一种可用于表征土地利用变化水文效应的水文模型探讨--SWAT模型在云州水库流域的应用研究

基于对SWAT模型的发展和运行流程的概述，以云州水库流域为例，模拟了20世纪80年代土地覆被状况下的1985年的流量过程。从结果来看，云州水库流域日径流模拟值与实测值曲线拟合度较好，其模拟结果的确定性系数为0．79，达到了乙等方案的要求，取得了较好的模拟效果。由此可以看出，SWAT模型在云州水库流域的应用是比较成功的，从而为该流域不同土地利用变化和土地覆被变化(LUCC)下的水文效应研究奠定了较好的基础。     

一维水质模型结合改进的输出系数法在流域非点源污染负荷估算中的应用

非点源污染是导致流域水体水质恶化的关键污染来源之一,为了估算流域非点源污染负荷,本文提出将一维水质模型应用于分离监测断面点源污染负荷和非点源污染负荷的方法,并结合了改进的输出系数法,以COD_Mn和NH₃-N为代表性指标,将该模型应用于潮河下游流域,并与传统的水文分割法结合改进的输出系数法估算非点源污染负荷的结果进行对比。结果表明,一维水质模型结合改进的输出系数法估算流域非点源COD_Mn和NH₃-N污染负荷模拟值的纳什系数均在0.800以上,具有良好的模拟精度,同时避免了水文分割法无法较好地模拟枯水期非点源污染负荷的弊端。该方法在运用SWAT（soil and water assessment tool）模型预测得到水文数据的情况下,能够预测流域非点源污染负荷,作为SWAT模型对COD模拟的补充。     

基于SUFI-2算法和SWAT模型的妫水河流域水文模拟及参数不确定性分析

敏感性分析和不确定性分析是分布式水文模型参数校准和模型应用的基础。本文以妫水河流域为例,基于SWAT模型和SUFI-2算法进行模型参数敏感性分析,结合手动调参和自动率定,通过SUFI-2的P因子和R因子进行模型不确定性分析,构建妫水河流域分布式水文模型。本次妫水河流域月尺度模拟中:率定期,确定系数R2=0.59,效率系数NSE=0.56;验证期,确定系数R2=0.82,效率系数NSE=0.80;P因子均大于0.5,R因子均小于0.5。结果表明,妫水河流域SWAT模型水文模拟效果较好。     

基于SWAT模型的资水流域径流模拟

以资水流域柘溪水库以下区域为研究对象,基于构建的分布式水文模型SWAT对水文过程进行模拟。在地面高程、土地利用、土壤、气象等数据预处理的基础上,采用2010~2011年实测径流数据进行参数率定,采用2012年实测径流数据进行模型验证,对模型在研究区的适用性进行研究。通过对径流模拟值和实测值的比较,月径流率定期和验证期的相关系数R~2和Nash系数Ens分别在0.93以上和0.91以上,日径流率定期和验证期的相关系数R~2和Nash系数Ens分别在0.78以上和0.70以上。基于这两个评价标准可知SWAT模型在资水游流域有良好的适用性,可为流域内拟建桃花江核电厂的取水安全分析和水环境影响评价提供技术支持。     

SWAT模型在粮食产量预测中的应用

以新乡县为研究对象,基于SWAT模型构建了该区域的分布式水文模型,并对影响模型的重要参数进行了率定和验证。结果表明,对比运用SWAT模型模拟得到粮食产量与实际粮食产量,其相对误差的绝对值大部分在10%以内,相关系数为0.84,Nash-Suttcliffe确定性系数为0.7,该模型可以较准确的模拟粮食产量,并能为该区域的粮食安全、水资源合理配置、水环境等方面的规划提供科学依据。     

不同分布式水文模型在大凌河中游对比运用研究

不同水文模型在不同流域都具有一定的适用性,为对比分布式水文模型SWAT模型和VIC模型在大凌河中游的适用性及模拟精度,以大凌河中游大城子水文站以上流域为研究区域,基于大城子水文站2000-2010年水文数据,对比分析两种分布式水文模型在大凌河中游的适用性及模拟精度。研究成果表明:SWAT模型更适合于大凌河中游的水量模拟,SWAT模型模拟相对误差均值为5.21%,低于VIC模型模拟的相对误差(相对误差均值为8.01%),且SWAT模型模拟的确定性系数均值为0.74,优于VIC模型模拟的确定系数(确定系数均值为0.68)。研究成果对于大凌河中游水文模拟及流域水文预报预警提供参考价值。     

SWAT模型在东江流域的应用研究

以SWAT模型为研究工具,对该模型在东江流域的3个子流域的适用性进行研究,研究表明,SWAT模型在东江流域3个子流域的适用性较好,校准期（19701975年）日径流模拟和月径流模拟的相对误差Re均在10%以内,日径流模拟的决定系数R2均在70%以上,月径流模拟的决定系数R2均在80%以上,Nash-Suttcliffe效率系数基本达到70%;验证期（19761985年及19962005年）,月径流模拟的决定系数R2和Nash-Suttcliffe效率系数均在70%以上,相对误差Re基本在±20%以内,可以满足该流域的水资源评价与规划的要求。     

沟灌土壤湿润体空间矩特征参数估算模型

为进一步增加矩分析理论在研究沟灌土壤湿润体运移特性方面的实用性,采用数值模拟和理论分析相结合的方法,定量分析了土壤初始含水率、入渗水深、沟底宽和边坡系数等因素对沟灌自由入渗条件下土壤湿润体空间矩特征参数的影响,并建立了其与主要影响因素间的函数关系式。结果表明,土壤初始含水率、入渗水深和沟底宽对垂直向土壤水分分布的质量重心影响较大;水平向湿润锋的平均离散度主要受土壤初始含水率、入渗水深、沟底宽和边坡系数的影响,而垂直向对土壤初始含水率和入渗水深变化的敏感性较高;选取不同土壤质地对所建模型的可靠性进行了验证,结果表明所建模型估算不同入渗时刻的空间矩特征参数值与根据HYDRUS软件模拟结果所得计算值具有高度一致性,所有验证组合条件下两者相对误差绝对值均值均低于8.5%,且无显著性差异,说明所建模型估算沟灌土壤湿润体空间矩特征参数具有高度可靠性。研究结果可为沟灌灌水方案设计和管理提供理论基础和技术支撑。     

SWAT模型在密赛流域的应用与比较研究

为对比分布式水文模型SWAT与典型集总式水文模型新安江模型的径流模拟能力,以钱塘江支流密赛流域为实验流域,以CRU气象数据集为气象输入资料,分别进行SWAT日、月径流模拟与验证,并与新安江模型模拟成果进行对比。结果显示SWAT模型在实验流域的月尺度径流模拟中更具优势,也表明SWAT模型在我国径流模拟中具有良好的适用性。     

岩溶地下河在SWAT中的概化方法——以毕节倒天河流域为例

岩溶地下河的存在严重影响了土壤和水评估工具（SWAT）在岩溶地区的普遍适用性。针对岩溶地下河在SWAT中的概化问题,提出基于数字高程模型（DEM）预处理结合SWAT流域自动识别功能的方法,将岩溶地下河暴露于地表,把岩溶区复杂的地表－地下二元结构简化为地表一元结构,并以贵州毕节地下河发育的倒天河流域为例进行应用。结果表明:① 对比未经概化地下河建立的模型,概化地下河建立的模型识别流域面积增大30.73%,子流域个数增加29.27%,水文响应单元（HRU）个数增加43.82%;② 参数取最大物理意义范围时,未经概化地下河建立的模型p因子=0.64,不满足建模条件,物理模型本身存在问题;③ 概化地下河建立的模型月步长模拟结果:校准期R2=0.96,NS=0.96,验证期R2=0.94,NS=0.93,月尺度模拟效果非常好。岩溶地下河概化方法使SWAT在流域划分方面更加合理,搭建的模型模拟更加合理。该研究拓展了SWAT模型在岩溶区的应用。      

水文响应单元空间离散化及SWAT模型改进

水文响应单元(Hydrological Response Units,HRU)是SWAT模型模拟的基本单元,传统方法划分的水文响应单元在空间分布上不连续且难以确定其明确的空间位置,不能反映HRU间的相互作用和进行精确空间分析。利用GIS工具对土地利用和土壤类型数据进行概化处理,提出了HRU空间离散化的方法,实现了水文响应单元在空间上的准确定位。在此基础上,针对SWAT模型中同一子流域所有HRU采取相同延迟的弱点进行改进,并选择太湖地区西苕溪流域对改进的SWAT模型进行水文模拟验证。改进后,校正期港口站Nash效率系数E_NS(Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency)从0.64提高到0.67,验证期E_NS系数从0.70提高到0.76。研究表明:修正后的SWAT模型更能反映流域的水文特征,可以达到非常好的效果,考虑到HRU距离因素的径流延迟更为准确地刻画径流过程。实现HRU空间离散化将为模型改进和更小尺度的空间分析提供数据基础。     

Climate change impacts on extreme floods I: combining imperfect deterministic simulations and non-stationary frequency analysis

Flood quantiles are routinely used in hydrologic engineering to design hydraulic structures, optimize erosion control structure and map the extent of floodplains. As an increasing number of papers are pointing out cycles and trends in hydrologic time series, the use of stationary flood distributions leads to the overestimation or underestimation of the hydrologic risk at a given time. Several authors tried to address this problem by using probability distributions with time-varying parameters. The parameters of these distributions were assumed to follow a linear or quadratic trend in time, which may be valid for the short term but may lead to unrealistic long-term projections. On the other hand, deterministic rainfall-runoff models are able to successfully reproduce trends and cycles in stream flow data but can perform poorly in reproducing daily flows and flood peaks. Rainfall-runoff models typically have a better performance when simulation results are aggregated at a larger time scale (e.g. at a monthly time scale vs. at a daily time scale). The strengths of these two approaches are combined in this paper where the annual maximum of the time-averaged outputs of a hydrologic model are used to modulate the parameters of a non-stationary GEV model of the daily maximum flow. The method was applied to the Kemptville Creek located in Ontario, Canada, using the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model as rainfall-runoff model. The parameters of the non-stationary GEV model are then estimated using Monte Carlo Markov Chain, and the optimal span of the time windows over which the SWAT outputs were averaged was selected using Bayes factors. Results show that using the non-stationary GEV distribution with a location parameter linked to the maximum 9-day average flow provides a much better estimation of flood quantiles than applying a stationary frequency analysis to the simulated peak flows.     

Evaluation of the SWAT model for water balance study of a mountainous snowfed river basin of Nepal

In this study, a semi-distributed hydrologic model Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) has been employed for the Karnali River basin, Nepal to test its applicability for hydrological simulation. Further, model was evaluated to carry out the water balance study of the basin and to determine the snowmelt contribution in the river flow. Snowmelt Runoff Model (SRM) was also used to compare the snowmelt runoff simulated from the SWAT model. The statistical results show that performance of the SWAT model in the Karnali River basin is quite good (p-factor = 0.88 and 0.88, for daily calibration and validation, respectively; r-factor = 0.76 and 0.71, for daily calibration and validation, respectively). Baseflow alpha factor (ALPHA_BF) was found most sensitive parameter for the flow simulation. The study revealed that the average annual runoff volume available at the basin outlet is about 47.16 billion cubic metre out of which about 12% of runoff volume is contributed by the snowmelt runoff. About 25% of annual precipitation seems to be lost as evapotranspiration. The results revealed that both the models, SWAT and SRM, can be efficiently applied in the mountainous river basins of Nepal for planning and management of water resources.     

黄河源鄂陵湖地区辐射收支和地表能量平衡特征研究

利用2010年6-7月鄂陵湖野外试验的近地层观测数据,分析了在不同天气条件下黄河源鄂陵湖地区辐射分量、地表能量分量、土壤温度和反照率的变化特征. 结果表明：不同天气条件下,辐射和地表能量各分量日变化差异较大,晴天、阴天和雨天的地表反照率依次递减,平均反照率约为0.21;观测期内,平均辐射贡献从大到小依次为向上长波、向下长波、向下短波、向上短波,日积分值分别为31.4 MJ·m^-2、25.6 MJ·m^-2、22.4 MJ·m^-2、4.2 MJ·m^-2,净辐射(12.5 MJ·m^-2)占向下短波辐射的55.7%;平均地表能量和土壤温度的变化幅度较晴天小,感热、潜热、0 cm土壤热通量的平均日积分值分别占净辐射的21.2%、43.1%、8.2%;平均土壤温度变化幅度随深度增加逐渐减小,浅层土壤温度峰值较晴天低2 ℃,深层土壤温度相差不大. 云和降水的扰动削弱了向下短波辐射,导致平均感热通量和0 cm土壤热通量的峰值比晴天小,而平均潜热通量的峰值大于晴天. 由于湖泊水体巨大的热容量和水分供应,鄂陵湖地区的气温日较差较小,地表温度变化幅度变小,附近地表温度升高缓慢. 鄂陵湖区的地表能量平衡中,潜热通量占主导,感热和地表土壤热通量次之. 研究结果有助于理解气候变化背景下黄河源区湖泊的能量水分循环过程,为促进该地区光热资源的合理利用和畜牧业的可持续发展提供数据支持.     

Sediment yield assessment and identification of check dam sites for Rawal Dam catchment

Sediment yield is the amount of erosional debris from drainage basin deposited in reservoirs. The economic life of storage reservoir depends upon the estimation of the time it takes for the reservoir to be filled with the deposition of sediments. This research is based on assessing the sediment yield in Rawal Dam catchment by using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. Digital Elevation Model (DEM), land use maps, soil maps, and weather data of the study watershed were used as input to SWAT model. Monthly sedimentation data of year 2010 and discharge data from 1998 to 2005 is being used for model calibration and validation, respectively. Whereas simulations are being generated from 1998 to 2011 for both sedimentation and discharge. Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) was used for the estimation of sediment yield. The Nash and Sutcliffe coefficient of the model was found to be 0.79 which depicts its effectiveness. After the estimation of the sediment yield and discharge by using SWAT model, double mass curve was used to evaluate the sedimentation rate. The rate of sediment transport can be reduced by the construction of check dams. Various sites have also been proposed for check dams construction to prevent the sediments transported into the Rawal Catchment.     

Three dimensional numerical simulation of residential building on shrink–swell soils in response to climatic conditions

Shrink–swell soils can cause distresses in buildings, and every year, the economic loss associated with this problem is huge. This paper presents a comprehensive system for simulating the soil–foundation–building system and its response to daily weather conditions. Weather data include rainfall, solar radiation, air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed, all of which are readily available from a local weather station or the Internet. These data are used to determine simulation flux boundary conditions. Different methods are proposed to simulate different boundary conditions: bare soil, trees, and vegetation. A coupled hydro‐mechanical stress analysis is used to simulate the volume change of shrink–swell soils due to both mechanical stress and water content variations. Coupled hydro‐mechanical stress‐jointed elements are used to simulate the interaction between the soil and the slab, and general shell elements are used to simulate structural behavior. All the models are combined into one finite element program to predict the entire system's behavior. This paper first described the theory for the simulations. A site in Arlington, Texas, is then selected to demonstrate the application of the proposed system. Simulation results are shown, and a comparison between measured and predicted movements for four footings in Arlington, Texas, over a 2‐year period is presented. Finally, a three‐dimensional simulation is made for a virtual residential building on shrink–swell soils to identify the influence of various factors. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

东北半干旱地区流域分布式水文模拟——以洮儿河流域为例

以东北半干旱地区典型流域-洮儿河流域为研究对象,应用SWAT模型对流域水文过程进行了模拟研究;选择流域上游子流域和中下游子流域分别进行参数敏感性分析,识别出影响模拟结果的敏感参数,研究发现部分参数敏感性存在空间变异性,分析主要原因在于气候和下垫面的空间异质性导致了流域上下游产流模式存在差异。采用1988-1997年水文气象数据进行模型率定和验证,结果表明：干流水文站月流量过程率定期Nash-Sutcliffe 效率系数平均值为0.78,验证期为0.72,相关系数都达到0.86以上,水量误差大多在20%以内,对日过程的模拟也有较高的精度;枯水年模拟结果较差,主要是因为流域降水站数量不够,难以反映降水的时空分布。对于水文、气象等资料相对缺乏的东北半干旱地区,SWAT模型的模拟结果总体令人满意,可以应用于与流域径流相关的各种模拟分析,研究成果对进一步加强洮儿河流域水资源综合管理提供了依据和手段。     

SWAT manual calibration and parameters sensitivity analysis in a semi-arid watershed in North-western Morocco

Being a laborious approach, manual calibration of hydrologic model in a semi-arid context requires in-depth knowledge of the watershed and as much as possible field input data to obtain reliable simulations. In this study, manual calibration and relative sensitivity analysis approaches of the SWAT model (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) were applied for water balance in a 1993 km² watershed (on the R’dom river) located in North-western Morocco. The watershed is located in a semi-arid area dominated by agro-forestry activities. The objectives of this study were (i) to perform a local sensitivity analysis of the SWAT model taking into consideration the watershed characteristics and (ii) to implement a detailed methodology of manual calibration and validation of the model in a semi-arid context. Sensitivity analysis has been carried out on 12 different SWAT input parameters, and has revealed that 4 input parameters only were the most influential ones on flow components of the R’dom watershed. Model manual calibration was conducted along 2006 and 2007 by comparing measured and predicted monthly and daily discharges and taking Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE), determination coefficient (R ²), and percent bias (PBIAS) as goodness-of-fit indicators. Validation has been performed by the same approach through 2008 and 2009 period. All final NSE values were above 0.5, R ² values exceeded 0.7, and PBIAS lower than 25% demonstrating satisfactory model performances over the study watershed conditions. The SWAT model set-up with measured input data, manually calibrated and validated, reflects well the real hydrologic processes occurring in the R’dom watershed and can be used to assess current and future conditions and to evaluate alternative management practices.