复杂荷载作用下考虑下卧层三维渗流的未打穿竖井地基固结分析

针对任意复杂变荷载作用下未打穿的竖井地基,通过在竖井底面以下土层中设置虚拟竖井,使其能够合理考虑下卧层土体三维渗流问题,运用Laplace变换,求得频域内竖井地基的固结解。通过Laplace逆变换,得到了任意荷载作用下竖井地基的平均固结度、孔压消散曲线、沉降曲线。结合具体算例,对影响竖井地基固结的主要影响因素进行了详细分析,并将现有未打穿竖井地基平均固结度近似计算方法的精度和适用的范围进行了对比,得到了一些有益于工程实践的结论。     

变荷载下考虑三维渗流的未打穿砂井地基固结分析

为探讨未打穿砂井地基的固结特性,基于三维固结理论和叠加原理,考虑变荷载条件,将砂井打设区和下卧层土体的固结均视为三维问题,分别导出了单级线性加载条件下砂井打设区和下卧层土体的固结度解析解,由此给出了地基整体的平均固结度计算式,并引入fzero函数基于Matlab编制了相应的计算程序。算例对比分析结果表明,受加载历时影响,砂井打设区和下卧层土体的固结度都较瞬时加载有所减小,且减幅随加载历时延长而增大。同时,将下卧层土体的固结视为三维要比一维更能合理考虑径向渗流,使得地基固结度计算值与模型试验推算值吻合较好     

成层软黏土地基的固结沉降计算分析

针对实际工程中软黏土地基的成层特性及竖井有时并未打穿软土层情况,采用太沙基一维固结理论和巴伦固结理论的基本假定,利用固结度联系孔压与变形,提出一种简化成层软黏土地基的固结沉降计算方法,对竖向排水地基的固结度及沉降等进行预测。对计算的几个关键问题进行探讨：如固结系数的反演选择、竖井未打穿土层时,竖井底部成层地基固结度计算、压缩土层厚度选取等问题。在上述理论的基础上,用FORTRAN语言编写排水竖井固结程序CONSOL,在工程实践中得到应用,取得良好的效果。     

双层竖井地基半透水边界固结分析

在现有双层竖井地基固结理论基础上,对双面半透水边界下的固结问题进行了研究,给出了相应的固结解答。将该解答编制成应用程序,对一算例进行了参数分析,以了解双层竖井地基半透水边界的固结特性。算例分析表明,半透水边界对竖井地基的固结影响较大：半透水参数(Rt,Rb)越大,则整个系统的孔压消散越快;半透水参数对与其相邻的土层的固结影响要比远离其边界的土层的固结影响大得多;按变形定义和按孔压定义的平均固结度两者的差别受半透水边界参数的影响。     

未打穿砂井地基下卧层固结研究分析

利用平均固结度普遍解,将未打穿砂井地基转化为等效双层地基,给出了下卧层一维固结解析解,进而求出下卧层的平均固结度。根据该解和现有解,编制计算机程序,给出了几幅考虑c值和土性参数对固结的影响曲线图,评估各解的适用性。研究表明,该解满足工程要求,特别是在PTPB排水条件下能够较好地反映Uz-Tv曲线的真实变化。     

饱和软土成层地基一维非线性固结解析解

假定土体在固结过程中压缩性和渗透性的变化成正比,基于 - 及 - 关系,推导出饱和软土成层地基一维非线性固结解析解,分别给出了按沉降定义和按有效应力定义的每层土平均固结度及整个土层总固结度的计算公式。采用Fortran语言编制了相应的计算程序,将计算得到的结果与已有双层地基一维非线性固结解析解计算结果进行比较,验证该解析解的正确性。利用该程序分析成层地基一维非线性固结性状,分别讨论了初始竖向渗透系数、初始体积压缩系数、荷载值及土层厚度对地基固结性状的影响。分析结果表明：在成层地基一维非线性固结过程中,初始竖向渗透系数对超静孔压的影响较为复杂,对上下层地基固结速率影响不同;初始体积压缩系数增大,超静孔压增大,固结速率变小;所加荷载值越大,超静孔压消散越慢,固结发展越慢;超静孔压消散速率不仅取决于土层厚度,同时取决于各层土渗透性的相对大小。     

非均匀地基与均匀地基一维固结解答之间的转换关系

基于一维固结理论,研究了土层物理力学性质沿深度非均匀连续变化的固结问题。首先,利用分离变量法,获得了渗透系数和压缩系数随深度按指数函数变化的非均匀地基一维固结方程的解析表达式; 然后与Terzaghi固结理论的经典解答进行了比较,获得了两种解答之间的相似转换关系。这样,非均匀地基固结问题就可以用相同荷载以及边界条件下的均匀地基固结的经典解线性表示。因此,非均匀地基固结问题的求解转化为对相似转换系数的计算。该系数集中反映土层非均匀性对地基固结的影响,从而为解决非均匀地基一维固结问题提供了便捷途径。     

未打穿散体材料桩复合地基固结简化解研究

利用平均固结度普遍解,将未打穿散体材料桩复合地基转化为等效双层地基,推导出未打穿散体材料桩复合地基固结简化解,给出其平均固结度计算简化公式。根据简化解、现有解和有限单元法编制程序,绘制考虑贯入比、桩体渗透系数、土体扰动区渗透系数和土体扰动区影响因子等因素对固结的影响曲线图,分析了各因素对未打穿散体材料桩复合地基固结性状的影响,并对3种计算方法所求出的平均固结度进行了比较研究,进而探讨了简化解的适用性。研究结果表明,无论是在单面排水还是在双面排水条件下,简化解求出的平均固结度总体上是介于现有解和有限单元法二者之间,尤其在固结过程的“中后期”（即固结度≥50%时）。从实用角度来看,简化解的计算结果具有足够精度,且简便、实用;在各种影响因素中,散体材料桩长度和桩体渗透系数对固结过程的影响最大。     

变荷载下不排水桩复合地基桩间土和下卧层土固结分析

基于悬浮不排水桩复合地基超静孔隙水压力解答,建立了变荷载条件下复合地基桩间土和下卧层土平均固结度的解析解。通过与有限元解答的对比,证明了解析解的正确性和有效性。利用解析解对桩间土和下卧层土的固结性状进行了分析。研究发现,桩间土的固结速率远大于下卧层土,并随置换率和桩土模量比的增加而增大。在工程设计采用的置换率范围内,桩的贯入比较小时,下卧层土的固结速率受置换率和桩土模量比的影响很小;桩的贯入比较大时,下卧层土的固结速率随置换率和桩土模量比的增加而增大。桩间土和下卧层土的固结存在临界置换率和临界桩土模量比,超过临界值后,桩间土和下卧层土的固结速率不随桩土模量比和置换率的增加而增大。桩间土和下卧层土的固结速率随加荷速率的增加而增大。     

竖井地基的大应变固结分析

简单介绍了真空-堆载联合预压下饱和软土竖井地基大变形固结沉降模型（VRCS1模型）,该模型能考虑大应变、材料非线性、非达西流、真空折损和竖井未打穿等因素。使用该模型对澳大利亚巴利纳支路某现场沉降进行预测,结果与现场实测数据吻合良好。基于该工程案例,讨论了分级堆载、循环荷载、真空联合堆载、上边界为等应力/等应变条件以及排水板打入深度等因素对竖井地基固结过程的影响规律。计算结果表明：分级堆载可降低土体超静孔压峰值进而改善土体稳定性;循环荷载使土体固结过程发生震荡,且土体沉降峰值迟于超静孔压峰值和荷载峰值出现;真空荷载和堆载作用机制有本质区别,真空荷载不可简单以堆载替代;上边界等应变条件下的固结速率一般快于等应力条件,工程真实条件一般介于两者之间;排水板打入深度超过0.9倍土层厚度时,再加大打入深度加速固结效果不明显。     

任意附加应力下竖井径竖向耦合固结等应变解

竖向排水体包括砂井和塑料排水板已广泛应用于加速软黏土地基的固结。不同形式的轴对称条件下含竖向排水体均质各向同性地基的固结解析解答也相继被提出,而各种解答均假定地基中附加应力在竖向排水体的深度范围内是均匀分布的。显然,当竖向排水体深度与地面堆载区宽度的比值相对较高,或竖向排水体的影响区域靠近地面堆载区的边缘时,这个假定并不适用。为此,在现有径竖向耦合固结等应变解的基础上,提出任意分布的地基附加应力条件下的解答,并分析附加应力分布形式和线性加载速率对地基固结的影响。结果表明,均匀分布的附加应力条件下的解答低估了地基的固结速率,而瞬时加载条件下的解答则高估了地基的固结速率。     

Consolidation of double‐layered ground with vertical drains

Vertical drains are usually installed in subsoil consisting of several layers. Due to the complex nature of the problem, over the past decades, the consolidation properties of multi‐layered ground with vertical drains have been analysed mainly by numerical methods. An analytical solution for consolidation of double‐layered ground with vertical drains under quasi‐equal strain condition is presented in this paper. The main steps for the computation procedure are listed. The convergence of the series solution is discussed. The comparisons between the results obtained by the present analytical method and the existing numerical solutions are described by figures. The orthogonal relation for the system of double‐layered ground with vertical drains is proven. Finally, some consolidation properties of double‐layered ground with vertical drains are analysed. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Consolidation of sensitive clay with vertical drain

The coefficient of consolidation is one of the most important parameters that control the rate of consolidation. Conventional consolidation theories assume that the coefficient of consolidation is constant during the whole consolidation process. In the case of sensitive clay, the coefficient of consolidation is strongly dependent on the level of effective stress of clay. With the dissipation of pore water pressure and the increase of effective stress, the soil structure of the upper subsoil is gradually destroyed downwards and its coefficient of consolidation becomes smaller. At the same time, the coefficient of permeability of the vertical drains drops down because of the kinking or bending effect. The destructured upper subsoil and the kinking of the vertical drain hinder the dissipation of the pore pressure in the lower subsoil. This paper presents a model to describe the above important phenomena during the consolidation of sensitive clay with vertical drain. The solution for proposed model can be obtained by extending the closed‐form solution of the consolidation of double‐layered ground with vertical drain by the interactive method introducing the concept of the moving boundary and the reduction of discharge capacity of vertical drain. The numerical results obtained from the finite element method package PLAXIS (Ver. 7.2) are adopted to compare those obtained from the present algorithm. Moreover, the rationality of the moving boundary is explained by the distributions of the excess pore water pressure in natural soil zone along the radial direction. Wenzhou airport project is taken as a case study in this paper. The results for the sensitive soil with decaying sand drain agree very well with the in situ measured data. The calculated results can properly explain two general phenomena observed in the consolidation of soft sensitive soil ground with vertical drains: one is that the time to achieve the same consolidation degree is much longer under heavy loading than that under light loading; the other is that the consolidation speed is much slower in the lower subsoil than in the upper subsoil. Finally, it is indicated that the vertical drains can decrease the hindrance effect of the destructured subsoil. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

砂墙地基二维固结自由应变解

将含竖向排水体地基的三维固结变形问题等效为平面应变问题进行数值分析时,砂墙地基二维固结解析解答是合理确定其等效固结计算参数的重要依据。为辨析现有砂墙地基等应变固结近似解答的适用性,针对微单元土体严格的二维固结微分方程,考虑对地基固结有重要影响的井阻作用,以及涵盖完全透水和不完全透水的更一般边界面排水条件,推求得到了其自由应变解答。并与现有解答进行对比分析,同时,分析了泊松比效应以及水平和竖向排水对地基固结的影响。结果表明,现有砂墙地基的等应变固结解答虽然近似,但已有足够精确;砂墙地基以水平向固结为主,竖向固结几乎可以忽略不计;地基固结速率随着泊松比的增大而增大,在将竖向排水体等效为砂墙时,应考虑其作用影响。     

A new simplified Hypothesis B method for calculating the consolidation settlement of ground improved by vertical drains

Vertical drains are widely used in soft ground improvements to accelerate the consolidation process. This paper develops a new simplified Hypothesis B method for calculating the consolidation settlement of a soil layer improved by vertical drains under the instant and ramp loadings. As a comparison, the traditional Hypothesis A method is also used to calculate the settlement. Then, a fully coupled finite element consolidation analysis is utilized to examine and verify this simplified method and Hypothesis A method. For the instant loading, Carrillo‐Barron method and Zhu‐Yin method are used to obtain the average degree of consolidation for vertical drain system. Typical parameters, such as over‐consolidation ratio (OCR), smear zone, and space ratio of vertical drains, are considered. It is found that the calculation results from the new simplified method in this study agree well with finite element simulations, and relative errors are in the range of 0.1% to 12.3%. Comparatively, there are obvious differences between the calculated results from Hypothesis A method and finite element results. Carrillo‐Olson method and Zhu‐Yin method are utilized to obtain the average degree of consolidation for the vertical drain system to consider the ramp loading. Equivalent time is determined from half of the construction period to calculate the creep compression under the ramp loading. The accuracy of this simplified Hypothesis B method using both Carrillo‐Olson method and Zhu‐Yin method is acceptable with the relative errors less than 9.4%.     

考虑影响区真实形状的竖向排水井地基固结解

针对现有竖向排水井地基固结解析理论对影响区一律采用圆形等效假定的缺陷,研究了影响区真实形状为正六边形的按梅花形布置的竖向排水井地基的固结问题。通过建立新固结方程和引入新的边界条件,并考虑土体水平渗透系数变化,得到了相应的解析解。对于土体水平渗透系数的3种变化模式,分别给出了各种模式下的特殊解。在此基础上,分析了3种模式下3个主要的无量纲参数对地基固结性状的影响,并比较了计算结果和现有理论结果。分析结果表明,影响区和涂抹扰动区范围越大,固结越慢;土体的最大与最小水平渗透系数之比越小,固结越快;在相同条件下,考虑扰动区渗透系数线性变化的模式2固结最快,而假定扰动区渗透系数不变的模式1的解与现有理论解相当接近,验证了现有竖向排水井地基固结解析理论中对影响区采用圆形等效假定的合理性