基于Vp/Vs波速比模型约束的张渤地震带深部电性结构研究

张渤地震带是中国东部地区一条重要的北西向地震活动带,获取深部精细的电性结构有助于探究该区域深部孕震环境及动力学机制等科学问题.为了提高大地电磁法深度分辨率,本文提出基于Vp/Vs波速比地震学模型约束的二维大地电磁反演法,通过理论模型合成数据检验了算法的可靠性.将算法应用于张渤地震带大地电磁测深资料,对比分析大地电磁无约束和有约束反演结果,检验算法在张渤地震带应用的有效性和实用性.最后结合已有的地质-地球物理资料,发现:反演获取的电阻率模型的电阻率梯度带与断层的空间分布吻合;唐山断裂带中上地壳表现为高阻特征,在下地壳底部有上涌的高导异常体,推测该区域深部高导区域与幔源物质侵入有关;三河—平谷断裂带浅部低阻异常与深部低阻异常不连续,地震主要分布于不连续区域;太行山山前断裂电阻率结构上表现为明显的电阻率变化梯度带,高阻异常体规模大、延伸到下地壳;张家口断裂带中下地壳高导异常区域比怀来盆地深部高导异常区域规模大,这可能暗示张家口断裂带的深部物质作用更为强烈.     

云南南部地区深部电性结构特征研究

在云南南部地区布设了一条孟连-罗平的北东向大地电磁测深剖面,以开展该地区的深部电性结构探测和孕震环境探查.沿该剖面进行了114个大地电磁测深点的观测,经过对观测资料的远参考Robust处理、定性分析和二维反演,得到了沿该剖面地壳、上地幔电性结构模型,从模型的电性结构特征进一步探讨了剖面穿过的3个地震区的深部地震孕育环境.研究结果表明：沿剖面的地壳上地幔电性结构反映出与区域地质构造资料基本一致的构造特征;该区的三个强震带地球深部都存在壳内低阻体,地震发生在电阻率梯度带上;断裂带的两侧块体介质的电阻率差异是强震活动带重要的深部背景.     

太行山东缘石家庄南部地壳结构及断裂活动性探测

采用深、浅地震反射和钻孔地质剖面相结合的方法,对太行山东缘石家庄南部的地壳结构和隐伏断裂的活动性进行了研究.深地震反射探测结果表明,该区地壳厚度33~38km,莫霍面从华北平原向太行山下倾伏.石家庄—晋县凹陷是受拆离断层控制的盆岭构造,太行山山前断裂为凹陷的西边界断裂,表现为上陡下缓的铲形断裂.石家庄—晋县凹陷中还发育北席断裂和栾城断裂,它们与太行山山前断裂一样受拆离断层的控制,未错断早更新世晚期以来沉积的地层不属于活动断裂.深地震反射剖面的中部还揭示了一个近垂直的穹窿状反射异常体,它可能起源于莫霍面,向上,穿过上、下地壳分界面,并延伸至上地壳.穹窿状反射异常体内部反射波视频率随深度增加而降低,在莫霍面附近的壳幔过渡带也出现明显的频率降低、界面扭曲和变形现象,推断它可能是上地幔岩浆上涌到地壳内部的侵入体.结合电磁测深结果可以发现,上地幔热物质的上涌和东、西向拉张可能是形成石家庄—晋县凹陷的动力学机制.探测结果为深入理解石家庄地区的深部地球动力学过程、华北克拉通破坏机制、深浅构造关系和地震构造提供了依据.     

青藏高原东北缘海原构造带马东山阶区深部电性结构特征及其构造意义

海原一六盘山构造带是青藏高原东北缘地区的一条重要边界,在海原断裂带和六盘山断裂带接触区形成了特殊的马东山挤压阶区,本文对跨过该挤压阶区一条密集测点大地电磁剖面数据进行了处理和二维反演,获得的深部电性结构图像揭示在马东山挤压阶区深部电性结构表现为在高阻背景下镶嵌多个向西南倾斜的低阻条带电阻率结构样式,并在深度约25 km汇聚到中下地壳低阻层内,共同组成"正花状"结构;海原一六盘山构造带西南侧到陇中盆地区间呈现高、低阻相互"楔合"的深部结构特征,而其东北侧的鄂尔多斯西缘带自地表到中下地壳为较完整的高阻块体.另外结合跨过海原断裂带中段和西秦岭造山带的大地电磁探测结果,对海原一六盘山构造带分段性及其两侧的陇中盆地和鄂尔多斯地块的接触关系进行了研究分析.大地电磁探测成果佐证了在海原断裂带中段为具有走滑特点的断裂,而其尾端与六盘山断裂带斜交区域的马东山地区发生了强烈的逆冲推覆与褶皱变形;活动构造研究发现沿海原断裂带所产生的左旋走滑位移被其尾端的马东山、六盘山以东西向的地壳缩短调节吸收,GPS观测表明青藏高原东北缘地区现今构造变形分布在海原一六盘山构造带以西上百公里的范围内,陇中盆地一海原一六盘山构造带和鄂尔多斯地块一线的深部电性结构图像也很好地解释了该区变形状态:海原一六盘山构造带带及西南盘的陇中盆地的中下地壳非常破碎,在青藏高原向北东方向的推挤下容易发生变形,而北东盘鄂尔多斯地块地壳结构完整,很难发生构造变形.对海原一六盘山构造带马东山阶区和龙门山构造带的深部电性结构及变形特征等进行了比较分析,发现该区有与2008年汶川地震相似的深部构造背景,应重视该区强震孕育环境的探测研究.     

滇西三江构造带电性结构特征——以福贡—巧家剖面为例

为查明滇西三江构造带及邻区复杂的构造特征,并揭示该区深部电性结构,沿福贡—巧家布设了一条长约410 km的大地电磁剖面.共观测到61个物理点,其中宽频大地电磁测点41个,长周期大地电磁测点20个.通过对采集到的数据进行一系列的处理、反演,得到了沿剖面的壳幔电性结构模型.并结合研究区内区域地质资料及其他地球物理资料,对剖面所经过的各个主要地质构造单元及主要断裂带进行了综合解释.电性结构模型揭示沿剖面地壳电性层次复杂,深部电性结构由西往东呈分块展布,横向变化大,壳内广泛发育低阻异常.在中甸构造带(香格里拉地块)和盐源—永胜构造带深部壳幔存在大规模低阻异常,这可能与地下局部熔融体和地热流有关;康滇构造带壳幔存在大规模高阻异常,表明地壳中曾经有地幔物质侵入;在大凉山构造带地下10~50 km深处存在一呈横向“半月形”展布的低阻体,电阻率值不满10Ωm,结合地质资料与前人的研究成果,推测该低阻体成因应与青藏高原东南缘“地壳管道流”有一定关联.     

各向异性介质的大地电磁反演及其有关地震前兆场的讨论

论述了某些条件下地球介质呈现出的电导率各向异性行为及层状对称各向异性介质大地电磁资料的反演方法；实测大地电磁（ＭＴ）资料的各向异性模型反演解释有助于识别地震深部电导率各向异性变化前兆，并对研究地壳深部应力状态和形变带提供了若干有用的信息     

各向异性介质的大地电磁反演及其有关地震前兆场的讨论

论述了某些条件下地球介质呈现出的电导率各向异性行为及层状对称各向异性介质大地电磁资料的反演方法；实测大地电磁(MT)资料的各向异性模型反演解释有助于识别地震深部电导率各向异性变化前兆，并对研究地壳深部应力状态和形变带提供了若干有用的信息．      

西秦岭与南北地震构造带交汇区深部电性结构特征

西秦岭造山带与南北地震构造带接触区是中国大陆最重要的南北向和东西向构造转化的接合部位之一.本文介绍了分别位于该区106°E东、西两侧的LMS-L3和DBS-L1两条大地电磁剖面的探测结果,两条剖面分别跨过了龙门山构造带东北段的青川段和宁强段.采用大地电磁相位张量分解技术对两条剖面上各测点的电性走向、二维偏离度等进行了计算和分析,采用NLCG二维反演方法对TE+TM模式的视电阻率和阻抗相位数据进行了二维联合反演.反演得到二维电性结构,在经度106°西侧LMS-L3剖面的深部电性结构自北向南揭示出,西秦岭北缘、成县盆地北缘、康县（即勉略构造带）和平武-青川断裂带都表现为明显的电性梯度带,深部延伸可达几十公里;西秦岭造山带、碧口地块与龙门山构造带东北段3个构造单元整体表现为高电阻体、呈现往南叠合且角度逐渐变陡的趋势.在106°E西侧西秦岭造山带区域的深部存在壳内低阻层,而东侧区域表现为高电阻体,深部电性结构在106°E东、西两侧的差异与该区深部速度结构特征一致,东、西两侧深部结构差异可能是该区中强地震分布差异的深层原因.LMS-L3和DBS-L1两条剖面南段的深部电性结构图像揭示出龙门山构造带东北部的青川段和宁强段内的平武-青川断裂带具有明显不同的深部结构特征,平武-青川断裂带在青川段为明显的电性梯度带,在宁强段不再表现为电性梯度带,而是完整的高电阻块体.汶川强余震向东北发展止于青川青木川附近,与平武-青川断裂带延伸深度和向北东方向的延伸长度密切相关,同时高电阻块体的宁强段对汶川强余震东北发展起到了阻挡作用.     

兰州地区深部电性结构的初步研究

利用兰州地区现有的大地电磁资料，对该区的深部电性结构进行了初步研究。结果表明，兰州地区各地质构造单元的电性差异较明显，与区域构造有较好的对应性。     

东北地区地壳上地幔结构的探测与研究

本文简要综述了近30余年来在中国东北地区开展的重力资料反演、大地电磁测深、深地震测深、地震层析成像等深部地球物理探测与研究及其在该区取得的地壳上地幔结构研究成果。     

唐山地震区地壳结构和构造:深地震反射剖面结果

1976年7月28日,在唐山地区发生了7.8级大地震.为了研究该区的地壳结构和断裂的深浅构造关系,2009年,我们在唐山市南部的丰南地区,跨唐山断裂带完成了1条道间距40m、炮间距200m、50次覆盖的深地震反射探测剖面.结果表明:研究区的地壳厚度为32 ～ 34km,莫霍面自东向西逐渐加深,在丰南县和宣庄镇之间,中-...     

Characteristic of crustal structure in the Shulu fault basin and its vicinity

（王椿镛，张先康，林中洋，李学清）ＣｈａｒａｃｔｅｒｉｓｔｉｃｏｆｃｒｕｓｔａｌｓｔｒｕｃｔｕｒｅｉｎｔｈｅＳｈｕｌｕｆａｕｌｔｂａｓｉｎａｎｄｉｔｓｖｉｃｉｎｉｔｙ￥Ｃｈｕｎ－ＹｏｎｇＷＡＮＧＩ；Ｘｉａｎ－ＫａｎｇＺＨＡＮＧ；Ｚｈｏｎｇ－ＹａｎｇＬ...     

深反射剖面揭示的芦山7.0级地震发震构造

芦山地震发生在龙门山断裂带前缘.关于芦山地震的发震断层,有的认为是前山断裂——双石—大川断裂,有的认为是山前断裂——大邑断裂拟或其他隐伏断裂,发震断裂究竟是哪条断裂以及芦山地震是不是汶川地震的余震?目前仍存在较大争议.震后穿过芦山地震区完成了一条长近40km的深地震反射剖面,以确定芦山地震的发震构造.反射剖面显示浅部褶皱和断裂构造发育,在上地壳存在6条逆冲断裂,下地壳存在一条非常明显的变形转换带,在深度16km左右还存在一个滑脱层,浅部的6条断裂最终都归并到该滑脱层上.参考主余震精定位结果,芦山地震的发震断裂应该是位于双石—大川断裂和大邑断裂之间的隐伏断裂F4,F2和F3断裂受控于发震断裂而活动,形成剖面上"Y"字型余震分布现象.隐伏断裂F4属山前断裂,不是前山断裂,因此芦山地震不是汶川地震的余震.     

Resistivity structure of a seismic gap along the Atotsugawa Fault, Japan

Seismicity along the Atotsugawa Fault, located in central Japan, shows a clear heterogeneity. The central segment of the fault with low-seismicity is recognized as a seismic gap, although a lot of micro-earthquakes occur along this fault. In order to elucidate the cause of the heterogeneity in seismicity, the electrical resistivity structure was investigated around the Atotsugawa Fault by using the magnetotelluric (MT) method. The regional geoelectrical strikes are approximately parallel to the fault in a low-frequency range. We constructed two-dimensional resistivity models across the fault using TM-mode MT responses to minimize three-dimensional effects on the modeling process. A smooth inversion algorithm was used, and the static-shifts on the apparent resistivity were corrected in the inversion process.A shallow, low resistivity zone along the fault is found from the surface to a depth of 1-2 km in the best-fit model across the high-seismicity segment of the fault. On the other hand, the corresponding low resistivity zone along the low-seismicity segment is limited to a shallower depth less than 1 km. The low resistivity zone along the Atotsugawa Fault is possibly due to fluid in the fracture zone; the segment with higher levels of seismicity may have higher fluid content in the fault zone compared with the lower seismicity segment. On a view of the crustal structure, a lateral resistivity variation in a depth range of 3-12 km is found below the fault trace in the high-seismicity segment, while a resistive layer of wide extent is found at a depth of about 5 km below the fault trace in the low-seismicity segment. The resistive layer is explained by less fluid condition and possibly characterized as high rigidity. Differences in the resistivity structures between low and high-seismicity segments of the fault suggest that the seismic gap in the central part of the Atotsugawa Fault may be interpreted as a locked segment. Thus, MT is an effective method in evaluating a cause and future activity of seismic gaps along active faults.The lower crust appears as a conductive zone beneath the low-seismicity segment, less conductive beneath the high-seismicity segment. Fluid is inferred as a preferable cause of the conductive zone in this study. It is suggested that the conductive lower crust beneath the low-seismicity segment is recognized where fluid is trapped by an impermeable layer in the upper crust. On the other hand, fluid in the lower crust may upwell to the surface along the high-seismicity segment of the fault.     

ELECTRICAL STRUCTURE OF THE 2017 MS7.0 JIUZHAIGOU EARTHQUAKE REGION AND THE EASTERN TERMINUS OF THE EAST KUNLUN FAULT

The East Kunlun Fault is a giant fault in northern Tibetan, extending eastward and a boundary between the Songpan-Ganzi block and the West Qinling orogenic zone. The East Kunlun Fault branches out into a horsetail structure which is formed by several branch faults. The 2017 Jiuzhaigou M_S7.0 earthquake occurred in the horsetail structure of the East Kunlun Fault and caused huge casualties. As one of several major faults that regulate the expansion of the Tibetan plateau, the complexity of the deep extension geometry of the East Kunlun Fault has also attracted a large number of geophysical exploration studies in this area, but only a few are across the Jiuzhaigou earthquake region. Changes in pressure or slip caused by the fluid can cause changes in fault activity. The presence of fluid can cause the conductivity of the rock mass inside the fault zone to increase significantly. MT method is the most sensitive geophysical method to reflect the conductivity of the rock mass. Thus MT is often used to study the segmented structure of active fault zones. In recent years MT exploration has been carried out in several earthquake regions and the results suggest that the location of main shock and aftershocks are controlled by the resistivity structure. In order to study the deep extension characteristics of the East Kunlun Fault and the distribution of the medium properties within the fault zone, we carried out a MT exploration study across the Tazang section of the East Kunlun Fault in 2016. The profile in this study crosses the Jiuzhaigou earthquake region. Other two MT profiles that cross the Maqu section of East Kunlun Fault performed by previous researches are also collected. Phase tensor decomposition is used in this paper to analyze the dimensionality and the change in resistivity with depth. The structure of Songpan-Ganzi block is simple from deep to shallow. The structure of West Qinlin orogenic zone is complex in the east and simple in the west. The structure near the East Kunlun Fault is complex. We use 3D inversion to image the three MT profiles and obtained 3D electrical structure along three profiles. The root-mean-square misfit of inversions is 2.60 and 2.70. Our results reveal that in the tightened northwest part of the horsetail structure, the East Kunlun Fault, the Bailongjiang Fault, and the Guanggaishan-Dieshan Fault are electrical boundaries that dip to the southwest. The three faults combine in the mid-lower crust to form a "flower structure" that expands from south to north. In the southeastward spreading part of the horsetail structure, the north section of the Huya Fault is an electrical boundary that extends deep. The Tazang Fault has obvious smaller scale than the Huya Fault. The Minjiang Fault is an electrical boundary in the upper crust. The Huya Fault and the Tazang Fault form a one-side flower structure. The Bailongjiang and the Guanggaishan-Dieshan Fault form a "flower structure" that expands from south to north too. The two "flower structures" combine in the high conductivity layer of mid-lower crust. In Songpan-Ganzi block, there is a three-layer structure where the second layer is a high conductivity layer. In the West Qinling orogenic zone, there is a similar structure with the Songpan-Ganzi block, but the high conductivity layer in the West Qinling orogenic zone is shallower than the high conductivity layer in the Songpan-Ganzi block. The hypocenter of 2017 M_S7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake is between the high and low resistivity bodies at the shallow northeastern boundary of the high conductivity layer. The low resistivity body is prone to move and deform. The high resistivity body blocked the movement of low resistivity body. Such a structure and the movement mode cause the uplift near the East Kunlun Fault. The electrical structure and rheological structure of Jiuzhaigou earthquake region suggest that the focal depth of the earthquake is less than 11km. The Huya Fault extends deeper than the Tazang Fault. The seismogenic fault of the 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquake is the Huya Fault. The high conductivity layer is deep in the southwest and shallow in the northeast, which indicates that the northeast movement of Tibetan plateau is the cause of the 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquake.     

郯庐断裂带中段电性结构及其地学意义研究

郯庐断裂带是中国大陆东部一个重要的左行走滑断裂系,对于研究中国大陆的形成演化与构造格局有着十分重要的意义.阿拉善左旗—山东日照超宽频带大地电磁测深剖面在山东莒县附近穿越了郯庐断裂带中段,电性主轴分析结果表明断裂带附近构造走向大致为北东20°;反演电阻率模型表明剖面穿越处郯庐断裂带的宽度约为30 km,断裂带主体是两条切割深度大、陡倾的断裂,西侧断裂切割深度约为60 km,向西倾斜,断面陡立,倾角约为70°,东侧断裂切割深度大于80 km,但小于100 km,界面东倾,陡立,倾角约为60°~80°;这两条断裂都切穿了地壳,但未切穿岩石圈.郯庐断裂带东缘至剖面终端日照,整个地壳为高阻,与断裂带西侧地壳的电性结构差异明显,这表明郯庐断裂带是华北地块与胶辽朝地块的边界断裂.     

邢台地震前地壳形变异常的可能性物理机制

将地壳介质视为麦克斯威尔体 ,运用差分法和三维有限元方法 ,探讨了邢台分层地壳结构模型 （含高速体和低速体及深大断裂 ）中深部断裂加速蠕滑时 ,平均应力、水平最大剪应力和地表面垂直位移随时间演化的特征 ,计算结果表明 :（1 ）在地壳中上部 1 1km处 ,深部断裂的加速蠕滑急剧加速了水平最大剪应力的增加速率 ,可达数百倍 ,深部断裂的加速蠕滑是邢台强地震成核过程的开始 ,可实现地壳下部的能量向地壳中上部快速转移 ;（2 ）深部断裂的加速蠕滑引起的地面垂直位移变化与邢台地震震前的地表面垂直位移变化非常一致 .说明邢台地震震前地壳表面垂直方向的位移不仅与岩石的膨胀有关 ,而且可能与地壳内深部断裂的加速蠕滑密切相关 .     

THE SOURCE PARAMETERS AND SEISMOTECTONIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE SEPTEMBER 4, 2017 ML4.4 LINCHENG EARTHQUAKE

At 3:05, September 4, 2017, an M_L4.4 earthquake occurred in Lincheng County, Xingtai City, Hebei Province, which was felt obviously by surrounding areas. Approximately 60km away from the hypocenter of Xingtai M_S7.2 earthquake in 1966, this event is the most noticeable earthquake in this area in recent years. On the one hand, people are still shocked by the 1966 Xingtai earthquake that caused huge disaster, on the other hand, Lincheng County is lack of strong earthquakes. Therefore, this quake has aroused widespread concerns by the government, society and seismologists. It is necessary to clarify whether the seismogenic structure of this event is consistent with the previous seismicity and whether it has any new implications for the seismic activity and seismic hazard in this region. Therefore, it is of great significance to study its seismogenic mechanism for understanding the earthquake activity in Xingtai region where a M_S7.2 earthquake had occurred in 1966. In this study, the Lincheng earthquake and its aftershocks are relocated using the multi-step locating method, and the focal mechanism and focal depth are determined by the "generalized Cut and Paste"(gCAP)method. The reliability of the results is analyzed based on the data of Hebei regional seismic network. In order to better constrain the focal depth, the depth phase sPL fitting method is applied to the relocation of focal depth. The inversion and constraint results show that aftershocks are mainly distributed along NE direction and dip to SE direction as revealed by depth profiles. Focal depths of aftershocks are concentrated in the depths of 6.5~8.2km with an average of about 7km. The best double-couple solution of the mainshock is 276°, 69° and -40° for strike, dip and slip angle for nodal plane I and 23°, 53° and -153° for nodal plane Ⅱ, respectively, revealing that it is a strike-slip event with a small amount of normal-fault component. The initial rupture depth of mainshock is about 7.5km obtained by the relocation while the centroid depth is 6km derived from gCAP method which was also verified by the seismic depth phase sPL observed by several stations, indicating the earthquake is ruptured from deep to shallow. Combined with the research results on regional geological structure and the seismic sequence relocation results, it is concluded that the nodal plane Ⅱ is the seismogenic fault plane of this earthquake. There are several active faults around the hypocenter of Lincheng earthquake sequence, however, none of the known faults on the current understanding is completely consistent with the seismogenic fault. To determine the seismogenic mechanism, the lucubrated research of the M_S7.2 Xingtai earthquake in 1966 could provide a powerful reference. The seismic tectonic characteristics of the 1966 Xingtai earthquake sequence could be summarized as follows:There are tensional fault in the shallow crust and steep dip hidden fault in the middle and lower crust, however, the two faults are not connected but separated by the shear slip surfaces which are widely distributed in the middle crust; the seismic source is located between the hidden fault in the lower crust and the extensional fault in the upper crust; the earthquake began to rupture in the deep dip fault in the mid-lower crust and then ruptured upward to the extensional fault in the shallow crust, and the two fault systems were broken successively. From the earthquake rupture revealed by the seismic sequence location, the Lincheng earthquake also has the semblable feature of rupturing from deep to shallow. However, due to the much smaller magnitude of this event than that of the 1966 earthquake, the accumulated stress was not high enough to tear the fracture of the detachment surface whose existence in Lincheng region was confirmed clearly by the results of Lincheng-Julu deep reflection seismology and reach to the shallower fault. Therefore, by the revelation of the seismogenic mechanism of the 1966 Xingtai earthquake, the seismogenic fault of Lincheng earthquake is presumed to be a concealed fault possessing a potential of both strike-slip and small normal faulting component and located below the detachment surface in Lincheng area. The tectonic significance indicated by this earthquake is that the event was a stress adjustment of the deep fault and did not lead to the rupture of the shallow fault. Therefore, this area still has potential seismic hazard to a certain extent.     

长江中下游成矿带中段岩石圈电性结构研究

长江中下游成矿带位于大别造山带、长江中下游凹陷、江南隆起带等大地构造单元结合部位,通过在研究区内布设两条首尾相接共计150km长的大地电磁剖面,获得了50km以浅岩石圈尺度的电性分布.长江中下游地区中段地下电性结构显示出在地下10km和30km处分别存在明显的圈层结构,以此认为现今横向稳定的"电莫霍"反映了研究区经历燕山期陆内构造-岩浆活动后已基本上完成壳幔重新平衡;而分隔大地构造单元的郯庐断裂带、长江断裂带以及江南断裂带在电性上具有特征的梯度显现,在印支造山期后的引张背景下,断裂带成为强伸展活动带与控制了燕山期大范围的陆内岩浆活动;高导地幔的局域性存在以及从北向南地幔导电性的变化反映了在经受深部动力学过程中处于不同大地构造部位的地幔所遭受的不同类型的改造以及地幔深部的构造极性.