山东长岛震群震源机制解一致性参数时空演化特征

借助山东数字地震台网记录到的长岛海域的中小地震波形资料,采用P波初动求取小震震源机制解的方法对研究区内293个ML≥2.0地震进行震源机制反演,并根据震源机制解的资料对长岛地区进行应力张量反演,计算各节点震源机制解一致性参数的时空演化,进而分析长岛地区的应力状态以及震源机制一致性参数的时空演化特征。结果表明:(1)研究区地震震源以走滑型为主,正断型次之,逆断型最少,初步判断发震断层为SE走向的高角度的走滑断层,主要表现为水平运动。(2)通过反演得到研究区区域平均应力场主压应力方向为101.4°,倾角29.1°;中等应力方向为280.8°,倾角60.8°;主张应力方向为11.3°,倾角0.3°,应力张量方差为0.085。(3)震源机制一致性参数的时空分布与中等地震活动有一定的关系,具体表现为:在中强地震发生前,震源机制和应力场一致,震源区附近的构造应力场的作用增强,此时震源机制一致性参数处于较低水平。空间上,研究区震源机制一致性参数整体上呈现出中间低两边高的特点,所有ML≥4.0地震都发生在极低值区或者高值区向低值区变化的过渡带上。     

2014年2月12日于田7.3级地震序列震源机制特征分析

基于新疆及西藏区域数字地震台网的宽频带资料,采用CAP方法反演了2014年2月12日于田7.3级地震的前震、主震及早期MS≥3.5余震序列的震源机制解。结果显示,此次7.3级强震为带有正断分量的走滑型地震,结合震源区的构造和余震分布,节面I走向241°/倾角90°/滑动角-22°,判定该节面代表了主震的发震断层面。主震主压力轴方位为194o,与该区历史中强震主压应力P轴方位近NS向较为接近。其5.4级前震和主震震源机制解具有较高的一致性。18次余震中有10次为走滑型地震,其中6次为正断型,2次为逆断型,且70%的地震具有近SN向的P轴方位。此次7.3级地震序列震源深度范围5~28km,而大部分地震为15~20km,略大于本文计算得到的主震震源深度10km。     

2014年2月12日于田7.3级地震序列震源机制特征分析

基于新疆及西藏区域数字地震台网的宽频带资料,采用CAP方法反演了2014年2月12日于田7.3级地震的前震、主震及早期MS≥3.5余震序列的震源机制解。结果显示,此次7.3级强震为带有正断分量的走滑型地震,结合震源区的构造和余震分布,节面I走向241°/倾角90°/滑动角-22°,判定该节面代表了主震的发震断层面。主震主压力轴方位为194°,与该区历史中强震主压应力P轴方位近NS向较为接近。其5.4级前震和主震震源机制解具有较高的一致性。18次余震中有10次为走滑型地震,其中6次为正断型,2次为逆断型,且70%的地震的P轴方位近SN向。此次7.3级地震序列震源深度为5~28km,而大部分地震为15~20km,略大于本文得到的主震震源深度10km。     

海城、盖州地区地震震源机制及一致性参数特征研究

本文选取辽宁海城、 盖州地区(40°~41°N, 122°~123°E)作为研究区, 利用广义极性振幅技术(GPAT)方法, 反演得到研究区2012—2017年6月共184个地震震源机制解, 并利用Misfit角度分析震源机制一致性参数特征。 研究结果表明: ① 研究区地震震源机制解以走滑型和正断型为主。 海城地区地震震源机制解以NW—SE向节面的左旋走滑型和NWW向节面的正断型为主。 发震构造以NW向海城河断裂为主, NE向节面为主的地震可能受到NE向金州断裂带的控制。 ② 青石岭地区的发震构造为与九寨—盖县北段共轭的NW向未知断裂, 西海域的地震活动可能是NE向的雁式断裂和NW向共轭的未知断裂共同作用的结果。 ③ 震源机制一致性结果显示, 一致性增强后发生了震级相对较大的地震。 研究区的震源机制一致性较强, 表明该区域的应力较为集中。 但由于2016年以来活动趋于平静, 尚难以根据震源机制解一致性程度做出当前应力状态的判断。     

2006年文安地震孕育、发生的应力场动态图像

利用数字地震记录反演了河北地区ML≥2.0地震的震源机制解,通过对震源机制解各参数的统计分析,发现应力轴的优势取向和华北构造应力场完全吻合,反映它们受到大区域动力因素的制约。进行震源机制解一致性参数计算,并对一致性参数进行空间平面插值,得到了2006年文安地震前震源机制解一致性参数空间动态的变化特征。文安地震前在震源区附近出现了大范围的一致性参数低值区域,并且低值区域面积随时间增长逐渐扩大,这可能是中强震前的一种具有动力学意义的前兆现象。     

多方法研究四川炉霍Ms5.3地震震源机制解

2011年4月10日四川省炉霍县发生了Ms5.3级地震,利用这次地震的观测数据,采用了CAP、TDMT-INVC和Snoke三种方法,研究不同解算方法得到的此次地震震源机制解结果。结果显示:(1)三种方法计算出的震源机制解参数基本一致,说明三种方法求解结果是稳定、可靠的。(2)计算得到的地震矩震级Mw为5.2;节面I的参数为:走向45°,倾角84°,滑动角-160°;节面Ⅱ的参数为:走向313°,倾角70°,滑动角-6°;P轴方位角271°,仰角18°;T轴方位角177°,仰角10°;发震断层属于走滑型略兼正倾滑分量性质。(3)最佳拟合震源深度为11 km,与该区域的优势发震层位深度比较一致。(4)该次地震震源机制解节面II参数与震中附近鲜水河断裂带的产状较为相同,主压应力方向与区域应力方向也比较一致,这些说明此次地震是鲜水河断裂左旋走滑错动的结果。     

山西地区震源机制一致性参数时空特征分析

利用山西数字地震台网记录到的中小地震波形资料,采用层状介质中点源位错模型的广义透射系数的快速算法和理论地震图拟合直达波最大振幅比来求取小震震源机制解的方法,计算了2001年—2012年山西地区281个中小地震震源机制解,根据优势分布得到山西地区现今平均构造应力场分布,计算震源机制解应力主轴与相应的区域构造应力场主轴之间的震源机制一致性参数,分析一致性参数时空分布与中等地震活动的关系。结果显示,2001年以来山西5次ML≥5.0地震前均有震源机制趋于一致性现象,震中分布在一致性参数低值附近或高低值过渡区域。     

2013年科左后旗5.3级地震前后的P轴转向和应力场变化分析

为了考察2013年4月22日科左后旗5.3级地震震中区域应力场的中短期变化过程,选取2009年以来发生在开鲁坳陷的ML≥3.0级地震作为研究对象,应用Focmec方法计算了17次地震的震源机制解,根据震源机制解结果绘制的P轴时序分布图显示,在科左后旗地震前,震中区应力场的P轴方位首先表现出中期阶段的"一致性"变化,接着出现短期时段的大幅波动,科左后旗M 5.3级地震则发生在短期显著紊乱过程中,表明开鲁坳陷的P轴趋于一致具有中期指示意义,震前3个月左右出现的P轴大幅度转向具有短期指示意义,科左后旗5.3级地震发生前后,部分余震均表现出与主震较为统一的走滑型机制,压应力轴和张应力轴分别做顺时针和逆时针旋转运动。     

2016年11月25日新疆阿克陶6.7级地震序列震源机制特征分析

本研究利用新疆区域数字地震台网的波形资料,采用CAP方法反演了2016年11月25日阿克陶6.7级地震的前震、主震及11次M_S ≥ 3.6余震序列的最佳双力偶震源机制解,得到阿克陶6.7级地震最佳双力偶机制解：节面Ⅰ走向20°/倾角69°/滑动角-10°;节面Ⅱ走向114°/倾角81°/滑动角-159°,表明此次阿克陶6.7级地震为一次走滑型地震事件,结合震源区的地震地质构造及余震序列空间分布等已有研究成果,判定节面Ⅱ代表了主震的发震断层面。主震最大主压力轴方位为339°,与震源区附近历史中强震P轴近NW向的优势方位基本一致。其4.8级前震的震源机制解为走滑型,与主震震源机制解具有较高的一致性。11次余震中有6次为走滑型地震,3次为逆断型地震,1次正断型地震,1次混合型地震,且多数地震具有近NW向的P轴方位。此次6.7级地震序列的震源深度分布于6~16km之间,而大部分地震为9~13km,与本文计算得到的主震的震源深度10km相差不大。此外,初步分析了兴都库什-帕米尔地区强震活动与此次阿克陶6.7级地震的关系。     

豫北及邻区中小地震震源机制解及应力场反演

利用区域地震台网的数字地震波记录资料,由垂直向记录Pg和Sg振幅比值,结合部分清晰的P波初动记录资料,计算得到了1985～2008年在豫北及邻区发生的145个中小地震的震源机制解。通过统计方法、系统聚类分析方法及采用格点尝试法,分析了震源机制解参数并求取了区域平均应力场。结果表明:研究区震源机制解以走滑型为主,应力轴比较接近水平,区域构造应力场以水平挤压为主要特征;震源机制解除走滑型外,还有一定数量的正断型和逆断型。整体显示中小地震震源机制解种类较多,分布散乱,表明小地震发生具有随机性,华北构造应力场整体的控制作用较弱。     

2003年伽师6.8级地震序列特征和震源机制的初步研究

在位于1997-1998年新疆伽师9次6级地震分布区域的东南端，2003年2月24日又发生6．8级地震。结合伽师6．8级地震序列震源机制解结果，对该地震序列的基本特征和震源区应力降等进行了对比分析。结果表明，6．8级地震断层是在北西向的区域应力场挤压作用下产生的倾滑逆断层，震源以单侧破裂为主，破裂方向与极震区走向，以及北西向的主压应力方向一致。震前震源区应力显著增强，震后应力释放较为彻底。中强余震震源机制解与主震有明显差异，表现出震源区应力场处于不稳定的调整阶段，余震震源机制的差异为震后地震趋势的判定提供了依据。     

Fracture Characters and Seismogenic Fault of the Yajiang Earthquake Sequence with Ms6.0 in Sichuan in 2001

The Yajiang earthquake sequence in 2001, with the major events of Ms5.1 on Feb. 14 and of Ms6.0 on Feb.23, are significant events in the Sichuan region during the last 13 years. Eighty-eight earthquakes in the sequence with at least 5 distinct onset parameters for each recorded by the Sichuan Seismic Network in the period of Jan. 1 through June 30,2001 were chosen for this study. The events are relocated and the focal mechanism is derived from P-wave onsets for 13 events with relatively larger magnitudes. The focal depth of all earthquakes fall between a range of 2km to 16km, with dominant distribution between 9km to 11km. Theforeshocks, the Ms5.1 earthquake and the Ms6.0 earthquake and their aftershocks are all located close to the Zihe fault and the dominant epicentral distribution is in NW direction, identical to that of the fault. The fracture surface of the focal mechanism is determined in accordance to the mass transfer orientation in the recent earth deformation field in the Yajiang region. The P axes of the principal compressive stress in focal mechanism solutions of the 13 events show bigger vertical components, and the horizontal projection trending SE. The earthquakes are of left-lateral, strike-slip normal, and normal strike-slip types. The rupture surface of most earthquakes strike NW-SE, dipping SW. Based on the above information, we conclude that the Zihe fault that crosses the earthquake area, striking NW and dipping SW, is the seismogenic fault for the Yajiang earthquake sequence.     

华北4次中、强地震前震源区及其附近应力场的变化

使用小震机制解资料 ,分析了 1975年海城 7 3级和 1976年唐山 7 8级强震及 1983年菏泽 5 9级和 1995年苍山 5 2级中强震前 ,震源区及其周围不同构造部位应力场的时、空变化 ,证实震前震源区附近应力场曾有某些异常改变 ,如唐山强震前震源区周围出现长达 4a多的小震机制解主应力轴一致性取向的现象 ,菏泽地震前小震机制解P轴“集中—转向” ,苍山地震前P轴偏转且一致性增强。同时还发现 ,唐山地震前应力场异常变化开始时间可能早于 1972年 ;震源区内的陡河台与源外区的昌黎台小震综合机制解反映出震前的受力差异 ;震源断层附近不同应力区内震源机制解和地震活动有时空动态差异。这些现象一定程度上提供了不同构造条件和应力背景下 ,中、强震前震源区不同构造部位力学状态的改变或地震孕育过程的信息 ,对研究不同地震的孕震过程及差异有一定意义。     

FOCAL FAULTS AND STRESS FIELD CHARACTERISTICS OF M7.0 JIUZHAIGOU EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE IN 2017

On August 8, 2017, Beijing time, an earthquake of M7.0 occurred in Jiuzhaigou County, Aba Prefecture, Sichuan Province, with the epicenter located at 33.20°N 103.82°E. The earthquake caused 25 people dead, 525 people injured, 6 people missing and 170000 people affected. Many houses were damaged to various degrees. Up to October 15, 2017, a total of 7679 aftershocks were recorded, including 2099 earthquakes of M ≥ 1.0. The M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake occurred in the northeastern boundary belt of the Bayan Har block on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, where many active faults are developed, including the Tazhong Fault(the eastern segment of the East Kunlun Fault), the Minjiang fault zone, the Xueshan fault zone, the Huya fault zone, the Wenxian fault zone, the Guanggaishan-Daishan Fault, the Bailongjiang Fault, the Longriuba Fault and the Longmenshan Fault. As one of the important passages for the eastward extrusion movement of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau(Tapponnier et al., 2001), the East Kunlun fault zone has a crucial influence on the tectonic activities of the northeastern boundary belt of Bayan Kala. Meanwhile, the Coulomb stress, fault strain and other research results show that the eastern boundary of the Bayan Har block still has a high risk of strong earthquakes in the future. So the study of the M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake' seismogenic faults and stress fields is of great significance for scientific understanding of the seismogenic environment and geodynamics of the eastern boundary of Bayan Har block. In this paper, the epicenter of the main shock and its aftershocks were relocated by the double-difference relocation method and the spatial distribution of the aftershock sequence was obtained. Then we determined the focal mechanism solutions of 24 aftershocks(M ≥ 3.0)by using the CAP algorithm with the waveform records of China Digital Seismic Network. After that, we applied the sliding fitting algorithm to invert the stress field of the earthquake area based on the previous results of the mechanism solutions. Combining with the previous research results of seismogeology in this area, we discussed the seismogenic fault structure and dynamic characteristics of the M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake. Our research results indicated that:1)The epicenters of the M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake sequence distribute along NW-SE in a stripe pattern with a long axis of about 35km and a short axis of about 8km, and with high inclination and dipping to the southwest, the focal depths are mainly concentrated in the range of 2~25km, gradually deepening from northwest to southeast along the fault, but the dip angle does not change remarkably on the whole fault. 2)The focal mechanism solution of the M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake is:strike 151°, dip 69° and rake 12° for nodal plane Ⅰ, and 245°, 78° and -158° for nodal plane Ⅱ, the main shock type is pure strike-slip and the centroid depth of the earthquake is about 5km. Most of the focal mechanism of the aftershock sequence is strike-slip type, which is consistent with the main shock's focal mechanism solution; 3)In the earthquake source area, the principal compressive stress and the principal tensile stress are both near horizontal, and the principal compressive stress is near east-west direction, while the principal tensile stress is near north-south direction. The Jiuzhaigou earthquake is a strike-slip event that occurs under the horizontal compressive stress.     

comprehensive study on the changing process of focal mechanisms of the 2014 huoshan ms4.3 earthquake sequence

In this paper, the focal mechanisms of Huoshan M_S4.3 earthquake sequence since October 2013 are calculated with the method developed recently by Snoke, which combines the use of first motion of P, SV and SH waves and their amplitude ratios(referred to as Snoke method). We estimate the difference(also referred to consistency parameter θ)between the stress axis direction of focal mechanism solution and the mean stress tensor on one hand, and get the relative changes of focal mechanisms rather than the focal mechanisms themselves on the other hand, by using methods of correlation coefficient of body-wave spectral amplitudes, first motions and amplitude ratios of vertical P wave of single station, as limited by the network layout and density of observation points, focal mechanism solutions of small earthquakes are not easy to obtain. We studied the changing process of focal mechanisms of Huoshan M_S4.3 earthquake sequence since October 2013 with many methods such as consistency parameter, correlation coefficient of body-wave spectral amplitudes, first motion and amplitude ratio of vertical P wave of single station, to determine the type of the sequence. The result shows that: before Huoshan M_S4.3 earthquake of April 20, 2014, the consistency parameter of the earthquake sequence was lower than the mean for a long period, correlation coefficient of body-wave spectral amplitudes was always at high values(about 0.9), odds ratio of first motions of vertical P wave of single station near the epicenter, defined as the ratio of predominant number to contrast number of first motions, was up to 13.8 at station SJH, 3.8 at BZY and 3.6 at LNA, respectively; first motions of vertical P wave of single station showed an obvious predominant distribution as a whole, and the amplitude ratios of vertical P were consistent, which suggests that before Huoshan M_S4.3 earthquake, focal mechanisms were consistent, so the earthquake sequence before Huoshan M_S4.3 earthquake is the foreshock sequence. After Huoshan M_S4.3 earthquake, correlation coefficient of body-wave spectral amplitudes was lower(about 0.6), first motions and amplitude ratios of vertical P wave of single station were in disorder, which suggest that the focal mechanisms are inconsistent after the Huoshan M_S4.3 earthquake, so the earthquake sequence after Huoshan M_S4.3 earthquake is the aftershock sequence, and subsequent larger earthquakes are not likely to occur. The focal mechanisms in Huoshan region during the period of Huoshan M_S4.3 earthquake experienced a process from scattering to convergency and to scattering again.     

2006年11月23日新疆乌苏5.1级地震及部分地震学前兆异常特征

介绍了2006年11月23日新疆乌苏5.1级地震的基本参数、震源机制解、地震序列特征、发震构造和局部构造应力场;分析了震前数字地震波参数的变化和部分地震学前兆异常特征。研究结果认为,乌苏5.1级地震是博罗科努-阿齐克库都克断裂发生右旋走滑错动所致。震前观察到震中附近P波初动半周期、P波与S波振幅比以及应力降的变化。震前震中附近曾出现4级地震集中分布、3级地震空区图像,震前6~9个月出现震群活动,震前2个月温泉地震窗异常。除上述异常外,乌苏5.1级地震前整体异常比例不高。     

首都圈地区震源机制解及现今构造应力场时空变化特征研究

基于2009年1月至2017年11月首都圈地区发生的8 061个地震事件的23 293条P波初动极性数据,采用改进的格点尝试法计算了首都圈地区单次地震的震源机制解和小震综合断层面解。在初步分析这些数据的基础上,利用计算得到的单次地震的震源机制解和搜集到的已有历史地震的震源机制解数据,运用线性反演法对首都圈地区构造应力场的时空变化特征进行了研究。结果显示:① 研究区的地震震源机制解类型以走滑型为主,正断型次之,这些地震震源机制解的P轴方位大都为ENE向和近EW向,与该地区的构造应力场方向基本一致,仅有个别地震的P轴方位为NNW向;② 首都圈地区的构造应力场具有较好的一致性和连续性,最大主应力轴方位由西部的ENE向至东部的近EW向呈现顺时针旋转的趋势,应力类型整体上为走滑型,这与以往的研究结果相一致;③ 通过与已有研究结果相比较认为:京西北地区现今构造应力场是相对稳定的,最大主应力轴未呈明显改变;唐山地区和北京地区的构造应力场（最大主应力轴）在1976年唐山地震前后可能发生了变化,唐山地震后一年至今（1977—2017年）是否发生变化,依据现有的计算结果尚不得而知,需要更多的研究来进一步验证.      

2010年10月24日周口太康MS4．6地震的震源机制解

利用河南省区域地震台网的近震波形资料,采用近震时间域方法,反演2010年10月24日16点58分太康 MS 4．6地震的地震矩张量,结果显示,该地震为走滑型地震。结合震后灾害考察,认为太康地震发生在周口-太康断裂上。     

2022年10月—2023年2月中国大陆地区M≥4.0地震震源机制解测定

利用中国地震台网记录的宽频带波形资料,采用近震全波形反演方法得到2022年10月1日—2023年2月28日发生在中国大陆地区的M≥4.0共46次地震的震源机制解以及2023年1月30日新疆沙雅M6.1地震的矩心位置和矩心偏移时间。结果显示逆断型15次,走滑型15次,正断型14次,未知型2次。      

RESEARCH ON CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS CONSISTENCY OF RUSHAN EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE,SHANDONG PROVINCE

Many small earthquakes occurred intensively and continuously and formed an earthquake sequence after the M_L3.8 earthquake happened at Rushan County, Shandong Province on October 1, 2013. Up to March, 2017, more than 13 000 events have been recorded, with 3 429 locatable shocks, of which 31 events with M_L ≥ 3.0. This sequence is rarely seen in East China for its extraordinary long duration and the extremely high frequency of aftershocks. To track the developing tendency of the earthquake sequence accurately, 20 temporary seismometers were arranged to monitor the sequence activities around the epicenter of the sequence since May 6, 2014. Firstly, this paper adopts double difference method to relocate the 1 418 earthquakes of M_L ≥ 1.0 recorded by temporary seismometers in the Rushan earthquake sequence (May 7, 2014 to December 31, 2016), the result shows that the Rushan earthquake sequence mainly extends along NWW-SEE and forms a rectangular activity belt of about 4km long and 3km wide. In addition, the seismogenic fault of Rushan earthquake sequence stretches along NWW-SEE with nearly vertical strike-slip movement and a small amount of thrust component. Then we apply the P-wave initial motion and CAP to invert the focal mechanism of earthquakes with M_L ≥ 1.5 in the study area. The earthquakes can be divided into several categories, including 3 normal fault earthquakes (0.9%), 3 normal-slip earthquakes (0.9%), 229 strike-slip earthquakes (65.8%), 18 thrust fault earthquakes (5.2%), 37 thrust-slip earthquakes (10.6%)and 58 undefined (16.6%). Most earthquakes had a strike-slip mechanism in Rushan (65.8%), which is one of the intrinsic characteristics of the stress field. According to the focal mechanism solutions, we further utilized the LSIB method (Linear stress inversion bootstrap)to invert the stress tensor of Rushan area. The result shows that the azimuth and plunge of three principal stress (σ₁, σ₂, σ₃) axes are 25°, 10°; 286°, 45°; 125°, 43°, respectively. Based on the stress field inversion results, we calculated the focal mechanism solutions consistency parameter (θ)and the angle (θ₁)between σ₁ and P axis. The trend lines of θ and θ₁ were relatively stable with small fluctuation near the average line over time. Furthermore, the earthquake sequence can be divided into three stages based on θ and θ₁ values. The first stage is before September 16, 2014, and the variation of the θ and θ₁ values is relatively smooth with short period. All focal mechanism solutions of the three M_L ≥ 3.0 earthquakes exhibited consistence. The second stage started from September 16, 2014 to July 1, 2015, the fluctuation range of θ and θ₁ values is larger than that of the first stage with a relative longer period. The last stage is after July 1, 2015, values of θ and θ₁ gradually changed to a periodic change, three out of the four M_L ≥ 3.0 earthquakes (strike-slip type)displayed a good consistency. Spatially, earthquakes occurred mainly in green, yellow-red regions, and the focal mechanism parameters consistency θ was dominant near the green region (around the average value), which presents a steady state, and the spatial locations are concordant with the distribution of θ value. Moreover, all of M_L ≥ 3.0 earthquakes are located in the transitional region from the mean value to lower value area or region below the mean value area, which also indicates the centralized stress field of the region.