首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

2013年芦山MS7.0地震前后姑咱台四分量钻孔应变时频特征分析
引用本文:刘琦,张晶,池顺良,闫伟.2013年芦山MS7.0地震前后姑咱台四分量钻孔应变时频特征分析[J].地震学报,2014,36(5):770-779.
作者姓名:刘琦  张晶  池顺良  闫伟
作者单位:1.中国北京 100036 中国地震局地震预测重点实验室
基金项目:中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务费专项(2012IES0202)和中国地震局地震行业科研专项(201108009)共同资助.
摘    要:2013年4月20日芦山MS7.0地震前, 四川省姑咱台四分量钻孔应变仪再度记录到类似于2008年汶川MS8.0地震前的高频应变畸变信号. 为了对该畸变信号各频率成分的时频演化特征进行细致分析, 讨论应变异常的可信度及其与芦山地震的相关性, 本文利用S变换方法对应变数据进行了处理. 结果表明, 研究时段内时频域中共出现两簇高能量异常, 一簇开始于2012年10月并持续了约4个月, 另一簇则开始于芦山MS7.0地震前数天. 同时段远震的影响及施工干扰并不能构成该异常的主体, 因此该异常可信度较高. 异常中包含了周期由数分钟至数小时的信号成分, 其中较短周期的信号成分震前出现较晚, 震后衰减较快. 震后异常信号的整体能量开始逐步衰减, 异常信号成分减少, 至2013年8月末应变观测记录已基本恢复至正常状态, 整个应变异常显示的时频演化过程与芦山MS7.0地震具有较高相关性. 

关 键 词:2013年芦山MS7.0地震    钻孔应变    S变换    地震前兆    慢滑移
收稿时间:2013-09-05

Time-frequency characteristics of four-component borehole strain at Guzan station before and after 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake
Affiliation:1.China Earthquake Administration Key Laboratory of Earthquake Prediction, Beijing 100036, China2.Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100036, China3.Key Laboratory of Computational Geodynamics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China4.China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing 100045, China
Abstract:The four-component borehole strainmeter at Guzan station in Sichuan Province recorded abnormal strain signals with high frequency before the 20 April 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake, which were similar to the signals before the Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake. The strain data were processed in the way of S transform in order to analyze the evolutionary process of each component of abnormal signals in time-frequency domain, and study the validity of the anomalies and its relation with Lushan earthquake. The result shows that two clusters of anomalies with high energy appeared during the research period, one in October of 2012 lasting for four months, and the other several days before the earthquake. The validity of the anomalies is high, considering that the disturbance of teleseismograms and engineering construction during this period are not the main cause for the anomalies. The anomalies are composed of all kinds of signals with various periods from several minutes to hours, of which the short-period signals appeared later and decayed sooner. The whole energy of the anomalies after the earthquake began to decay gradually, and the signal components began to reduce, too. The strain observation had returned to normal by the end of August 2013. The whole evolutionary process of strain anomalies in time-frequency domain has very close relations to the Lushan MS7.0 earthquake. 
Keywords:
点击此处可从《地震学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地震学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号