曲靖盆地上新统地层

曲靖盆地上新统地层发育，可以作为滇东大型新生代盆地沉积之代表。本文划分介形类4组合，孢粉5组合。根据生物组合，结合岩石地层特征，对该盆地地层作系统划分，为云南晚第三纪地层划分、对比提供依据。     

冀北晚侏罗世张家口组内段的划分

冀北晚侏罗世张家口组内岩石地层单位长期以来一直没有一个较统一的划分方案，使之划分较为混乱，影响了其合理地层层序的建立及区域地层对比。笔者通过“冀北中生代陆相火山一沉积盆地1：25万填图方法研究”项目的工作，提出张家口组内以相序的岩石组合为基本单元将其依次划分3个岩性段。一段主要为弱喷发相序的岩石组合；二段主要为爆发相序的岩石组合；三段主要为喷发沉积相序的岩石组合。三者分别代表该组某破火山的初始爆发阶段、大规模爆发阶段和破火口塌陷沉积阶段。由此划分的岩性段可以较好地反映火山构造特征，建立合理的地层层序，有助于火山演化历史的研究。使岩石地层单位划分与火山-沉积盆地研究有机地结合在一起。     

广东三水芦苞-大塘地区古近纪早中期淡水生物群的发现及其地质意义

对研究区内地层进行了多重划分对比,将古近纪地层划分为莘庄村组、土布心组、宝月组和华涌组4个岩石地层单位,并在该地层中首次发现轮藻、介形虫、腹足类、双壳类、鱼类、植物6个门类7个化石组合25属60余种生物化石,填补了本区生物地层的空白。根据岩石地层层序、生物组合特征和7个动植物化石组合的国内外对比,确定其形成时代为古新世-始新世,形成环境为陆相淡水,气候干旱、炎热。喜马拉雅运动使本区抬升为陆地,进一步证实晚古新世海侵边界大致在南边镇-水锅尾-基塘连线之南东地带。     

用现代地层学理论探讨华北二叠系划分对比中的几个问题

本文从现代理论地层学的概念出发，对华北二叠纪地层划分对比中的几个重要问题，进行了探讨：①岩石地层、生物地层与年代地层的含义；②岩石地层基本单元－－组的划分；③岩石地层对比与年代地层对比；④重要标志层在区域对比中的作用；⑤华北二叠系上、下统分界线的划分。通过对这些问题的探讨，暴露了在地层划分对比中，因长期受传统地层学与统一地层划分某些观点的影响所产生的问题，今后应该注意什么和如何处理。     

河北省赤城县样田——刁鹗地区中生代地层划分的探讨

本文从生物地层、岩石地层和地球化学等方面论述了本区中生代地层的划分。本区中生代地层时代属中——晚侏罗世,可划分九龙山组、髫髻山组、后城组、白旗组、张家口组、大北沟组和西瓜园组等七个组。     

塔河地区志留系的对比

塔河地区遭受过多次的构造抬升和剥蚀，志留系分布不规则，地层划分对比是本区寻找志留系油气藏的难题之一。本文综合应用古生物、测井、地震和野外露头资料进行地层划分对比，首先通过疑源类古生物的分析，确认塔河地区井下志留系的存在；继而分析其地震反射特征，通过地震一测井地层对比，将其与东河砂岩予以区分；最后通过与柯坪野外露头剖面的岩石地层对比，确认塔河地区所钻遇的志留系确为下志留统的柯坪塔格组中段。     

中国东北部兴安岭地区奥陶纪生物地层研究的新成果

较系统地总结了几十年来兴安岭地区奥陶纪生物地层研究的成果，以三叶虫化石为主对该区奥陶系进行了划分与对比，同时厘定了本区腕足类化石组合和笔石等重要化石层位，为兴安岭地区奥陶纪生物地层与我国华南、华北标准地区和其它地区以及与世界各区的对比提供了依据，同时为研究该区的地质问题提供了可靠的古生物资料。     

中国东北部兴安岭地区奥陶纪生物地层研究的新成果

较系统地总结了几十年来兴安岭地区奥陶纪生物地层研究的成果，以三叶虫化石为主对该区奥陶系进行了划分与对比，同时厘定了本区腕足类化石组合和笔石等重要化石层位，为兴安岭地区奥陶纪生物地层与我国华南、华北标准地区和其它地区以及与世界各区的对比提供了依据，同时为研究该区的地质问题提供了可靠的古生物资料。     

川西波格西地区晚古生代岩石地层厘定

在对四川西部巴塘县波格西地区晚古生代地层剖面研究的基础上,从岩性、岩相分析入手,将该区地层划分为６个组级岩石地层单位。根据所含化石确定地层形成时代为泥盆纪至二叠纪。在与邻区岩石地层对比基础上,将木里小区前人已建立的崖子沟组延入本区,修订了波格西组和龙巴组含义,新建了那来组、夺给组和帮相组,选定了剖面层型。从而完善了稻城小区晚古生代岩石地层系统。     

西藏申扎地区石炭—二叠纪岩石地层划分之我见

岩石地层单位是根据地层的岩性特征划分的地层单位，组是岩石地层的基本单位，西藏申扎德日昂玛一下拉和昂杰剖面石炭-二叠系发育，该地区石炭、二叠系的岩石地层单位都是在这两个剖面上建立，然而，其中的一些岩石地层单位的建立是根据地层中的化石组合而不是据其岩性特征，不符合多重地层划分的原则，该文对申扎地区石炭-二叠纪岩地层系统提出了一些见解，并简要讨论了石炭-二叠系界线。     

新疆北部前寒武系划分和对比

库鲁克塔格是新疆北部前寒武系分布较广,地层层序相对完整的地区.作者以库鲁克塔格为地层模型区,以同位素第龄为格架,初步确定了本区群级地层单元的界线及归属.在岩石地层、生物地层、化学地层等各种方法相互印证的基础上,建立并完善了前寒武纪的地层层序.     

辽西建平-喀左地区元古宙-古生代层序地层

通过１∶５万区域地质调查工作,对建平—喀左地区元古宙—古生代地层做了岩石地层、生物地层、不整合界线地层和层序地层的多重划分与对比。进行了基本层序、沉积相和沉积环境的调查研究,将元古宙—古生代地层划分为１０个层序,归并为２个超层序,初步建立了岩石地层和年代地层格架。     

湖南元古宙林家湾组和横路冲组的对比研究

简单介绍了湖南元古宙论水铺群林家湾组正层型剖面和板溪群横路冲组正副层型剖面;对比了二组剖面的地层岩性和成岩时代及层位等特征;论证了沧水铺群林家湾组层位是合乎客观地质实际的;阐述了对湖南益阳沧水铺地区磨拉石一火山建造的划分对比讨论的重要意义。     

早前寒武纪地质及深成构造作用研究进展

早前寒武纪地质的研究进展主要表现在准大陆克拉通早期构造演化,克拉通及古老造山带深层结构,元古代超大陆恢复对比、早期地壳性质及生长等主要问题上开展多学科研究计划的实施。其中,同位素年代学,特别是锆石Ｕ－Ｐｂ方法,地震反射、Ｐ－Ｔ计算及古地磁研究对前寒武纪地质学的进展具有重要的推动作用。和个古陆克拉通区域地质学的持质研究积累,不断产生新的认识,这种新的科学思想涉及到早期陆壳组成及区划,太古代克拉通化历史,太古代－元古代界限及性质,元古代造山带网络与克拉进陆块拼合,大陆下地壳剖面及其组成等同题。华北早前寒武纪地质演化研究中的重要问题包括：华北麻粒岩相带与克拉通基底构造的关系,克拉通基底构造区域,早期陆壳性质及其记录的重大构造一热事件幕,华北克拉通与世界典型陆块构造演化对比等。     

南秦岭中,新元古代地层划分对比新认识

在运用板块动力学模式研究晚前寒武纪地层划分对比问题的基础上,根据南秦岭构造带区域地质的实际情况,提出在中、新元古代南秦岭曾经历了晋宁期造山作用和澄江期裂解作用两次重大构造事件,它们控制了区内不同岩石建造的形成和时,空分布,据此对区域内中,新元古代地层的划分对比提出了新的认识。     

A New Progress of the Proterozoic Chronostratigraphical Division

The Precambrian, an informal chronostratigraphical unit, represents the period of Earth history from the start of the Cambrian at ca. 541 Ma back to the formation of the planet at 4567 Ma. It was originally conceptualized as a "Cryptozoic Eon" that was contrasted with the Phanerozoic Eon from the Cambrian to the Quaternary, which is now known as the Precambrian and can be subdivided into three eons, i.e., the Hadean, the Archean and the Proterozoic. The Precambrian is currently divided chronometrically into convenient boundaries, including for the establishment of the Proterozoic periods that were chosen to reflect large-scale tectonic or sedimentary features(except for the Ediacaran Period). This chronometric arrangement might represent the second progress on the study of chronostratigraphy of the Precambrian after its separation from the Phanerozoic. Upon further study of the evolutionary history of the Precambrian Earth, applying new geodynamic and geobiological knowledge and information, a revised division of Precambrian time has led to the third conceptual progress on the study of Precambrian chronostratigraphy. In the current scheme, the Proterozoic Eon began at 2500 Ma, which is the approximate time by which most granite-greenstone crust had formed, and can be subdivided into ten periods of typically 200 Ma duration grouped into three eras(except for the Ediacaran Period). Within this current scheme, the Ediacaran Period was ratified in 2004, the first period-level addition to the geologic time scale in more than a century, an important advancement in stratigraphy. There are two main problems in the current scheme of Proterozoic chronostratigraphical division:(1) the definition of the Archean–Proterozoic boundary at 2500 Ma, which does not reflect a unique time of synchronous global change in tectonic style and does not correspond with a major change in lithology;(2) the round number subdivision of the Proterozoic into several periods based on broad orogenic characteristics, which has not met with requests on the concept of modern stratigraphy, except for the Ediacaran Period. In the revised chronostratigraphic scheme for the Proterozoic, the Archean–Proterozoic boundary is placed at the major change from a reducing early Earth to a cooler, more modern Earth characterized by the supercontinent cycle, a major change that occurred at ca. 2420 Ma. Thus, a revised Proterozoic Eon(2420–542 Ma) is envisaged to extend from the Archean–Proterozoic boundary at ca. 2420 Ma to the end of the Ediacaran Period, i.e., a period marked by the progressive rise in atmospheric oxygen, supercontinent cyclicity, and the evolution of more complex(eukaryotic) life. As with the current Proterozoic Eon, a revised Proterozoic Eon based on chronostratigraphy is envisaged to consist of three eras(Paleoproterozoic, Mesoproterozoic, and Neoproterozoic), but the boundary ages for these divisions differ from their current ages and their subdivisions into periods would also differ from current practice. A scheme is proposed for the chronostratigraphic division of the Proterozoic, based principally on geodynamic and geobiological events and their expressions in the stratigraphic record. Importantly, this revision of the Proterozoic time scale will be of significant benefit to the community as a whole and will help to drive new research that will unveil new information about the history of our planet, since the Proterozoic is a significant connecting link between the preceding Precambrian and the following Phanerozoic.     

大陆造山带元古宙构造体制研究的思路和方法探讨──以秦岭造山带为例

根据现代构造理论和大陆地质研究的新进展，以秦岭造山带为例，从稳定地块与造山带的结合、显生宙造山过程对元古宙构造体制的限制、元古宙地层划分对比、元古宙古构造环境分析的地球化学等方面研究入手，对造山带元古宙构造体制研究的思路和方法进行了初步探讨。     

Tectonic Units and Their Fundamental Characteristics on the Northern Margin of the Alxa Block

The northern margin of the Alxa block is the junction of a tectonic units. Four first-order tectonic units are distinguished: 1. the Yagan structural zone characteristic of an immature island arc; 2. the Zhusileng-Hangwula structural zone, which was a passive continental margin in the Early Palaeozoic and was transformed into an active continental margin in the Late Palaeozoic;3. the Shalazha structural zone characteristic of a mature island arc; 4. the Nuru-Langshan structural zone, which was a Proterozoic orogenic belt and later evolved into an extensional transtional crust in the Palaeozoic. The above-mentioned tectonic units differ remarkably in sedimentary formations, magmatic rock associations, metamorphism and geochemistry and are bounded by faults between one another.     

大陆造山带元古宙构造体制研究的思路和方法探讨——以秦岭造山带为例

根据现代构造理论和大陆地质研究的新进展，以秦岭造山带为例，从稳定地块与造山带的结合、显生宙造山过程对元古宙构造体制的限制、元古宙地层划分对比、元古宙古构造环境分析的地球化学等方面研究入手，对造山带元古宙构造体制研究的思路和方法进行了初步探讨。     

Tectonic Units and Their Fundamental Characteristics on the Northern Margin of the Alxa Block1

Abstract The northern margin of the Alxa block is the junction of a tectonic units. Four first—order tectonic units are distinguished: 1. the Yagan structural zone characteristic of an immature island arc; 2. the Zhusileng—Hangwula structural zone, which was a passive continental margin in the Early Palaeozoic and was transformed into an active continental margin in the Late Palaeozoic; 3. the Shalazha structural zone characteristic of a mature island arc; 4. the Nuru—Langshan structural zone, which was a Proterozoic orogenic belt and later evolved into an extensional transitional crust in the Palaeozoic. The above—mentioned tectonic units differ remarkably in sedimentary formations, magmatic rock associations, metamorphism and geochemistry and are bounded by faults between one another.