中国大陆科学钻探（CCSD）主孔微断层的空间展布和脆性变形构造应力场分析
The spatial distribution of microfaults and the tectonic stress field analysis during brittle deformation of the main hole core at Chinese Continental Sciences Drilling（CCSD）
-
摘要: CCSD主孔岩芯中发育有十分丰富的脆性微断层，孔深5158m以上，按其空间分布，可将其主体归纳为北北东向微断层系、北西向微断层系、北东向微断层组和近于东西向微断层组等四个微断层系（组）和SEE-NWW向水平挤压构造应力场、NE-SW向水平挤压构造应力场等二期区域构造应力场。SEE-NWW向水平挤压构造应力场贯穿于高压-超高压变质岩折返的全过程，表明在折返过程中，深层韧性变形阶段的构造应力场和浅层脆性变形阶段的构造应力场，具有高度的一致性。但流劈理和微断层的极点等值线图表明，韧性变形阶段的变形较脆性变形阶段的变形简单，深部发生的基本上是一种以逆冲型剪切应变为主导的变形，而浅部脆性变形域，除继承性的逆冲型剪切应变外，往往叠加有后期的构造伸展作用和走滑作用，因此具有更为复杂的应变图象。NE~SW向水平挤压构造应力场，在时间上晚于SEE~NWW向水平挤压构造应力场，它是导致先存的北北东向逆冲型流劈理发生自北东向南西方向滑动的主因。对比不同岩石类型的微断层和流劈理的极点等值线图，无论是极密类型，还是极密的分布，均不受岩石类型的影响，说明微断层和流劈理的形成与岩石类型（岩性）无关，而主要受构造因素制约，因此，运用微断层和流劈理（叶理）相结合的分析法，研究高压-超高压变质岩带折返阶段的构造应力场和动力学过程，有其他方法无可替代的效果。Abstract: There development a very rich brittle microfaults within CCSD main hole core, more than 5158m deep hole, according to their spatial distribution, can be summed up as four microfault systems (or groups), i.e., the main NNE microfault system, the NW microfault system, the NE microfault group and the near EW microfault group, and two stage tectonic stress fields, i.e., dominantly SEE-NWW level compression tectonic stress fields and NE-SW level compression tectonic stress fields. The SEE-NWW level compression tectonic stress field throughout in the whole process of exhumation of the high-pressure-ultrahigh pressure metamorphic rocks, indicating that during the exhumation process,tectonic stress field of the deep-seated ductile deformation phase and tectonic stress field of the shallow brittle deformation stage, is highly consistency. However, flow cleavage and microfault Pole isogram showed that the deformation of ductile deformation stages is relatively simple than that of brittle deformation stages, deep happened basically is a thrust-type shear strain, while the shallow brittle deformation domain, with the exception of the succession of thrust-type shear strain, the latter often have a structure superimposed extension and strike-slip effect and hence has a more complex strain images. The NE-SW level compression tectonic stress field, in time later than the SEE-NWW level compression tectonic stress field, which is the main reason leading to pre-existing NE thrust-type flow cleavage (associated with early SEE-NWW level compression ) occurred from NE to SW sliding.Comparison microfaults and flow cleavage isogram Pole of different rock types, whether it is a very dense type, or a very dense distribution of rock types are not subject to the impact on microfaults and flow cleavage formation and rock types (lithology) has nothing to do, and is mainly affected by structural factors, therefore, the use of microfaults and flow cleavage (foliation) a combination of analysis, study tectonic stress field and dynamic processes of high pressure - ultrahigh pressure metamorphic belt exhumation phase, there are other ways irreplaceable effect.
-
-
[1] Cong BL,Ultrahigh-Pressure Metamorphic Rocks in the Dabieshan-Sulu Region of China,北京:科学出版社,1996.
[2] Cui JW,Wang LJ,Li PW,Xu DH and Wu HY,Tectonic stress field of brittle deformation within 2000m of the main borehole of Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling,Acta Petrologica Sinica,2004(01).
[3] Cui JW,Wang LJ,Zhang XW,Tang ZM and Shi JS,Changes in tectonic boundaries and stress fields during exhumation and uplift of the Sulu-HP-UHP metamorphic belt,Acta Petrologica Sinica,2006(07).
[4] Cui JW,Tang ZM,Homogenization temperature of secondary inclusions in microfrature veins of the CCSD main hole,Acta Petrologica Sinica,2007(12).
[5] Li PW,Cui JW,Wang LJ,Wang W and Qian ZJ,The determination of in-situ stress from wellbore breakouts in the main borehole of the Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling,Acta Petrologica Sinica,2005(02).
[6] Liou JG,zhang RY,Ernst WG,Rumble D and Maruyama S,High-pressure minerals from deeply subducted metamorphic rocks,Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry,1998.
[7] Niu YX,Pan HP,Wang WX,Zhu LF and Xu DF,Geophysical Logging of the 0～2000 m Core from the Main Hole of the Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling (CCSD) Project,武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2006.
[8] Tang ZM,Chen FY,Ductile Sheer zone of changed shear sense:EBSD characteristics and kinematics of ductile shear from 2010 to 2145m of the main borehole in Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling (CCSD),Acta Petrologica Sinica,2007(21).
[9] Wang LJ,Li PW,Cui JW,Ding YC,The determination of insitu stress in the main borehole of the Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling by using acoustic emission,Geology of China,2005(02).
[10] Wang LJ,Cui JW,Zhang XW,Tang ZM Li PW and Li SL,InSitu stress state in the Main Borehole of the Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling,Earth Science-journal of China University of Geosciences,2006(04).
[11] Xu ZQ,Zhang ZM,Liu FL,Yang JS Li HB Qiu HJ Li TF Meng FC Chen SZ Tang ZM and Chen FY,Exhumation structure and mechanism of the Sulu ultrahig-pressure metamorphic belt,Central China,Acta Geologica Sinica,2003(04).
[12] Xu ZQ,Liu FL,Qi XX,Zhang ZM Yang JS Zeng LS and Liang FH,Record for Rodinia supercontinent breakup event in the south Sulu ultrabigh-pressure metamorphic terrane,Acta Petrologica Sinica,2006(07).
[13] Xu ZQ,Continental deep subduction and exhumation dynamics:Evidence from the main hole of Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling and the Sulu HP-UHP metamorphic terrane,Acta Petrologica Sinica,2007(21).
[14] Yang WC,Yu CQ,Kinetics and dynamics of development of the Dabie Sulu UHPM terranes based on geophysical evidences,Acta Geophysica Sinica,2001(03).
[15] You ZD,Su SG,Liang FH,Zhang ZM,The metamorphic evolution of the eclogitic rocks in the main hole of the Chinese continental scientific drilling project:An elucidation on the uplift processes of the ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic terrane,Acta Petrologica Sinica,2005(02).
[16] Zhang ZM,Zhang JF,You ZD,Shen K,Ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic P-T-t path of the Sulu orogenic belt,eastern central China,Acta Petrologica Sinica,2005(02).
[17] Zhang CH,Chai YH,Song HL,The rode of extensional tectonic in the exhumation of high-and ultrahigh-pressure rock in northern Jiangsu and southeastern Shandong,Geological Review,1998(03).
[18] 崔军文,王连捷,李朋武,徐东辉,吴海燕,中国大陆科学钻探主孔2000米以上脆性变形构造应力场,岩石学报,2004(01).
[19] 崔军文,王连捷,张晓卫,唐哲民,史金松,苏鲁高压-超高压变质带折返抬升过程中构造界面和应力场的变化,岩石学报,2006(07).
[20] 崔军文,唐哲民,CCSD主孔微破裂脉次生包裹体的均一温度,岩石学报,2007(12).
[21] 李朋武,崔军文,王连捷,王薇,乔子江,中国大陆科学钻探主孔钻孔崩落与现场应力状态的确定,岩石学报,2005(02).
[22] 牛一雄,潘和平,王文先,朱留芳,许东晖,中国大陆科学钻探主孔0～2000m地球物理测井,武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2006.
[23] 唐哲民,陈方远,剪切指向转换的韧性剪切带--中国大陆科学钻探工程(CCSD)主孔中韧性剪切带(深度2010～2145m)的EBSD特征及运动学研究,岩石学报,2007(12).
[24] 王连捷,李朋武,崔军文,丁原辰,中国大陆科学钻探主孔声发射法现今地应力状态的确定,中国地质,2005(02).
[25] 王连捷,崔军文,张晓卫,唐哲民,李朋武,李双林,中国大陆科学钻主孔现今地应力状态,地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2006(04).
[26] 许志琴,张泽明,刘福来,杨经绥,李海兵,杨天南,邱海峻,孟繁聪,李天福,陈志忠,唐哲民,陈方远,苏鲁高压-超高压变质带的折返构造及折返机制,地质学报,2003(04).
[27] 许志琴,刘福来,戚学祥,张泽明,杨经绥,曾令森,梁凤华,南苏鲁超高压变质地体中罗迪尼亚超大陆裂解事件的记录,岩石学报,2006(07).
[28] 许志琴,深俯冲和折返动力学:来自中国大陆科学钻探主孔及苏鲁超高压变质代的制约,岩石学报,2007(12).
[29] 杨文采,余长青.根据地球物理资料分析大别-苏鲁超高压变质带演化的运动学和动力学,地球物理学报,2001(03).
[30] 游振东,苏尚国,梁凤华,张泽明,中国大陆科学钻探主孔榴辉岩类岩石退变质过程--对超高压变质体隆升的启示,岩石学报,2005(02).
[31] 张泽明,张金凤,游振东,沈昆,苏鲁造山带超高压变质作用极其P-T-t轨迹,岩石学报,2005(02).
[32] 张长厚,柴育成,宋鸿林,吴正文,苏北-鲁东南高压超高压变质带剥露过程中伸展构造作用,地质论评,1998(03).
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 5879
- PDF下载数: 5062
- 施引文献: 0
下载: