‘real’ geomorphology revisited

Some of the reasons are given for the editorial (Richards, 1990) now discussed by Rhoads (1994) and Bassett (1994). These include the lack of interest generally displayed by geomorphologists in matters of scientific philosophy and method, and the instrumentalist view of research often presented to postgraduate students given present funding imperatives. It is suggested that in a revision of views about the validity of a hypothesis-testing, critical rationalist methodology might have considerable implications for the practice of environmental sciences, and that accordingly the debate initiated by Rhoads and Bassett is worthy of continuation.     

On being a ‘real’ geomorphologist

In a recent editorial Richards (1990) advocated a realist perspective for geomorphology. Scientific realism, defined broadly, is the doctrine that science attempts to generate true knowledge of the observable and unobservable (i.e. non-empirical) aspects of an objective world. Various brands of realism exist; the particular version cited by Richards (1990) has not strongly influenced mainstream philosophy of science. Also, critical rationalism, which Richards (1990) contrasts with realism, fully adopts a realist perspective. In its broadest sense, realism encompasses the entire spectrum of geomorpho-logic research, thus providing a unifying philosophical framework for geomorphology.     

Ergodicity and the ‘scale effect’

Solute plume spreading in an aquifer exhibits a ‘scale effect’ if the second spatial concentration moment of a plume has a non-constant time-derivative. Stochastic approaches to modeling this scale effect often rely on the critical assumption that ensemble averages can be equated to spatial averages measured in a single field experiment. This ergodicity assumption should properly be evaluated in a strictly dynamical context, and this is done in the present paper. For the important case of trace plume convection by steady groundwater flow in an isotropic, heterogeneous aquifer, ergodicity does not obtain because of the existence of an invariant function on stream surfaces that is not uniform throughout the aquifer. The implications of this result for stochastic models of solute transport are discussed. © 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved     

‘Total’ fabric of some till landforms

The distinction between clast-dominant, matrix-dominant and well-graded tills is important in view of the influence of texture on the definition and function of till fines. Till fabric includes a wide range of features of both primary and secondary origin including folds, thrusts, fissures (the macrofabric), disposition of clasts (the mesofabric) and organization of the matrix (the microfabric). The results of fabric analysis of pebble, granule, sand, silt and clay in small depositional landforms beneath currently-active glaciers are described. Deformation fabrics are distinguished in freshly deposited end moraines and flutes. The sand-size material in deformed till may or may not behave in the same way as larger clasts, depending on the degree to which the till is matrix-dominant. While clasts in saturated subglacial till tend to align themselves sub-parallel to the depositional surface, the matrix usually retains abundant pore spaces. With slow, unloaded drainage, clast fabrics appear to be little modified. Such material is potentially unstable and any subsequent increase in overburden and hydraulic pressures may cause slope collapse and flowtill development. It is concluded that examination of a wide range of fabric parameters provides a means of distinguishing tills of diverse origins and of assessing their potential instability.     

The Icelandic ‘rofabard’ soil erosion features

Soil erosion and desertification are severe problems in Iceland. Erosion processes are numerous, and more than one can occur at each site, resulting in many erosional forms. Erosion forms and an erosion severity scale are the basis for a recent national survey of erosion in Iceland. One of the most distinctive erosion forms in Iceland is an erosion escarpment, termed ‘rofabard’ in Icelandic. Rofabards are formed in thick but non‐cohesive Andosols that overlie more cohesive materials such as glacial till or lava. The relatively loose Andosols beneath the root mat are undermined, creating escarpments, or rofabards. The rofabards retreat as a unit, with a fully vegetated and rich ecosystem on top but leaving barren desert in their place. Rofabards are common within a 20 000 km² area. The Agricultural Research Institute and Soil Conservation Service erosion database suggests that erosion associated with rofabards has denuded 15 000 –30 000 km² of land that was previously fully vegetated and had fertile Andosols, but is now mostly desert. Erosion rates associated with rofabards are reported as the loss of vegetated land with Andosol mantle, measured as hectares per square kilometre per year. This measure of erosion has more meaning for Icelandic landscapes than the traditional tonnes per hectare per year. Estimated losses of Andosol cover in rofabard areas for the whole country are currently about 230 ha a⁻¹. This rate is about 10 times lower than the rate needed to cause estimated losses of Andosol mantle in rofabard areas since settlement, 1125 years ago. During peak years of soil erosion, losses were probably several thousand hectares per year, but the erosion rates slowed down as extensive Andosol areas have become barren deserts. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

‘Natural’ rivers, ‘hydromorphological quality’ and river restoration: a challenging new agenda for applied fluvial geomorphology

Fluvial geomorphology is rapidly becoming centrally involved in practical applications to support the agenda of sustainable river basin management. In the UK its principal contributions to date have primarily been in flood risk management and river restoration. There is a new impetus: the European Union's Water Framework and Habitats Directives require all rivers to be considered in terms of their ecological quality, defined partly in terms of ‘hydromorphology’. This paper focuses on the problematic definition of ‘natural’ hydromorphological quality for rivers, the assessment of departures from it, and the ecologically driven strategies for restoration that must be delivered by regulators under the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). The Habitats Directive contains similar concepts under different labels. Currently available definitions of ‘natural’ or ‘reference’ conditions derive largely from a concept of ‘damage’, principally to channel morphology. Such definitions may, however, be too static to form sustainable strategies for management and regulation, but attract public support. Interdisciplinary knowledge remains scant; yet such knowledge is needed at a range of scales from catchment to microhabitat. The most important contribution of the interdisciplinary R&D effort needed to supply management tools to regulators of the WFD and Habitats regulations is to interpret the physical habitat contribution to biodiversity conservation, in terms of ‘good ecological quality’ in rivers, and the ‘hydromorphological’ component of this quality. Contributions from ‘indigenous knowledge’, through public participation, are important but often understated in this effort to drive the ‘fluvial hydrosystem’ back to spontaneous, affordable, sustainable self‐regulation. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Observations of ‘freezing-induced redistribution’ in soil lysimeters

Data are presented of vertical profiles of soil water potential and soil temperature from a field lysimeter experiment with automatic water-table control at Silwood Park, Ascot, UK. The observed water-table fluxes confirm the analysis of profile response, which shows a diurnal pattern of upward water movement as a result of surface freezing, followed by reversed flow when soil thawing occurs. The results provide a clear, and relatively rare, illustration of the phenomenon of freezing-induced redistribution.