共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 359 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
在对1966年以来63次强震前中等地震活动图象全时空扫描的基础上,讨论了大陆不同构造区域、不同震源机制强震前中等地震活动图象异常演化特征及其主要活动图象与震源机制节面的相关性. 研究表明:强震前中等地震活动图象显现出应力集中和减弱两个阶段性特征,第一阶段(中期阶段)的活动图象以条带、空区和集中活跃为主;第二阶段(中短期)以持续平静为主. 走滑和正断层机制震前显示出较好的特征图象;逆冲断层震前的活动图象与其它两种机制的图象不同,没有明显的特征图象,两个阶段都有平静现象出现. 强震前中等地震条带走向与震源机制的两个节面走向一致性较好,但空区的一致性较差. 相似文献
5.
以单次散射模型、球形辐射源、一维线性速度模型为基础计算理论包络线,通过尾波归一化方法把理论与观测包络线结合起来形成非线性方程组,用迭代最小二乘方法反演大姚震区的散射系数空间分布.结果显示,MS6.2和MS6.1地震序列的主震和余震基本都分布在高散射系数区内.MS6.2地震序列震源深度在研究区中部向下弯曲绕过低散射系数区,在深度剖面上呈弧形分布;震源深度较浅的MS6.1地震序列向北西、南东方向的扩展终止于两端的低散射系数区.大姚强震区10km深度上的高散射系数条带沿震源断层分布,暗示了震区下方断层破碎带的存在. 相似文献
6.
丽江大震前长—中—短—临地震学异常的演化过程 总被引:4,自引:6,他引:4
本通过丽江大震前地震学各项异常的动态追踪,研究了长-中-短-临异常伴随大震孕育、发生的演化过程,结果表明:在强震的缺震、强震的重复、中强震密集、诱发地震、相关地震等多项长期异常的背景上,出现了中小地震活跃、调制小震频繁、复发周期降低、震源深度加深和震级差增大、地震序列h值下降等同步的中期异常,而1995年中小地震活跃后的平静、低复发周期的回升、震源深度为25公里和震级差在1.0-1.1级的地震次 相似文献
7.
研究弱震活动性参数的时间进程和空间分布,这些参数是K=10与K=9地震数量之比(N10/N9)、震源深度以及震源机制确定的压应力轴方位角的变化。绘制出弱震活动性参数的空间分布图,识别可预报强震的弱震活动性参数的中期异常。得出强震前1~2年期间的强震孕育区位置。 相似文献
8.
强震中短期前兆异常的共性特征 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
强震前兆异常具有六大共性特征。地震学方面: 第一,长期阶段的平静异常,强震均发生在已发生强震震源区之间的空段上;第二,中短期阶段强震震源区之外相当大范围中小地震或震群异常活跃,震源区反而平静,形成环形或 R-t图空区。定点前兆方面;第一,异常开始时间的外早内晚特征 ;第二,异常台站空间分布的非连续性特征; 第三,短期阶段异常数量的“突增”性特征 ;第四,短临阶段异常幅度的“巨变”性特征。上述事实用已有的DD和IPE模型无法解释,可作震源硬化模型的事实基础。在强震的预报实践中,空段和空区可以作为地点判据,异常数量的增加同时伴随的巨变异常,可以作为进入短临阶段的判据。除某些强震前1~2天外,其他时段震源区内异常不明显。按传统模型指导实践,必然造成声东击西,若用已揭示的异常共性特征指导预报,则可避免上述错误。 相似文献
9.
溧阳——介休——五原北西向地震条带,是唐山地震后华北地区地震活动最为活跃的地带。通过研究发生在这条带上强震的震源机制,破裂过程,震源参数及迁移特点,发现这条带上的较强地震具有以下特点: 1.ML5.0级地震的破裂面走向均为北西向,与条带的总体走向基本一致。反映这些地震具有沿破裂面方向迁移的特点。 2.强震是从中间向北西及南东两个条带的延伸方向交替扩展迁移的,并且强度有逐个增大的趋势。而1980年3月9日在条带上平遥地区发生ML=5.7级地震后,再不具备上述迁移,震级增大的特点。 3.截止现在,均以中强震释放能量。其中多数的主压应力P轴与华北地区统一的主压应力方位基本一致,但仍有几个强震与华北地区总体走向明显不同,说明局部条件的影响在这个带上有时可以起主导作用。 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
By means of the hypocenter distribution and focal mechanism of Wuding MS=6.5 earthquake sequence occurred in 1995, the space orientation and activity characteristics of focal fault of Wuding earthquake have been studied from the three-dimensional space-time process. The results indicate that the focal fault of Wuding earthquake is a subsurface, NWW-trending, upright and right-lateral strike slip fault which is consistent with the intensity distribution in the meizoseismal region. Although the large-scale NS-trending Tanglang-Yimen active fault passes through the earthquake region, it is irrelevant to the MS=6.5 Wuding main earthquake. Since the relationship between the strong earthquake and the shallow geological active fault can not be determined, the crustal deep structure should be studied. The method proposed in the paper can be used to distinguish the focal fault in the deep crust. 相似文献
13.
14.
The Yecheng, Xinjiang, China, earthquake of February 14, 1980
—A destructive intermediate earthquake
—A destructive intermediate earthquake
In this study, we have checked the location and focal depth of the Yecheng earthquake (m
b
= 6.0, maximum intensity VII) of February 14, 1980. The result shows that this is an intermediate event with a focal depth
of 90 km. The microepicenter is located at 36. 4°N, 76, 9°E, while the macroepicenter is at 37.3°N, 76.9°E, 90 km to the north
of the microepicenter. This is the first destructive intermediate event in China which led to a damage as severe as of intensity
VII. The focal mechanism of the event is determined to be of thrust type. Combined with the analysis of seismological and
geological data in surrounding area, the possible relation between the event and plate movement has been discussed. The result
in this paper indicates that in some particular place, the destructive effect of intermediate event should be considered in
seismic hazard assessment.
The Chinese version of this paper appeared in the Chinese edition ofActa Seismologica Sinica,14, 137–143, 1992. 相似文献
15.
XIN YANG GUO YING GAO Seismological Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region rümqi China 《地震学报(英文版)》1998,11(6):669-676
ntroductionXinjiangisaseismicalyactiveregioninChina,andJiashiisafocalmonitoringareainXinjiang.IntheperiodfromJanuary21toApril... 相似文献
16.
采用CAP方法反演2010年玉树7.1级地震序列前震、主震及余震19个ML≥4.0事件的震源机制解,19个结果以走滑类型为主,前震、主震的震源机制解十分接近,反映出前震、主震之间密切的联系;震源深度集中在7~12 km,震源最浅(4.5 km)与最深(34 km)的两个余震事件具有明显的逆冲性质,表现出明显的边界特征;19个事件的震中分布在甘孜-玉树断裂北支玉树-隆宝断裂上,目前已经证明该断裂即为玉树地震的发震构造。自SE-NW沿玉树-隆宝断裂走向拉一剖面,观察震源深度沿剖面的变化情况,可看出玉树-隆宝断裂西北段震源深度要大于东南段,该段主要是余震活动的中后期,因此在地震活动的中后期,余震向地壳深部扩展,断裂累积的应变能得到更进一步的释放;P轴方位角优势分布集中在220°~230°,T轴方位优势分布集中在310°~320°,两个优势分布互相垂直性与单个事件的沙滩球应力轴一样,说明玉树地震的震源机制解类型较为简单;玉树周边地区应力场分布比较均匀,并不像汶川周边地区那么复杂,本次玉树地震为巴颜喀拉地块与羌塘块体边界处甘孜-玉树断裂应变能量的正常释放。 相似文献
17.
2011年1月19日发生的安庆MS4.8地震,在较远范围引起了明显震感.通过仔细辨认此次地震不同频段的波形记录,发现在一些台站记录到了清晰的SmS震相.采用CAP方法反演了其震源机制解,并利用理论地震图与实际观测数据对比进一步确认了SmS震相的存在.结合已有实验结果,推断在人类有感频率(1Hz至几Hz)范围内,震中距70——200 km内SmS震相往往是振幅最大的震相,是引起远距离有感的主要原因.利用理论地震图研究了震源深度对SmS震相的影响. 结果表明,震源深度可改变SmS震相发育的临界震中距,震源越深对应的临界震中距越小.进一步通过对比SmS与S的振幅比,定性讨论了震源机制解中倾角、滑动角和地壳浅层衰减等因素对SmS震相的影响.结果表明,倾角和滑动角对其振幅比影响呈现比较复杂的关系,而SmS与S振幅比随地壳浅层衰减的增大而减小,说明浅层衰减对SmS震相影响较大.综合分析认为,除当地地壳速度结构的影响外,SmS震相的发育受到震源机制解的倾角、滑动角,震源深度以及地壳浅层衰减等多种因素的影响. 相似文献
18.
RESEARCH ON GENESIS OF M4.2 AND M4.5 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCES IN MARCH 2014 IN ZIGUI COUNTY,HUBEI PROVINCE 下载免费PDF全文
On 27th and 30th March 2014, an M4.2 and M4.5 earthquake sequence occurred in Zigui County, Hubei Province, and the earthquake sequence type is double seismic type. The two earthquake sequences occurred at the water unloading stage of the 175m trial impounding, and G-R relations showed the similar characteristics with that of the tectonic earthquakes. In order to verify the influences of dam reservoir on earthquake triggering, ETAS model was introduced, the results showed that the slow water level changes had little impact on the occurrence of earthquake. Double difference precision relocation results indicated that the two earthquake sequences occurred at the intersection part of a NE-striking fault and the NNW-striking Xiannvshan Fault, and the preferred direction of aftershock distribution was separately NE and NNW. Moment tensor inversion method and P wave initial motion method were used to determine the focal mechanisms of the two earthquakes, and the results indicated that the two earthquakes were controlled by the regional tectonic stress field and were of reverse-slip type. Comprehensive analysis showed that the M4.2 earthquake was caused by a small-scale fault striking NE with a big dip angle. From the hypocenter profile, it can be seen that the M4.2 earthquake sequence was restrained by an east-dip fault, and the M4.5 earthquake sequence was the product under the conjugate action of the NE-striking fault and the NNW-striking Xiannvshan fault. 相似文献
19.
On July 31st, 2016, an earthquake of MS5.4 occurred in Cangwu County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, which is the first MS ≥ 5.0 earthquake in coastal areas of southern China in the past 17a. The moderate earthquake activities have come into a comparatively quiet period in coastal areas of southern China for decades, so the study about the Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake is very important. However, differernt research institutions and scholars have got different results for the focal depth of the Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake. For this reason, we further measured the focal depth by using CAP method and sPL phase method.
sPL phase was first put forward by Chong in 2010. It is often observed between P and S wave of continental earthquakes with epicentral distance of about 30km to 50km. The energy of sPL phase is mainly concentrated on the radial component. Arrival time difference between sPL phase and direct P wave is insensitive to epicentral distancs, but increases almost linearly with the increase of focal depth. Based on these characteristics and advantages, sPL phase method is chosen to measure the focal depth of Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake in the paper.
First of all, we selected the broadband waveform data through seismic stations distributed mainly in Guangxi and adjacent provinces from Data Management Centre of China National Seismic Network and Guangxi Earthquake Networks Center. And an appropriate velocity model of Cangwu area was constructed by the teleseismic receiver function method. Then, the focal mechanism and focal depth of Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake were determined by using the CAP(Cut and Paste)method. Next, we compared the synthetic waveforms simulated by F-K forward method of different focal depth models with the actual observed waveforms. According to the difference of arrival times between sPL and Pg phases, we finally obtained the focal depth of Cangwu earthquake. The results show that the focal depth is 11km measured by CAP method and 9km by sPL phase method. Based on the focal mechanism solution, isoseismal shapes, aftershocks distributions and investigation on spot, we conclude that the Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake is a left-lateral strike-slip earthquake which occurred in the upper crust. Our preliminary analysis considers that the seismogenic structure of Cangwu earthquake is a north-northwest branch fault, and the control fault of this earthquake is the Hejie-Xiaying Fault. 相似文献
20.
2008年6月10日14时5分,内蒙古鄂伦春自治旗发生M5.2地震,该地震处于大兴安岭梯度带北段,是内蒙古东北部地区近年来发生的最大地震。基于内蒙古地震台网观测资料,使用TDMT方法、CAP方法、PTD方法和sPn-Pn等方法测定此次地震的震源机制解和震源深度。结合已有数据资料,分析震源区域地震的时空分布特征和构造应力特征,并探讨该地震的发震构造。此次地震震源深度较浅,位于上地壳,结合震源机制解结果、地震分布特征和构造背景分析认为,此次地震为右旋走滑类型,走向NNE,主压应力方向为SWW。 相似文献