新疆伽师强震群部分地震前的序列频度异常及其临震预报

１９９７年１－５月新疆伽师发生Ｍｓ５．０－６．６地震１４次。在１月２１日之后发生的１２次Ｍｓ〉５．０地震中,有５次地震震前出现了序列异常平现象。说明就此次伽师强震群而言,小震异常平静物征确实具有较了的临震预报效能。     

甘肃近期2次中强震前后震源区微震尾波（Qc）的变化特征

利用张掖台网和天祝－古浪台网的记录资料研究了１９８８年１１月２２日肃南５．７级地震和１９９６年６月１日天祝－古浪５．４级地震前台震源区微震尾波Ｑｃ值的变化特征,结果表明：５．７级地震前源及邻近地区介质１／Ｑｃ值趋于一致,认为这是该次地震的一种前兆表现,结合该次地震的震源机制和构造情况进行了讨论。天祝－古浪５．４级地震震源区附近地区微震尾波Ｑｃ值民频率的关系表明,这一地区属于构这活动地区。     

白玉—巴塘5.5级地震的前兆异常特征

详细介绍了１９９６年１２月２１日白玉－巴塘５．５级地震前， 定地震中心站根部前兆手段异常的宏观异常，对该地震进行中短期预报的情况。     

1997年5月31日永安5.2级震区地震趋势预测

分析１９９７年５月３１日福建永安５．２级地震的序列特征,论证其为一次前－主－余型地震。根据震区的构造背景,现场烈度调查,震源机制及余震分布,综合判断发震断裂为万安－古田断裂,为左旋逆断层性质。     

张北-尚义地震前太平庄井地下流体中短期异常

张北－尚义地震前,北京太平庄井地下流体多次出现异常,这些异常虽然在时间上与１９９７年５月２５日张家口４．２级和１９９７年１０月２１日乌拉特后旗５．０级地震相对应,但笔者认为应该将这些异常群体与地震活动都看作是华北北部地区地壳活动的反应,是整个区域应力场应力不断增强的反应,是张北－尚义地震的中短期前兆异     

怀安4.5级地震和张北6.2级地震前后重力异常变化及对应关系

对华北火车流动重力网北环１９８７年－１９９８年２４期复测资料（京西北张家口一带）作了分析,探讨了１９９７年５月２５日怀安４．５级地震和１９９８年１月１０日张北６．２级地震孕育发生过程中重力异常变化及对应关系,研究表明,重力场时空分布变化特征图象较清晰地反映了由孕震过程的非均匀动态到发震的演变过程。     

永登5.8级地震和天祝—古浪5.4级地震前S波分裂特征

应用ＣＤＳＮ台网兰州数字台的记录和中法合作建立的朗索数字台的记录,研究了１９９５年７月２２日甘肃永登５．８级地震和１９９６年６月１日天祝－古浪５．４级地震前台剪切波分裂的特征。结果表明,在永登地震前大约１年的时间延迟和偏振方向很快恢复。因此,可以认为,此次地震前ＮＷ向,地震后剪切波分裂时间延迟和偏振方向很快恢复。因此,可以认为,此次地震前Ｓ波分裂方向的前兆特征是明显的。对于天祝－古浪５．４级地震,     

1995年孟连地震（M=7.3）的预报及社会响应能力

云南是中国地震活动最为频繁的省份之一。在１９９５年７月于１９９６年２月的７个月期间,接连发生了３次大地震,它们是,１９９５年７月１２日孟连地震（Ｍ＝７．３）;１９９５年１０月２４日武定地震（Ｍ≡６．５）,和１９９６年２月３日丽江地震（Ｍ≡７．０）。本在对上述３次地震作简单介绍的同时,将重点强调孟连地震的短临预报及社会响应能力。孟连地震是一次前震－主震－余震型地震,发震时刻为１９９５年７月１２日０     

甘肃永登5.8级地震前兆异常特征及天祝—古浪5.4级地城中短期预报

综合分析了１９９５年７月２２日甘肃泳登５．８级地夺前兆地震时空分布特征,主要表现为异常数量多、分布广、密度大、震后响应性异常显,且时空分布具有成组性、空间分布具有相对稳定性。这可能与该区中强城成丛活动方式有关。此研究结果在１９９６年６月１日甘肃天祝－古浪５．４级地震中短期预报中发挥了作用。     

大同—阳高2次地震前的震级熵异常

利用最大熵原理推导了连续随机变量震级熵的表达式，计算大同－阳高地震前后≥２．０地震的震级熵，计算结果表明，从１９８８年４月开始，震级熵开始出现低值异常，１９８９年３月熵开始回升，在回升途中发生了１９８９年１０月１８日的大同－阳高６．１级地震，１９９０年４月份后震级熵再次出现低值异常，９月份后震级熵再次回升，在回升途中发生１９９１年３月２６日的５．８级地震。     

鄱阳湖水质现状及变化趋势

根据鄱阳湖1990年监测资料,对水质污染现状进行分析,同时利用1981—1990年资料,分析了水质变化趋势。分析表明:湖体、河口水质均属较清洁水或尚清洁水。但是,随着入湖污染负荷量的增加,湖区水体污染呈上升趋势,宜引起有关部门高度重视。     

鄱阳湖流域径流模型

流域径流是鄱阳湖主要来水,建立鄱阳湖流域径流模型对揭示湖泊水量平衡及其受流域自然和人类活动的影响具有重要意义.针对鄱阳湖-流域系统的特点:流域面积大(16.22×104km2)、多条入湖河流、湖滨区坡面入湖径流等,研究了相应的模拟方法,建立了考虑流域土壤属性和土地利用空间变化的鄱阳湖流域分布式径流模型.采用6个水文站1991-2001年的实测河道径流对模型进行了率定和验证.结果显示,模型整体模拟精度较高.其中,赣江、信江和饶河均取得了较好的模拟结果,月效率系数为0.82-0.95;抚河和修水模拟精度略低,为0.65-0.78.模型揭示了研究时段内年平均入湖径流总量为1623×108m3,其中,赣江最多,占47%,其次为信江和抚河,分别占13%和12%,湖滨区坡面入湖径流约占4%,其余24%来自饶河、修水以及其它入湖支流.模型将用于评估流域下垫面或气候变化引起的入湖水量变化,为湖泊水量平衡计算提供依据.     

Lake flooding sensitivity to the relative timing of peak flows between upstream and downstream waterways: A case study of Poyang Lake,China

The relative timing of peak flows (RTPF) from tributaries has significant influence on flood occurrence at their confluence. This study is aimed at (1) analysing the characteristics of the RTPF of the 5 recharging rivers in the Poyang Lake catchment and the Yangtze River during the period of 1960–2012, and (2) employing a physically‐based hydrodynamic model (MIKE 21) to quantify the effects of RTPF on flood behaviour in the Poyang Lake (the largest freshwater lake in China). The results show that short RTPF, or close occurrence of peak flows, triggers flood in the Poyang Lake more easily. More than 75% of total flood events in the study period occurred with RTPF less than 60 days, and more than 55% of the events occurred with RTPF less than 30 days. The hydrodynamic simulation revealed that the date of flood peak in the lake was postponed by 4–7 days and the flood stage raised by 0.69 m because of the delay of peak flows from the upstream rivers/tributaries. On the other hand, earlier start of the Yangtze River peak flow led to flood peak in the lake 6–13 days earlier. Additionally, the duration of high lake water levels was extended by 9–12 days when the RTPF shortened, and the flood hydrograph of the Poyang Lake changed from a flat to a flashy type. These results indicate that an enlarged RTPF between the upstream rivers and the Yangtze River could be an effective way to prevent flood disasters in the Poyang Lake, a method apparently being adopted in the operation of the Three Gorges Dam. The RTPF should be considered and integrated when developing flood prevention and management plans in the Poyang Lake, as well as in other similar regions in the world.     

Monitoring the impact of backflow and dredging on water clarity using MODIS images of Poyang Lake,China

Backflow from the Yangtze River to Poyang Lake occurs frequently due to their different flood seasons. Based on the reasons for and time period of backflow, this study estimated the spatial‐temporal extent and the change of water clarity influenced by sediments within the backflow and northern Poyang Lake using time‐series Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images. The results revealed that the sediments from backflows together with dredging activities in the northern Poyang Lake not only affected the northern Poyang Lake, but also influenced the central and southern Poyang Lake and the Poyang Lake national nature reserve, and resulted in great decline of water clarity in the regions influenced, which could seriously affect the lake ecosystem. The results indicated that MODIS images have potential for monitoring the distribution of sediments from backflows and dredging activities. However, the potential is limited because of the frequent cloud cover in the study area and the characteristics of backflow itself. The dredging activity combined with backflows might have great negative impacts on the Poyang Lake ecosystem, and it would be worthwhile to explore the possible impacts in order to develop scientific knowledge to support the decisions, which need to be made by the responsible authorities for deciding how to rationally manage this unique lake ecosystem Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

三峡工程运行对鄱阳湖水位影响试验

三峡工程运行改变了长江中下游水沙情势,影响了鄱阳湖湖区水位,造成了水资源利用、水质、湿地和生态等方面的新问题.实测日水位资料分析认为:湖区水位年内变化可分为低水、涨水、顶托倒灌和退水4个阶段;顶托倒灌阶段湖区水位基本由长江干流控制,另外3个阶段湖区水位受湖口流量和长江干流的共同影响,受影响程度与水位站位置、湖口流量和长江干流相互作用强弱有关;三峡工程运行没有改变鄱阳湖水位"高水湖相、低水河相"的基本特征,但对水位造成了一定影响.开展物理模型试验探索三峡工程运行对湖区水位的影响程度,结果表明:蓄水期三峡工程运行造成湖区水位降幅较大,枯水年都昌站平均(最大)降幅为0.94 m(2.58 m),枯水年湖区水面面积减小68%;增泄期会增加湖区水位,都昌水位最大增幅约1 m,平水年湖区面积增加约32%;枯水期三峡工程运行对鄱阳湖水位基本无影响.     

鄱阳湖水位变化规律的研究

根据都昌水位站１９５３￣１９９２年水位资料,对鄱阳湖水位的基本特征、退水过程及演变趋势进行了统计分析,在此基础上指出鄱阳湖开发利用中面临的主要问题和水位变化对鄱阳湖生态环境可能造成的影响。     

鄱阳湖水利枢纽工程对湖泊水位变化影响的模拟

水位变化是影响湖泊水文过程和生态环境的重要因素.本研究基于环境流体动力学(EFDC)模型构建了鄱阳湖水利枢纽工程与主湖区的二维模型,模拟水利枢纽工程运行后对主湖区及湿地保护区水位变化节律的影响.模拟结果表明:水利枢纽工程对湖泊水位的影响由北向南逐渐减小,水利枢纽工程提升了大湖北部水位,使南北水位差减小,将影响鄱阳湖枯水期的流速及自净能力.吴城和南矶湿地自然保护区核心区水位变化受水利枢纽工程的影响较小,吴城自然保护区核心区在水位低于13.8 m时与大湖脱离,不再受水利枢纽工程影响,但水利枢纽工程会影响蚌湖与大湖脱离时间;南矶自然保护区位于鄱阳湖南部,水位受水利枢纽工程影响很小.水利枢纽工程条件下,湖泊水位受人工控制,枯水年和平水年湖泊水位的变化基本一致;枯水年水利枢纽工程对湖泊水位的影响大于平水年,但对湖泊南部的水位变化影响仍然较小.模型模拟结果可以揭示在目前调度方案下,水利枢纽工程对湖泊水位变化节律的影响规律,为工程建设提供一定的理论参考.     

鄱阳湖典型洪泛区地下水数值模拟研究

受地表河湖系统水情变化干扰,高度动态和异质性的洪泛区地下水文对河湖水资源、水污染以及生态环境功能等方面具有重要影响和贡献。鄱阳湖洪泛区湿地在长江中下游具有重要区位优势和研究特色,但变化环境下其水动力特征和水量交换情况等仍存在许多不确定性。本文以鄱阳湖典型洪泛区为研究区,采用地下水流二维数值模型,开展了洪泛区地表地下水转化作用与水量变化的模拟研究。结果表明,鄱阳湖季节性水位变化很大程度上决定了主湖区与周边地下水之间的动态补排模式,即洪泛区地下水补给湖泊主要发生在枯水和退水时期,而湖泊补给地下水主要发生在涨水和高洪水位时期。一般情况下,整个洪泛区地下水位与湖水位的年内变化态势基本一致,主湖区附近的地下水位年内变幅较大,而大部分洪泛区的地下水位变幅相对较小。北部地下水流速明显大于南部,主湖区附近地下水流速明显大于洪泛区,地下水流速基本小于1～2 m/d。水均衡分析发现,洪泛区地下水系统以接受降雨输入（52%）和主湖区补给（39%）为主,以地下水蒸发输出（72%）和向湖排泄（24%）为主,但补给主要发生在春、夏季,而排泄则发生在秋、冬季。地形地貌对洪泛区地下水位分布以及流速场演化具有主控作用,...     

The influence of river‐to‐lake backflow on the hydrodynamics of a large floodplain lake system (Poyang Lake,China)

Backflow, the temporary reversal of discharge at the outlet of a lake, is an important mechanism controlling flow and transport in many connected river–lake systems. This study used statistical methods to examine long‐term variations and primary causal factors of backflow from the Yangtze River to a laterally connected, large floodplain lake (Poyang Lake, China). Additionally, the effects of backflow on the lake hydrology were explored using a physically based hydrodynamic model and a particle‐tracking model. Although backflow into Poyang Lake occurs frequently, with an average of 16 backflow events per year, and varies greatly in magnitude between years, statistical analysis indicates that both the frequency and magnitude of backflow reduced significantly during 2001–2010 relative to the previous period of 1960–2000. The ratio of Poyang Lake catchment inflows to Yangtze River discharge can be used as an indication of the daily occurrence of backflow, which is most likely to occur during periods when this ratio is lower than 5%. Statistical analysis also indicates that the Yangtze River discharge is the main controlling factor of backflow during July to October, rather than catchment inflows to the lake. Hydrodynamic modelling reveals that, in general, backflow disturbs the normal northward water flow direction in Poyang Lake and transports mass ~20 km southward into the lake. The effects of backflow on flow direction, water velocities and water levels propagate to virtually its upstream extremity. The current study represents a first attempt to explore backflow and causal factors for a highly dynamic floodplain lake system. An improved understanding of Poyang Lake backflow is critical for guiding future strategies to manage the lake, its water quality and ecosystem value, given proposals to modify the lake–river connectivity. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

鄱阳湖换水周期与示踪剂传输时间特征的数值模拟

在复杂湖泊水动力环境作用下,换水周期和传输时间变化直接影响着污染物的迁移和转化.本文运用数值模拟方法,定量研究了季节水情动态下鄱阳湖换水周期和示踪剂传输时间的空间分布.结果表明,不同季节下鄱阳湖换水周期均具有较高的空间异质性,贯穿整个湖区的主河道换水周期约10 d,大多湖湾区的换水周期则长达300多天.尽管不同季节下换水周期空间分布格局几乎相似,但受鄱阳湖水动力场的季节变化影响,夏、秋季的换水周期要明显大于春、冬季.基于换水周期频率分布曲线的统计表明,80%的鄱阳湖区的换水周期约30 d,其余湖区换水周期为几十天至几百天,表明鄱阳湖应该更加确切地描述为一个快速换水和慢速换水同时共存的湖泊系统.鄱阳湖示踪剂传输时间介于4~32 d,夏、秋季的传输时间(11~32 d)约为春、冬季(4~8 d)的4倍,主要与鄱阳湖季节性水情特征及示踪剂的迁移路径有关.本文所获取的换水周期和示踪剂传输时间的时空分布信息可为今后鄱阳湖水质、水环境和生态系统管理和维护等方面提供重要科学参考.