2021年6月10日云南双柏地震序列发震构造分析

本文基于云南地震台网数据,对2021年6月10日云南双柏地震序列进行重新定位,并对序列中4次M_S≥3.5地震的震源机制解和震源区构造应力场进行了反演,研究了双柏地震序列时空分布特征和发震构造.地震重定位结果显示,双柏地震序列空间上呈NNE-SSW向优势分布,发震断层较为陡立,震源深度集中分布于5～15 km范围内,震源深度表现为南浅北深的特征.M_S5.1地震后余震序列在时空上呈现出不对称的双侧发展模式,M_S4.6地震前后余震沿SSW向存在往返迁移现象.反演得到的序列震源机制解类型均为走滑型,都具有与序列优势分布一致的NNE走向、高倾角SEE倾向节面.构造应力场反演表明震源区受到NNW向水平挤压和NEE向水平拉张的构造应力作用.结合重定位结果和序列震源机制分析认为,双柏地震序列与附近的楚雄—建水断裂等无关,其发震构造为一条NNE走向、SEE倾向的高倾角左旋走滑断裂,构造形成受控于川滇菱形块体SSE向整体运动产生的NNW向挤压构造应力作用.     

吴忠、灵武地区地震的精确定位和中强地震的发震构造

应用射线追踪方法及由震源参数和速度联合反演获得的地壳速度结构, 对吴忠、灵武地区１９８２～１９９３ 年发生的全部地震进行了精确定位。根据该地区中强地震序列的空间分布特征、震源机制和地震烈度考察结果,对４ 次中强地震的发震机制进行了探讨。认为１９８８年１ 月４ 日灵武５．５ 级地震的发震构造与灵武北断层有关,而其它３ 次５ 级地震可能与吴忠、灵武地区的沉陷和拉张有关。     

伽师强震群震源特征及震源机制力学成因分析

应用改进的主地震相对定位法对17年伽师强震群3级以上地震进行了精确定位,根据较强地震的空间分布和震源机制解推断出伽师震群的发震构造为北北西向的雁行断裂.根据伽师震群地震的2177个P波初动方向记录,计算了伽师震群的平均震源机制解.基于Silver的震源模型,由震源谱推断了伽师震群主要地震的破裂方向,破裂尺度及应力降.文中最后用右阶雁行断裂的数值模型计算了伽师震群的发震构造所产生的扰动应力场的空间分布图像,用其解释了序列地震震源机制的多样性和低应力降现象,并认为特定的雁行发震构造与强震的多发性有关.     

2013年8月河北蔚县小震群遗漏地震检测与发震构造分析

华北地区近年来小震群活动频繁, 在有数字波形记录的中强地震相对缺乏的背景下, 小震群发震构造精细研究可为华北地区地震危险性分析和地震趋势判断提供重要依据. 本文利用匹配滤波技术对2013年8月22—25日河北蔚县小震群遗漏地震事件进行检测, 并通过地震精定位和震源机制求解分析此次震群的发震构造. 计算结果显示, 通过互相关扫描检测到18次被地震台网常规分析遗漏的地震, 约为地震目录给出的13次地震事件的1.38倍. 该震群发震构造有北东向和北西向两组断裂, 震群活动前期以北东向构造活动为主, 后期地震主要发生在北西向构造, 北西向构造在此次震群活动中地震频度和强度均高于北东向构造. 震源机制计算结果显示北西向构造发震机制以正断拉张为主.      

2021年5月21日云南漾濞Ms6.4地震序列重新定位与发震构造分析

本文利用云南区域地震台网提供的震相报告,采用"多阶段定位"方法,对2021年5月21日云南漾濞Ms6.4地震序列的震源位置进行了重新定位.选取序列中13次具有高信噪比宽频带波形记录的Ms≥4.0地震事件,应用CAP波形反演方法,获取了这些事件的震源机制解和震源矩心深度.结果显示,漾濞地震序列震中距离NE侧的维西—乔后断裂约3～10 km,余震区长轴呈NW-SE向展布,长约22 km,震源优势分布深度为4～8 km,反映本次地震发生在上地壳浅部.地震分布北西窄、南东宽的分段特征明显,北西段地震更浅、更密集,南东段事件更深、更分散且存在向S偏转的现象.余震区不同位置的短轴剖面分析表明,发震构造倾向SW,南东段倾角缓于北西段.北西段还存在规模较小的NE向共轭断裂,长度约5 km.5月18日开始的前震自余震区中段向NW逐级迁移扩展,前震序列密集且存在相互触发,符合前震发生的级联模式.主震位于余震密集区的NW端,表明其具备SE向单侧破裂特征.多数4级以上地震的震源机制解都具有与序列长轴走向一致的NW-SE走向、高倾角SW倾向节面;基于震源机制解反演获得的区域构造应力场显示,发震构造受NNW-SSE向近水平主压应力作用发生右旋走滑运动,揭示主发震断层产状和错动类型与维西—乔后断裂基本一致.因此,可初步判定发震构造为维西—乔后断裂的平行伴生断裂,这一构造的形成可能与川滇块体SE向滑移和滇西南块体的顺时针旋转有关.     

宁洱地震序列的震源机制解分析

利用云南数字地震台网资料得到宁洱地震序列的主震、5.1级强余震和52个余震震源机制解.分析表明,该地震序列的发震断裂呈NW走向,倾角陡立.在接近水平的近南北向压应力作用下,断裂具有右旋走滑的错动性质.主震、强余震和众多的余震都发生在同一发震断裂上.大量的余震震源机制解结果与主震一致,是地震序列的主要破裂类型,但还存在与主要类型不一致的倾向滑动类型,这可能与余震破裂起始点的微构造控制作用有关,但是它们呈水平向的应力轴与主震的主应力轴一致.NW向断层作右旋走向错动,滑动断层推挤的象限都是逆冲类型的余震,而拉张的象限都是正断层类型的地震.宁洱地震序列的震源机制和周围4次5级以上地震的震源机制相同,表明震源区应力场和区域应力场完全一致,宁洱地震的孕育和发生受区域应力场的控制.     

2021年5月22日青海玛多Ms7.4地震发震构造分析

精确的余震序列定位及震源机制反演能够提供强震破裂尺度、发震断层面和区域应力场等信息,为震后应急决策和分析发震构造提供科学依据.本研究采用双差定位方法对2021年5月22日 青海玛多Ms7.4地震序列进行精定位,得到震后9天内共1055个事件的精定位结果;同时,利用青海、西藏、四川和甘肃台网记录的波形数据,采用近震全波形矩张量反演方法得到了玛多Ms7.4地震15次中等余震(Ms≥4.0)震源机制解,并进一步反演得到震源区构造应力场.地震定位结果显示,玛多主震位于玛多—甘德断裂与甘德南缘断裂之间,发震断层面较为陡立,余震序列在时间上呈现出不对称的双侧破裂模式,且沿主破裂面的两端均表现出分支破裂特征,说明本次地震触发了分支断层;震源机制结果显示15次中等余震包含12次走滑型和3次逆冲型地震,暗示主断层破裂受到局部异常结构的影响;另外,应力场反演表明震源区为近EW向挤压特征,与该区域最大水平主压应力优势取向一致.结合上述结果以及周边地质构造背景,我们认为玛多地震发震构造为位于巴颜喀拉地块内部一条NWW向的高倾角左旋走滑断裂,主破裂触发了东西两端分支断层活动,断层面的非均匀性控制了余震序列时空分布的差异性.     

2008年3月30日甘肃肃南5.0级地震特征

2008年3月30日在甘肃省肃南县皇城镇一带发生了一次MS5.0地震。本文归纳总结了本次地震的基本地震参数、序列特征,利用P波资料计算了震源机制解,根据地震现场考察结果分析了烈度分布特征。综合本次地震的地质构造和历史地震活动背景、震源机制、余震分布、极震区长轴方向分析了本次地震的发震构造,结果显示本次地震的发震构造不清晰。     

广西北流Ms5.2地震序列重新定位及其发震构造分析

收集广西北流5.2级地震序列波形和震相资料,采用结合波形互相关技术的双差定位方法对北流5.2级地震序列进行重新定位,采用CAP方法反演了北流5.2级地震震源机制。结合地质调查、地震烈度、地震精定位等结果,探讨了此次地震的发震构造。结果显示,北流5.2级地震序列呈北西向优势展布,震源深度主要集中在6～9 km。震源机制为走滑型,NWW向节面为可能的地震破裂面,初步推测NW向的米场-石窝断裂为发震断裂。     

2022年四川马尔康6.0级震群序列震源机制特征分析

采用近震全波形矩张量方法反演了2022年四川马尔康6.0级震群序列22次地震的震源机制解,结果显示：这22次地震全部为走滑型,断层面走向呈NNW和NE两个优势方向,断层面倾角近似直立,滑动角分布在0°和180°附近,P轴优势方位为NWW-SEE向,倾伏角接近水平,表明此次地震事件主要受区域NWW-SEE向水平挤压应力场控制。3次5级以上地震震源机制均与序列其他地震的总体震源机制差异较小,说明序列震源机制较为一致。结合精定位结果综合分析认为：马尔康震群属于多断层面触发性震群,3次5级以上地震是不同断裂的破裂事件,其中5.8级和6.0级地震发震断层面走向为NNW,为左旋走滑破裂事件;5.2级地震发震断层面走向为NE,为右旋走滑破裂事件,3个发震断层均以走滑错动为主,断层面近似直立。     

2018年9月4日伽师5.5级地震序列震源机制解及震源处应力场特征

本文采用新疆测震台网数字波形记录，利用CAP和P、S波初动和振幅比方法计算2018年9月4日伽师5.5级地震序列中M_S≥2.5地震的震源机制解，结合地震烈度等震线和双差重定位后的地震序列空间展布等特征分析了此次地震的发震构造，反演了震源处应力场。结果表明，伽师5.5级地震呈NE向的节面I为发震断层面，属于左旋走滑断层，震源深度为9km，发震构造可能为浅部超基底断裂；地震序列中有21次为走滑型，4次为正断型，说明绝大多数序列的破裂方式与主震相近，表明余震应力场主要受主震震源应力场控制；P轴方位在NNE向有明显的优势分布且倾伏角较小，T轴方位在NWW向有明显的优势分布且倾伏角较小，说明震源处主要以NNE向水平挤压和NWW向水平拉张作用为主；此次伽师5.5级地震序列表现的浅部应力场与已有研究得出的震源区深部应力场基本一致，应力形因子R的最优解为0.17，说明震源处近NE向中间主应力σ₂有一定挤压成分。     

RELOCATION OF THE 23 NOVEMBER 2017 WULONG MS5.0 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE AND ANALYSIS OF ITS SEISMOGENIC FAULT

The Wulong M_S5.0 earthquake on 23 November 2017, located in the Wolong sap between Wenfu, Furong and Mawu faults, is the biggest instrumentally recorded earthquake in the southeastern Chongqing. It occurred unexpectedly in a weak earthquake background with no knowledge of dramatically active faults. The complete earthquake sequences offered a significant source information example for focal mechanism solution, seismotectonics and seismogenic mechanism, which is helpful for the estimation of potential seismic sources and level of the future seismic risk in the region. In this study, we firstly calculated the focal mechanism solutions of the main shock using CAP waveform inversion method and then relocated the main shock and aftershocks by the method of double-difference algorithm. Secondly, we determined the seismogenic fault responsible for the M_S5.0 Wulong earthquake based on these calculated results. Finally, we explored the seismogenic mechanism of the Wulong earthquake and future potential seismic risk level of the region. The results show the parameters of the focal mechanism solution, which are:strike24°, dip 16°, and rake -108° for the nodal plane Ⅰ, and strike223°, dip 75°, and rake -85° for the nodal plane Ⅱ. The calculations are supported by the results of different agencies and other methods. Additionally, the relocated results show that the Wulong M_S5.0 earthquake sequence is within a rectangular strip with 4.7km in length and 2.4km in width, which is approximately consistent with the scales by empirical relationship of Wells and Coppersmith(1994). Most of the relocated aftershocks are distributed in the southwest of the mainshock. The NW-SE cross sections show that the predominant focal depth is 5~8km. The earthquake sequences suggest the occurrence features of the fault that dips northwest with dip angle of 63° by the least square method, which is largely consistent with nodal planeⅡof the focal mechanism solution. Coincidentally, the field outcrop survey results show that the Wenfu Fault is a normal fault striking southwest and dipping 60°~73° by previous studies. According to the above data, we infer that the Wenfu Fault is the seismogenic structure responsible for Wulong M_S5.0 earthquake. We also propose two preliminary genetic mechanisms of "local stress adjustment" and "fluid activation effect". The "local stress adjustment" model is that several strong earthquakes in Sichuan, such as M8.0 Wenchuan earthquake, M7.0 Luzhou earthquake and M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, have changed the stress regime of the eastern margin of the Sichuan Basin by stress transference. Within the changed stress regime, a minor local stress adjustment has the possibility of making a notable earthquake event. In contract, the "fluid activation effect" model is mainly supported by the three evidences as follows:1)the maximum principle stress axial azimuth is against the regional stress field, which reflects NWW-SEE direction thrusting type; 2)the Wujiang River crosscuts the pre-existing Wenfu normal fault and offers the fluid source; and 3)fractures along the Wenfu Fault formed by karst dissolution offer the important fluid flow channels.     

2015年7月3日皮山6.5级地震发震构造初步研究

基于新疆区域数字地震台网记录,采用CAP（Cut and Paste）方法反演了2015年7月3日皮山6.5级主震和部分M_S3.6以上余震的震源机制解和震源深度;采用HypoDD方法重新定位了序列中M_L2.5以上地震序列的震源位置,并利用小震分布和区域应力场拟合了可能存在的发震断层面参数.基于上述研究,综合分析了皮山6.5级地震序列的震源深度、震源机制和震源破裂面特征,探讨可能的发震构造.结果显示,利用CAP方法得到的最佳双力偶机制解节面I：走向280°/倾角60°/滑动角90°;节面Ⅱ：走向100°/倾角30°/滑动角90°,矩心深度19 km,表明该地震为一次逆冲型地震事件.大部分M_S3.6以上余震震源机制与主震具有一定的相似性.双差定位结果显示,M_L2.5以上的余震序列主要分布在主震的西南方向,深度主要分布在0～15 km范围内,余震分布显示出与发震构造泽普隐伏断裂一致的倾向南西的特征.利用小震分布和区域应力场拟合得到发震断层参数为走向104°/倾角34°/滑动角94°,该结果与主震震源机制解中节面Ⅱ的滑动角较为接近,绝大多数余震发生在断层面附近10 km左右的区域.根据本研究得到的震源机制、精定位结果以及利用小震分布和区域应力场拟合得到的断层面的参数,结合震源区地质构造情况,初步给出了此次皮山6.5级地震的发震模式.     

STUDY ON THE SEISMOGENIC FAULT AND DYNAMICS PARAME-TERS OF THE 2014 MS6.6 JINGGU EARTHQUAKE IN YUNNAN

On October 17, 2014, a M_S6.6 earthquake occurred in Jinggu, Yunnan. The epicenter was located in the western branch of Wuliang Mountain, the northwest extension line of Puwen Fault. There are 2 faults in the surrounding area, one is a sinistral strike-slip and the other is the dextral. Two faults have mutual intersection with conjugate joints property to form a checkerboard faulting structure. The structure of the area of the focal region is complex. The present-day tectonic movement is strong, and the aftershock distribution indicates the faulting surface trending NNW. There is no obvious surface rupture related to the known fault in the epicenter, and there is a certain distance from the surface of the Puwen fault zone. Regional seismic activity is strong. In 1941, there were two over magnitude 7.0 earthquakes in the south of the epicenter of Jinggu County and Mengzhe Town. In 1988, two mainshock-aftershock type earthquakes occurred in Canglan-Gengma Counties, the principal stress axes of the whole seismic area is in the direction of NNE. Geological method can be adopted to clarify the distribution of surficial fracture caused by active faults, and high-precision seismic positioning and spatial distribution characteristics of seismic sequences can contribute to understand deep seismogenic faults and geometric features. Thus, we can better analyze the three-dimensional spatial distribution characteristics of seismotectonics and the deep and shallow tectonic relationship. The focal mechanism reveals the property and faulting process to a certain extent, which can help us understand not only the active property of faults, but also the important basis for deep tectonic stress and seismogenic mechanism. In order to study the fault characteristic of the Jinggu earthquake, the stress field characteristics of the source area and the geometric parameters of the fault plane, this paper firstly uses the 15 days aftershock data of the Jingsuo M_S6.6 earthquake, to precisely locate the main shock and aftershock sequences using double-difference location method. The results show that the aftershock sequences have clustering characteristics along the NW direction, with a depth mainly of 5~15km. Based on the precise location, calculations are made to the focal mechanisms of a total of 46 earthquakes including the main shock and aftershocks with M_L ≥ 3.0 of the Jinggu earthquake. The double-couple(DC)component of the focal mechanism of the main shock shows that nodal plane Ⅰ:The strike is 239°, the dip 81°, and the rake -22°; nodal plane Ⅱ, the strike is 333°, the dip 68°, and the rake -170.31°. According to focal mechanism solutions, there are 42 earthquakes with a focal mechanism of strike-slip type, accounting for 91.3%. According to the distribution of the aftershock sequence, it can be inferred that the nodal plane Ⅱ is the seismogenic fault. The obtained focal mechanism is used to invert the stress field in the source region. The distribution of horizontal maximum principal stress orienation is concentrated. The main features of the regional tectonic stress field are under the NNE-SSW compression(P axis)and the NW-SE extension(T axis)and are also affected by NNW direction stress fields in the central region of Yunnan, which indicates that Jinggu earthquake fault, like Gengma earthquake, is a new NW-trending fault which is under domination of large-scale tectonic stress and effected by local tectonic stress environment. In order to define more accurately the occurrence of the fault plane of the Jinggu earthquake, with the precise location results and the stress field in the source region, the global optimal solution of the fault plane parameters and its error are obtained by using both global searching simulated annealing algorithm and local searching Gauss-Newton method. Since the parameters of the fault plane fitting process use the stress parameters obtained by the focal mechanism inversion, the data obtained by the fault plane fitting is more representative of the rupture plane, that is, the strike 332.75°, the dip 89.53°, and the rake -167.12°. The buried depth of the rupture plane is 2.746km, indicating that the source fault has not cut through the surface. Based on the stress field characteristics and the inversion results of the fault plane, it is preliminarily believed that the seismogenic structure of the Jinggu earthquake is a newly generated nearly vertical right-lateral strike-slip fault with normal component. The rupture plane length is about 17.2km, which does not extend to the Puwen fault zone. Jinggu earthquake occurred in Simao-Puer seismic region in the south of Sichuan-Yunnan plate. Its focal mechanism solution is similar to that of the three sub-events of the Gengma earthquake in November 1988. The seismogenic structure of both of them is NW-trending and the principal stress is NE-SW. The rupture plane of the Jinggu main shock(NW direction)is significantly different from the known near NS direction Lancang Fault and the near NE direction Jinggu Fault in the study area. It is preliminarily inferred that the seismogenic structure of this earthquake has a neogenetic feature.     

由震源机制解推断唐山地震序列发震断层的分段特征

使用唐山地区2002年1月—2015年11月M_L≥2.5地震的255个震源机制解, 采用构造应力场均匀性的分段方法对唐山地震序列的发震断层进行分段． 在已有唐山地区震源机制解分区特征的基础上, 给出了5个参考应力张量, 并通过差异显著性的z值检验计算将唐山地震序列的发震断层分为宁河、 唐山、 滦县和卢龙等4个子段, 进而分别对4个子段的应力场进行反演． 结果显示: 4个子段的最大主压应力方向均呈近EW向, 且唐山、 宁河和卢龙子段的应力场均表现出较大的拉张分量; 唐山、 宁河子段的最佳应力张量与唐山主震对唐山断裂带两端点所产生的引张应力场的作用方式一致． 此外, 唐山子段的应力场符合基于接收函数给出的上地幔物质隆升模型, 滦县子段走滑型的应力状态反映了该区的共轭构造运动, 卢龙子段的最佳应力张量为正断兼右旋走滑． 从当前唐山地震序列发震断层分段的应力场特征可以推断, 现今唐山地区的地震活动具有继承性, 主要受区域构造应力场和该区深、 浅共存的断裂构造体系控制．      

RELOCATION OF THE HUTUBI MS6.2 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE ON 8 DECEMBER 2016 AND ANALYSIS OF THE SEISMOGENIC STRUCTURE

Based on the digital waveforms of Xinjiang Seismic Network, the Hutubi M_S6.2 earthquake sequence (M_L ≥ 1.0) was relocated precisely by HypoDD.The best double-couple focal mechanisms of the main shock and aftershocks of M_L ≥ 4.0 were determined by the CAP method. We analyzed the characteristics of spatial distribution, focal mechanisms and the seismogenic structure of earthquake sequence. The results show that the main shock is located at 43.775 9°N, 86.363 4°E; the depth of the initial rupture and centriod is about 15.388km and 17km. The earthquake sequence extends unilaterally along NWW direction with an extension length of about 15km and a depth ranging 5~15km. The characteristics of the depth profiles show that the seismogenic fault plane dips northward and the faulting is dominated by thrusting. The nodal planes parameters of the best double-couple focal mechanisms are:strike 292°, dip 62° and rake 80° for nodal plane I, and strike 132°, dip 30° and rake 108° for nodal plane Ⅱ, indicating that the main shock is of thrust faulting. The dip of nodal planeⅠis consistent with the dip of the depth profile, which is inferred to be the fault plane of seismogenic fault of this earthquake. According to the comprehensive analysis of the relocation results, the focal mechanism and geological structure in the source region, it is preliminarily inferred that the seismogenic structure of the Hutubi M_S6.2 earthquake may be a backthrust on the deeper concealed thrust slope at the south of Qigu anticline. The earthquake is a "folding" earthquake taking place under the stress field of Tianshan expanding towards the Junggar Basin.     

2017年精河MS6.6地震邻区构造应力场特征与发震断层性质的厘定

2017年8月9日新疆精河发生M_S6.6地震,深入了解该地震的构造应力背景及其所破裂断层的活动特性对理解其孕震过程及震后的地震危险性估计十分重要.本研究自GCMT目录收集了2017年8月9日新疆精河M_S6.6地震震中及其邻区的253个震源机制解,应用MSATSI软件反演了该地震及其邻区的应力场.反演结果显示,西北区域应力场的最大主压应力轴的方位从西到东呈现出NNW-NS-NNE的渐变过程,东南区域应力场最大主压应力轴的方位稳定于NNE向,倾角都较小;最大主张应力轴都基本沿东西向,倾角相对较大;西北区域较大的R值显示出区域应力场主要受近NS向水平挤压作用,中部挤压分量相对较大,西部和东部挤压分量相对较小.根据所反演的区域构造应力场,结合发震的库松木契克山前断裂的地质调查参数,估算该断裂的理论滑动角为137.7°,误差为21.3°,验证了地质上得到的库松木契克山前断裂的逆冲兼右旋走滑性质.判断该断裂滑动性质的另一种方法是通过发生在该断裂上地震的震源机制验证.本研究首先计算了发生在库松木契克山前断裂不同机构给出的震源机制节面在所反演的局部应力场作用下的理论滑动角,发现理论滑动角与实际地震震源机制滑动角相差很小,验证了反演的局部应力场的正确性;而后计算了局部应力场作用下的库松木契克山前断裂上的理论震源机制与实际发生地震震源机制的三维空间旋转角,发现两者在给定的误差范围内是一致的.本研究自地球物理角度确证了库松木契克山前断裂的滑动性质,为该地区的地震孕育环境、地震活动性和地球动力学研究提供了基础.     

盖州青石岭地震序列发震构造初探

利用双差定位方法对盖州青石岭震群2012年2月至2015年8月的地震活动进行了重新定位,并使用CAP方法和P波初动法计算了M_L≥4.0地震的震源机制解,之后结合盖州地区的地震地质资料,分析了青石岭震群的发震构造.结果表明:青石岭震群在平面上呈NW向分布,地震活动主要分布在6 km×3 km的矩形范围内,震源深度为7—10 km;较大地震的震源机制解的走向与精定位后地震的优势分布方向一致;综合分析双差定位结果、震源机制解和发震区的地震地质等资料,初步认为九寨—盖县北段西北侧存在NW向次级铲式正断层,青石岭震群即为该断层在区域应力场作用下不断地左旋走滑-拉张错动造成的.      

2019年6月17日四川长宁6.0级地震中心震源机制解及震源区构造应力场研究

不同资料和方法给出的2019年6月17日四川长宁6.0级地震震源机制解存在较大差异,为了找到1个合适的震源机制解来研究此次地震的发震方式,通过数学方法得到了与现有震源机制解差别最小的中心震源机制解,节面I的走向、倾角、滑动角分别为194.78°、52.68°和139.16°,节面Ⅱ的走向、倾角、滑动角分别为312.44°、58.67°和45.22°,根据本次地震余震分布拟合得到的断层面的走向为312.17°,与中心震源机制的节面Ⅱ走向一致,因而推断节面Ⅱ为本次地震的发震断层面。之后,利用此次地震之前震源区地震的震源机制解,反演了震源区的震前构造应力场。结果表明,长宁6.0级地震的中心震源机制解和震源区震前应力场均为逆冲型为主兼走滑分量的类型,震前应力场压轴为NWW—SEE向,中间轴为NNE—SSW向,两轴倾角接近水平,而张轴较陡,表现为逆冲型的应力场。将反演得到的应力场投影到中心震源机制解给出的与余震分布一致的节面上,发现中心震源机制解的滑动角和应力场预测的滑动角差别仅为13.45°,表明此次地震受背景应力场控制而发生在先存的薄弱面上。     

采用2021年青海玛多地震序列震源机制节面聚类确定发震断裂几何形态

地震断裂带形状是活动构造和地球动力学的重要资料。2021年发生的玛多地震序列提供了丰富的震源机制资料,为统计震源机制节面并估计玛多地震发震断层面形状提供了很好机会。文章对地震的震源机制资料进行基于密度的聚类来确定断层的几何形态。首先对收集到的玛多地震序列的震源机制解进行中心解求解，从而获得更为精准的数据,然后对其进行DBSCAN方法的聚类分析，得到断层的走向为113.5°，倾角为88.2°,通过震源机制反演应力场,并将应力场投影到断层上，得到断裂带的相对剪应力和相对正应力分别为0.84和-0.79,剪应力强度较大,滑动角为-0.72°。结果表明玛多地震是发震断裂受NE-SW的挤压和NW-SE的拉张,形成了较大的剪切力,从而促使近东西的江错断裂发生左旋走滑错动所致。