建筑结构不同性能水平失效概率的合理比例关系研究

在基于性能的抗震设计中,为了使结构在整个生命周期内费用达到最小,不仅需要确定各个性能水平的目标失效概率,同时还需要确定不同性能水平目标失效概率之间的合理关系。本文针对这个问题。研究了在结构造价一定的情况下,不同性能水平失效概率的合理比例关系,使得在设计基准期内结构损失达到最小。在本文中,根据我国建筑抗震设计规范的条件,仅考虑“小震不坏”和“大震不倒”两个性能水平。     

钢筋混凝土框架结构造价与失效概率之间的近似关系研究

本文以层间位移角作为结构性能参数,分析了钢筋混凝土框架结构层间变形能力,以及在水平地震作用下层间位移反应。考虑钢筋混凝土框架结构材料强度和几何尺寸以及地震作用的不确定性,得出了在设计基准期内结构的失效概率。同时分析了不同设计参数下结构的最小造价,在此基础上,确定了结构最小造价和失效概率之间的近似关系。目的是为采用“投资—效益“准则确定该类型结构目标性能水平提供分析依据,从而为采用基于性能抗震设计理念制定建筑结构抗震设计规范提供基础研究。本文中,结构失效概率指结构最终极限状态的失效概率。     

基于“投资—效益”准则的结构全寿命总费用模型

作为基于结构性能抗震设计的重要原则,“投资—效益”准则反映了抗震设计思想由只注重结构安全到综合考虑技术、经济、社会等诸多因素影响的转变,而结构性能水平和抗震性能目标是实现这一准则的前提和基础.采用五级结构性能水平细化现行规范给出的三水准设防,以层间位移角为定量指标,建立了结构性能水平与层间位移角限值之间一一对应的关系.提出抗震性能目标优化决策,根据最优设防烈度并引入地震危险性分析,建立了基于“投资—效益”准则的结构全寿命总费用模型.该模型规避了直接求解体系可靠度的复杂过程,将问题转化为求解结构的失效概率.其优点在于既能考虑结构的初始造价,又充分根据结构性能失效的特点考虑结构在各级性能水平下的损失期望,全面注重了结构性能、安全及经济等条件,体现了基于性能的抗震设计理念.     

基于性能的既有钢筋混凝土建筑结构抗震评估与加固技术研究

根据我国现行的建筑结构抗震规范,无论是新建建筑结构的抗震设计还是既有建筑结构的抗震评估与加固,均通过小震弹性承载力计算 抗震延性构造措施来达到"小震不坏、中震可修、大震不倒"的抗震设防目标(对于不规则且具有明显薄弱部位的建筑结构还需要进行罕遇地震作用下的弹塑性层间变形验算)。对于抗震延性构造措施不满足现行规范的既有建筑结构的评估、改建、扩建,如果仅通过小震弹性的承载力计算,显然无法达到"大震不倒"的目标。本文通过引入国际上先进的基于性能的结构抗震思想,以结构层间位移和结构构件变形作为性能目标,从定量上解决了既有钢筋混凝土建筑结构的抗震评估与加固问题。     

抗震设计中结构的性能等级与设计性能安全指数

通常根据结构的破坏程度可以将结构的破坏划分为：基本完好、轻微破坏、中等破坏、严重破坏、倒塌等5个阶段。根据这5个阶段,本文将结构在地震过程中的性能极限状态划分为：功能连续极限状态、破坏控制极限状态、控制损失极限状态和防止倒塌极限状态,并以此作为划分结构性能等级的标准。定义结构失效概率的自然对数的负值为设计性能安全指数,通过计算结构失效概率对各构件可靠指标的一阶偏导数的方法,求出结构的设计性能安全等级。这种方法可以考虑建筑结构构件、建筑非结构构件以及其它非结构构件的性能,而且同时可以考虑结构系统总体效应的影响,因而能够比较全面地反映结构的抗震性能等级。     

钢筋混凝土结构抗震设防目标及实现步骤研究

钢筋混凝土结构的抗震设防目标,通俗的说法是“小震不坏,中震可修、大震不倒”,具体来说是“三水准设防目标”。三个水准的设防目标是通过两阶段设计来实现的。钢筋混凝土结构抗震设计的基本步骤：把握好抗震概念设计,采取双指标控制条件,使结构和结构构件既满足抗震承载力要求又满足变形要求,同时保证加强抗震构造措施,使结构有足够的结构延性,最终实现“三水准设防”目标。     

基于性能目标的一种核电站抗震设计方法研究

核电站在设计基准期因地震可能引起的破坏与核电站抗震性能设计水准的高低有直接的关系。美国土木工程协会(ASCE)根据美国能源部门对电站在自然灾害下的设计理论做进一步的研究,提出了ASCE 43-05规范的设计方法。该方法运用了成熟的概率地震危险性分析和地震易损性分析基本原理,提出了基于性能目标的设计方法。由于我国还缺少这方面的研究,故系统推导了该方法,并给出了参数变化时该方法的两个性能目标达到的程度。另外,评估核电站结构、系统和组件(SSC)的高置信低失效(HCLPF)是目前评估核电站的主要指标,研究了ASCE 43-05规范设计方法的HCLPF值,得出了该方法在不同条件下满足性能目标的要求,和具备高置信低失效的要求。最后,进行了算例验证和计算分析,为今后我国核电站的设计提供技术参考。     

基于可靠度的结构损伤性能设计

本文基于现行抗震规范设计方法，运用荷载抗力分项系数法对结构损伤可靠度进行了研究。选择了恰当的地震动随机过程模型。合理地确定了模型参数。利用现有的钢筋混凝土构件的损伤模型。应用响应面法拟合目标函数，提出了钢筋混弹簧土结构损伤可靠度的分项系数标定方法，根据试验经验公式并结合截面应力应变分析。确定了钢筋混凝土截面恢复力模型参数，应用MonteCarlo方法对结构的可靠度进行计算。编制了钢筋混凝土结构的损伤可靠度计算程序，采用重要抽样法计算结构的可靠度，提高了计算效率，计算了现行抗震规范的结构损伤可靠度，确定了分项系数和目标失效概率的关系。为现行规范向性能设计规范的过度提供了可靠度基础。     

某新型梁柱节点的装配式钢筋混凝土框架结构基于性能的抗震设计研究

在一种新型无黏结预应力装配式混凝土梁柱框架节点抗震性能试验基础之上，使用基于位移的抗震设计方法对新型框架节点的无黏结预应力装配式钢筋混凝土框架结构进行整体抗震设计研究。首先使用有限元软件sap2000进行预应力三维结构设计并建立相应的有限元模型，同时建立该梁柱节点的梁恢复力模型，进而实现自定义塑性铰本构关系研究该装配式框架结构。使用pushover分析去表征结构的抗震性能，对比研究不同目标位移下的相应性能水平要求。通过施加Y方向均匀分布荷载对结构进行弹塑性推覆分析，对结构的层间位移角、破坏机制进行分析讨论。结果表明：按照"功能良好""生命安全""防止倒塌"三水平的设计均达到预期结果，各层层间位移角和薄弱层的性能均能满足规范的相应要求。并选用三条地震波对结构进行弹塑性动力时程分析，表明基于该新型梁柱节点的装配式结构在基于位移的抗震设计中可以较好满足相关抗震性能水平要求。     

广州花园酒店"白金五星级酒店"结构改造基于性能的可行性研究

广州花园酒店原结构及改造后结构均不满足我国现行规范的抗震构造要求。本文依据基于性能的抗震设计思想,提出结构宏观上的层间位移角目标和微观上的结构构件变形及损伤目标,采用PKPM系列2005年版SATWE和ETABS 9.0中文版进行结构弹性分析,采用PKPM系列EPDA和美国Buffalo大学的IDARC 2D 6.0进行弹塑性静力推覆分析和弹塑性动力时程分析,并采用TNO公司的DIANA8.0进行单榀剪力墙的极限承载力分析,研究结构是否满足设定的整体及结构构件性能目标要求,确保改造后的结构达到"小震不坏、中震可修、大震不倒"的要求。     

基于性态的建筑工程抗震设计——《建筑工程抗震性态设计通则》述评

《建筑工程抗震性态设计通则(试用)》对抗震设计具有重要的指导意义,其中的抗震设计理念同以往的抗震设计规范在抗震设防的思路、概念和方法上有较大的区别。从工程实践的角度,比较了《通则》和现行抗震设计相关规范的区别并对具体应用提出一些看法。     

Performance-based seismic design of nonstructural building components:The next frontier of earthquake engineering

With the development and implementation of performance-based earthquake engineering,harmonization of performance levels between structural and nonstructural components becomes vital. Even if the structural components of a building achieve a continuous or immediate occupancy performance level after a seismic event,failure of architectural,mechanical or electrical components can lower the performance level of the entire building system. This reduction in performance caused by the vulnerability of nonstructural components has been observed during recent earthquakes worldwide. Moreover,nonstructural damage has limited the functionality of critical facilities,such as hospitals,following major seismic events. The investment in nonstructural components and building contents is far greater than that of structural components and framing. Therefore,it is not surprising that in many past earthquakes,losses from damage to nonstructural components have exceeded losses from structural damage. Furthermore,the failure of nonstructural components can become a safety hazard or can hamper the safe movement of occupants evacuating buildings,or of rescue workers entering buildings. In comparison to structural components and systems,there is relatively limited information on the seismic design of nonstructural components. Basic research work in this area has been sparse,and the available codes and guidelines are usually,for the most part,based on past experiences,engineering judgment and intuition,rather than on objective experimental and analytical results. Often,design engineers are forced to start almost from square one after each earthquake event: to observe what went wrong and to try to prevent repetitions. This is a consequence of the empirical nature of current seismic regulations and guidelines for nonstructural components. This review paper summarizes current knowledge on the seismic design and analysis of nonstructural building components,identifying major knowledge gaps that will need to be filled by future research. Furthermore,considering recent trends in earthquake engineering,the paper explores how performance-based seismic design might be conceived for nonstructural components,drawing on recent developments made in the field of seismic design and hinting at the specific considerations required for nonstructural components.     

Performance-based seismic design of nonstructural building components: The next frontier of earthquake engineering

With the development and implementation of performance-based earthquake engineering, harmonization of performance levels between structural and nonstructural components becomes vital. Even if the structural components of a building achieve a continuous or immediate occupancy performance level after a seismic event, failure of architectural, mechanical or electrical components can lower the performance level of the entire building system. This reduction in performance caused by the vulnerability of nonstructural components has been observed during recent earthquakes worldwide. Moreover, nonstructural damage has limited the functionality of critical facilities, such as hospitals, following major seismic events. The investment in nonstructural components and building contents is far greater than that of structural components and framing. Therefore, it is not surprising that in many past earthquakes, losses from damage to nonstructural components have exceeded losses from structural damage. Furthermore, the failure of nonstructural components can become a safety hazard or can hamper the safe movement of occupants evacuating buildings, or of rescue workers entering buildings. In comparison to structural components and systems, there is relatively limited information on the seismic design of nonstructural components. Basic research work in this area has been sparse, and the available codes and guidelines are usually, for the most part, based on past experiences, engineering judgment and intuition, rather than on objective experimental and analytical results. Often, design engineers are forced to start almost from square one after each earthquake event: to observe what went wrong and to try to prevent repetitions. This is a consequence of the empirical nature of current seismic regulations and guidelines for nonstructural components. This review paper summarizes current knowledge on the seismic design and analysis of nonstructural building components, identifying major knowledge gaps that will need to be filled by future research. Furthermore, considering recent trends in earthquake engineering, the paper explores how performance-based seismic design might be conceived for nonstructural components, drawing on recent developments made in the field of seismic design and hinting at the specific considerations required for nonstructural components.     

基于抗震性态的设防标准研究

以基于性态的抗震设计为出发点,并以我国为例,针对目前国内外抗震设防标准的若干问题和不足,提出了基于性态抗震设计的三环节抗震设防方法．将现有的设防内容改为确定结构的抗震设计类别、确定设计烈度或设计地震动参数、确定建筑的重要性等级３个方面,并分别在每一方面进行具体深入的研究,从而形成了一套完整的基于性态的抗震设防标准确定的原则、方法和框架,可以直接用来编制规范供抗震设计使用．      

Recent progress of seismic research on tall buildings in China Mainland

As a result of rapid economic growth and urbanization in the past two decades,many tall buildings have been constructed in China Mainland,offering researchers and practitioners an excellent opportunity for research and practice in the field of structural engineering. This paper reviews progress by researchers throughout China Mainland on the seismic research of tall buildings,focusing on three major topics that impact the seismic performance of tall buildings. These are:(1) new types of steel-concrete composite structural members such as steel-concrete composite shear walls and columns,(2) earthquake resilient shear wall structures such as shear walls with replaceable structural components,self-centering shear walls and rocking walls,and(3) performance-based seismic design,including seismic performance index,performance level and design method. The paper concludes by presenting future research needs and directions in this field.     

Research on performance-based seismic design criteria

IntroductionAt present, the proper design and construction of buildings for earthquake-resistance is the most effective measure to mitigate the earthquake damage. In a broad sense, the earthquake resistance design should include the following seven contents:1) Determining the seismic design criteria Determining the seismic design goals3) Determining the seismic design parameters (intensity or ground motion) and their numerical values4) Determining the category of importance for buildings and …