基于性能的设计方法在超限高层建筑结构设计中的应用研究

针对超限高层建筑结构抗震设计,提出了基于性能设计方法的性能目标,通过结构在小震、中震、大震作用下的弹性、弹塑性静力和动力时程分析,对三水准地震作用下结构构件进行了承载力定量分析。从理论上证明了结构性能可以达到“小震不坏,中震可修,大震不倒”的抗震设防目标,同时进行了1：20模型的结构振动台试验,确证了实际结构设计的安全性。     

钢筋混凝土结构抗震设防目标及实现步骤研究

钢筋混凝土结构的抗震设防目标,通俗的说法是“小震不坏,中震可修、大震不倒”,具体来说是“三水准设防目标”。三个水准的设防目标是通过两阶段设计来实现的。钢筋混凝土结构抗震设计的基本步骤：把握好抗震概念设计,采取双指标控制条件,使结构和结构构件既满足抗震承载力要求又满足变形要求,同时保证加强抗震构造措施,使结构有足够的结构延性,最终实现“三水准设防”目标。     

广州花园酒店"白金五星级酒店"结构改造基于性能的可行性研究

广州花园酒店原结构及改造后结构均不满足我国现行规范的抗震构造要求。本文依据基于性能的抗震设计思想,提出结构宏观上的层间位移角目标和微观上的结构构件变形及损伤目标,采用PKPM系列2005年版SATWE和ETABS 9.0中文版进行结构弹性分析,采用PKPM系列EPDA和美国Buffalo大学的IDARC 2D 6.0进行弹塑性静力推覆分析和弹塑性动力时程分析,并采用TNO公司的DIANA8.0进行单榀剪力墙的极限承载力分析,研究结构是否满足设定的整体及结构构件性能目标要求,确保改造后的结构达到"小震不坏、中震可修、大震不倒"的要求。     

8.5度设防区剪力墙结构层间位移角限值探讨

为满足小震作用下结构层间位移角限值的要求,抗震设防高烈度区设计的结构竖向构件多,截面尺寸大,影响建筑使用空间。控制小震作用下的层间位移角除满足舒适度、装饰结构和机械设备正常使用的需求外,主要目的是确保结构大震不倒。根据新疆喀什地区(8.5度设防)128条强震地震动和当地实际工程,参照现行不同规范对层间位移角限值的规定,以层间位移角和高度为控制参数,设计6个剪力墙结构模型,采用基于构件变形的抗震性能评估方法研究大震作用下结构的安全性。结果表明：6个剪力墙结构在8.5度大震作用下均满足“大震不倒”的要求,且在两倍大震作用下具有合理的屈服耗能机制。建议小震作用下新疆喀什地区剪力墙结构的弹性层间位移角限值放松至1/500。     

双防线可恢复性能斜交网格结构耗能机制和抗震性能研究

为提高斜交网格结构的抗震性能,提出一种双防线可恢复性能斜交网格结构。双防线可恢复性能斜交网格结构采用剪切耗能段和特定梁端塑形铰进行集中耗能,使主体结构构件保持弹性。剪切耗能段不承受和传递重力荷载,易在震后修复或更换,使建筑可迅速恢复功能。为实现目标耗能机制,对等效能量塑形设计法进行改进以适用于可恢复性能斜交网格结构,并进行结构设计举例。采用OpenSees软件对所设计结构建立详细的有限元计算模型,进行非线性动力时程分析,以验证双防线耗能机制并评估抗震性能。分析结果表明:（1）小震、中震和大震下的结构顶部位移角分别为0.28%、0.8%和1.7%,与性能设计目标基本相同;（2）中震时剪切耗能段屈服,特定梁端未出现塑性铰;（3）大震时,特定梁端出现塑性铰以增加结构耗能能力,剪切耗能段屈服且处于延性范围内。因此新型可恢复性能斜交网格结构具有有效的双防线耗能机制,在中震后可迅速修复,在大震中可保持延性,实现"中震可修,大震不倒"的性能目标。     

客运专线桥梁基于性能的抗震设计研究

从基于性能的抗震设计理念出发,给出了客运专线桥梁结构的性能目标及各性能水准下的桥墩地震破损描述,明确并量化了桥墩各抗震性能目标的验算内容。给出了小震不坏及可控制中震损伤的验算方法,简化能力谱法计算位移延性系数,指出了大震时最大位移验算的不足,讨论了桥墩大震时地震损伤指数的计算与验算,通过算例详细介绍了基于性能的抗震设计方法与过程。     

超限高层建筑结构抗震设计加强措施和建议——以某超限高层建筑为例

为加强超限高层建筑结构的抗震性能,最大程度减小地震损失,以某一超限高层建筑为对象,对其结构抗震设计的加强措施和建议进行详细分析。在小震作用下运用pkpm软件MIDAS/Building对建筑结构进行弹性计算对比分析,证明弹性计算的可靠性;借用SATWE对结构在中震或大震作用下不同构件的承载力和截面进行验算;采用midasbuilding软件对该超限高层建筑进行罕遇地震作用下的静力弹塑性分析。根据不同震级下建筑结构线弹性分析结果,对建筑主体结构、结构抗震和地基基础进行加强设计,从中归纳出整体结构的抗震加强措施和建议,说明该超限结构能满足规范的设防要求,是安全可靠的。     

RC剪力墙结构小震与中震设计对比及其抗震性能研究

近年来,国内学者强调对于复杂和超限结构需进行中震性能设计,即在小震弹性设计后进行中震下的承载力复核及调整,然而中震设计能否提高结构整体抗震性能仍存在争议。为探究中震设计与小震设计方法的差异,本文依据现行规范,以设防烈度、结构高度和场地类别为变化参数,建立了48个典型RC剪力墙模型,并分别以“小震”、“高规中震”、“广东高规中震”和“关键构件中震”进行截面设计,之后进行罕遇地震作用下的弹塑性分析及增量动力分析计算。在对比了不同设计方法的钢筋用量、结构与构件性能表现及结构抗倒塌能力储备的差异后认为,现行中震设计方法存在诸多弊端,包括会导致结构用钢量的显著增大,结构延性的降低,及结构安全度的降低等;采用关键构件中震设计方法则能较好地提高结构整体抗震性能,更符合抗震设计概念。因此,建议对RC剪力墙结构仅针对关键构件进行中震性能设计,以提高重要结构的安全性。     

按新规范设计的不规则框架非线性抗震性能分析

按2002新规范设计了两栋不规则空间框架，分析了结构在小震、中震及大震作用下结构的反应，重点考察了结构在中震及大震作用的非线性响应，主要包括最大层间位移、层间扭转角以及构件混凝土纤维和钢筋纤维的最大应变等，对新抗震规范要求的设防水准及目标进行了初步评估。     

我国7度设防等跨RC框架抗地震倒塌能力研究

我国建筑结构抗震设计主要采用基于小震下的构件承载力计算保证结构的抗震承载能力,配合抗震构造措施保证结构的变形能力,缺乏大震抗倒塌定量计算.而实际地震震害表明,即使是同类结构,其结构体系参数对其抗地震倒塌能力也有很大影响.为此,本文依据《建筑抗震设计规范》GB50011 - 2001,按照7度抗震设防设计了24个不同跨度...     

Seismic safety of low ductility structures used in Spain

The most important aspects of the design, seismic damage evaluation and safety assessment of structures with low ductility like waffle slabs buildings or flat beams framed buildings are examined in this work. These reinforced concrete structural typologies are the most used in Spain for new buildings but many seismic codes do not recommend them in seismic areas. Their expected seismic performance and safety are evaluated herein by means of incremental non linear structural analysis (pushover analysis) and incremental dynamic analysis which provides capacity curves allowing evaluating their seismic behavior. The seismic hazard is described by means of the reduced 5% damped elastic response spectrum of the Spanish seismic design code. The most important results of the study are the fragility curves calculated for the mentioned building types, which allow obtaining the probability of different damage states of the structures as well as damage probability matrices. The results, which show high vulnerability of the studied low ductility building classes, are compared with those corresponding to ductile framed structures.     

桥梁抗震设计规范与建筑抗震设计规范的分析与比较

对我国现行《公路工程抗震设计规范》(JTJ004-89)与《建筑抗震设计规范》(GB50011-2001)进行了较为详细的对比。分别从抗震设计的基本思想、设计地震动参数、地震反应分析和计算方法、构造细节等方面对这两本规范进行了比较,并指出了今后我国各行业工程结构抗震设计规范宜逐步统一。     

高层钢结构基于均匀损伤设计的整体抗震能力提高方法

本文主要研究如何通过合理设计来提高高层钢结构的整体抗震能力。首先,给出了高层钢结构的非线性计算模型;其次,建立了高层钢结构在强地震动作用下的倒塌失效模式的极限状态判别准则;然后,通过模态pushover分析,研究了高层钢结构在水平地震作用下的损伤规律;最后,重点研究了高层钢结构的整体抗震能力的提高方法,提出了均匀损伤的设计方法,该方法通过消除结构的薄弱层,来达到提高高层钢结构的整体抗震能力的目的。通过对两栋20层的高层钢框架结构进行极限时程分析和极限pushover分析,验证了文中提出的均匀损伤的设计方法的可行性。本文的工作可为高层钢结构的抗地震倒塌设计提供参考依据。     

Estimation of the behavior factor of existing RC-MRF buildings

In recent years, several research groups have studied a new generation of analysis methods for seismic response assessment of existing buildings. Nevertheless, many important developments are still needed in order to define more reliable and effective assessment procedures. Moreover, regarding existing buildings, it should be highlighted that due to the low knowledge level, the linear elastic analysis is the only analysis method allowed. The same codes (such as NTC2008, EC8) consider the linear dynamic analysis with behavior factor as the reference method for the evaluation of seismic demand. This type of analysis is based on a linear-elastic structural model subject to a design spectrum, obtained by reducing the elastic spectrum through a behavior factor. The behavior factor (reduction factor or q factor in some codes) is used to reduce the elastic spectrum ordinate or the forces obtained from a linear analysis in order to take into account the non-linear structural capacities. The behavior factors should be defined based on several parameters that influence the seismic nonlinear capacity, such as mechanical materials characteristics, structural system, irregularity and design procedures. In practical applications, there is still an evident lack of detailed rules and accurate behavior factor values adequate for existing buildings. In this work, some investigations of the seismic capacity of the main existing RC-MRF building types have been carried out. In order to make a correct evaluation of the seismic force demand, actual behavior factor values coherent with force based seismic safety assessment procedure have been proposed and compared with the values reported in the Italian seismic code, NTC08.     

Assessment indices for the seismic vulnerability of existing R.C. buildings

The seismic vulnerability of old multi‐storey reinforced concrete (R.C.) buildings reinforced with substandard details is assessed as a function of interstorey drift demand imposed by the design earthquake while considering brittle termination of elastic response of the critical members of the structure due to a premature shear failure. Interstorey drift demand is related to column and wall translational stiffnesses which are expressed through analytical derivations in terms of the floor area ratios of gravity and lateral load bearing members in the critical floor. Interstorey drift capacity is related to the available transverse reinforcement and the axial load ratio of the vertical members. The significance of the area ratio of vertical members in the typical floor as an index of vulnerability is explored with reference to the limitations in the value of axial load ratio used in R.C. design in order to secure ductile flexural behavior, and also with reference to the stability index of gravity load bearing members. Interstorey Drift Spectra are derived for the existing R.C. buildings suitable for rapid seismic vulnerability screening but also as a guide for rehabilitation of the existing structures. Lightly reinforced or substandard reinforced concrete buildings that reportedly collapsed during previous earthquakes are used as example case studies in order to calibrate the proposed methodology. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

按现行规范设计的Ⅷ度区RC框架结构的倒塌性能评估

选取按照现行规范设计的既有建筑进行有限元建模,考虑地震动的不确定性对其进行大量增量动力分析(IDA),得到模型的IDA曲线簇。在此基础上对其进行地震需求概率分析和概率抗震能力分析,拟合得到结构的易损性曲线,据此对结构的倒塌概率进行定量评估,并比较基于非线性分析与性能评估软件PERFORM-3D的纤维模型和塑性铰模型的分析结果。结果表明:按照我国现行规范设计的钢筋混凝土(RC)框架结构,在预期的罕遇地震作用下倒塌概率较小,可满足"大震不倒"的要求;基于PERFORM-3D的截面纤维模型所得的RC框架结构,经非线性分析所得的倒塌概率相对保守,安全储备更高。     

Comparison between seismic vulnerability models and experimental dynamic properties of existing buildings in France

Elastic fundamental frequency is a key-parameter of simplified seismic design and vulnerability assessment methods. Empirical relationships exist in codes to estimate this frequency but they miss experimental data to validate them accounting for national feature of building design and, above all, corresponding uncertainties. Even if resonance frequency extracted from ambient vibrations may be larger than the elastic frequency (at yield) generally used in earthquake engineering, ambient vibration recordings may provide a large set of data for statistical analysis of periods versus building characteristics relationships. We recorded ambient vibrations and estimated the fundamental frequency of about 60 buildings of various types (RC and masonry) in Grenoble City (France). These data complete the set existing yet, made of 26 RC-buildings of Grenoble (Farsi and Bard 2004) and 28 buildings in Nice (France) (Dunand 2005). Statistical analysis of these experimental data was performed for fundamental frequencies of RC shear wall structures and the results are compared with existing relationships. Only building height or number of stories has a statistical relevancy to estimate the resonance frequency but the variability associated to the proposed relationships is large. Moreover, we compared the elastic part of capacity curves of RC and masonry buildings used in the European Risk-UE method for vulnerability assessment with the experimental frequencies. The variability is also large and the curves may not be consistent with French existing buildings.     

Seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete buildings with discontinuity in columns

Irregular reinforced concrete (RC) buildings constitute a significant portion of the existing housing stock. A common type of irregularity is in the form of discontinuity in the vertical framing elements, which can exacerbate their seismic vulnerability. The design guidelines available in seismic design codes essentially cater to only regular buildings, and the safety of such buildings, even when the other guidelines of the codes are followed, is doubtful. This article evaluates the vulnerability of RC frame buildings with discontinuity in columns designed for modern seismic codes, in the form of seismic collapse capacity, collapse resistance against maximum earthquake demand level, and failure mechanism. The adequacy and limitations of the provisions of the seismic design codes are evaluated for such buildings. Analysis results show that the sequential analysis of buildings considering the construction staged effects, considerably affects the design and hence the collapse failure mechanism of even low- and mid-rise buildings. The results also underline the importance of strong column–weak beam design in the seismic performance of the floating column buildings. The vertical component of ground motion is also observed to be relatively more crucial in floating column buildings.