The geopotential to (14, 14) from a combination of satellite and gravimetric data

A set of2261 5°×5° mean anomalies were used alone and with satellite determined harmonic coefficients of the Smithsonian' Institution to determine the geopotential expansion to various degrees. The basic adjustment was carried out by comparing a terrestrial anomaly to an anomaly determined from an assumed set of coefficients. The (14, 14) solution was found to agree within ±3 m of a detailed geoid in the United States computed using1°×1° anomalies for an inner area and satellite determined anomalies in an outer area. Additional comparisons were made to the input anomaly field to consider the accuracy of various harmonic coefficient solutions. A by-product of this investigation was a new γ_E=978.0463 gals in the Potsdam system or978.0326 gals in an absolute system if −13.7 mgals is taken as the Potsdam correction. Combining this value of γ_E withf=1/298.25, KM=3.9860122·10 ²² cm ³ /sec ² , the consistent equatorial radius was found to be6378143 m.     

Earth＇s Temporal Principal Moments of Inertia and Variable Rotation

Based on the gravity field models EGM96 and EIGEN-GL04C, the Earth＇s time-dependent principal moments of inertia A, B, C are obtained, and the variable rotation of the Earth is determined. Numerical results show that A, B, and C have increasing tendencies; the tilt of the rotation axis increases 2.1×10^ 8 mas/yr; the third component of the rotational angular velocity, ω3 , has a decrease of 1.0×10^ 22 rad/s^2, which is around 23% of the present observed value. Studies show in detail that both 0 and ω3 experience complex fluctuations at various time scales due to the variations of A, B and C.     

The geopotential value <Emphasis Type="Italic">W</Emphasis><Subscript>0</Subscript> for specifying the relativistic atomic time scale and a global vertical reference system

The TOPEX/Poseidon (T/P) satellite alti- meter mission marked a new era in determining the geopotential constant W ₀. On the basis of T/P data during 1993–2003 (cycles 11–414), long-term variations in W ₀ have been investigated. The rounded value W ₀ = 62636856.0 ± 0.5) m ² s ⁻² has already been adopted by the International Astronomical Union for the definition of the constant L _G = W ₀/c ² = 6.969290134 × 10⁻¹⁰ (where c is the speed of light), which is required for the realization of the relativistic atomic time scale. The constant L _G , based on the above value of W ₀, is also included in the 2003 International Earth Rotation and Reference Frames Service conventions. It has also been suggested that W ₀ is used to specify a global vertical reference system (GVRS). W ₀ ensures the consistency with the International Terrestrial Reference System, i.e. after adopting W ₀, along with the geocentric gravitational constant (GM), the Earth’s rotational velocity (ω) and the second zonal geopotential coefficient (J ₂) as primary constants (parameters), then the ellipsoidal parameters (a,α) can be computed and adopted as derived parameters. The scale of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame 2000 (ITRF2000) has also been specified with the use of W ₀ to be consistent with the geocentric coordinate time. As an example of using W ₀ for a GVRS realization, the geopotential difference between the adopted W ₀ and the geopotential at the Rimouski tide-gauge point, specifying the North American Vertical Datum 1988 (NAVD88), has been estimated.     

On calculating the Earth's C21 and S21 gravity coefficients in the IERS terrestrial reference frame

Modern models of the Earth's gravity field are developed in the IERS (International Earth Rotation Service) terrestrial reference frame. In this frame the mean values for gravity coefficients of the second degree and first order, C ₂₁(IERS) and S ₂₁(IERS), by the current IERS Conventions are recommended to be calculated by using the observed polar motion parameters. Here, it is proved that the formulae presently employed by the IERS Conventions to obtain these coefficients are insufficient to ensure their values as given by the same source. The relevant error of the normalized mean values for C ₂₁(IERS) and S ₂₁(IERS) is 3×10⁻¹², far above the adopted cutoff (10⁻¹³) for variations of these coefficients. Such an error in C ₂₁ and S ₂₁ can produce non-modeled perturbations in motion prediction of certain artificial Earth satellites of a magnitude comparable to the accuracy of current tracking measurements. Received: 14 September 1998 / Accepted: 20 May 1999     

World Geodetic Datum 2000

 Based on the current best estimates of fundamental geodetic parameters {W ₀,GM,J ₂,Ω} the form parameters of a Somigliana-Pizzetti level ellipsoid, namely the semi-major axis a and semi-minor axis b (or equivalently the linear eccentricity ) are computed and proposed as a new World Geodetic Datum 2000. There are six parameters namely the four fundamental geodetic parameters {W ₀,GM,J ₂,Ω} and the two form parameters {a,b} or {a,ɛ}, which determine the ellipsoidal reference gravity field of Somigliana-Pizzetti type constraint to two nonlinear condition equations. Their iterative solution leads to best estimates a=(6 378 136.572±0.053)m, b=(6 356 751.920 ± 0.052)m, ɛ=(521 853.580±0.013)m for the tide-free geoide of reference and a=(6 378 136.602±0.053)m, b=(6 356 751.860±0.052)m, ɛ=(521 854.674 ± 0.015)m for the zero-frequency tide geoid of reference. The best estimates of the form parameters of a Somigliana-Pizzetti level ellipsoid, {a,b}, differ significantly by −0.39 m, −0.454 m, respectively, from the data of the Geodetic Reference System 1980. Received: 1 February 1999 / Accepted: 31 August 1999     

Accuracy of GPS-derived relative positions as a function of interstation distance and observing-session duration

 Ten days of GPS data from 1998 were processed to determine how the accuracy of a derived three-dimensional relative position vector between GPS antennas depends on the chord distance (denoted L) between these antennas and on the duration of the GPS observing session (denoted T). It was found that the dependence of accuracy on L is negligibly small when (a) using the `final' GPS satellite orbits disseminated by the International GPS Service, (b) fixing integer ambiguities, (c) estimating appropriate neutral-atmosphere-delay parameters, (d) 26 km ≤ L ≤ 300 km, and (e) 4 h ≤T ≤ 24 h. Under these same conditions, the standard error for the relative position in the north–south dimension (denoted S _n and expressed in mm) is adequately approximated by the equation S _n =k _n /T ^0.5 with k _n =9.5 ± 2.1 mm · h^0.5 and T expressed in hours. Similarly, the standard errors for the relative position in the east–west and in the up-down dimensions are adequately approximated by the equations S _e =k _e /T ^0.5 and S _u =k _u /T ^0.5, respectively, with k _e =9.9 ± 3.1 mm · h^0.5 and k _u =36.5 ± 9.1 mm · h^0.5. Received: 5 February 2001 / Accepted: 14 May 2001     

Valeur de la Pesanteur pour le Point Fondamental de Varsovie

Résumé Le système provisoire des mesures gravimétriques en Pologne a été établi pour le point fondamental de Varsovie sur la valeur: g=981,2412cm·sec⁻². De l'analyse des résultats obtenus par le système de rattachements modernes de Varsovie à Potsdam dont les mesures ont été effectuées par A. Kwiatkowski, P. Lejay, Reicheneder, Weiken, l'auteur déduit dans le système de Potsdam comme valeur de pesanteur la plus probable à Varsovie g=981,2400±0,0002 cm·sec⁻². Cette valeur a été vérifiée au moyen de l'analyse des rattachements indirects de Varsovie à Potsdam par les points pendulaires de Kielce, Cracovie, Racibórz (tableau 2), de Ciechanów, Goldap, Susz et Szczytno (tableau 3). Les données prises en considération proviennent de mesures effectuées avec des gravimètres de N?rgaard. La concordance des résultats particuliers a été vérifiée dans les limites d'erreurs moyennes d'observations. Dans la dernière partie de cette étude ont été consignés les résultats des dernières mesures absolues de la pesanteur à Washington et à Teddington qui ont permis de constater entre le système absolu et celui de Potsdam une différence de 15 à 20 mgals. Comité National Polonais de Géodésie     

National height datum,the Gauss–Listing geoid level value w0 and its time variation 0 (Baltic Sea Level Project: epochs 1990.8, 1993.8, 1997.4)

 A methodology for precise determination of the fundamental geodetic parameter w ₀, the potential value of the Gauss–Listing geoid, as well as its time derivative ₀, is presented. The method is based on: (1) ellipsoidal harmonic expansion of the external gravitational field of the Earth to degree/order 360/360 (130 321 coefficients; http://www.uni-stuttgard.de/gi/research/ index.html projects) with respect to the International Reference Ellipsoid WGD2000, at the GPS positioned stations; and (2) ellipsoidal free-air gravity reduction of degree/order 360/360, based on orthometric heights of the GPS-positioned stations. The method has been numerically tested for the data of three GPS campaigns of the Baltic Sea Level project (epochs 1990.8,1993.4 and 1997.4). New w ₀ and ₀ values (w ₀=62 636 855.75 ± 0.21 m²/s², ₀=−0.0099±0.00079 m²/s² per year, w ₀/&γmacr;=6 379 781.502 m,₀/&γmacr;=1.0 mm/year, and &γmacr;= −9.81802523 m²/s²) for the test region (Baltic Sea) were obtained. As by-products of the main study, the following were also determined: (1) the high-resolution sea surface topography map for the Baltic Sea; (2) the most accurate regional geoid amongst four different regional Gauss–Listing geoids currently proposed for the Baltic Sea; and (3) the difference between the national height datums of countries around the Baltic Sea. Received: 14 August 2000 / Accepted: 19 June 2001     

Truncation error formulae for the disturbing gravity vector

Recurrence relations have been derived for truncation error coefficients of the extended Stokes' function and its partial derivatives required in the computation of the disturbing gravity vector at any elevation above the earth's surface. The corresponding formulae, the example of values of the truncation error coefficients for H=30.1 km and ψ₀=30^∘ and the estimations of truncation error are given in this article. Received: 26 January 1996 / Accepted: 11 June 1997     

Somigliana–Pizzetti gravity: the international gravity formula accurate to the sub-nanoGal level

 The Somigliana–Pizzetti gravity field (the International gravity formula), namely the gravity field of the level ellipsoid (the International Reference Ellipsoid), is derived to the sub-nanoGal accuracy level in order to fulfil the demands of modern gravimetry (absolute gravimeters, super conducting gravimeters, atomic gravimeters). Equations (53), (54) and (59) summarise Somigliana–Pizzetti gravity Γ(φ,u) as a function of Jacobi spheroidal latitude φ and height u to the order ?(10⁻¹⁰ Gal), and Γ(B,H) as a function of Gauss (surface normal) ellipsoidal latitude B and height H to the order ?(10⁻¹⁰ Gal) as determined by GPS (`global problem solver'). Within the test area of the state of Baden-Württemberg, Somigliana–Pizzetti gravity disturbances of an average of 25.452 mGal were produced. Computer programs for an operational application of the new international gravity formula with (L,B,H) or (λ,φ,u) coordinate inputs to a sub-nanoGal level of accuracy are available on the Internet. Received: 23 June 2000 / Accepted: 2 January 2001     

On the existence of solutions for the method of Bjerhammar in the continuous case

The method of Bjerhammar is studied in the continuous case for a sphere. By varying the kernel function, different types of unknowns (u^*) are obtained at the internal sphere (the Bjerhammar sphere). It is shown that a necessary condition for the existence of u^* is that the degree variances (σ _n ² ) of the observations are of an order less than n⁻². According to Kaula’s rule this condition is not satisfied for the earth’s gravity anomaly field (σ _n ² =n⁻¹) but well for the geopotential (σ _n ² =n⁻³).     

On the approximation of external gravitational potential with closed systems of (trial) functions

Summary Let S be the (regular) boundary-surface of an exterior regionE _e in Euclidean space ℜ³ (for instance: sphere, ellipsoid, geoid, earth's surface). Denote by {φ_n} a countable, linearly independent system of trial functions (e.g., solid spherical harmonics or certain singularity functions) which are harmonic in some domain containingE _e ∪ S. It is the purpose of this paper to show that the restrictions {ϕ_n} of the functions {φ_n} onS form a closed system in the spaceC (S), i.e. any functionf, defined and continuous onS, can be approximated uniformly by a linear combination of the functions ϕ_n. Consequences of this result are versions of Runge and Keldysh-Lavrentiev theorems adapted to the chosen system {φ_n} and the mathematical justification of the use of trial functions in numerical (especially: collocational) procedures.     

Variational formulation of the geodetic boundary value problem

A variational principle for the Stokesian boundary value problem is derived using the Euler-Lagrange theory. The resulting variational principle is then transformed into an equation determining the semi-major axis of the best fitting ellipsoid which fulfills the conditionU ₀ =W ₀ . The computations using three different geopotential models yields the semi-major axis of the earth ellipsoid asa=6378145.4 metres for the flatteningf=1/298.2564. The corresponding equatorial gravity and the geopotential number are computed as γ_a=978029.59 mgals andU ₀=W ₀=6.26367371 10⁶ kgalmeters respectively.     

Comparison of undulation difference accuracies using gravity anomalies and gravity disturbances

Errors are considered in the outer zone contribution to oceanic undulation differences as obtained from a set of potential coefficients complete to degree 180. It is assumed that the gravity data of the inner zone (a spherical cap), consisting of either gravity anomalies or gravity disturbances, has negligible error. This implies that error estimates of the total undulation difference are analyzed. If the potential coefficients are derived from a global field of 1°×1° mean anomalies accurate to ε_Δg=10 mgal, then for a cap radius of 10°, the undulation difference error (for separations between 100 km and 2000 km) ranges from 13 cm to 55 cm in the gravity anomaly case and from 6 cm to 36 cm in the gravity disturbance case. If ε_Δg is reduced to 1 mgal, these errors in both cases are less than 10 cm. In the absence of a spherical cap, both cases yield identical error estimates: about 68 cm if ε_Δg=1 mgal (for most separations) and ranging from 93 cm to 160 cm if ε_Δg=10 mgal. Introducing a perfect 30-degree reference field, the latter errors are reduced to about 110 cm for most separations.     

Determination of geoidal heights and deflections of the vertical for the hellenic area using heterogeneous data

Mean gravity anomalies, deflections of the vertical, and a geopotential model complete to degree and order180 are combined in order to determine geoidal heights in the area bounded by [34°≦ϕ≤42°, 18°≦λ≦28°]. Moreover, employing point gravity anomalies simultaneously with the above data, an attempt is made to predict deflections of the vertical in the same area. The method used in the computations is least squares collocation. Using empirical covariance functions for the data, the suitable errors for the different sources of observations, and the optimum cap radius around each point of evaluation, an accuracy better than±0.60m for geoidal heights and±1″.5 for deflections of the vertical is obtained taking into account existing systematic effects. This accuracy refers to the comparison between observed and predicted values.     

Unification of vertical datums by GPS and gravimetric geoid models with application to Fennoscandia

The second Baltic Sea Level (BSL) GPS campaign was run for one week in June 1993. Data from 35 tide gauge sites and five fiducial stations were analysed, for three fiducial stations (Onsala, Mets?hovi and Wettzell) fixed at the ITRF93 system. On a time-scale of 5 days, precision was several parts in 10⁹ for the horizontal and vertical components. Accuracies were about 1 cm in comparison with the International GPS Geodynamical Service (IGS) coordinates in three directions. To connect the Swedish and the Finnish height systems, our numerical application utilises three approaches: a rigorous approach, a bias fit and a three-parameter fit. The results between the Swedish RH70 and the Finnish N 60 systems are estimated to −19.3 ± 6.5, −17 ± 6 and −15 ± 6 cm, respectively, by the three approaches. The results of the three indirect methods are in an agreement with those of a direct approach from levelling and gravity measurements. Received: 3 April 1996 / Accepted: 4 August 1997     

Downward continuation of the free-air gravity anomalies to the ellipsoid using the gradient solution and terrain correction—An attempt of global numerical computations

The formulas for the determination of the coefficients of the spherical harmonic expansion of the disturbing potential of the earth are defined for data given on a sphere. In order to determine the spherical harmonic coefficients, the gravity anomalies have to be analytically downward continued from the earth's surface to a sphere—at least to the ellipsoid. The goal of this paper is to continue the gravity anomalies from the earth's surface downward to the ellipsoid using recent elevation models. The basic method for the downward continuation is the gradient solution (theg ₁ term). The terrain correction has also been computed because of the role it can play as a correction term when calculating harmonic coefficients from surface gravity data. Theg ₁ term and the terrain correction were expanded into the spherical harmonics up to180 ^th order. The corrections (theg ₁ term and the terrain correction) have the order of about 2% of theRMS value of degree variance of the disturbing potential per degree. The influences of theg ₁ term and the terrain correction on the geoid take the order of 1 meter (RMS value of corrections of the geoid undulation) and on the deflections of the vertical is of the order 0.1″ (RMS value of correction of the deflections of the vertical).     

Determination of Geopotential of Local Vertical Datum Surface

1　ＩｎｔｒｏｄｕｃｔｉｏｎＥａｃｈｃｏｕｎｔｒｙｏｒｅａｃｈｇｒｏｕｐｏｆｃｏｕｎｔｒｉｅｓｓｅｌｅｃｔｓｍｅａｎｓｅａｌｅｖ ｅｌａｔａｄｅｆｉｎｅｄｔｉｄｅｇａｕｇｅｏｒａｔａｇｒｏｕｐｏｆｇａｕｇｅｓｆｏｒｉｔｓｖｅｒｔｉ ｃａｌｄａｔｕｍｓｕｒｆａｃｅ .Ｉｔｉｓｒｅａｌｉｚｅｄ ,ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ,ｔｈａｔｔｈｅｌｏｃａｌｍｅａｎｓｅａｌｅｖｅｌｉｓｕｓｕａｌｌｙｄｅｐａｒｔｅｄｆｒｏｍｔｈｅｇｅｏｉｄ ,ｗｈｉｃｈｓｈｏｕｌｄｂｅｔｈｅｉｄｅａｌｄａｔｕｍｓｕｒｆａｃｅｆｏｒｈｅｉｇｈｔ,ｏｗ…