首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 162 毫秒
1.
利用中小震作为经验格林函数,选取0.2~2.0 Hz频段的强震数据进行波形反演,获得了2021年福岛县冲地震的破裂过程。结果表明:该地震的破裂主要集中在断层面距离震源约25 km的区域内,沿震源向东北延伸约5 km,向西南延伸约20 km;在该区域内,识别出两个滑动量集中的区域,均分布在距离震源约15 km西南侧,主要滑动量集中区域最大滑动量约3.2 m,深度基本与震源一致;次要滑动量集中区域略比主要滑动量集中区域浅约18 km。该震源模型对应矩震级Mw7.3,破裂速度为2.4 km/s。通过选择不同的中小震组合进行波形反演,结果对该震源模型特性无显著影响,揭示了该震源模型的稳健性;基于该震源模型合成反演分析中未使用的强震观测台站强震动,获得的合成波形与观测波形有很好的相关性,充分证明了该震源模型时空特征的可靠性。  相似文献   

2.
1996年3月19日新疆阿图什6.9级地震震源破裂特征的研究   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4  
通过对1996年3月19日新疆阿图什6.9级地震余震分布特征的研究,分析了这次地震震源破裂过程.并结合柯坪断裂带的构造运动、区域应力场的分布特征以及1972年以来该带的另外3次6级地震的余震分布方向,探讨了柯坪断裂带附近地区不同构造部位震源破裂扩展方向与强震活动的迁移方向.结果表明,本次地震震源破裂为明显的单侧破裂.柯坪断裂带的阿图什震区和柯坪震区,余震分布具有一定规律性,震源破裂基本都为单侧破裂;震源断错以逆断层为主.区内主要受NW向压应力。不同地段强震震源破裂扩展具有明显的区域特征,强余震分布方向是应力集中的体现,它标志着同一构造断裂带附近近期强震活动的迁移方向.在柯坪断裂带上这种规律更为明显。  相似文献   

3.
川滇地区强地震活动与区域新构造运动的关系   总被引:33,自引:0,他引:33  
在分析了川滇地区强震活动空间分布的非均匀性图象、震源破裂图象及震源断层力学性质等资料的基础上,讨论了该地区强震活动与区域活动断裂、活动地块现今运动状态、深部介质构造环境等的关系,对该区强震活动特征及其可能的力学机制进行了讨论.  相似文献   

4.
1996年3月19日新疆阿图什6.9级地震震源破坏特征的研究   总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3  
高国英 《地震》1997,17(3):290-296
通过对1996年3月19日新疆阿图什6.9级地震余震分布特征的研究,分析了这次地震震源破裂过程,并结合柯坪断裂带的构造运动、区域应力场的分布特征以及1972年以来该带的另外3次6级地震的余震分布方向。探讨了柯坪断裂带附近地区不同构造部位震源破裂扩展方向与强震活动的迁移方向。结果表明,本次地震震源破坏为明显的单侧破裂;震源断错以逆断层为主,区内主要受NW向压应力。不同地段强震震源破裂扩展具有明显的区  相似文献   

5.
川青藏地区的地震活动及震源特征   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4       下载免费PDF全文
高原  马林 《地震地质》1998,20(4):126-422
在分析区域地震活动和构造环境及利用GDSN的宽频带波形资料分析震源破裂特征的基础上,结合余震资料,讨论了1988~1990年发生在四川和青海的9次强震的震源破裂和余震分布特征,分析了四川、青海、西藏相邻区域内的地震能量迁移,并用单键群分析方法对1970年以来的地震活动总体图象进行了研究。结果表明,这些地震的震源性质与构造应力环境相符,但青海地震的震源都具有较大的逆掩分量,与过去的走滑震源性质不同,而四川地震的震源P轴不接近水平方向与当地的“Y”字形复杂构造有关  相似文献   

6.
高原  吴忠良 《华南地震》1997,17(4):10-18
1988至1990年,青海地区发生了4次震级大于6.0的强震。利用GDSN宽频带波形资料,通过波形模拟,结合地质构造的背景资料对这几次地震进行了震源破裂和发震构造背景的研究。使用台站的准震源时间函数和准时间差的分析方法,对震源和复杂性进行了讨论。  相似文献   

7.
川滇地区强地震活动与区域新构造运行的关系   总被引:6,自引:0,他引:6  
苏有锦 《中国地震》2001,17(1):24-34
在分析了川滇地区强震活动空间分布的非均匀性图象,震源破裂图象及震源断层力学性质等资料的基础上,讨论了该地区强震活动与区域活动断裂,活动地块现今运行状态,深部介质构造环境等的关系,对该区强震活动特征及可能的力学机制进行了讨论。  相似文献   

8.
孟国杰  苏小宁  王振  廖华 《地震》2018,38(2):11-27
联合近场GPS测站1-Hz运动学位移、 强震仪加速度波形和全球台站P震相波形作为约束, 以时空滑动分布约束条件和ABIC模型参数选择方法, 结合先验的滑动方向变化范围, 反演2008年汶川MS8.0地震的震源时空破裂过程, 给出了能够综合反映震源破裂过程的统一模型。 结果表明, 汶川地震总体上存在4个主要的破裂区, 最主要的一个破裂区位于震源东北40~120 km, 断层面上的最大位错量约为10 m, 主体滑动分布在2~20 km深度范围, 破裂达到地表; 第二个主体破裂区位于断层破裂带南段, 最大滑动量达到6 m; 另外2个主体滑动区位于断层破裂带北段, 但滑动破裂量小于断层南段破裂区的滑动量, 滑动破裂值最大值为4 m, 超过1 m的区域在走向上超过70 km。 反演得到的断层滑动模型的地震矩为9.5×1021 Nm, 相应的矩震级为MW7.95。 汶川地震破裂表现为单侧破裂, 起始破裂在汶川下方16 km深度, 向东北方向一致性地传播, 过程持续~120 s。 在地震发生后0~10 s内, 破裂集中在震源起始破裂区, 滑动破裂值为~1.0 m, 之后破裂向东北方向扩展, 震后20~40 s是主要的破裂时段。 在40~60 s, 破裂跨越断层南段和北段。 在80~90 s破裂最大值开始下降, 在100~110 s时, 下降为~0.5 m, 在110~120 s时, 下降为~0.1 m。 加入近场GPS测站1-Hz 波形数据与近场强震仪波形和远场长周期体波联合反演, 提高了震源破裂模型的空间分辨率, 特别是浅部滑动破裂区的分辨率, 反演的最大滑动破裂值比不用1-Hz 波形数据反演的结果增大, 表明近场1-Hz GPS波形数据对于揭示汶川地震的时空破裂过程具有重要的作用。  相似文献   

9.
1976年龙陵震群序列的破裂特征   总被引:2,自引:1,他引:2  
张四昌  王绍晋 《中国地震》1994,10(2):152-159
龙陵地震是由8个6级以上地震组成的强震震群序列,采用地震活动图象和震源机制资料的构造分析方法,得到带有运动学和动力学特征的震源破裂组合在地面的投影图象,配合其它资料,提出龙陵地震序列强震的破裂特征是:由3条北东东向左旋走滑断层和2条北北西向右旋走滑断层组成的共轭破裂组合,进一步讨论了某些有关的地震地质问题。  相似文献   

10.
1830年磁县712级地震是一个活动水平高、持续时间长的强震序列。近年来邯郸遥测地震台网记录到沿磁县地震极震区方向发生的大量小地震。根据对这些小地震的震源位置、震源机制的三维空间分布的分析,认为磁县地震的震源断层是NWW向近于直立的左旋走滑断层,它和磁县地震的等震线、地表破裂带特征相符合。这个例子说明在地震学和地震地质学相结合的基础上,有可能由历史大地震区内现今小地震的群体特征,推测历史大地震的震源断层空间取向及其运动方式  相似文献   

11.
On August 8, 2017, a strong earthquake of M7.0 occurred in Jiuzhaigou County, Aba Prefecture, northern Sichuan. The earthquake occurred on a branch fault at the southern end of the eastern section of the East Kunlun fault zone. In the northwest of the aftershock area is the Maqu-Maqin seismic gap, which is in a locking state under high stress. Destructive earthquakes are frequent along the southeast direction of the aftershocks area. In Songpan-Pingwu area, only 50~80km away from the Jiuzhaigou earthquake, two M7.2 earthquakes and one M6.7 earthquake occurred from August 16 to 23, 1976. Therefore, the Jiuzhaigou earthquake was an earthquake that occurred at the transition part between the historical earthquake fracture gap and the neotectonic active area. Compared with other M7.0 earthquakes, there are few moderate-strong aftershocks following this Jiuzhaigou earthquake, and the maximum magnitude of aftershocks is much smaller than the main shock. There is no surface rupture zone discovered corresponding to the M7.0 earthquake. In order to understand the feature of source structure and the tectonic environment of the source region, we calculate the parameters of the initial earthquake catalogue by Loc3D based on the digital waveform data recorded by Sichuan seismic network and seismic phase data collected by the China Earthquake Networks Center. Smaller events in the sequence are relocated using double-difference algorithm; source mechanism solutions and centroid depths of 29 earthquakes with ML≥3.4 are obtained by CAP method. Moreover, the source spectrum of 186 earthquakes with 2.0≤ML≤5.5 is restored and the spatial distribution of source stress drop along faults is obtained. According to the relocations and focal mechanism results, the Jiuzhaigou M7.0 earthquake is a high-angle left-lateral strike-slip event. The earthquake sequence mainly extends along the NW-SE direction, with the dominant focal depth of 4~18km. There are few shallow earthquakes and few earthquakes with depth greater than 20km. The relocation results show that the distribution of aftershocks is bounded by the M7.0 main shock, which shows obvious segmental characteristics in space, and the aftershock area is divided into NW segment and SE segment. The NW segment is about 16km long and 12km wide, with scattered and less earthquakes, the dominant focal depth is 4~12km, the source stress drop is large, and the type of focal mechanism is complicated. The SE segment is about 20km long and 8km wide, with concentrated earthquakes, the dominant depth is 4~12km, most moderate-strong earthquakes occurred in the depth between 11~14km. Aftershock activity extends eastward from the start point of the M7.0 main earthquake. The middle-late-stage aftershocks are released intensively on this segment, most of them are strike-slip earthquakes. The stress drop of the aftershock sequence gradually decreases with time. Principal stress axis distribution also shows segmentation characteristics. On the NW segment, the dominant azimuth of P axis is about 91.39°, the average elevation angle is about 20.80°, the dominant azimuth of T axis is NE-SW, and the average elevation angle is about 58.44°. On the SE segment, the dominant azimuth of P axis is about 103.66°, the average elevation angle is about 19.03°, the dominant azimuth of T axis is NNE-SSW, and the average elevation angle is about 15.44°. According to the fault profile inferred from the focal mechanism solution, the main controlling structure in the source area is in NW-SE direction, which may be a concealed fault or the north extension of Huya Fault. The northwest end of the fault is limited to the horsetail structure at the east end of the East Kunlun Fault, and the SE extension requires clear seismic geological evidence. The dip angle of the NW segment of the seismogenic fault is about 65°, which may be a reverse fault striking NNW and dipping NE. According to the basic characteristics of inverse fault ruptures, the rupture often extends short along the strike, the rupture length is often disproportionate to the magnitude of the earthquake, and it is not easy to form a rupture zone on the surface. The dip angle of the SE segment of the seismogenic fault is about 82°, which may be a strike-slip fault that strikes NW and dips SW. The fault plane solution shows significant change on the north and south sides of the main earthquake, and turns gradually from compressional thrust to strike-slip movement, with a certain degree of rotation.  相似文献   

12.
On two velocity models, the HypoDD method is used to accurately locate the Tongliao M5.3 earthquake sequence, then the CAP method is used to invert the focal mechanism solutions. The parameters of the seismogenic fault plane are fitted quantitatively by the small earthquake distribution and the regional stress field. The geometry, rupture features and possible seismogenic structure of the Tongliao M5.3 earthquake are comprehensively determined. The HypoDD relocation results show that this earthquake is located at 42.95°N, 122.37°E, the whole sequence trends in NW and major aftershocks (ML ≥ 3.0) strike in NEE direction. With the time elapsed, the aftershocks extended to the shallow crust gradually. Comparing the focal mechanism solutions and relocation results, we determine that the fitted causative fault based on NNW-trending aftershock distribution is reliable, which has the top left corner (43.00°N, 122.35°E, depth 3.3km), lower left corner (43.00°N, 122.35°E, depth 8.9km), upper right corner (42.92°N, 122.37°E, depth 3.3km), lower right corner (42.92°N, 122.37°E, depth 8.9km), extending range 3km×7km, trending in 349° (NNW), dip angle 86° (nearly vertical), and slip angle 15°. It is inferred that whole process of main shock rupture is from the source to the NW and SE sides as a shear. The rupture degree is larger in southeast where the late rupture concentrated, and did not reach the surface.  相似文献   

13.
We collected seismic records of 228 ML≥1.0 Jiujiang-Ruichang MS5.7 earthquake sequence from Dec.26, 2005 to Jun. 30, 2006. By using double-difference method combined with waveform cross-correlation, those earthquakes were relocated and finally the accurate source parameters of 224 earthquakes were obtained. The errors are about 0. 5km in horizontal and less than 2km in vertical direction, respectively. It was found that the depth of earthquake sequence concentrates in 8~14km range, and the epicenters are distributed along both NW and NE direction, and dominantly along NW direction. Combined with the focal mechanism, the distribution direction and the tectonic setting, we infer that the rupture of the NW-trending fault caused the MS5. 7 main shock, and then the rupture probably encountered an asperity and triggered the MS4. 8 strong aftershock. The NE-trending fault came into a seismically quiet period by stress adjustment in a short time, while the NW-trending fault released stress for a long time which caused a series of aftershocks. The MS5. 7 main shock is caused by the NW striking Yangjisshan-Wushan-Tongjiangling Fault and the MS4. 8 aftershock occurred on the NE striking Liujia-Fanjiapu-Chengmenshan Fault.  相似文献   

14.
2003年伽师6.8级地震序列特征和震源机制的初步研究   总被引:14,自引:0,他引:14  
在位于1997-1998年新疆伽师9次6级地震分布区域的东南端,2003年2月24日又发生6.8级地震。结合伽师6.8级地震序列震源机制解结果,对该地震序列的基本特征和震源区应力降等进行了对比分析。结果表明,6.8级地震断层是在北西向的区域应力场挤压作用下产生的倾滑逆断层,震源以单侧破裂为主,破裂方向与极震区走向,以及北西向的主压应力方向一致。震前震源区应力显著增强,震后应力释放较为彻底。中强余震震源机制解与主震有明显差异,表现出震源区应力场处于不稳定的调整阶段,余震震源机制的差异为震后地震趋势的判定提供了依据。  相似文献   

15.
快速确定断层破裂特征是烈度速报的一项重要技术,断层破裂特征可为烈度速报提供震源模型,提升烈度速报准确性。通过汶川地震加速度记录,提出一种快速计算震源破裂参数的方法。 假定断层为线源模型,以一定间距将断层离散化为若干子源,以震中为不动点,通过旋转获得所有断层可能的走向,通过每次移动一个子源,获得断层所有可能的破裂方式,将二者结合即可给出断层所有可能的空间分布;计算每种断层空间分布与每个台站的断层距,利用加速度记录峰值和断层距统计回归衰减关系,分析每个衰减关系的拟合残差,残差最小拟合效果最好的衰减关系所对应断层参数,能够对该次地震的地震动场有最合理的解释,也最有可能是实际地震中的断层空间分布。  相似文献   

16.
2014年8月3日云南鲁甸6.5级地震序列破裂过程研究   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2       下载免费PDF全文
本文利用主地震相对定位法,对2014年鲁甸MS6.5地震序列中的8月3日—9月30日地震进行了重新定位,借助于时空图像分析方法,对本次地震破裂过程进行了分析,得到如下结果:(1)2014年鲁甸MS6.5地震主要沿NW向破裂,存在沿NE向破裂的成分,但是NE向破裂并不明显;(2)地震破裂时,主要从主震震中处往ES方向传播,破裂带长度大约为10km,破裂面近乎直立;(3)余震活动主要集中于主震上方区域,震源深度大于主震的余震稀少.根据上述结果,结合当地的地震构造情况和本次地震的震源机制解,分析表明,本次地震的破裂面为NW向,其发震断层为包谷垴—小河断裂的可能性很大.  相似文献   

17.
利用P、SH、SV波的初动及振幅比获得2001年4月至2012年8月山东及附近区域132次地震震源机制解,对该区域地震断层的错动性质及地壳应力场特征进行分析.结果表明,山东及附近区域地震断层错动的基本方向为北东向和北西向,错动方式以走向滑动为主,部分为斜向滑动.分区研究表明:聊考断裂带附近区域所受挤压作用相对较强,逆断型地震破裂较多;胶东半岛及北侧海域所受拉张作用略占优势,逆断型地震破裂较少;沂沭断裂带南部附近区域逆断型与正断型的地震破裂所占比例差别不大.  相似文献   

18.
为研究2016年8月24日意大利中部MW6.2地震的断层破裂方向性效应, 依据断层走向将强震动观测台站划分为SE和NW两组, 比较两组记录的地面峰值加速度PGA、 地面峰值速度PGV、 拟加速度反应谱PSA和重要持时DSR. 结果显示: NW组观测到的PGA, PGV和PSA普遍大于SE组, PGA和PGV的观测值与预测值的残差随方位角变化明显; NW组观测到的DSR值整体小于SE组, 由此推断此次地震存在明显的方向性效应. 在此基础上, 采用反演方法, 确定了该地震的震源为双向非对称破裂, 主破裂方向大约介于345°—360°之间, 主破裂长度约占整个破裂的70%—80%, 破裂速度为2.2—2.5 km/s, 反演结果印证了两组台站数据的地震动参数差异是由断层破裂方向效应所引起的.   相似文献   

19.
By analyzing higher-accuracy location data of the Tangshan earthquake sequence,a clear distribution pattern of three aftershock belts in the NE,NWW,and NW directions of has been obtained.The analysis reveals three rupture planes of strong events of MS7.8,MS7.1 and MS6.9 in the sequence.It indicates that the complex pattern is closely related to the earthquake source,and the NE-,NWW-and NW-trending regional fault zones,which have been revealed by the research of the pre-seismicity anomaly.In summary,the source is located in the junction of the three fault zones,and the rupture planes of the three strong events located in the source can be regarded as the locked segments on the three fault zones.On these grounds,the paper explains the complexity of the source and epicentral distribution of aftershocks.  相似文献   

20.
唐山地震序列空间分布复杂性原因研究   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
刘蒲雄  吕晓健 《地震》2011,31(4):1-14
本文采用唐山地震序列定位精度较高的资料, 对不同时段余震震中分布进行再分析, 取得了余震密集带和序列3次强震(唐山7.8级、 滦县7.1级、 宁河6.9级)破裂面分布的清晰图像, 其中判定7.1级地震为NWW向破裂面。 其复杂图像与震前地震活动异常所揭示的震源及与震源孕育有关的三组区域性断裂带存在密切联系。 简单说来, 震源位于NE向、 NWW向、 NW向三组断裂带交汇的区域, 位于震源的余震密集带显示了这3次强震的破裂面, 它们分别可看作是三组区域断裂的闭锁段。 据此解释了形成唐山地震震源和序列震中分布复杂性的原因。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号