三大洋中太平洋均方根误差最小。随着时空分辨率的降低,SMOS SSS资料的均方根误差显著减小。检验的几种资料中,CATDS/CEC-OS处理制作的月平均海表盐度L3级产品误差最小,全球平均均方根误差(RMSE)为0.314;另外几种高分辨率产品中,除由BEC制作的简单加权平均产品均方根误差最大,全球平均0.543以外,其他3种资料的均方根误差量级相当,差异不太明显,全球平均的RMSE为0.3~0.4;BEC的两种分析产品总体上RMSE更小。     

西北太平洋海表温度融合产品交叉比对分析

海表温度产品是研究全球海洋大气系统的重要数据源,在海洋相关领域的研究和应用方面具有重要价值。以西北太平洋海域为研究区域,本文对2007-2014年的3个海表温度融合数据（AVHRR OISST,MISST和OSTIA）的产品特性与Argo浮标进行了真实性检验,并对融合产品进行了交叉比对分析。结果表明,3个融合产品在空间尺度上均能反映西北太平洋海域的海表温度变化趋势。融合数据与Argo浮标的平均偏差在±0.1℃之间,均方根误差小于0.9℃。融合数据与浮标数据存在明显的季节性变化,其中冬季融合数据与浮标数据的平均偏差和均方根误差较小。在高纬海域,融合产品和浮标存在正偏差。与另两个融合产品相比,OSTIA的数据质量与Argo浮标最为接近。3个融合产品在近岸和高纬海域差异较大,三者对海冰的标识和处理方式不同对融合结果也有影响。在2012年6月之前MISST和OSTIA的海表温度数据质量更为接近,但在此之后MISST存在系统误差。红外数据、微波数据和实测数据作为输入数据,是制作高时空分辨率高精度海表温度融合产品必不可少的要素。     

基于最优插值和贝叶斯最大熵的海表温度融合方法研究

海表温度(sea surface temperature,SST)是影响全球气候的重要因素,在海洋科学研究中占有关键位置。论文基于MODIS红外、AMSR-2和HY-2A微波辐射计数据,分别利用最优插值和贝叶斯最大熵方法对SST数据进行融合,并用i Quam实测数据和Argo浮标数据对2015年SST融合数据进行检验。MODIS、AMSR-2、HY-2A辐射计SST的年平均空间覆盖率分别为15.0%,21.6%,22.0%,最优插值和贝叶斯最大熵融合SST产品的年平均空间覆盖率提高到98.6%和99.4%,融合产品空间覆盖率明显提高。与i Quam实测数据对比,最优插值和贝叶斯最大熵融合产品年平均偏差分别为0.07℃,0.04℃,均方根误差皆为0.78℃,其中3-7月最优插值融合产品的精度略优于贝叶斯最大熵融合产品,其它月份则相反;与Argo浮标数据对比,两种融合产品的均值偏差分别为0.06℃,0.01℃,均方根误差分别为0.77℃,0.75℃。整体上,贝叶斯最大熵融合产品的精度略优于最优插值融合产品,但计算成本较高。     

SST融合产品在渤黄海的质量评估与修正研究

为获取高空间分辨率与空间覆盖率的海表面温度(Sea Surface Temperature,SST)产品,基于最优插值方法,对微波辐射计Wind Sat、AMSR-E、ASMR2、HY-2 RM和红外辐射计MODIS、AVHRR的SST观测数据进行融合,生成了一种0.1°空间分辨率的每日SST融合产品,利用浮标数据在渤黄海区域进行了精度评估和修正,并分析了该区域的SST时空分布特征。结果表明:SST融合产品的在中国近海的精度为1.1℃,利用浮标数据修正后的精度略有改善;利用修正的SST产品对渤黄海区域SST分布特征进行了分析,分析结果显示,渤黄海海域冬季海温最为均匀,春季在海水升温过程中海温不均匀性明显。     

基于星载红外辐射计的北极海表温度数据对比分析

本文基于2016年MODIS(ModerateResolutionImagingSpectroradiometer)-Aqua、MODIS-Terra和VIIRS(Visible Infrared Imager Radiometer Suite)三种红外辐射计的海表面温度(Sea Surface Temperature,SST)数据,统计了北极地区红外SST1月和7月的覆盖率及有效覆盖天数,并与Argo(Arrayfor Real-timeGeostrophicOceanography)浮标数据进行了匹配验证,直观获取北极SST误差分布情况并研究SST遥感观测能力,为更好地了解北极地区从而应对气候变化提供一定的资料基础。结果表明,北极地区红外辐射计SST数据7月的覆盖率和有效观测天数均高于1月,1月三种数据相差不大,7月VIIRS的覆盖率和有效观测天数均优于MODIS-Aqua和MODIS-Terra,联合三种红外辐射计的覆盖率和有效观测天数相较于单星有所增加, 1月覆盖率最高为8%, 7月最高接近70%,表明多星联合探测是提高北极地区SST数据覆盖率和观测天数的有效方法;北极地区SST数据的误差普遍高于全球总体水平, VIIRS白天、夜间的均方根误差(E_(rms))均低于MODIS-Aqua和MODIS-Terra, MODIS-Aqua白天SST的E_(rms)高于MODIS-Terra,夜间则低于MODIS-Terra。综合来看, VIIRS在北极的覆盖率、有效观测天数及与浮标的匹配结果在三种红外辐射计中为最优。     

Generation of high resolution sea surface temperature using multi-satellite data for operational oceanography

In the present article, we introduce a high resolution sea surface temperature(SST) product generated daily by Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology(KIOST). The SST product is comprised of four sets of data including eight-hour and daily average SST data of 1 km resolution, and is based on the four infrared(IR) satellite SST data acquired by advanced very high resolution radiometer(AVHRR), Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS), Multifunctional Transport Satellites-2(MTSAT-2) Imager and Meteorological Imager(MI), two microwave radiometer SSTs acquired by Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2(AMSR2), and Wind SAT with in-situ temperature data. These input satellite and in-situ SST data are merged by using the optimal interpolation(OI) algorithm. The root-mean-square-errors(RMSEs) of satellite and in-situ data are used as a weighting value in the OI algorithm. As a pilot product, four SST data sets were generated daily from January to December 2013. In the comparison between the SSTs measured by moored buoys and the daily mean KIOST SSTs, the estimated RMSE was 0.71°C and the bias value was –0.08°C. The largest RMSE and bias were 0.86 and –0.26°C respectively, observed at a buoy site in the boundary region of warm and cold waters with increased physical variability in the Sea of Japan/East Sea. Other site near the coasts shows a lower RMSE value of 0.60°C than those at the open waters. To investigate the spatial distributions of SST, the Group for High Resolution Sea Surface Temperature(GHRSST) product was used in the comparison of temperature gradients, and it was shown that the KIOST SST product represents well the water mass structures around the Korean Peninsula. The KIOST SST product generated from both satellite and buoy data is expected to make substantial contribution to the Korea Operational Oceanographic System(KOOS) as an input parameter for data assimilation.     

Difference characteristics of sea surface temperature observed by GLI and AMSR aboard ADEOS-II

This study compares infrared and microwave measurements of sea surface temperature (SST) obtained by a single satellite. The simultaneous observation from the Global Imager (GLI: infrared) and the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR: microwave) aboard the Advanced Earth Observing Satellite-II (ADEOS-II) provided an opportunity for the intercomparison. The GLI-and AMSR-derived SSTs from April to October 2003 are analyzed with other ancillary data including surface wind speed and water vapor retrieved by AMSR and SeaWinds on ADEOS-II. We found no measurable bias (defined as GLI minus AMSR), while the standard deviation of difference is less than 1°C. In low water vapor conditions, the GLI SST has a positive bias less than 0.2°C, and in high water vapor conditions, it has a negative (positive) bias during the daytime (nighttime). The low spatial resolution of AMSR is another factor underlying the geographical distribution of the differences. The cloud detection problem in the GLI algorithm also affects the difference. The large differences in high-latitude region during the nighttime might be due to the GLI cloud-detection algorithm. AMSR SST has a negative bias during the daytime with low wind speed (less than 7 ms⁻¹), which might be related to the correction for surface wind effects in the AMSR SST algorithm.     

红外和微波辐射计反演海表面温度的比较

介绍了红外辐射计和微波辐射计测量海表面温度的原理,分析了它们各自在反演海表面温度时的差异。在全球范围的海表面温度的遥感监测中,红外辐射计和微波辐射计的遥感精度受到多种因素影响。传感器本身的噪音、算法反演精度、传感器分辨率、搭载卫星的全球覆盖率等自身因素使辐射计的探测资料产生差别;大气状况、海面风速、测量海洋不同深度海水的表征温度等外界因子也同时影响着红外辐射计和微波辐射计的遥感精度。了解红外波段和微波波段的辐射计在各方面的优劣,有助于发挥各自特长,有效提高卫星监测海表面温度的精度。     

Examination of the merged sea surface temperature using wavelet analysis

In the previous study, merged sea surface temperature (SST) dataset called “New Generation SST” has been produced from several infrared and microwave satellite SSTs through an objective mapping. Here we examine the merged SST by comparison with moored buoy SST at 1 m depth, which is treated as true sea surface temperature. Comparison between wavelet spectra of merged and buoy SSTs shows that the former have larger amplitudes than those of the latter, which is partly explained as an aliasing effect due to TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) aboard Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) sampling on merged products. Coherency between wavelet-decomposed merged and buoy SSTs has high values in autumn and low ones in winter to spring. In winter, phase differences between them are positive, meaning that wavelet components of merged SST lag those of buoy SST. Reasons for delay and low coherency are: (1) seasonal components of merged SSTs are strongly affected by a lack of infrared SSTs due to clouds in winter, and (2) small-scale oceanic features, undetectable by coarse-resolution microwave SSTs, are blurred by the merging process. Improvements of merging methodology are discussed with regard to present study results.     

利用DINEOF方法重构缺测的卫星遥感海温数据

针对海温数据补缺问题提出一种基于经验正交函数(EOF)分解的缺测数据重构方法--经验正交函数插值法(DINEOF).此方法是一种自适应的EOF分解方法,不需要任何先验信息,并且能估算出重构数据的误差大小.奇异值(SVD)分解时采用了Lanczos算子以提高计算速度,并利用了交叉验证的算法以确定出重构时所需最优的EOF阶数.实测数据处理结果表明,DINEOF方法能很好地重构大面积的缺测数据,具有较高精度及实际可操作性.     

红外和微波辐射计反演海表面温度的比较

介绍了红外辐射计和微波辐射计测量海表面温度的原理，分析了它们各自在反演海表面温度时的差异。在全球范围的海表面温度的遥感蛉测中，红外辐射计和微波辐射计的遥感精度受到多种因素影响。传感器本身的噪音、算法反演精度、传感器分辨率、搭载卫星的全球覆盖率等自身因素使辐射计的探测资料产生差别：大气状况、海面风速、测量海洋不同深度海水的表征温度等外界因子也同时影响着红外辐射计和微波辐射计的遥感精度。了解红外波段和微波波段的辐射计在各方面的优劣，有助于发挥各自特长，有效提高卫星监测海表面温度的精度。     

A review of satellite-based microwave observations of sea surface temperatures

Satellite-based microwave radiometers can measure sea surface temperature (SST) over wide areas, even under cloud cover, owing to the weak absorption of microwaves by cloud droplets. This advantage is not available in the case of infrared observations, hence SST data derived from microwave radiometers have been widely used for operational and research purposes in recent years. This paper reviews the significant algorithms, validations, and applications related to microwave observation of SST. The history and specifications of past and present microwave radiometers are also documented. Various physical properties, including sea surface salinity, sea surface wind, molecules in the atmosphere, and clouds, affect the accuracy of SST data estimated by satellite-based microwave radiometers. Estimation algorithms are designed to correct these effects by using microwave measurements in several frequency channels and by using data of ancillary geophysical parameters. Validation studies have shown that microwave radiometer SST data have high accuracy that is comparable to the accuracy of data obtained from infrared measurements. However, certain persistent problems, such as sea-surface wind correction, remain to be solved.     

Retrieval of Sea Surface Temperature from TRMM VIRS

The Visible and Infrared Scanner (VIRS) aboard the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a five-channel radiometer with wavelength from 0.6 to 12 μm. Daily 0.125° sea surface temperature (SST) data from VIRS were first produced at the National Space Development Agency (NASDA) for comparison with SST from TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI). In order to obtain accurate high spatial resolution SST for the merging of SST from infrared and microwave measurements, new SST retrieval coefficients of the Multichannel SST (MCSST) algorithm were generated using the global matchups from VIRS brightness temperature (BT) and Global Telecommunications System (GTS) SST. Cloud detection was improved and striping noise was eliminated. One-year global VIRS level-1B data were reprocessed using the MCSST algorithm and the advanced cloud/noise treatments. The bias and standard deviation between VIRS split-window SST and in situ SST are 0.10°C and 0.63°C, and for triple-window SST, are 0.06°C and 0.48°C. The results indicate that the reprocessing algorithm is capable of retrieving high quality SST from VIRS data. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

HY1C/1D海表温度对Terra/Aqua产品的可替代性分析

通过卫星遥感获取的海表温度（SST）产品已经成为海洋和大气研究中的重要数据源,我国海洋水色遥感卫星（HY1C和HY1D）的海洋水色水温扫描仪（COCTS）具有两个热红外通道,可反演全球SST遥感产品。对比Terra和Aqua卫星的中分辨率成像光谱仪（MODIS）的SST产品,分析COCTS海表温度产品对MODIS相应产品的可替代性。比较了两种卫星的全球SST单日和月平均融合产品的图像空间结构,分析了匹配像元SST值的离散度,统计了HY1C/1D的误差结果,讨论了HY1C与HY1D产品的一致性、不同质量控制方案对SST产品影响以及遥感产品质量对昼夜SST变化研究影响等问题。结果表明,以2020年6月SST(Terra)为真值,HY1C白天SST的单日全球遥感产品的平均偏差、绝对偏差、均方根误差和相关系数分别为0.04℃、0.60℃、0.78℃和0.98,夜晚SST的单日全球遥感产品的平均偏差、绝对偏差、均方根误差和相关系数分别为-0.16℃、0.78℃、0.95℃和0.86。以2020年6月SST(Aqua)为真值,HY1D白天SST的单日全球遥感产品的平均偏差、绝对偏差、均方根误差和相...     

利用卫星资料分析黄海海表温度的年际与年代际变化

海表温度长期变化在一定程度上反映了海域的气候变化信号,卫星遥感资料是获取高时空分辨率水温长期变化的有效手段。基于国家海洋局1982—1999年黄海断面监测器测数据的2 954组水温数据对时空匹配的卫星(NOAA/AVHRR)反演海表温度(SST)进行校验,计算得到卫星反演SST系统偏差为(0.18±1.00)℃。卫星反演的水温空间分布以及长期变化趋势与器测趋势较为一致,可以用来研究海域SST长期变化规律。利用校验后1982-01～2011-08NOAA/AVHRR的SST数据,分析了该时段黄海冬夏季代表月2、8月海表水温的变化规律。结果显示:(1)近30a,黄海冬季水温有2次跃迁:1989—1990年由冷至暖的状态跃迁,2000-2001年出现由暖至冷的状态转变;1990年代冬季水温达最高,相比1880年代,水温升高1.07℃,新世纪水温稍有降低,水温较1990年代下降了0.53℃,温度变化较大区域位于北黄海、山东半岛沿岸,苏北浅滩毗邻海区,该区SST与局地经向风场存在显著正相关,且北极涛动通过影响冬季风间接影响黄海水温变化;(2)夏季海表水温在1994—1995年呈现由冷至暖的状态跃迁,冷、暖期水温相差0.57℃,水温变化较显著的区域为黄东海分界处,其具体变化机制需深入研究。