| 5种光合有效辐射表性能测试 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 丁蕾,杨云,边泽强,权继梅,王冬.5种光合有效辐射表性能测试[J].应用气象学报,2013,24(5):617-624. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 丁蕾 杨云 边泽强 权继梅 王冬 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国气象局气象探测中心，北京 100081 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为认识和提高光合有效辐射 (波长为400~700 nm) 的测量精度，对国内外5种常用的光合有效辐射表的灵敏度、余弦响应、非线性、温度依赖性、光谱响应等性能进行了测试和分析。结果表明: 5种光合有效辐射表 (简称光合表) 的非线性误差均在1%以内; 3种光合表 (PAR LITE，LI-190和FS-PR) 的余弦误差均小于10%，温度系数均小于0.3%/℃，2种光合表 (TRT-5和HSC-FPH-1) 的余弦误差明显偏大，温度系数小于0.5%/℃。2种光合表 (PAR LITE和LI-190) 的光谱响应曲线接近于理想光谱，而其余3种光合表与理想光谱曲线偏离较大。在自然光下的一致性比对测量结果显示，5种光合表测量的辐射量与标准值的误差均在5%以内，但综合评价后认为，3种光合表 (PAR LITE，LI-190和FS-PR) 的性能明显优于其他2种光合表 (TRT-5和HSC-FPH-1)。该结果可为气象观测业务选型提供参考。
|
| 关 键 词： | 光合有效辐射表 余弦响应 光谱响应 性能测试 |
| 收稿时间： | 2013-01-18 |
Performance Test of Five type Photosynthetic Active Radiometers |
| |
| Ding Lei,Yang Yun,Bian Zeqiang,Quan Jimei and Wang Dong.Performance Test of Five type Photosynthetic Active Radiometers[J].Quarterly Journal of Applied Meteorology,2013,24(5):617-624. |
| |
| Authors: | Ding Lei Yang Yun Bian Zeqiang Quan Jimei and Wang Dong |
| |
| Affiliation: | Meteorological Observation Center of CMA, Beijing 100081 |
| |
| Abstract: | Photosynthetic active radiometers are used to measure the solar photosynthetic active radiation. Also, it can be turned 180°, facing down to measure the photosynthetic active radiation of the ground. When it is used outdoors, the environmental condition has impacts on the performance, which may increase the measurement error. The performances of five different types of photosynthetic active radiometers are tested, such as sensitivity, cosine response, linearity, temperature dependence, spectral sensitivity and non-stability.The non-linearity errors of five photosynthetic active radiometers are all within 1%. When the irradiance is less than 250 W·m-2, the differences of the non-linearity errors for different-type radiometers are significant. Cosine response errors gets bigger with the increase of the zenith angle (θ). When the zenith angle changes from-80° to +80°, cosine response errors of PAR LITE, LI-190 and FS-PR type radiometers are within 10%; the error of TRT-5 radiometer is within 10% just in the range of-55° to +55°; and HSC-FPH-1 is within 10% when θ is-45° to +40°. When testing the effects of temperature on photosynthetic active radiometer, the temperature coefficients of PAR LITE, LI-190 and FS-PR type radiometers are within 0.3%/℃, TRT-5 and HSC-FPH-1 type photosynthetic active radiometers are within 0.5%/℃. The wavelength range of photosynthetic active radiometer is from 400 nm to 700 nm. The ideal sensor should have clear cutoffs to light below 400 nm and above 700 nm. The spectral response of PAR LITE, LI-190 type radiometers is approximated to a horizontal line, which is closer to the ideal spectral curve. The response of FS-PR is overestimated within 400—550 nm and underestimated after that. The response of TRT-5 and HSC-FPH-1 photosynthetic active radiometers is lower than the ideal curve in the whole visible waveband. The consistency of five-type photosynthetic active radiometers with the standard value are all within 5% which is tested under solar light outside. At noon, the error is smaller as the zenith angle is small; but when the zenith angle grows bigger, the error is bigger due to the increase of cosine error. The stability for photosynthetic active radiometer in the experiment are within ±3%. Due to the limited time and samples, the stability of homemade radiometer need further test. Zero offset of photosynthetic active radiometer is very small, which could be ignored. Therefore, it is necessary to calibrate the radiometer periodically to minimize the error. The analysis and comparisons of the experiment results provide scientific basis for controlling the radiometer quality, improving the measurement accuracy and selecting instrument for meteorological observations. |
| |
| Keywords: | photosynthetic active radiometer cosine response spectral sensitivity performance test |
|
| 点击此处可从《应用气象学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《应用气象学报》下载全文 |
|
