柔性支护黏性土基坑非极限被动土压力研究

经典的Rankine和Coulomb土压力计算理论均建立在土体达到极限平衡状态的基础上,并不适用于位移需要严格控制的基坑工程。以柔性支护的黏性土基坑边坡为研究对象,考虑边坡土拱效应、非极限状态下柔性支护结构与土体间内摩擦角以及黏聚力发挥值、土体内摩擦角以及黏聚力发挥值的影响,从黏性土应力莫尔圆出发,采用微层分析法建立静力平衡,搜索边坡土体潜在滑动面,推导柔性支护黏性土基坑的非极限被动土压力计算式。通过实例计算对比分析了本文计算理论与经典Rankine计算理论,推导公式计算得到的被动土压力小于Rankine计算值19%,合力作用位置低于Rankine计算值,作用位置距桩底距离较Rankine计算值小1.5%,计算得到的潜在滑动面为一水平倾角随深度逐渐减小的曲面,潜在滑动面范围小于Rankine极限状态滑动面。     

放坡状态有限土体刚性挡土墙主动土压力研究

针对现有有限土体刚性挡土墙主动土压力研究大都集中于临近建筑物墙体或地下室外墙的狭窄土体,相邻基坑、路堤与切坡挡土墙形成放坡状态有限土体研究甚少,本文考虑填土黏聚力及墙土间黏结力、墙土间摩擦作用、墙背倾角及填土顶面竖向荷载等的影响,利用刚体极限平衡理论进行研究。根据相邻基坑与边坡挡土墙放坡状有限土体的工程特性,分析挡土墙平动位移模式下平面滑动破裂面的形成特征,建立放坡状态有限土体主动土压力计算模型,并利用数值计算方法可以求解。通过对放坡状有限土体主动土压力进行算例分析与参数分析,表明极限破裂角与宽高比、黏聚力、墙背倾角及墙土间外摩擦角为负相关,不同黏聚力下随着宽高比增大,极限破裂角趋近于考虑黏聚力作用库伦方法得到的极限破裂角值,不同黏聚力下有限土体宽度临界值亦是变化的;主动土压力随黏聚力、墙背倾角及墙土外摩擦角增大而减小,随着宽高比增大而增大并逐步趋近于库伦方法计算的土压力值。最后,通过模型试验验证表明按本文方法计算的极限破裂角与实测破裂角吻合,PIV系统测试得到的临界宽高比与库伦方法的结果一致。     

RT模式下刚性挡墙土压力计算方法研究

针对绕墙顶向外转动的刚性挡土墙,提出一种土压力计算方法。根据土体渐进破坏机理,考虑土拱效应,建立了填土内摩擦角及墙土接触面上外摩擦角的发挥与土体位移的非线性关系,并根据初始应力条件确定初始内摩擦角。采用改进的水平层分析法计算各转角下的土压力分布,并得到土压力合力大小及其作用点的计算公式。通过比较,不同转角下土压力强度、合力大小以及作用点计算值与模型试验实测结果接近。     

Computation of sliding displacements of seawalls under earthquake conditions

To understand the serviceability aspects of seawalls, it is essential to study the permanent displacements of seawalls that occur during the earthquakes. Studies in the existing literature have concentrated on displacements of retaining walls with dry backfills; to the authors’ observation there is no specific analytical investigation devoted to the earthquake-induced displacements of retaining walls with submerged backfills. This paper focuses on sliding displacements of gravity type seawall retaining a submerged backfill under active earth pressure condition during the earthquakes. The threshold seismic acceleration coefficients required for initiation of sliding and the amount of sliding displacement due to seismic loading are calculated by adopting Newmark’s sliding block method. One of the prime features of the study is the estimation of seismic inertia forces in the submerged soil and wall applying the modified pseudo-dynamic method. The comparison of the results obtained using the proposed analytical formulation with the existing literature found to be in good agreement. A comprehensive parametric study has been conducted to understand the effects of different parameters such as seismic horizontal and vertical acceleration coefficients, soil and wall friction angles, width of the wall, wall inclination and excess pore water pressure ratio.

     

基于混合粒子群算法和能量法主动土压力计算

假定挡土墙后填土滑动面为通过墙踵的对数螺线滑动面,基于能量法,推导出了墙背倾斜、粗糙、墙后填土向上倾斜,适用于砂性土与黏性土的主动土压力上限解。以对数螺线通过斜坡的旋入角? 0和旋出角? h为变量,使用基于自然选择的混合粒子群优化算法对最危险滑动面进行全局搜索,从而获得主动土压力最优解。对于砂性土,将土压力系数与经典的极限分析上限解相比,发现在墙面倾角较小时两者基本一致,但当墙面倾角大于30°时,经典解明显偏小,而文中解与基于最优性原理的极限平衡解较接近。至于黏性土,对一工程实例进行计算,计算结果与实测值的相对误差为5.4%。     

考虑拱效应深基坑支护结构土压力分析

针对基坑支护结构土压力的研究以数值模拟为主,而解析理论应用需要完善研究现状,提出一种用于计算基坑支护结构土压力的解析方法。根据填土中土拱效应的作用以及土拱成形的基本理论,结合极限平衡分析方法,应用摩尔圆理论确定了基坑端壁间稳定土拱的轨迹方程,并且得到基于土拱形状所围滑裂土体的体积,确定出基坑支护结构土压力的解析表达式,最后进行了算例分析,研究结果表明土体的物理属性决定了有效滑裂土体的边界。提出的解析方法是深基坑计算土压力的一种新的解析方法。     

Finite Element Modeling of Swelling Soil Pressures Using Joint/Interface Elements

There could be some discontinuities in a soil media such as layers, earth structures, cracks, and fissures so that estimation of stresses and deformations in these types of soil masses are somewhat different from continuous masses. The discontinuities in a soil mass could be considered as a special link between two blocks. Transmitted swelling pressures affected by the soil properties of the backfill especially at the interface between the backfill and retaining wall. In order to estimate the transmitted swelling pressure distribution behind a retaining wall, using with interface element, a new finite element model and a code (SWELPRES) have been developed. To evaluate the effect of backfill characteristics and interface element from the transmitted lateral swelling pressures, four cases of thickness of backfills with or without interface elements are investigated.     

Estimation of static earth pressures for a sloping cohesive backfill using extended Rankine theory with a composite log-spiral failure surface

The Rankine earth pressure theory is extended herein to an inclined c–? backfill. An analytical approach is then proposed to compute the static passive and active lateral earth pressures for a sloping cohesive backfill retained by a vertical wall, with the presence of wall–soil interface adhesion. The proposed method is based on a limit equilibrium analysis coupled with the method of slices wherein the assumed profile of the backfill failure surface is a composite of log-spiral and linear segments. The geometry of the failure surface is determined using the stress states of the soil at the two boundaries of the mobilized soil mass. The resultant lateral earth thrust, the point of application, and the induced moment on the wall are computed considering global and local equilibrium of forces and moments. Results of the proposed approach are compared with those predicted by a number of analytical models currently adopted in the design practice for various combinations of soil’s frictional angles, wall–soil interface frictional angles, inclined angles of backfill and soil cohesions. The predicted results are also verified against those obtained from finite element analyses for several scenarios under the passive condition. It is found that the magnitude of earth thrust increases with the backfill inclination angle under both the passive and active conditions.

     

Three-dimensional active earth pressure from cohesive backfills with tensile strength cutoff

Most of previous analyses on the active earth pressure were performed in two-dimensional cases using the Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) failure function to describe the soil strength. However, all failures of retained slopes indicate a somewhat three-dimensional (3D) feature, and the M-C function is found to overestimate the tensile strength of cohesive soil. In this work, a kinematic limit analysis–based approach is developed for computing the 3D active earth pressure resulting from cohesive backfills. The concept of tensile strength cutoff is adopted to implement the reduction or elimination of tensile strength from the strength envelope. An extended 3D horn failure mechanism that is associated with the modified strength envelope is developed to characterize the collapse of retained slopes. The resultant of active earth pressure is evaluated from the work rate balance equation and expressed as an unfactored coefficient. The obtained results indicate that less support provided by the wall is required when allowing the existence of soil cohesion and 3D effects and that eliminating the tensile strength can observably increase the active earth pressure, especially for the backfill with a great level of cohesion.     

考虑土拱效应的刚性挡墙主动土压力分析

以墙后填土为无黏性土的刚性挡土墙为研究对象,考虑墙后土体的土拱效应,修改了Shubhra Geol 抛物线形土拱表达式,推导了对应不同内摩擦角和墙-土摩擦角的挡土墙平动模式下的主动土压力系数。基于水平微分单元法,得到考虑土拱效应的主动土压力分布、合力大小和合力作用点高度的理论表达式,并与现有经典理论解及前人理论研究成果和模型试验数据进行对比分析,结果表明,主动土压力与墙-土接触面摩擦角、土体内摩擦角、土体重度和挡墙高度相关,土压力分布为非线性,与其他结果比较吻合,从而验证了该研究成果的正确性。     

考虑土拱效应的黏性填土排桩桩后土压力研究

研究了考虑土拱效应的黏性填土排桩桩后总土压力的计算方法。以黏性填土的单排支护桩为研究对象,将考虑土拱效应的桩后总土压力分为直接土压力和间接土压力。首先,针对已有土压力计算方法的不足,借鉴并改进了挡土墙的主应力旋转理论,认为主应力旋转后大小会发生改变,通过对土拱单元的应力分析和平衡微分方程的求解,推导出了黏性填土排桩桩后直接土压力的解析式,并将计算结果与前人的解析解和试验数据进行对比,表明改进后的方法与实测数据更加吻合。然后,将改进后的方法应用在黏性土间接土压力的分析中,通过将间接土压力看作是由桩间土体滑裂面上的剪应力沿滑裂面的积分,推导出考虑水平土拱效应的桩后间接土压力和总土压力解析式。最后,探究了总土压力随黏聚力和桩土摩擦角的变化规律,结果表明,土拱效应主要影响桩体H/3深度以下部分,使该部分土压力减小,且越靠近桩底,减小速率越大。该研究可为排桩结构的合理设计提供依据。     

Analytical solution for active earth pressure of c–φ soil considering arching effect

The current study was undertaken to study the effect of soil arching on active earth pressure distribution in retaining walls with c–φ backfill. An analytical approach is presented to develop a general solution considering the effects of surcharge, backfill soil cohesion and slip surface inclination. The magnitude and height of the application of lateral active force is also derived. The results from the proposed equation corresponded to the measured results from a full-scale test, shows non-linear pressure distribution with zero pressure at wall base and less pressure in deeper heights compared to Coulomb’s method. According to the results of parametric analysis, the proposed equation predicts the active earth thrust nearly equal to that of the Coulomb’s equation, however, the surcharge-induced soil pressure is obtained approximately 50% greater than the conventional equation. Moreover, the height of application of active thrust is located at the height of 0.4H from the wall base. These indicate that using the Coulomb’s active equation for retaining walls design, is not in the safe side.     

基于土拱效应原理求解挡土墙被动土压力

对平移模式下的刚性挡土墙和滑裂面间的楔形土体处于被动极限平衡状态的应力进行分析,考虑墙面和滑裂面之间土体水平力平衡,运用土拱效应原理推导出被动土压力系数和滑裂面水平倾角。并根据水平单元土体的静力平衡条件建立平衡方程,提出被动土压力分布、土压力合力及其作用位置的公式。将公式计算结果与试验结果以及库仑、朗肯理论所得结果进行比较,结果表明,与试验结果接近,验证了所得计算方法的合理性。     

考虑土拱效应刚性挡墙土压力研究

基于库仑土压力理论,假定刚性挡墙后主应力拱迹线为抛物线,推导了主、被侧土压力系数和水平微分单元间摩擦系数的理论公式,得到改进的主、被动土压力计算公式。研究表明：考虑土拱效应计算结果与模型试验结果吻合比较好。主动极限状态下,土体内摩擦角越小,墙土接触面上外摩擦角越大,土拱效应越明显,主动土压力合力作用点越上移;被动极限状态下,土体内摩擦角和墙土接触面上外摩擦角越大,土拱效应越明显,被动土压力合力点越往下移。     

Passive earth pressure of overconsolidated collapsible soil subjected to inundation

ABSTRACT

Backfills behind retaining walls are often made of collapsible soils, which are subjected to wetting by surface running water or by rising the groundwater table. Collapsible soil shows considerable strength when it is dry or at a relatively low degree of saturation and experiences excessive and sudden settlement when it is inundated. This paper presents an experimental investigation on walls retaining overconsolidated collapsible soil subjected to passive earth pressure. A prototype model of a vertical wall, retaining horizontal backfill was developed. Collapsible soil was prepared in the laboratory by mixing kaolin clay with fine sand. The model was instrumented to measure the total passive earth force on the wall, the passive earth pressure at strategic locations on the wall, and the overconsolidation ratio of the soil in the testing tank. The state of passive pressure was developed by pushing the wall horizontally toward the backfill without any rotation. Tests were conducted on walls retaining overconsolidated collapsible soil at the dry and at full saturation conditions. Results showed that for the dry state, the passive earth pressure increases with the increase of the collapse potential and overconsolidation ratio, and was significantly dropped at full saturation.     

土拱效应原理求解挡土墙土压力方法的改进

对应用土拱效应原理求解挡土墙主动土压力强度分布存在其所采用的滑裂面不满足墙后滑裂楔体水平力平衡等问题进行分析,提出水平力平衡的滑裂面水平倾角的计算方法;由此根据单元水平土层的静力平衡条件建立了竖向土压力强度、挡土墙主动土压力强度、土压力合力及其作用位置的计算公式。对运用该公式的计算结果与其他方法计算值及模型试验成果进行比较,结果表明文中方法安全性高且最接近试验结果。     

绕墙脚转动的挡土墙主动土压力分布研究

对挡土墙背离填土绕墙脚转动时墙后滑裂土体的应力状态进行了详细分析,建立了墙后滑裂体水平土层墙面反力、滑裂面反力、土层间剪力和土层竖向土压力强度之间的关系式。为了考虑挡土墙绕墙脚转动时墙脚局部土体并未达到极限状态,对墙面摩擦角、滑裂面土体的内摩擦角予以折减。在水平土层单元法的基础上,考虑水平土层间剪力作用、每一土层的墙面摩擦角和滑裂面水平倾角等的变化,建立了土层竖向土压力强度的逐层渐近的计算方法,并给出了挡土墙主动土压力强度、土压力合力及其作用位置的计算公式。经比较表明：挡土墙主动土压力分布曲线与试验结果基本一致,计算得的主动土压力系数与试验结果很接近,比库仑解大;计算得出的滑裂面为一曲面,其顶部开裂宽度比库仑滑裂面小,与工程实际相符。     

黏性土填料下考虑土拱效应的非极限主动土压力计算方法

不论挡土墙填料采用砂性土,还是黏性土,其墙背主动土压力与墙体倾角和位移关系存在较大的联系,因而研究黏性土填料下的非极限主动土压力计算理论具有重要意义。通过应力状态分析给出了非极限状态下考虑土拱效应的侧向主动土压力系数,然后采用水平微分层析法给出了倾斜墙下非极限主动土压力解析解。通过与室内模拟试验及已有理论进行对比,验证了该方法的合理性。最后研究了相关参数包括位移比?,墙土摩擦角与内摩擦角之比? /?,墙体倾角?,黏聚力c等对主动土压力分布及其作用点高度的影响。结果表明：土体由静止状态向极限主动土压力状态发展时,土拱效应的影响会越来越大。随着? /?的不断增大,土压力分布曲线非线性强度会不断增强,土压力合力作用点高度呈上升趋势,并且? /?对土压力的影响会随着位移比? 的增大而增大。随着挡土墙墙背倾斜角度? 的不断增大,土拱效应对非极限主动土压力的影响减小。随着土体填料黏聚力的不断增大,上部张拉裂缝高度也会随之增加,且土压力合力作用点越低。给出的考虑土拱效应的非极限主动土压力计算方法对于丰富挡土墙土压力计算理论具有重要意义。     

黏性土填料下考虑土拱效应的挡土墙被动土压力计算

为解释挡土墙后填土被动土压力的非线性分布现象,在考虑土拱形状为圆弧,滑裂面采用朗肯滑裂面的基础上,给出考虑土拱效应的被动土压力系数Kawn,进而基于应力状态法及土楔形体静力平衡两种思想求解了竖向平均应力 公式,在该基础上,给出黏性土填料下的挡土墙被动土压力分布公式、合力公式及作用点高度计算公式。通过与试验与其他方法对比,文中提出的方法得到验证。最后,研究了黏性土填料下的挡土墙被动土压力变化规律,即考虑土拱效应求得的黏性土填料的被动土压力分布呈现上小下大的指数型分布。此外,随着δ/φ（δ为墙土摩擦角,φ为内摩擦角）的增大,土拱效应逐渐增强,土压力合力点逐渐降低。     

考虑填土强度的加筋土挡墙动位移计算

加筋土挡墙在地震荷载作用下的位移大小对结构的抗震性能影响显著。为了计算地震荷载作用下加筋土挡墙的位移,Newmark滑块法通常被用于设计中。由于传统的Newmark滑块法在计算中忽略了填土强度的变化,因而采用单一峰值或残余强度的计算将可能导致计算得到的位移小于或大于实际位移值。在二楔块破坏模式的假定条件下,根据楔块的力学平衡条件,建立了加筋土挡墙滑动安全系数计算式,同时通过引入位移阈值考虑了填土的应变软化特点。通过将计算结果与模型试验结果对比,得到以下结论：相较于单楔块法,二楔块法更能真实地反映出墙体的实际破坏模式,且计算得到的屈服加速度系数更接近试验值;相较于采用单一峰值或残余强度计算的位移,考虑填土应变软化的计算解更接近于模型测试值。