MCC降水过程集合预报不同物理过程扰动方案的对比试验研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点基础研究发展计划(2013CB430102);国家自然科学基金资助项目(40975068;41205082);江苏省高校自然科学研究计划重点项目(11KJA170001);华东区域气象科技协同创新基金合作项目(QYHZ201801);2019年中国气象局预报员专项(CMAYBY2019-059)


A comparative study of different physical process perturbation schemes for ensemble forecast on MCC system
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    利用WRF模式,从模式的不确定性角度来构造中尺度的集合预报,重点对比分析了不同物理参数化方案、物理过程随机扰动方案、积云对流参数化敏感参数扰动方案对中尺度对流复合体降水集合预报的影响。试验结果表明:3种物理过程扰动方法都可以反映中尺度对流复合体降水预报的不确定性特征,其预报效果比控制预报好。物理过程随机扰动方案集合平均的降水落区及强度最接近实况,并且其降水的ETS评分要高于其他2种方案。从均方根误差与离散度的角度来看,3种方案中物理过程随机扰动的均方根误差要小于其他2种方案,而其离散度要大于其他2种方案,物理过程随机扰动方案要优于其他2种方案。

    Abstract:

    The Weather Research and Forecasting(WRF) mesoscale numerical prediction model was used to construct mesoscale ensemble forecast from the aspects of model uncertainty.The focus was to compare and analyze the influence on precipitation forecast of mesoscale convection complex(MCC) exerted by the three methods,which were different physical parameterization method,the method of disturbing sensitive parameters in cumulus convection parameterization scheme and the stochastic physical perturbation method.The results showed that all of the three ensemble forecast methods could reflect the uncertainty of MCC precipitation forecast and they performed better than control forecast.Compared to the other two methods,the spatial distribution and intensity of ensemble mean 24-hour accumulated rainfall by stochastic physical perturbation method were closer to the reality.The 24-hour rainfall ETS of stochastic physical perturbation method was better than the other two methods.In terms of root mean square error (RMSE),the stochastic physical perturbation method had smaller RMSEs than the other two methods,while its dispersion was larger than the other two.In all,the stochastic physical perturbation method was superior to the other two methods.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

包慧濛,闵锦忠,陈耀登,2019. MCC降水过程集合预报不同物理过程扰动方案的对比试验研究[J].大气科学学报,42(3):370-379. BAO Huimeng, MIN Jinzhong, CHEN Yaodeng,2019. A comparative study of different physical process perturbation schemes for ensemble forecast on MCC system[J]. Trans Atmos Sci,42(3):370-379. DOI:10.13878/j. cnki. dqkxxb.20170528004

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-28
  • 最后修改日期:2018-01-09
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-06-21
  • 出版日期:

地址:江苏南京宁六路219号南京信息工程大学    邮编:210044

联系电话:025-58731158    E-mail:xbbjb@nuist.edu.cn    QQ交流群号:344646895

大气科学学报 ® 2024 版权所有  技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司