| MSCT不同组合后处理技术对腹内疝诊断的应用价值 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李孟静,霍英杰,宫凤玲,张惠英,徐慧慧,王星稳,马春梅.MSCT不同组合后处理技术对腹内疝诊断的应用价值[J].CT理论与应用研究,2019,28(5):609-615. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李孟静 霍英杰 宫凤玲 张惠英 徐慧慧 王星稳 马春梅 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华北理工大学附属医院CT室,河北 唐山,063000;中国石油天然气集团公司中心医院MRI,河北 廊坊,065000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的:探讨多层螺旋CT（MSCT）的不同组合后处理技术在腹内疝（IAH）诊断中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析手术证实的63例行腹部增强扫描IAH患者，其中22例为腹内疝伴绞窄性肠梗阻，41例为腹内疝伴非绞窄性肠梗阻，将不同后处理技术进行组合:多平面重组（MPR）+最大密度投影（MIP）组；MPR+曲面重组（CPR）组，根据咖啡豆征/假肿瘤征、鸟嘴征、肠系膜漩涡征/缆绳征、同心圆征等征象，对IAH的定位、定性作出判断，分析结果。结果:十二指肠旁疝3例、Winslow孔疝1例、盲肠周围疝2例、肠粘连束带型腹内疝57例，MPR+MIP组准确率（80.95％），MPR+CPR组准确率（76.19％），两组在IAH类型诊断中无统计学差异（P>0.05）；在显示漩涡征/缆绳征及同心圆征结果中，MPR+MIP组（58.73％和26.98％）均高于MPR+CPR组（49.21％和12.70％），两组具有统计学差异（P<0.05）。结论:在MPR+MIP组合后处理技术能很好地对IAH作出诊断，因而可在IAH影像诊断中加以推广。
|
| 关 键 词： | 多层螺旋CT 不同后处理技术 腹内疝 |
| 收稿时间： | 2019-03-20 |
Application Value of Different Post-processing Techniques of MSCT in Diagnosis of Intra-abdominal Hernia |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated hospital CT, Tangshan 063000, China;2. CNPC central hospital MRI, Langfang 065000, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective: To evaluate the application value of multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in the diagnosis of internal abdominal hernia (IAH) with different combined post-processing techniques. Method: A retrospective analysis of 63 cases of intra-abdominal hernia with abdominal enhanced scanning, confirmed by the operation, of which 22 were intra-abdominal hernia with strangulated intestinal obstruction, 41 were intra-abdominal hernia with non-strangulated intestinal obstruction, and different post-processing techniques were combined. Results: Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) +maximum intensity projection (MIP) group and Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) +curved planar reformation (CPR) group. According to the signs of coffee bean sign/pseudotumor sign, bird's mouth sign, mesenteric whirlpool sign/cable sign, concentric circle sign and so on, making a judgment about the localization and qualitative analysis of abdominal internal hernia and the results were analyzed. Conclusion: 3 cases of parduodenal hernia, 1 case of Winslow's foramen hernia, 2 cases of pericecal hernia, and 57 cases of intra-abdominal hernia of intestinal adhesive band. The accuracy rate of MPR+MIP group and MPR+CPR group are 80.95% and 76.19%, respectly. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the diagnosis of intra-abdominal hernia (P>0.05).The results of whirlpool sign/cable sign and concentric circle sign were higher in MPR+MIP group (58.73%, 26.98%) than that in MPR+CPR group (49.21%, 12.70%). There was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: The combined post-processing technique of MPR+MIP can make a diagnosis of IAH better, so it can be widely expanded in the imaging diagnosis of intra-abdominal hernia. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《CT理论与应用研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《CT理论与应用研究》下载全文 |
|
