土星卫星CCD定位观测的初步分析

发表了１９９４年８月土星主要卫星ＣＣＤ观测的相对位置资料及其与理论值的比较分析。观测使用了开放实验室分山基地的１５６ｃｍ天体测量望远镜上的ＣＣＤ探测器．对观测资料的分析表明；Ｒｈｅａ和Ｄｉｏｎｅ相对于Ｔｉｔａｎ的位置精度为０．１２”。这相当于距离土星７００ｋｍ．土星卫星ＣＣＤ观测与最佳的照相观测比较，其位置精度相当。     

高精度测定外行星位置-可行性及实验

大行星位置的测量是天体测量学中的一项长期而重要的任务。如何在当前形势下高精度测定行星的位置是本文研究方向的最终目标。鉴于太阳系内行星和木星都有新技术进行高精度的位置观测,作者探讨了如何用光学手段高精度测定外行星（土星,天王星和海王星）的位置,提出了用长焦距望远镜ＣＣＤ观测行星卫星和用中天望远镜ＣＣＤ观测暗恒星相配合的思路。因此,对长焦距望远镜ＣＣＤ观测外行星卫星和中天望远镜ＣＣＤ相对观测恒星进行了系统调研,同时也对外行星卫星的理论从观测验证的角度进行了介绍。本文重点介绍了在长焦距望远镜上相对于天王星卫星高精度测定暗恒星的位置。结果表明,相对于天王星卫星确实可以精确测定同一ＣＣＤ视场中暗恒星的位置,位置测量的精度和国外最好的天王星卫星位置测量的精度相当或更高。还介绍了与观测资料的归算有关的天王星和卫星的位置历算。最后,分析了我国从事高精度大行星位置测量的可行性     

天王星卫星的CCD观测与分析解的比对

本文给出了处理天王星卫星ＣＣＤ图象位置资料的新方法,并将我们在１９９５年取得的重要资料与两种理论模型位置进行了比较计算,结果表明经处理后的天王星五颗主要卫星ＣＣＤ观测精度有了较大提高。     

天王星卫星CCD（SRT）位置测量的数字图象处理

天然卫星的位置测量在天体测量和天体力学中都有重要意义。国外有人对天王星卫星位置测量应用新的图象处理方法得到了高精度的卫星观测资料。利用云南天文台１米望远镜上获得的两颗卫星的ＳＲＴ的ＣＣＤ观测资料进行了新老图象处理方法的比较研究。当用两颗卫星直接作定标测量ＣＣＤ的比例尺和指向时表明：主星晕的处理对卫星位置的测量非常重要。去晕处理后,测得的比例尺和指向的弥散将大为减少。     

高精度测定外行星位置—可行性及实验

大行星位置的测量是天体测量学中的一项长期而重要的任务,如何在当前形势下高精度测定行星的位置是本文研究方向的最终目标,鉴于太阳系内行星和木星都有新技术进行高精度的位置观测,作者探讨了如何用光学手段高精度测量外行星（土星,天王星和海王星）的位置。提出了长焦距望远镜ＣＣＤ观测行星卫星和用中天望远镜ＣＣＤ观测暗恒星相配合的思路,因此,对长焦距望远镜ＣＣＤ观测外行星卫星和中天望远镜ＣＣＤ相对观测恒星进行了系     

依巴谷星(104297)相对于伽里略卫星Callisto的CCD位置测量

１９９７年１１月１４日晚，在中国科学院云南天文台１米望远镜上用新安装的１０２４２ＣＣＤ观测到了木星的两颗伽里略卫星；Ｅｕｒｏｐａ和Ｃａｌｌｉｓｔｏ及一颗依巴谷星（星号为 １０４２９７）．当采用新的 ＪＰＬ ＤＥ４０５和 Ｓａｍｐｓｏｎ－Ｌｉｅｓｋｅ理论（Ｇ５）计算卫星的理论位置并相对于Ｃａｌｌｉｓｔｏ测量恒星位置时，视位置的观测值与计算值之差的平均值在赤经和赤纬方向分别为△α＝－０″０２９±０．″０１２，△δ＝０．″００５± ０．″０１１．这对应于平均观测历元（ＵＴ）：１９９７年１１月１４日１３时４３分５０秒．这一试验结果与 Ｃａｓａｓ等在同一时期内ＣＣＤ观测的结果有着很好的一致性 它反映了依巴谷星表体现的光学参考系与ＤＥ４０５体现的动力学参考系在观测历元具有较好的一致性．单次位置测定的标准误差在赤经赤纬方向分别为±０．″０５２和０．″０４７．这一精度明显优于 Ｃａｓａｓ等人发表的 Ｃａｌｌｉｓｔｏ的处理精度，并与目前国际上最好的伽里略卫星观测精度相当     

HD 104237,εCha和HD 100546的演化状态

根据Ｈｉｐｐａｒｃｏｓ的资料和ＴＤ－１对εＣｈａ和ＨＤ１００５４６的紫外观测资料讨论了εＣｈａ、ＨＤ１０４２３７和ＨＤ１００５４６在赫罗图上的位置以及它们的演化状态．     

HD104237,εCha和HD100546的演化状态

根据Ｈｉｐｐａｒｃｏｓ的资料和ＴＤ－１对εＣｈａ和ＨＤ１００５４６的紫外观测资料讨论了εＣｈａ、ＨＤ１０４２３７和ＨＤ１００５４６在赫罗图上的位置以及它们的演化状态。     

天王星卫星的星历表计算

根据天王星卫星的运动理论模型，建立了一套５颗主要卫星的星历表计算和误差分析程序。对部分高精度卫星观测位置资料进行的Ｏ－Ｃ计算和分析表明了计算程序的正确性和实用性。     

射电源0716 714和0839 187的光学定位

利用北京天文台具有ＣＣＤ终端的６０ｃｍ光学望远镜（Ｖ波段）观测射电源的光学对应体，得到了０７１６＋７１４和０８３９＋１８７精确的光学位置。参考星表采用拉帕尔玛（ＬａＰａｌｍａ）的１８ｃｍ全自动子午环观测资料编制的ＣＡＭＣ星表，该星表是ＦＫ５星表系统。两颗源位置的内符精度约为０．″１９，与其他作者给出的光学和射电位置观测结果分别进行了比较     

图像移位堆叠方法用于暗天然卫星的天体测量

暗弱天然卫星与主带小行星相比,具有亮度低、速度变化快的特点.在观测这类天体时,不能简单地延长曝光时间来提高其信噪比.尝试观测多幅短曝光的CCD (chargecoupled device)图像,采用移位堆叠(shift-and-add)方法,希望提高目标成像的信噪比,获得暗弱天然卫星的精确测量结果.使用2018年4月9—12日夜间,中国科学院云南天文台1 m望远镜(1 m望远镜)拍摄的木星5颗暗卫星的229幅CCD图像,实施了移位堆叠试验.为了验证结果的正确性,与相近日期中国科学院云南天文台2.4 m望远镜(2.4 m望远镜)观测的相同木卫图像的测量结果进行了比较和分析.位置归算采用了JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratory)历表.结果表明,对CCD图像使用移位堆叠方法,通过叠加约10幅曝光时间100 s的图像, 1 m望远镜能观测暗至19等星的不规则天然卫星,而且测量的准确度与2.4 m望远镜的测量结果有良好的一致性.     

Astrometric observations of major satellites of Saturn with a 26-inch refractor

The results of observations of Saturn and its satellites with the 26-inch refractor at Pulkovo are presented. Over the observing period from January 2008 until May 2009, results were found from more than 5000 CCD frames suitable for measurement. On the basis of these frames, 183 positions of major satellites of Saturn (with the exception of Mimas) were obtained. The astrometric reduction was based on the Turner method, with the use of the UCAC2 catalog as a reference. The obtained equatorial coordinates of satellites were compared with the TASS 1.7 theory, and results of comparison are presented. The accuracy of observed positions is 0.05″ on average. Positions of Saturn, calculated on the basis of positions of satellites and their theoretical saturnocentric coordinates according to the TASS 1.7, and the differential coordinates of satellites relative to each other, are also given.     

The astrometric observations of planetary satellites, close approaches and occultations of stars by asteroids and mutual events in the systems of planetary satellites with the 26-in. refractor of Pulkovo observatory in 1995-2006

Astrometric and photometric observations of major planets, their satellites and asteroids have been made with the 26-in. refractor of the Pulkovo observatory during the period from 1995 to 2006. The CCD (ST6) and photographic observations were carried out. Accurate relative position of satellites of Jupiter and Saturn have been derived. The positions of Saturn have been calculated using the theoretically predicted coordinates of satellites relative to the planet without measurements of the photographic images of the planet. Also the observations of Hale-Bopp comet and Mercury transit have been made. The 26-in. refractor has been included into the international campaign PHEMU-2003: photometric CCD observations of mutual occultations and eclipses of Galilean satellites. The light curves of the events have been obtained and parameters of the events have been determined.     

天王星卫星两种定标方法测定结果的比较

利用新发表的高精度、高密度天体测量星表UCAC2,对天王星的五颗主要卫星的CCD观测图像重新进行量测,采用不同方法作定标归算,并使用两种理论模型(GUST86和GUST06模型)计算卫星的理论位置。对不同方法所得到的卫星位置的O-C结果的分析和比较表明,本文获得的卫星位置精度,除天卫五(Miranda)有显著提高,其他4颗卫星的位置精度基本相同。本文中天卫一和天卫三的结果与"亮卫星定标法"的结果在精度上相当,天卫二的位置精度与其他天王星卫星的位置精度具有较好的一致性,这从另一方面证明了我们的"亮卫星定标法"的可靠性。此外我们还获得了天卫四的位置与精度。     

Astrometric observations of Uranus with the Pulkovo Normal astrograph

The positions of Uranus were observed astrometrically with a CCD detector attached to the Pulkovo Normal astrograph (D/F = 0.33 m/3.5 m, S2C CCD, FOV 18′ × 16′). We provide the positions in the time interval from 2006 to 2011. Reduction of the CCD images was made with reference to the UCAC3 catalogue. The (O-C) values were calculated using the “Natural Satellites Service”. The results were compared with two contemporary theories of Uranus’s motion: INPOP10 and DE414/LE414. The obtained equatorial coordinates correspond well to both theories. On average, (O-C) over both coordinates relative to both theories are 0.1″.     

New evidence of precision premium for Galilean satellites from CCD imaging

After a CCD image of the four Galilean satellites of Jupiter is obtained by a long focal length telescope, we can compare the theoretical positions of these satellites with their pixel positions so as to obtain the calibration parameters of the CCD field of view. In theory, when two of the four satellites have small enough separation, their relative positional measurement will have a good accuracy since the error existing in the solved calibration parameters has a direct proportional effect on the separation of the two satellites. The 347 CCD images taken by 1-m long focal length telescope at Yunnan Observatory in 2002-2005 are used to perform the experimental test. After we improve the centroid algorithm for the satellites and our former halo-removal technique, the results show that the positional measurement of two small-separation satellites has an external precision as good as 0.01-0.03 arcsec. This precision has comparability as that from rarely occurring mutual events of the Galilean satellites. This experiment confirms the finding of the “precision premium” firstly presented by Pascu [1994. An appraisal of the USNO program of photographic astrometry of bright planetary satellites. In: Morrison, L.V., Gilmore, G.F., (Eds.), Galatic and Solar System Optical Astrometry, pp. 304-311] using photographic observations. We believe that this type of observations, besides mutual event observations, might also be used to improve our knowledge of the orbital motions of the Galilean satellites because of its much more opportunities.     

Astrometric studies of the series of photographic and CCD observations of the Saturnian system with the 26-inch Pulkovo refractor in 1995-2007

The results of the reduction, investigation, and comparison of the photographic observations of the major Saturnian satellites and CCD observations with an ST6 CCD camera obtained at the 264nch Pulkovo refractor in 1995–2007 are presented. A comparison of the observational results with the TASS 1.7 theory of motion of the Saturnian satellites has served as the basis for investigating and comparing the series of observations. The period-averaged (O-C) residuals and observational errors have been calculated. A comparison of the series of CCD and photographic observations has shown the same external accuracy of the observations at a higher internal accuracy of the CCD observations than that of the photographic ones. A comparison of the Pulkovo results with those of other authors has shown them to be close in accuracy. The accuracy of the theory has been estimated by comparing simultaneous (on the same night) CCD and photographic observations. The errors of the observations and the theory have been found from this comparison to be the following: 0.081“ and 0.067” for the observations and 0.077“ and 0.115” for the theory (inxandy, respectively). An analysis of the dependence of (O-C)x,y for three satellites (the sixth, seventh, and eighth) on the satellite positions in Saturn-centered orbits has revealed systemat ic deviations for the seventh satellite in both coordinates. The positions of Saturn have been determined from satellite observations without measuring its images on photographic plates with accuracies of 0.121“ and 0.105” in right ascension and declination, respectively.     

Near-infrared CCD observations of umbral dots

Umbral fine structures have been observed at 8500 Å using a new CCD detector. Four frames with diffraction-limited seeing were obtained. Between 68 and 91 umbral dots with a brightness contrast greater than 2% were found in each frame, although no dots were found in the darkest part of the umbra. The intrinsic flux of the umbral dots varies widely, indicating that their intrinsic brightness does as well. The mean dot lifetime is estimated as 15 min, although some dots were observed to live more than 2 h. Some of the umbral dots are flowing into the umbra at speeds up to 0.5 km s^-1. These dots have higher than average contrast and are associated with penumbral grains.