Thermal expansion of gehlenite, Ca2Al[AlSiO7], and the related aluminates LnCaAl[Al2O7] with Ln=Tb, Sm

The thermal expansion of gehlenite, Ca₂Al[AlSiO₇], (up to T=830 K), TbCaAl[Al₂O₇] (up to T=1,100 K) and SmCaAl[Al₂O₇] (up to T=1,024 K) has been determined. All compounds are of the melilite structure type with space group Thermal expansion data was obtained from in situ X-ray powder diffraction experiments in-house and at HASYLAB at the Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY) in Hamburg (Germany). The thermal expansion coefficients for gehlenite were found to be: α₁=7.2(4)×10⁻⁶ K⁻¹+3.6(7)×10⁻⁹ΔT K⁻² and α₃=15.0(1)×10⁻⁶ K⁻¹. For TbCaAl[Al₂O₇] the respective values are: α₁=7.0(2)×10⁻⁶ K⁻¹+2.0(2)×10⁻⁹ΔT K⁻² and α₃=8.5(2)×10⁻⁶ K⁻¹+2.0(3)×10⁻⁹ΔT K⁻², and the thermal expansion coefficients for SmCaAl[Al₂O₇] are: α₁=6.9(2)× 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹+1.7(2)×10⁻⁹ΔT K⁻² and α₃=9.344(5)×10⁻⁶ K⁻¹. The expansion-mechanisms of the three compounds are explained in terms of structural trends obtained from Rietveld refinements of the crystal structures of the compounds against the powder diffraction patterns. No structural phase transitions have been observed. While gehlenite behaves like a ’proper’ layer structure, the aluminates show increased framework structure behaviour. This is most probably explained by stronger coulombic interactions between the tetrahedral conformation and the layer-bridging cations due to the coupled substitution (Ca²⁺+Si⁴⁺)-(Ln ³⁺+Al³⁺) in the melilite-type structure. Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article at     

Thermodynamic data of the high-pressure phase Mg5Al5Si6O21(OH)7 (Mg-sursassite)

 Calorimetric and P–V–T data for the high-pressure phase Mg₅Al₅Si₆O₂₁(OH)₇ (Mg-sursassite) have been obtained. The enthalpy of drop solution of three different samples was measured by high-temperature oxide melt calorimetry in two laboratories (UC Davis, California, and Ruhr University Bochum, Germany) using lead borate (2PbO·B₂O₃) at T=700 ^∘C as solvent. The resulting values were used to calculate the enthalpy of formation from different thermodynamic datasets; they range from −221.1 to −259.4 kJ mol⁻¹ (formation from the oxides) respectively −13892.2 to −13927.9 kJ mol⁻¹ (formation from the elements). The heat capacity of Mg₅Al₅Si₆O₂₁(OH)₇ has been measured from T=50 ^∘C to T=500 ^∘C by differential scanning calorimetry in step-scanning mode. A Berman and Brown (1985)-type four-term equation represents the heat capacity over the entire temperature range to within the experimental uncertainty: C _P (Mg-sursassite) =(1571.104 −10560.89×T ^−0.5−26217890.0 ×T ⁻²+1798861000.0×T ⁻³) J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ (T in K). The P V T behaviour of Mg-sursassite has been determined under high pressures and high temperatures up to 8 GPa and 800 ^∘C using a MAX 80 cubic anvil high-pressure apparatus. The samples were mixed with Vaseline to ensure hydrostatic pressure-transmitting conditions, NaCl served as an internal standard for pressure calibration. By fitting a Birch-Murnaghan EOS to the data, the bulk modulus was determined as 116.0±1.3 GPa, (K ^′=4), V _T,0 =446.49 ³ exp[∫(0.33±0.05) × 10⁻⁴ + (0.65±0.85)×10⁻⁸ T dT], (K _T/T) _P  = −0.011± 0.004 GPa K⁻¹. The thermodynamic data obtained for Mg-sursassite are consistent with phase equilibrium data reported recently (Fockenberg 1998); the best agreement was obtained with Δ_f H ⁰ ₂₉₈ (Mg-sursassite) = −13901.33 kJ mol⁻¹, and S ⁰ ₂₉₈ (Mg-sursassite) = 614.61 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹. Received: 21 September 2000 / Accepted: 26 February 2001     

Behavior of epidote at high pressure and high temperature: a powder diffraction study up to 10 GPa and 1,200 K

The thermo-elastic behavior of a natural epidote [Ca_1.925 Fe_0.745Al_2.265Ti_0.004Si_3.037O₁₂(OH)] has been investigated up to 1,200 K (at 0.0001 GPa) and 10 GPa (at 298 K) by means of in situ synchrotron powder diffraction. No phase transition has been observed within the temperature and pressure range investigated. P–V data fitted with a third-order Birch–Murnaghan equation of state (BM-EoS) give V ₀ = 458.8(1)ų, K _T0 = 111(3) GPa, and K′ = 7.6(7). The confidence ellipse from the variance–covariance matrix of K _T0 and K′ from the least-square procedure is strongly elongated with negative slope. The evolution of the “Eulerian finite strain” vs “normalized stress” yields Fe(0) = 114(1) GPa as intercept values, and the slope of the regression line gives K′ = 7.0(4). The evolution of the lattice parameters with pressure is slightly anisotropic. The elastic parameters calculated with a linearized BM-EoS are: a ₀ = 8.8877(7) Å, K _T0(a) = 117(2) GPa, and K′(a) = 3.7(4) for the a-axis; b ₀ = 5.6271(7) Å, K _T0(b) = 126(3) GPa, and K′(b) = 12(1) for the b-axis; and c ₀ = 10.1527(7) Å, K _T0(c) = 90(1) GPa, and K’(c) = 8.1(4) for the c-axis [K _T0(a):K _T0(b):K _T0(c) = 1.30:1.40:1]. The β angle decreases with pressure, β_P(°) = β_P0 −0.0286(9)P +0.00134(9)P ² (P in GPa). The evolution of axial and volume thermal expansion coefficient, α, with T was described by the polynomial function: α(T) = α₀ + α₁ T ^−1/2. The refined parameters for epidote are: α₀ = 5.1(2) × 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹ and α₁ = −5.1(6) × 10⁻⁴ K^1/2 for the unit-cell volume, α₀(a) = 1.21(7) × 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹ and α₁(a) = −1.2(2) × 10⁻⁴ K^1/2 for the a-axis, α₀(b) = 1.88(7) × 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹ and α₁(b) = −1.7(2) × 10⁻⁴ K^1/2 for the b-axis, and α₀(c) = 2.14(9) × 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹ and α₁(c) = −2.0(2) × 10⁻⁴ K^1/2 for the c-axis. The thermo-elastic anisotropy can be described, at a first approximation, by α₀(a): α₀(b): α₀(c) = 1 : 1.55 : 1.77. The β angle increases continuously with T, with β_T(°) = β_T0 + 2.5(1) × 10⁻⁴ T + 1.3(7) × 10⁻⁸ T ². A comparison between the thermo-elastic parameters of epidote and clinozoisite is carried out.     

Thermoelasticity and high-<Emphasis Type="Italic">T</Emphasis> behaviour of anthophyllite

The thermoelastic behaviour of anthophyllite has been determined for a natural crystal with crystal-chemical formula ^ANa_0.01 ^B(Mg_1.30Mn_0.57Ca_0.09Na_0.04) ^C(Mg_4.95Fe_0.02Al_0.03) ^T(Si_8.00)O₂₂ ^W(OH)₂ using single-crystal X-ray diffraction to 973 K. The best model for fitting the thermal expansion data is that of Berman (J Petrol 29:445–522, 1988) in which the coefficient of volume thermal expansion varies linearly with T as α _V,T  = a ₁ + 2a ₂ (T − T ₀): α₂₉₈ = a ₁ = 3.40(6) × 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹, a ₂ = 5.1(1.0) × 10⁻⁹ K⁻². The corresponding axial thermal expansion coefficients for this linear model are: α _a ,₂₉₈ = 1.21(2) × 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹, a _2,a  = 5.2(4) × 10⁻⁹ K⁻²; α _b ,₂₉₈ = 9.2(1) × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹, a _2,b  = 7(2) × 10⁻¹⁰ K⁻². α _c ,₂₉₈ = 1.26(3) × 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹, a _2,c  = 1.3(6) × 10⁻⁹ K⁻². The thermoelastic behaviour of anthophyllite differs from that of most monoclinic (C2/m) amphiboles: (a) the ε ₁ − ε ₂ plane of the unit-strain ellipsoid, which is normal to b in anthophyllite but usually at a high angle to c in monoclinic amphiboles; (b) the strain components are ε ₁ ≫ ε ₂ > ε ₃ in anthophyllite, but ε ₁ ~ ε ₂ ≫ ε ₃ in monoclinic amphiboles. The strain behaviour of anthophyllite is similar to that of synthetic C2/m ^ANa ^B(LiMg) ^CMg₅ ^TSi₈ O₂₂ ^W(OH)₂, suggesting that high contents of small cations at the B-site may be primarily responsible for the much higher thermal expansion ⊥(100). Refined values for site-scattering at M4 decrease from 31.64 epfu at 298 K to 30.81 epfu at 973 K, which couples with similar increases of those of M1 and M2 sites. These changes in site scattering are interpreted in terms of Mn ↔ Mg exchange involving M1,2 ↔ M4, which was first detected at 673 K.     

X-ray diffraction study of magnesite at high pressure and high temperature

 P–V–T measurements on magnesite MgCO₃ have been carried out at high pressure and high temperature up to 8.6 GPa and 1285 K, using a DIA-type, cubic-anvil apparatus (SAM-85) in conjunction with in situ synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction. Precise volumes are obtained by the use of data collected above 873 K on heating and in the entire cooling cycle to minimize non-hydrostatic stress. From these data, the equation-of-state parameters are derived from various approaches based on the Birch-Murnaghan equation of state and on the relevant thermodynamic relations. With K′₀ fixed at 4, we obtain K₀=103(1) GPa, α(K⁻¹)=3.15(17)×10⁻⁵ +2.32(28)×10⁻⁸ T, (∂K_T/∂T)_P=−0.021(2) GPaK⁻¹, (dα/∂P)_T=−1.81×10⁻⁶ GPa⁻¹K⁻¹ and (∂K_T/∂T)_V= −0.007(1) GPaK⁻¹; whereas the third-order Birch-Murnaghan equation of state with K′₀ as an adjustable parameter yields the following values: K₀=108(3) GPa, K′₀=2.33(94), α(K⁻¹)=3.08(16)×10⁻⁵+2.05(27) ×10⁻⁸ T, (∂K_T/∂T)_P=−0.017(1) GPaK⁻¹, (dα/∂P)_T= −1.41×10⁻⁶ GPa⁻¹K⁻¹ and (∂K_T/∂T)_V=−0.008(1) GPaK⁻¹. Within the investigated P–T range, thermal pressure for magnesite increases linearly with temperature and is pressure (or volume) dependent. The present measurements of room-temperature bulk modulus, of its pressure derivative, and of the extrapolated zero-pressure volumes at high temperatures, are in agreement with previous single-crystal study and ultrasonic measurements, whereas (∂K_T/∂T)_P, (∂α/∂P)_T and (∂K_T/∂T)_V are determined for the first time in this compound. Using this new equation of state, thermodynamic calculations for the reactions (1) magnesite=periclase+CO₂ and (2) magnesite+enstatite=forsterite+CO₂ are consistent with existing experimental phase equilibrium data. Received September 28, 1995/Revised, accepted May 22, 1996     

Effect of pressure on the thermal expansion of MgO up to 8.2 GPa

Isobaric volume measurements for MgO were carried out at 2.6, 5.4, and 8.2 GPa in the temperature range 300–1073 K using a DIA-type, large-volume apparatus in conjunction with synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction. Linear fit of the thermal expansion data over the experimental pressure range yields the pressure derivative, (∂α/∂P) _T , of −1.04(8) × 10⁻⁶ GPa⁻¹ K⁻¹ and the mean zero-pressure thermal expansion α_{0, T}  = 4.09(6) × 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹. The α_{0, T} value is in good agreement with results of Suzuki (1975) and Utsumi et al. (1998) over the same temperature range, whereas (∂α/∂P) _T is determined for the first time on MgO by direct measurements. The cross-derivative (∂α²/∂P∂T) cannot be resolved because of large uncertainties associated with the temperature derivative of α at all pressures. The temperature derivative of the bulk modulus, (∂K _T/∂T) _P , of −0.025(3) GPa K⁻¹, obtained from the measured (∂α/∂P) _T value, is in accord with previous findings. Received: 2 April 1999 / Revised, accepted: 22 June 1999     

Thermal equations of state of dioctahedral micas on the join muscovite–paragonite

 Powder diffraction measurements at simultaneous high pressure and temperature on samples of 2M1 polytype of muscovite (Ms) and paragonite (Pg) were performed at the beamline ID30 of ESRF (Grenoble), using the Paris-Edinburgh cell. The bulk moduli of Ms, calculated from the least-squares fitting of V–P data on each isotherm using a second-order Birch–Murnaghan EoS, were: 57.0(6), 55.1(7), 51.1(7) and 48.9(5) GPa on the isotherms at 298, 573, 723 and 873 K, respectively. The value of (∂K _T /∂T) was −0.0146(2) GPa K⁻¹. The thermal expansion coefficient α varied from 35.7(3) × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹ at P ambient to 20.1(3) × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹ at P = 4 GPa [(∂α/∂P) _T = −3.9(1) × 10⁻⁶ GPa⁻¹ K⁻¹]. The corresponding values for Pg on the isotherms at 298, 723 and 823 K were: bulk moduli 59.9(5), 55.7(6) and 53.8(7) GPa, (∂K _T /∂T) −0.0109(1) GPa K⁻¹. The thermal expansion coefficient α varied from 44.1(2) × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹ at P ambient to 32.5(2) × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹ at P = 4 GPa [(∂α/∂P) _T = −2.9(1) × 10⁻⁶ GPa⁻¹ K⁻¹]. Thermoelastic coefficients showed that Pg is stiffer than Ms; Ms softens more rapidly than Pg upon heating; thermal expansion is greater and its variation with pressure is smaller in Pg than in Ms. Received: 28 January 2002 / Accepted: 5 April 2002     

Pressure–volume–temperature equation of state of andradite and grossular, by high-pressure and -temperature powder diffraction

 The thermoelastic parameters of natural andradite and grossular have been investigated by high-pressure and -temperature synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction, at ESRF, on the ID30 beamline. The P–V–T data have been fitted by Birch-Murnaghan-like EOSs, using both the approximated and the general form. We have obtained for andradite K ₀=158.0(±1.5) GPa, (dK/dT )₀=−0.020(3) GPa K⁻¹ and α₀=31.6(2) 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹, and for grossular K ₀=168.2(±1.7) GPa, (dK/dT)₀=−0.016(3) GPa K⁻¹ and α₀=27.8(2) 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹. Comparisons between the present issues and thermoelastic properties of garnets earlier determined are carried out. Received: 7 July 2000 / Accepted: 20 October 2000     

Thermal expansion and decomposition of jarosite: a high-temperature neutron diffraction study

The structure of deuterated jarosite, KFe₃(SO₄)₂(OD)₆, was investigated using time-of-flight neutron diffraction up to its dehydroxylation temperature. Rietveld analysis reveals that with increasing temperature, its c dimension expands at a rate ~10 times greater than that for a. This anisotropy of thermal expansion is due to rapid increase in the thickness of the (001) sheet of [Fe(O,OH)₆] octahedra and [SO₄] tetrahedra with increasing temperature. Fitting of the measured cell volumes yields a coefficient of thermal expansion, α = α₀ + α₁ T, where α₀ = 1.01 × 10⁻⁴ K⁻¹ and α₁ = −1.15 × 10⁻⁷ K⁻². On heating, the hydrogen bonds, O1···D–O3, through which the (001) octahedral–tetrahedral sheets are held together, become weakened, as reflected by an increase in the D···O1 distance and a concomitant decrease in the O3–D distance with increasing temperature. On further heating to 575 K, jarosite starts to decompose into nanocrystalline yavapaiite and hematite (as well as water vapor), a direct result of the breaking of the hydrogen bonds that hold the jarosite structure together.     

The thermoelastic behavior of clintonite up to 10?GPa and 1,000°C

The thermoelastic behavior of a natural clintonite-1M [with composition: Ca_1.01(Mg_2.29Al_0.59Fe_0.12)_Σ3.00(Si_1.20Al_2.80)_Σ4.00O₁₀(OH)₂] has been investigated up to 10 GPa (at room temperature) and up to 960°C (at room pressure) by means of in situ synchrotron single-crystal and powder diffraction, respectively. No evidence of phase transition has been observed within the pressure and temperature range investigated. P–V data fitted with an isothermal third-order Birch–Murnaghan equation of state (BM-EoS) give V ₀ = 457.1(2) ?³, K _T0 = 76(3)GPa, and K′ = 10.6(15). The evolution of the “Eulerian finite strain” versus “normalized stress” shows a linear positive trend. The linear regression yields Fe(0) = 76(3) GPa as intercept value, and the slope of the regression line leads to a K′ value of 10.6(8). The evolution of the lattice parameters with pressure is significantly anisotropic [β(a) = 1/3K _T0(a) = 0.0023(1) GPa⁻¹; β(b) = 1/3K _T0(b) = 0.0018(1) GPa⁻¹; β(c) = 1/K _T0(c) = 0.0072(3) GPa⁻¹]. The β-angle increases in response to the applied P, with: β_P = β₀ + 0.033(4)P (P in GPa). The structure refinements of clintonite up to 10.1 GPa show that, under hydrostatic pressure, the structure rearranges by compressing mainly isotropically the inter-layer Ca-polyhedron. The bulk modulus of the Ca-polyhedron, described using a second-order BM-EoS, is K _T0(Ca-polyhedron) = 41(2) GPa. The compression of the bond distances between calcium and the basal oxygens of the tetrahedral sheet leads, in turn, to an increase in the ditrigonal distortion of the tetrahedral ring, with ∂α/∂P ≈ 0.1°/GPa within the P-range investigated. The Mg-rich octahedra appear to compress in response to the applied pressure, whereas the tetrahedron appears to behave as a rigid unit. The evolution of axial and volume thermal expansion coefficient α with temperature was described by the polynomial α(T) = α₀ + α₁ T ^−1/2. The refined parameters for clintonite are as follows: α₀ = 2.78(4) 10⁻⁵°C⁻¹ and α₁ = −4.4(6) 10⁻⁵°C^1/2 for the unit-cell volume; α₀(a) = 1.01(2) 10⁻⁵°C⁻¹ and α₁(a) = −1.8(3) 10⁻⁵°C^1/2 for the a-axis; α₀(b) = 1.07(1) 10⁻⁵°C⁻¹ and α₁(b) = −2.3(2) 10⁻⁵°C^1/2 for the b-axis; and α₀(c) = 0.64(2) 10⁻⁵°C⁻¹ and α₁(c) = −7.3(30) 10⁻⁶°C^1/2for the c-axis. The β-angle appears to be almost constant within the given T-range. No structure collapsing in response to the T-induced dehydroxylation was found up to 960°C. The HP- and HT-data of this study show that in clintonite, the most and the less expandable directions do not correspond to the most and the less compressible directions, respectively. A comparison between the thermoelastic parameters of clintonite and those of true micas was carried out.     

Structural thermal behavior of paragonite and its dehydroxylate: a high-temperature single-crystal study

 The lattice constants of paragonite-2M₁, NaAl₂(AlSi₃)O₁₀(OH)₂, were determined to 800 °C by the single-crystal diffraction method. Mean thermal expansion coefficients, in the range 25–600 °C, were: α_a = 1.51(8) × 10⁻⁵, α_b = 1.94(6) × 10⁻⁵, α_c = 2.15(7) ×  10⁻⁵ °C⁻¹, and α_V = 5.9(2) × 10⁻⁵ °C⁻¹. At T higher than 600 °C, cell parameters showed a change in expansion rate due to a dehydroxylation process. The structural refinements of natural paragonite, carried out at 25, 210, 450 and 600 °C, before dehydroxylation, showed that the larger thermal expansion along the c parameter was mainly due to interlayer thickness dilatation. In the 25–600 °C range, Si,Al tetrahedra remained quite unchanged, whereas the other polyhedra expanded linearly with expansion rate proportional to their volume. The polyhedron around the interlayer cation Na became more regular with temperature. Tetrahedral rotation angle α changed from 16.2 to 12.9°. The structure of the new phase, nominally NaAl₂ (AlSi₃)O₁₁, obtained as a consequence of dehydroxylation, had a cell volume 4.2% larger than that of paragonite. It was refined at room temperature and its expansion coefficients determined in the range 25–800 °C. The most significant structural difference from paragonite was the presence of Al in fivefold coordination, according to a distorted trigonal bipyramid. Results confirm the structural effects of the dehydration mechanism of micas and dioctahedral 2:1 layer silicates. By combining thermal expansion and compressibility data, the following approximate equation of state in the PTV space was obtained for paragonite: V/V ₀ = 1 + 5.9(2) × 10⁻⁵ T(°C) − 0.00153(4) P(kbar). Received: 12 July 1999 / Revised, accepted: 7 December 1999     

Temperature evolution between 50 K and 320 K of the thermal expansion tensor of gypsum derived from neutron powder diffraction data

The unit cell parameters, extracted from Rietveld analysis of neutron powder diffraction data collected between 4.2 K and 320 K, have been used to calculate the temperature evolution of the thermal expansion tensor for gypsum for 50 ≤ T ≤ 320 K. At 300 K the magnitudes of the principal axes are α ₁₁  = 1.2(6) × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹, α ₂₂  = 36.82(1) × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹ and α ₃₃  = 25.1(5) × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹. The maximum axis, α ₂₂ , is parallel to b, and using Institution of Radio Engineers (IRE) convention for the tensor orthonormal basis, the axes α ₁₁ and α ₃₃ have directions equal to (−0.979, 0, 0.201) and (0.201, 0, 0.979) respectively. The orientation and temperature dependent behaviour of the thermal expansion tensor is related to the crystal structure in the I2/a setting. Received 12 February 1998 / Revised, accepted 19 October 1998     

High-pressure and high-temperature in situ X-ray diffraction study of iron and corundum to 68 GPa using an internally heated diamond anvil cell

Using powder X-ray diffraction of heated solids to pressures reaching 68 GPa, the pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) data on corundum Al₂O₃ and ɛ-Fe were determined with the following results: *Corundum,*Iron, *Al₂O₃*ɛ-Fe Isothermal bulk*258 (2)*164 (3)  modulus K'_{300, 1} (GPa) Pressure derivative K_{300, 1}*4.88 (4)*5.36 (16) Temperature derivative*–0.020 (2)*–0.043 (3)  (∂K _T,1 /∂T) _P (GPa/K) Molar volume V_300,1*25.59 (2)*6.76 (2)  (cm³/mol) Isobaric thermal expansion at 1 atm (0.101 MPa) is given by (K^–1): α _T =2.6 (2) 10^–5+1.81 (9) 10^–9 T–0.67 (6)/T ² for corundum, and α _T =5.7 (4) 10^–5+4.2 (4) 10^–9 T–0.17 (7)/T ² for iron ɛ-Fe. Received: 1 March 1997 / Revised, accepted: 21 August 1997     

Thermal Expansion of Periclase (MgO) and Tungsten (W) to Melting Temperatures

 In situ x-ray data on molar volumes of periclase and tungsten have been collected over the temperature range from 300 K to melting. We determine the temperature by combining the technique of spectroradiometry and electrical resistance wire heating. The thermal expansion (α) of periclase between 300 and 3100 K is given by α=2.6025 10⁻⁵+1.3535 10⁻⁸ T+6.5687 10⁻³ T⁻¹−1.8281 T⁻². For tungsten, we have (300 to 3600 K) α=7.862 10⁻⁶+6.392 10⁻⁹ T. The data at 298 K for periclase is: molar volume 11.246 (0.031) cm³, α=3.15 (0.07) 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹, and for tungsten: molar volume 9.55 cm³, α=9.77 (10.08) 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹. Received: July 18, 1996 / Revised, accepted: February 14, 1997     

Thermal expansion behavior of Ce2Zr2O7 up to 898 K in conjunction with structural analyses by neutron diffraction

The thermal expansion of cubic pyrochlore Ce₂Zr₂O₇ has been measured from room temperature to 898 K on polycrystalline material in conjunction with structural analyses using neutron diffraction. This compound has a thermal expansion coefficient in line with the other comparable lanthanoide pyrochlore oxides. The coefficient can be expressed as α(T) = 8.418 × 10⁻⁶ + 0.9861 × 10⁻⁹ × T. The structural refinements performed for each measured temperature showed a comparable linear evolution of the Ce–O/Zr–O distances (within 0.57%).     

High pressure study of ScAlO3 perovskite

The crystal structure of orthorhombic (Pbnm) ScAlO₃ perovskite has been refined to 5 GPa using single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The compression of the structure if anisotropic with β _a =1.39(3)×10⁻³ GPa⁻¹, β _b =1.14(3)×10⁻³ GPa⁻¹ and β _c =1.84(3)×10⁻³ GPa⁻¹. The isothermal bulk modulus of ScAlO₃, K _T , determined from fitting a Birch-Murnaghan equation of state (K ^′ _T =4) to the volume compression data is 218(1) GPa. The interoctahedral angles to not vary significantly with pressure, and the compression of the structure is entirely attributable to compression of the AlO₆ octahedra. The compressibilities of the constituent AlO₆ and ScO₁₂ are well matched: β_Al−O=1.6×10⁻³ GPa⁻¹ and β_Sc−O=1.5×10⁻³ GPa⁻¹. Therefore the distortion of the structure shows no significant change with increasing pressure. Received: 18 August 1997 / Revised, accepted: 11 November 1997     

Excess heat capacity and entropy of mixing along the chlorapatite–fluorapatite binary join

The heat capacity at constant pressure, C _p, of chlorapatite [Ca₅(PO₄)₃Cl – ClAp], and fluorapatite [Ca₅(PO₄)₃F – FAp], as well as of 12 compositions along the chlorapatite–fluorapatite join have been measured using relaxation calorimetry [heat capacity option of the physical properties measurement system (PPMS)] and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) in the temperature range 5–764 K. The chlor-fluorapatites were synthesized at 1,375–1,220°C from Ca₃(PO₄)₂ using the CaF₂–CaCl₂ flux method. Most of the chlor-fluorapatite compositions could be measured directly as single crystals using the PPMS such that they were attached to the sample platform of the calorimeter by a crystal face. However, the crystals were too small for the crystal face to be polished. In such cases, where the sample coupling was not optimal, an empirical procedure was developed to smoothly connect the PPMS to the DSC heat capacities around ambient T. The heat capacity of the end-members above 298 K can be represented by the polynomials: C _p^ClAp = 613.21 − 2,313.90T ^−0.5 − 1.87964 × 10⁷ T ⁻² + 2.79925 × 10⁹ T ⁻³ and C _p^FAp = 681.24 − 4,621.73 × T ^−0.5 − 6.38134 × 10⁶ T ⁻² + 7.38088 × 10⁸ T ⁻³ (units, J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹). Their standard third-law entropy, derived from the low-temperature heat capacity measurements, is S° = 400.6 ± 1.6 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹ for chlorapatite and S° = 383.2 ± 1.5 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹ for fluorapatite. Positive excess heat capacities of mixing, ΔC _p^ex, occur in the chlorapatite–fluorapatite solid solution around 80 K (and to a lesser degree at 200 K) and are asymmetrically distributed over the join reaching a maximum of 1.3 ± 0.3 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹ for F-rich compositions. They are significant at these conditions exceeding the 2σ-uncertainty of the data. The excess entropy of mixing, ΔS ^ex, at 298 K reaches positive values of 3–4 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹ in the F-rich portion of the binary, is, however, not significantly different from zero across the join within its 2σ-uncertainty.     

New thermoelastic parameters of natural <Emphasis Type="Italic">C</Emphasis>2/<Emphasis Type="Italic">c</Emphasis> omphacite

The compressibility at room temperature and the thermal expansion at room pressure of two disordered crystals (space group C2/c) obtained by annealing a natural omphacite sample (space group P2/n) of composition close to Jd₅₆Di₄₄ and Jd₅₅Di₄₅, respectively, have been studied by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Using a Birch–Murnaghan equation of state truncated at the third order [BM3-EoS], we have obtained the following coefficients: V ₀ = 421.04(7) Å³, K _T0 = 119(2) GPa, K′ = 5.7(6). A parameterized form of the BM3 EoS was used to determine the axial moduli of a, b and c. The anisotropy scheme is β _c  ≤ β _a  ≤ β _b , with an anisotropy ratio 1.05:1.00:1.07. A fitting of the lattice variation as a function of temperature, allowing for linear dependency of the thermal expansion coefficient on the temperature, yielded α_V(1bar,303K) = 2.64(2) × 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹ and an axial thermal expansion anisotropy of α _b  ≫ α _a  > α _c . Comparison of our results with available data on compressibility and thermal expansion shows that while a reasonable ideal behaviour can be proposed for the compressibility of clinopyroxenes in the jadeite–diopside binary join [K _T0 as a function of Jd molar %: K _T0 = 106(1) GPa + 0.28(2) × Jd_(mol%)], the available data have not sufficient quality to extract the behaviour of thermal expansion for the same binary join in terms of composition.     

In search of the mixed derivative ?2 M /? P ? T ( M = G , K ): joint analysis of ultrasonic data for polycrystalline pyrope from gas- and solid-medium apparatus

Elastic wave velocities for dense (99.8% of theoretical density) isotropic polycrystalline specimens of synthetic pyrope (Mg₃Al₂Si₃O₁₂) were measured to 1,000 K at 300 MPa by the phase comparison method of ultrasonic interferometry in an internally heated gas-medium apparatus. The temperature derivatives of the elastic moduli [(∂Ks/∂T) _P = −19.3(4); (∂G/∂T) _P = −10.4(2) MPa K⁻¹] measured in this study are consistent with previous acoustic measurements on both synthetic polycrystalline pyrope in a DIA-type cubic anvil apparatus (Gwanmesia et al. in Phys Earth Planet Inter 155:179–190, 2006) and on a natural single crystal by the rectangular parallelepiped resonance (RPR; Suzuki and Anderson in J Phys Earth 31:125–138, 1983) method but |(∂Ks/∂T) _P | is significantly larger than from a Brillouin spectroscopy study of single-crystal pyrope (Sinogeikin and Bass in Phys Earth Planet Inter 203:549–555, 2002). Alternative approaches to the retrieval of mixed derivatives of the elastic moduli from joint analysis of data from this study and from the solid-medium data of Gwanmesia et al. in Phys Earth Planet Inter 155:179–190 (2006) yield ∂² G/∂P∂T = [0.07(12), 0.20(14)] × 10⁻³ K⁻¹ and ∂² K _S /∂P∂T = [−0.20(24), 0.22(26)] × 10⁻³ K⁻¹, both of order 10⁻⁴ K⁻¹ and not significantly different from zero. More robust inference of the mixed derivatives will require solid-medium acoustic measurements of precision significantly better than 1%.     

Low T heat capacity measurements and new entropy data for titanite (sphene): implications for thermobarometry of high-pressure rocks

The accepted standard state entropy of titanite (sphene) has been questioned in several recent studies, which suggested a revision from the literature value 129.3 ± 0.8 J/mol K to values in the range of 110–120 J/mol K. The heat capacity of titanite was therefore re-measured with a PPMS in the range 5 to 300 K and the standard entropy of titanite was calculated as 127.2 ± 0.2 J/mol K, much closer to the original data than the suggested revisions. Volume parameters for a modified Murgnahan equation of state: V _P,T  = V ₂₉₈° × [1 + a°(T − 298) − 20a°(T − 298)] × [1 – 4P/(K ₂₉₈ × (1 – 1.5 × 10⁻⁴ [T − 298]) + 4P)]^1/4 were fit to recent unit cell determinations at elevated pressures and temperatures, yielding the constants V ₂₉₈° = 5.568 J/bar, a° = 3.1 × 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹, and K = 1,100 kbar. The standard Gibbs free energy of formation of titanite, −2456.2 kJ/mol (∆H°_f = −2598.4 kJ/mol) was calculated from the new entropy and volume data combined with data from experimental reversals on the reaction, titanite + kyanite = anorthite + rutile. This value is 4–11 kJ/mol less negative than that obtained from experimental determinations of the enthalpy of formation, and it is slightly more negative than values given in internally consistent databases. The displacement of most calculated phase equilibria involving titanite is not large except for reactions with small ∆S. Re-calculated baric estimates for several metamorphic suites yield pressure differences on the order of 2 kbar in eclogites and 10 kbar for ultra-high pressure titanite-bearing assemblages.