Non-thermal processes in large solar flares

We analyze particle acceleration processes in large solar flares, using observations of the August, 1972, series of large events. The energetic particle populations are estimated from the hard X-ray and γ-ray emission, and from direct interplanetary particle observations. The collisional energy losses of these particles are computed as a function of height, assuming that the particles are accelerated high in the solar atmosphere and then precipitate down into denser layers. We compare the computed energy input with the flare energy output in radiation, heating, and mass ejection, and find for large proton event flares that:

1. The ～10–10² keV electrons accelerated during the flash phase constitute the bulk of the total flare energy.
2. The flare can be divided into two regions depending on whether the electron energy input goes into radiation or explosive heating. The computed energy input to the radiative quasi-equilibrium region agrees with the observed flare energy output in optical, UV, and EUV radiation.
3. The electron energy input to the explosive heating region can produce evaporation of the upper chromosphere needed to form the soft X-ray flare plasma.
4. Very intense energetic electron fluxes can provide the energy and mass for interplanetary shock wave by heating the atmospheric gas to energies sufficient to escape the solar gravitational and magnetic fields. The threshold for shock formation appears to be ～10³¹ ergs total energy in >20 keV electrons, and all of the shock energy can be supplied by electrons if their spectrum extends down to 5–10 keV.
5. High energy protons are accelerated later than the 10–10² keV electrons and most of them escape to the interplanetary medium. The energetic protons are not a significant contributor to the energization of flare phenomena. The observations are consistent with shock-wave acceleration of the protons and other nuclei, and also of electrons to relativistic energies.
6. The flare white-light continuum emission is consistent with a model of free-bound transitions in a plasma with strong non-thermal ionization produced in the lower solar chromosphere by energetic electrons. The white-light continuum is inconsistent with models of photospheric heating by the energetic particles. A threshold energy of ～5×10³⁰ ergs in >20 keV electrons is required for detectable white-light emission.

The highly efficient electron energization required in these flares suggests that the flare mechanism consists of rapid dissipation of chromospheric and coronal field-aligned or sheet currents, due to the onset of current-driven Buneman anomalous resistivity. Large proton flares then result when the energy input from accelerated electrons is sufficient to form a shock wave.     

Observation of the impulsive phase of a simple flare

We present a broad range of complementary observations of the onset and impulsive phase of a fairly large (1B, M1.2) but simple two-ribbon flare. The observations consist of hard X-ray flux measured by the SMM HXRBS, high-sensitivity measurements of microwave flux at 22 GHz from Itapetinga Radio Observatory, sequences of spectroheliograms in UV emission lines from Ov (T ≈ 2 × 10⁵ K) and Fexxi (T ≈ 1 × 10⁷ K) from the SMM UVSP, Hα and Hei D₃ cine-filtergrams from Big Bear Solar Observatory, and a magnetogram of the flare region from the MSFC Solar Observatory. From these data we conclude:

1. The overall magnetic field configuration in which the flare occurred was a fairly simple, closed arch containing nonpotential substructure.
2. The flare occurred spontaneously within the arch; it was not triggered by emerging magnetic flux.
3. The impulsive energy release occurred in two major spikes. The second spike took place within the flare arch heated in the first spike, but was concentrated on a different subset of field lines. The ratio of Ov emission to hard X-ray emission decreased by at least a factor of 2 from the first spike to the second, probably because the plasma density in the flare arch had increased by chromospheric evaporation.
4. The impulsive energy release most likely occurred in the upper part of the arch; it had three immediate products:

1. An increase in the plasma pressure throughout the flare arch of at least a factor of 10. This is required because the Fexxi emission was confined to the feet of the flare arch for at least the first minute of the impulsive phase.
2. Nonthermal energetic (～ 25 keV) electrons which impacted the feet of the arch to produce the hard X-ray burst and impulsive brightening in Ov and D₃. The evidence for this is the simultaneity, within ± 2 s, of the peak Ov and hard X-ray emissions.
3. Another population of high-energy (～100keV) electrons (decoupled from the population that produced the hard X-rays) that produced the impulsive microwave emission at 22 GHz. This conclusion is drawn because the microwave peak was 6 ± 3 s later than the hard X-ray peak.

     

Stellar flare statistics — Physical consequences

The observational data permit us to establish clear statistical correlations between different parameters of stellar flare activity and the characteristics of quiet stars. These relations are:

1. between energies and frequencies of flares on stars of different luminosities;
2. between total radiation energies of flares and quiet stars both in X-ray and Balmer emission lines;
3. between flare decay rates just after the maxima and flare luminosities at maxima.

     

Remote flare brightenings and type III reverse slope bursts

We present two large flares which were exceptional in that each produced an extensive chain of H emission patches in remote quiet regions more than 10⁵ km away from the main flare site. They were also unusual in that a large group of the rare type III reverse slope bursts accompanied each flare.The observations suggest that this is no coincidence, but that the two phenomena are directly connected. The onset of about half of the remote H emission patches were found to be nearly simultaneous with RS bursts. One of the flares (August 26, 1979) was also observed in hard X-rays; the RS bursts occurred during hard X-ray spikes. For the other flare (June 16, 1973), soft X-ray filtergrams show coronal loops connecting from the main flare site to the remote H brightenings. There were no other flares in progress during either flare; this, along with the X-ray observations, indicates that the RS burst electrons were generated in these flares and not elsewhere on the Sun. The remote H brightenings were apparently not produced by a blast wave from the main flare; no Moreton waves were observed, and the spatially disordered development of the remote H chains is further evidence against a blast wave. From geometry, time and energy considerations we propose: (1) That the remote H brightenings were initiated by direct heating of the chromosphere by RS burst electrons traveling in closed magnetic loops connecting the flare site to the remote patches; and (2) that after onset, the brightenings were heated by thermal conduction by slower thermal electrons (kT1 keV) which immediately follow the RS burst electrons along the same loops.     

X-Ray and microwave observations of active regions

Radio and X-ray observations are presented for three flares which show significant activity for several minutes prior to the main impulsive increase in the hard X-ray flux. The activity in this ‘pre-flash’ phase is investigated using 3.5 to 461 keV X-ray data from the Solar Maximum Mission, 100 to 1000 MHz radio data from Zürich, and 169 MHz radio-heliograph data from Nançay. The major results of this study are as follows:

1. Decimetric pulsations, interpreted as plasma emission at densities of 10⁹–10¹⁰ cm^?3, and soft X-rays are observed before any Hα or hard X-ray increase.
2. Some of the metric type III radio bursts appear close in time to hard X-ray peaks but delayed between 0.5 and 1.5 s, with the shorter delays for the bursts with the higher starting frequencies.
3. The starting frequencies of these type III bursts appear to correlate with the electron temperatures derived from isothermal fits to the hard X-ray spectra. Such a correlation is expected if the particles are released at a constant altitude with an evolving electron distribution. In addition to this effect we find evidence for a downward motion of the acceleration site at the onset of the flash phase.
4. In some cases the earlier type III bursts occurred at a different location, far from the main position during the flash phase.
5. The flash phase is characterized by higher hard X-ray temperatures, more rapid increase in X-ray flux, and higher starting frequency of the coincident type III bursts.

     

Observations of limb flares with a soft X-ray telescope

The structure and evolution of 26 limb flares have been observed with a soft X-ray telescope flown on Skylab. The results are:

1. One or more well defined loops were the only structures of flare intensity observed during the rise phase and near flare maximum, except for knots which were close to the resolution of the telescope in size (≈2 arc seconds) and whose structure can therefore not be determined.
2. The flare core features were always sharply defined during the rise phase.
3. For the twenty events which contain loops, the geometry of the structure near maximum was that of a loop in ten cases, a loop with a spike at the top in four cases, a cusp or triangle in four cases, and a cusp combined with a spike in another two cases.
4. Of the fifteen cases in which sufficient data were available to allow us to follow a flare's evolution, five showed no significant geometrical deviation from a loop structure, one displayed little change except for a small scale short-lived perturbation on one side of the loop 10 seconds before a type III radio burst was observed, eight underwent a large scale deformation of the loop or loops on a time scale comparable to that of the flare itself and one double loop event changed in a complex and undetermined manner, with reconnection being one possibility.

Based on observation of the original film, it is suggested that the eight flares which underwent large scale deformations had become unstable to MHD kinks. This implies that these flares occurred in magnetic flux tubes through which significant currents were flowing. It is suggested that the high energy electrons responsible for type III bursts accompanying these flares could have been accelerated by the V x B electric field induced by a small scale short-lived perturbation of parts of a flaring flux tube, similar to the one perturbation which was observed having these characteristics.     

Flares and changing magnetic fields

An observational study of maps of the longitudinal component of the photospheric fields in flaring active regions leads to the following conclusions:

1. The broad-wing Hα kernels characteristic of the impulsive phase of flares occur within 10″ of neutral lines encircling features of isolated magnetic polarity (‘satellite sunspots’).
2. Photospheric field changes intimately associated with several importance 1 flares and one importance 2B flare are confined to satellite sunspots, which are small (10″ diam). They often correspond to spot pores in white-light photographs.
3. The field at these features appears to strengthen in the half hour just before the flares. During the flares the growth is reversed, the field drops and then recovers to its previous level.
4. The magnetic flux through flare-associated features changes by about 4 × 10¹⁹ Mx in a day. The features are the same as the ‘Structures Magnétiques Evolutives’ of Martres et al. (1968a).
5. An upper limit of 10²¹ Mx is set for the total flux change through McMath Regions 10381 and 10385 as the result of the 2B flare of 24 October, 1969.
6. Large spots in the regions investigated did not evince flux changes or large proper motions at flare time.
7. The results are taken to imply that the initial instability of a flare occurs at a neutral point, but the magnetic energy lost cannot yet be related to the total energy of the subsequent flare.
8. No unusual velocities are observed in the photosphere at flare time.

     

Quantitative analysis of hard X-ray ‘footpoint’ flares observed by the Solar Maximum Mission

We describe the instrumental corrections which have to be incorporated for reliable correction and deconvolution of images obtained in the 16–22 keV and 22–30 keV energy bands of the Hard X-Ray Imaging Spectrometer (HXIS) aboard the Solar Maximum Mission (SMM). These corrections include amplifier gain and collimator hole size variations across the field of view, amplifier/filter efficiency, variation in effective collimator hole size and angular response with photon energy, dead-time, and hard X-ray plate transmission. We also emphasise the substantial Poisson noise in these energy bands, and describe the maximum entropy deconvolution/correction routine we have developed to establish the spatial structure which can be reliably inferred from HXIS data.

Next we discuss the results of application of our routine to the three impulsive flare phases reported by Duijveman et al. (1982) as exhibiting hard X-ray ‘footpoints’, namely 1980, April 10, May 21, and November 5. Our main conclusions are:

1. (1)

   Maximum entropy smoothing and Poisson noise data perturbations do not remove the main footpoint features in 16–30 keV nor change their basic morphology. However the results emphasise the asymmetry in footpoint size in the May 21 flare and confirm its possible presence in April 10. They also reveal the 3rd weak distant footpoint in the May 21 flare at an earlier time than found by Duijveman et al.

When the 16–22 and 22–30 keV bands are analysed separately, however, it is found that the footpoints are much less visible above noise in the harder band - i.e. the footpoint spectra are steep. In the April 10 and November 5 flares they are steeper than either the spectrum of intervening pixels or the spectrum at higher energies measured for the whole flare by the SMM Hard X-Ray Burst Spectrometer (HXRBS).

1. (2)

   The footpoint contrast with surroundings is less than found by Duijveman et al., despite image deconvolution, because of the maximum entropy smoothing of noise.

2. (3)

   The 16–30keV HXIS footpoint fluxes in the three flares are respectively 28%, 17%, and 15% of the simultaneous HXRBS flare power-law spectrum extrapolated into this energy range.

3. (4)

   Where Poisson noise is taken into account we find, by cross-correlating pixel count rates, that footpoint synchronism was either not provable at all, or substantially less close than reported by Duijveman et al.

Next we considered the implications of these results for models of the footpoint emission. Contrary to Duijveman et al. we do not consider the HXIS ‘footpoint’ data as supporting a conventional thick target beam interpretation since:

1. (A)

   The footpoint photon (and electron) fluxes are much less than expected from HXRBS extrapolation. This result casts doubt on recent models of chromospheric heating by electron beams which usually assume all of the HXRBS emission to come from HXIS footpoints.

2. (B)

   The footpoint spectra for the April 10 and November 5 flares are much softer than the HXRBS spectrum and than the spectrum of intervening pixels, contrary to thick target predictions.

3. (C)

   Contrary to Duijveman et al. footpoint synchronism does not demand an unreasonable Alfvén speed and so does not require non-thermal particles.

In spite of these objections we also re-considered the constraints placed on the acceleration site conditions in a beam interpretation by return current stability and footpoint contrast in the summed 16–30 keV range. Using the smoothed maximum entropy contrast and taking explicit account of coronal thermal emission, we find maximum densities somewhat larger than Duijveman et al. estimated, and much higher maximum values of T _e /T _i .

Regarding thermal interpretations we found:

1. (a)

   Models involving continuous production of short-lived hot kernels in the arch top with Maxwellian tail electrons escaping to the footpoints could explain the 16–30 keV contrast with a rather higher energetic efficiency than a pure beam model. However, whatever the temperature distribution of hot kernel production, the model predicts footpoints harder than the arch summit, contrary to HXIS data.

2. (b)

   A model with hot kernels produced in one limb of an arch can explain the asymmetry in footpoint size observed in May 21, and probably April 10, and is energetically even more efficient than (a) but is also inconsistent with the spectral data.

3. (c)

   Finally we point out that HXIS footpoint data may be consistent with a purely geometric interpretation in an almost uniform arch filled with hot plasma.

     

Hard X-ray imaging evidence of nonthermal and thermal burst components

We analyze hard X-ray imaging observations of three flares, showing widely different characteristics, in order to try and discriminate the relative efficiency of heating and acceleration in the primary energy release. Using a simplified approach, we compute the hard X-ray distribution and energy deposition due to accelerated electrons, with beam and ambient plasma parameters appropriate for each of the observed events. The results are convolved with the Hard X-Ray Imaging Spectrometer (HXIS) instrumental response and compared with observations. We find that: (a) Many observations are compatible with thick target processes, and with the possibility that flares may have high (>20%) acceleration efficiency. (b) Single hard X-ray sources should be very common in the data available at present (HXIS and HINOTORI), as it is the case, as well as a transition from chromospheric footpoints to single source structures. The latter cannot then be directly interpreted as thermal sources. (c) In the particular case of a limb flare, associated with a rather weak high energy burst, we show that the spatial and spectral behavior of the hard X-ray emission is incompatible with pure nonthermal processes. We thus propose that the observed emission was principally due to the strong heating intrinsic to a reconnection process within the region of interaction between two magnetic structures which are seen in the soft X-ray data. (d) We also study the heating effect of a beam, due to Coulomb losses, during its passage through the flare loops. In some cases, rather large and localized temperature increases can be expected to appear within short timescales ( 1 s), leading to a combination of nonthermal plus thermal output in the hard X-ray spectrum, which renders virtually impossible the determination of the underlying beam parameters. We finally discuss the extent to which our conclusions are valid, considering the instrumental limitations as well as the simple physical treatment that we apply.     

Energy of microwave-emitting electrons and hard X-ray/microwave source model in solar flares

We present a new method of estimating the energy of microwave-emitting electrons from the observed rate of increase of the microwave flux relative to the hard X-ray flux measured at various energies during the rising phase of solar flares. A total of 22 flares observed simultaneously in hard X-rays (20–400 keV) and in microwaves (17 GHz) were analyzed in this way and the results are as follows:

1. The observed energy of X-rays which vary in proportion to the 17 GHz emission concentrates mostly below 100 keV with a median energy of 70 keV. Since the mean energy of electrons emitting 70 keV X-rays is ?130 keV or ?180 keV, depending on the assumed hard X-ray emission model (thin-target and thick-target, respectively), this photon energy strongly suggests that the 17 GHz emission comes mostly from electrons with an energy of less than a few hundred keV.
2. Correspondingly, the magnetic field strength in the microwave source is calculated to be 500–1000 G for the thick-target case and 1000–2000 G for the thin-target case. Finally, judging from the values of the source parameters required for the observed microwave fluxes, we conclude that the thick-target model in which precipitating electrons give rise to both X-rays and microwaves is consistent with the observations for at least 16 out of 22 flares examined.

     

On some transient Hα features associated with metric type III bursts

The question of the chromospheric features type III association is reconsidered by using Hα filtergrams both on and off band. A set of 44 metric type III groups, for which an association can be ascertained with a high degree of confidence leads to the following results:

1. The type III's have a dual chromospheric association. Sometimes they are related to a flare, sometimes to a perturbation of a different kind. The latter is seen in absorption in the Hα core and ±0.75 Å away. It is interpreted as a rather dense and cool material in motion in the chromosphere or the low corona. A part of which moves downward, the other upward. The type III's are more closely related to the downward motion.
2. The type III associated absorbing features take place at the border of an active center and along an H_∥ = 0 line. At the present time this appears as the most conspicuous property for marking them off from the great variety of the Hα absorbing features commonly observed on the Sun.
3. Most of the type III associated flares are related to an absorbing feature of the same kind, which appears before the flare itself. This indicates that the initial instability which is responsible for the type III emission is basically the same, whether the bursts are flare associated or not.

Our observations give good evidence that an efficient acceleration of 10–100 keV electrons occur also in the absence of flares. Furthermore the chromospheric perturbation involved in this acceleration is, in many cases, clearly associated to the triggering of a flare. A tentative model is proposed. We assume that in relation with the Hα absorbing feature a stream of fast electrons is accelerated which in turn, under suitable conditions, triggers both the flare and the type III's at the same time.     

The flare of September 7, 1973: A typical example of a newly recognized class of solar transients

X-ray, extreme-ultraviolet and optical observations of a solar flare are discussed. It is shown that the flare exemplifies a class of transient events characterized by long duration and long decay time and by the development of high systems of loops, generally brighter at the top. In contrast with compact short lifetime events, the distinctive properties of this class of transients are:

1. The disruption of the magnetic configuration at the flare onset, as indicated by prominence eruption or activation and by associated white-light coronal transients;
2. a continuous energy deposition, presumably at the top of loops, during a large fraction of the flare development and well after the intensity peak;
3. a continuous supply of additional material to the top of loops, with subsequent downflows and out-of-hydrostatic equilibrium conditions.

     

An evaluation of the possibility of studying flare plasma turbulence using the satellites of Hei line forbidden components

Using the Baranger-Mozer method, we explore the possibility of diagnosing the flare plasma of forbidden Hei lines, that permits the determination of the plasma oscillation frequency and noise level. Examination of the Hei lines observed in solar flare has led us to conclude that:

1. the appearance of satellites of forbidden components in the flares spectrum, due to turbulent electric fields, is the most probable for Hei 3819.606 Å lines;
2. the Baranger-Mozer method is more sensitive to the high-frequency component of turbulent fields than to the low-frequency ones;
3. the upper limit of the turbulent oscillation level in flares is evaluated.

In the spectrum of the solar flare of 26 September, 1963 we detected satellites of the forbidden component of the 3820 Å line and used its relative intensity to derive the level of low-frequency oscillations (～1.5 kVcm^-1).     

Solar flare physics enlivened by TRACE and RHESSI

The Transition Region and Coronal Explorer (TRACE) gave us the highest EUV spatial resolution and the Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectrometric Imager (RHESSI) gave us the highest hard X-ray and gammaray spectral resolution to study solar flares. We review a number of recent highlights obtained from both missions that either enhance or challenge our physical understanding of solar flares, such as:

1. Multi-thermal Diagnostic of 6.7 and 8.0 keV Fe and Ni lines
2. Multi-thermal Conduction Cooling Delays
3. Chromospheric Altitude of Hard X-Ray Emission
4. Evidence for Dipolar Reconnection Current Sheets
5. Footpoint Motion and Reconnection Rate
6. Evidence for Tripolar Magnetic Reconnection
7. Displaced Electron and Ion Acceleration Sources.

     

The footpoints of giant arches

We have detected chromospheric footpoints of the giant post-flare coronal arches discovered by HXIS a few years ago. H photographs obtained at Big Bear and Udaipur Solar Observatories show chromospheric signatures associated with 5 sequential giant arch events observed in the interval from 6 to 10 November, 1980. The set of footpoints at one end of the arches consists of enhancements within a plage at the northeast periphery of the active region and the set of footpoints at the other end of the arch consists of brightenings of the chromosphere south of the active region. Both sets of footpoints show very slow brightness variations correlated in time with the brightness variations of the X-ray arches. Current-free modelling of the coronal magnetic field by Kopp and Poletto (1989), based on a Kitt Peak magnetogram, confirms the identification of the two sets of footpoints by showing magnetic field lines connecting them.The brightenings appear as a succession of point-like enhancements whose individual lifetimes are of the time-scale of minutes but which continue to occur for periods of several hours. This behaviour allows us to infer a fine structure in the coronal arches, undetectable in the X-ray images. The discovery of these brightenings and their location at the periphery of the active region also alters our conception of the relationship of the giant arches to the flares that begin concurrently with them. The giant arch phenomenon appears now to be either: (1) a long-lived, semi-permanent, coronal structure which is revived and fed with plasma and energy by underlying dynamic flares, or alternatively (2) a system of high-altitude loops which open at the onset of every such flare and subsequently reconnect over intervals of many hours.     

Keynote address: Outstanding problems in solar physics

Celebrating the diamond jubilee of the Physics Research Laboratory (PRL) in Ahmedabad, India, we look back over the last six decades in solar physics and contemplate on the ten outstanding problems (or research foci) in solar physics:

1. The solar neutrino problem
2. Structure of the solar interior (helioseismology)
3. The solar magnetic field (dynamo, solar cycle, corona)
4. Hydrodynamics of coronal loops
5. MHD oscillations and waves (coronal seismology)
6. The coronal heating problem
7. Self-organized criticality (from nanoflares to giant flares)
8. Magnetic reconnection processes
9. Particle acceleration processes
10. Coronal mass ejections and coronal dimming

The first two problems have been largely solved recently, while the other eight selected problems are still pending a final solution, and thus remain persistent Challenges for Solar Cycle 24, the theme of this jubilee conference.     

The flares of August 1972

We present the analysis of observations of the August flares at Big Bear and Tel Aviv, involving monochromatic movies, magnetograms and spectra. In each flare the observations fit a model of particle acceleration in the chromosphere with emission produced by impact and by heating by the energetic electrons and protons. The region showed inverted polarity and high gradients from birth, and flares appear due to strong magnetic shears and gradients across the neutral line produced by sunspot motions. Post flare loops show a strong change from sheared, force-free fields parallel to potential-field-like loops, perpendicular to the neutral line above the surface.We detected fast (5 s duration) small (1') flashes in 3835 at the footpoints of flux loops in the August 2 impulsive flare at 1838 UT, which may be explained by dumping of > 50 keV electrons accelerated in individual flux loops. The flashes show excellent time and intensity agreement with > 45 keV X-rays. In the less impulsive 2000 UT flare a less impulsive wave of emission in 3835 moved with the separating footpoints. The thick target model of X-ray production gives a consistent model for X-ray, 3835 and microwave emission in the 18:38 UT event.Spectra of the August 7 flare show emission 12 Å FWHM in flare kernels, but only 1 to 2 Å wide in the rest of the flare. The kernels thus produce most of the H emission. The total emission in H in the August 4 and August 7 flares was about 2 × 10³⁰ erg. We belive this dependable value more accurate than previous larger estimates for great flares. The time dependence of total H emission agrees with radio and X-ray data much better than area measurements which depend on the weaker halo.Absorption line spectra show a large (6 km/s^-1) photospheric velocity discontinuity across the neutral line, corresponding to sheared flow across that line.This work has been supported by NASA under NGR 05 002 034, NSF Atmospheric Sciences program under GA 24015, and AFCRL under FI9628-73-C-0085.     

The Alfvén-wave theory of solar flares

Evidence is discussed showing that a representative solar flare event comprises three or more separate but related phenomena requiring separate mechanisms. In particular it is possible to separate the most energetic effect (the interplanetary blast) from the thermal flare and from the rapid acceleration of particles to high energies. The phenomena are related through the magnetic structure characteristic of a composite flare event, being a bipolar surface field with most of its field lines ‘closed’. Of primary importance are helical twists on all scales, starting with the ‘flux rope’ of the spot pair which was fully twisted before it emerged. Subsequent untwisting by the upward propagation of an Alfvén twist wave provides the main flare energy.

1. The interplanetary blast model is based on subsurface, helically twisted flux ropes which erupt to form spots and then transfer their twists and energy by Alfvén-twist waves into the atmospheric magnetic fields. The blast is triggered by the prior-commencing flash phase or by a coronal wave.
2. The thermal flare is explained in terms of Alfvén waves travelling up numerous ‘flux strands’ (Figure 3) which have frayed away from the two flux ropes. The waves originate in interaction (collisions, bending, twisting, rubbing) between subsurface flux strands; the sudden flash is caused by a collision. The classical twin-ribbon flare results from the collision of a flux rope with a tight bunch of S-shaped flux strands.
3. The impulsive acceleration of electrons (hard X-ray, EUV, Hα and radio bursts) is tentatively attributed to magnetic reconnection between fields in two parallel, helically twisted flux strands in the low corona.
4. Flare (Moreton) waves in the corona have the same origin as the interplanetary blast. Sympathetic flares represent only the start of enhanced activity in a flare event already in the slow phase. Filament activation also occurs during the slow phase as twist Alfvén waves store their energy in the atmosphere.
5. Flare ejecta are caused by Alfvén waves moving up flux strands. Surges are attributed to packets of twist Alfvén waves released into bundles of flux strands; the waves become non-linear and drive plasma upwards. Spray-type prominences result from accumulations of Alfvén wave energy in dome-shaped fields; excessive energy density eventually explodes the field.

     

On the infrared observations of stellar flares

In connection with the appearance of the first results of infrared observations of stellar flares, a more elaborate analysis ofnegative infrared flares as a phenomenon, predicted by the fastelectron hypothesis, has been carried out. As a result, the wavelength regions of negative flares are established for the stars of different spectral types as well as the calculated amplitudes of the negative flares (Tables I and II). The analysis of the infrared observations (c.f. Kilyachkoet al., 1978) lead to the following conclusions:

1. The negative infrared flares discovered around 8000 Å is not in agreement with the theory in the case of the flare star UV Cet. Some traces of negative flares have been noted for a number of less powerful flares of EV Lac.
2. The amplitudes of the recorded positive flares of UV Cet and EV Lac on λ8000 Å are in good agreement with the magnitudes predicted by the fast-electron hypothesis (non-thermal bremsstrahlung).
3. In the future the negative flares around 8000 Å should be looked for in early-type flare stars of types M0-K5.
4. For a positive discovery of negative flares, future observations must be carried out in the wavelength region of 1–3 μm.

     

Energetics and morphology of powerful impulsive solar flares

We have studied the energetics of two impulsive solar flares of X-ray class X1.7 by assuming the electrons accelerated in several episodes of energy release to be the main source of plasma heating and reached conclusions about their morphology. The time profiles of the flare plasma temperature, emission measure, and their derivatives, and the intensity of nonthermal X-ray emission are compared; images of the X-ray sources and magnetograms of the flare region at key instants of time have been constructed. Based on a spectral analysis of the hard X-ray emission from RHESSI data and GOES observations of the soft X-ray emission, we have estimated the spatially integrated kinetic power of nonthermal electrons and the change in flare-plasma internal energy by taking into account the heat losses through thermal conduction and radiation and determined the parameters needed for thermal balance. We have established that the electrons accelerated at the beginning of the events with a relatively soft spectrum directly heat up the coronal part of the flare loops, with the increase in emission measure and hard X-ray emission from the chromosphere being negligible. The succeeding episodes of electron acceleration with a harder spectrum have virtually no effect on the temperature rise, but they lead to an increase in emission measure and hard X-ray emission from the footpoints of the flare loops.